Empirical assessment of the legibility of the Naskh-style typeface used on Arabic road signs

References

1. Abu Dhabi manual of uniform traffic control devices
   Abu Dhabi manual of uniform traffic control devices (2020) Abu Dhabi Government – Department of Municipalities and Transports, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Al-Madani, H.
   , & ai (2002) Assessment of drivers’ comprehension of traffic signs based on their traffic, personal and social characteristics. Janahi, A. Transportation Research Record, 51, 63–76. 10.1016/S1369‑8478(02)00006‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00006-2 [Google Scholar]
3. Al-Madani, H.
   (2004) Comprehension of signs: Driver demographic and traffic safety characteristics. The human factor of transport signs, 1691–183. 10.1201/9780203457412
   https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203457412 [Google Scholar]
4. Al-Omari, B. H., Barqawi, N. R., & Abu-Lebdeh, G.
   (2001) Driver Comprehension of Selected Traffic Signs in Jordan. InTransportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington DC.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Almuhajri, M.
   (2013) Arabic E-reading: Studies on Legibility and Readability for Personal Digital Assistants [Masters Thesis]. Concordia University.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bateman, S., Gutwin, C., & Nacenta, M.
   (2008) Seeing things in the clouds: The effect of visual features on tag cloud selections. InProceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp.193–202). 10.1145/1379092.1379130
   https://doi.org/10.1145/1379092.1379130 [Google Scholar]
7. Beier, S., & Oderkerk, C. A. T.
   (2019) Smaller visual angles show greater benefit of letter boldness than larger visual angles. Acta Psychologica, 1991, 102904. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102904
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102904 [Google Scholar]
8. Beier, S., & Oderkerk, C. A. T.
   (2021) High letter stroke contrast impairs letter recognition of bold fonts. Applied Ergonomics, 971, 103499. 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103499
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103499 [Google Scholar]
9. Beier, S., Sand, K., & Starrfelt, R.
   (2017) Legibility implications of embellished display typefaces. Visible Language, 51(1), 112–133.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bernard, J. B., Kumar, G., Junge, J., & Chung, S. T.
    (2013) The effect of letter-stroke boldness on reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision research, 841, 33–42. 10.1016/j.visres.2013.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.03.005 [Google Scholar]
11. Burmistrov, I., Zlokazova, T., Ishmuratova, I., & Semenova, M.
    (2016) Legibility of light and ultralight fonts: Eye tracking study. InProceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp.1–6). 10.1145/2971485.2996745
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2996745 [Google Scholar]
12. Chahine, N.
    (2012) Reading Arabic: Legibility Studies of Arabic Script [PhD Thesis]. Leiden University.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dyson, M. C., & Beier, S.
    (2016) Investigating typographic differentiation: Italics are more subtle than bold for emphasis. Information Design Journal, 22(1), 3–18. 10.1075/idj.22.1.02dys
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.22.1.02dys [Google Scholar]
14. Dobres, J., Chahine, N., & Reimer, B.
    (2017) Effects of ambient illumination, contrast polarity, and letter size on text legibility under glance-like reading. Applied Ergonomics, 601, 68–73. 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.001 [Google Scholar]
15. Dobres, J., Chahine, N., Reimer, B., Gould, D., Mehler, B., & Coughlin, J. F.
    (2016) Utilizing psychophysical techniques to investigate the effects of age, typeface design, size and display polarity on glance legibility. Ergonomics, 59(10), 1377–1391. 10.1080/00140139.2015.1137637
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1137637 [Google Scholar]
16. Dobres, J., Chrysler, S. T., Wolfe, B., Chahine, N., & Reimer, B.
    (2017) Empirical assessment of the legibility of the Highway gothic and Clearview signage fonts. Transportation Research Record, 2624(1), 1–8. 10.3141/2624‑01
    https://doi.org/10.3141/2624-01 [Google Scholar]
17. Dubai Traffic Control Devices Manual
    Dubai Traffic Control Devices Manual (2015) Road Transport Authority. Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Farell, B., & Pelli, D. G.
    (1999) Psychophysical methods, or how to measure a threshold and why. InR. H. S. Carpenter & J. G. Robson (Eds.). psych.nyu.edu/pelli/, Vision research: A practical guide to laboratory methods. Oxford University Press.
19. Ganayim, D., & Ibrahim, R.
    (2013) How do typographical factors affect reading text and comprehension performance in Arabic?Human Factors, 55(2), 323–332. 10.1177/0018720812452302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812452302 [Google Scholar]
20. Garvey, P., Klena, M., Eie, W., Meeker, D., & Pietrucha, M.
    The Legibility of the Clearview Typeface System versus Standard Highway Alphabets on Negative- and Positive-Contrast Signs (2015). Thomas D. Larson Pennsylvania Transportation Institute. Pennsylvania State University.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Garvey, P. M., Pietrucha, M. T., & Meeker, D.
    (1997) Effects of font and capitalization on legibility of Guide signs. Transportation Research Record, 1605(1), 73–79. 10.3141/1605‑09
    https://doi.org/10.3141/1605-09 [Google Scholar]
22. Ghadban, N. R., Abdella, G. M., Alhajyaseen, W.,
    (2018) Analyzing the impact of human characteristics on the comprehensibility of road traffic signs. Khalifa, K. N.InProceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bandung, Indonesia (pp.2210–2219).
    [Google Scholar]
23. Holick, A., Chrysler, S., Park, E., & Carlson, P.
    Evaluation of the Clearview font for negative contrast traffic signs. Federal Highway Administration/TX-06/0-4984-1 (2006) Texas Transportation Institute, and College Station (pp.1–130).
    [Google Scholar]
24. Institute of Transportation EngineersJ. L. Pline
    Institute of Transportation Engineers (1992) Traffic engineering handbook. InJ. L. Pline (Ed.). Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ismail, A. A. I.
    (2012) Comprehension of posted highway traffic signs in Iraq. Tikrit Journal of engineering Sciences, 191, 62–70. 10.25130/tjes.19.1.07
    https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.19.1.07 [Google Scholar]
26. Lund, O.
    (1999) Knowledge construction in typography: The case of legibility research and the legibility of sans serif typefaces [PhD Thesis]. University of Reading.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Mahgoub, A. O., & Choe, P.
    (2020, December). Comparing design preference of guide road signs by native Arabic speakers and international speakers in the State of Qatar. InIEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) 2020. IEEE (pp.504–508). 10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309895
    https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309895 [Google Scholar]
28. Miles, J., Kotwal, B., Hammond, S., & Ye, F.
    (2014) Evaluation of guide sign font. Texas A&M transportation institute.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mohammed, H., & Toum, A.
    (2017) Role of Arabic typography in improving readability of traffic signs [Translated] (2017)-6732. University of Science and Technology (Sudan) (SUST) Journal of Humanities, 18(1) (pp.271–292). ISSN (text): 1858–6724. e-ISSN (online).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Jordan manual on devices: Road signs, signals, and road markings (2001) Ministry of Public Work and Housing.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pelli, D. G., & Farrell, B.
    (1995) Psychophysical methods. InM. Bass (Ed.), Handbook of optics, 1. Fundamentals, techniques, and design (pp.291.1–29.13). McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Qatar traffic manual
    Qatar traffic manual (2016) Civil Engineering Department, Ministry of Public Work.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sheedy, J. E., Subbaram, M. V., Zimmerman, A. B., & Hayes, J. R.
    (2005) Text legibility and the letter superiority effect. Human Factors, 47(4), 797–815. 10.1518/001872005775570998
    https://doi.org/10.1518/001872005775570998 [Google Scholar]
34. Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K.
    (2010) The influence of text legibility on eye movements during reading. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(8), 1129–1148. 10.1002/acp.1623
    https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1623 [Google Scholar]
35. United Nations
    United Nations (2021) THE 17 GOALS – Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations – Department of Economic and Social Affairs – Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
    [Google Scholar]
36. Taamneh, M., & Alkheder, S.
    (2018) Traffic sign perception among Jordanian drivers: An evaluation study. Transport Policy, 661, 17–29. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.02.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.02.017 [Google Scholar]
37. Tinker, M. A.
    (1963) Influence of simultaneous variation in size of type, width of line, and leading for newspaper type. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47(6), 380–382. 10.1037/h0043573
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043573 [Google Scholar]
38. Tinker, M. A.
    (1964) Legibility of print. Iowa State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Waller, R.
    (2007) Comparing typefaces for airport signs. Information Design Journal, 15(1), 1–15. 10.1075/idj.15.1.01wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.1.01wal [Google Scholar]