1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Information Design Journal
  4. Volume 29, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 29, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0142-5471
  • E-ISSN: 1569-979X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The importance of research in designing for the vulnerable lies in its commitment to address the inherent inequalities and injustices that pervade our socio-cultural fabric. This article presents a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis focused on the transition from vulnerability to accessibility in design for vulnerable populations, exploring the possibilities of extending this vital area to information design. Employing the PRISMA approach, the study meticulously analyses 30 selected papers to uncover insights into how design practices and methodologies are evolving to better address the needs of those often marginalized or overlooked. The findings illuminate the multifaceted nature of vulnerability, challenging information designers to think beyond traditional norms and engage in innovative practices that not only make solutions accessible but also ensure they are comprehensible. This research underscores the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration and participatory approaches, emphasizing the importance of culturally sensitive, user-centered design solutions. The study culminates in identifying novel areas for future research, particularly emphasizing the development of information design that is tailored to the unique needs of vulnerable populations, thereby fostering inclusive growth.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/idj.23011.ron
2024-05-27
2024-12-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/idj.23011.ron
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aday, L. A.
    (1994) Health status of vulnerable populations. Annual review of public health, 15(1), 487–509. 10.1146/annurev.pu.15.050194.002415
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.15.050194.002415 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amundson, R., & Tresky, S.
    (2007) On a bioethical challenge to disability rights. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 32(6), 541–561. 10.1080/03605310701680924
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310701680924 [Google Scholar]
  3. Atmodiwirjo, P.
    (2014) Space Affordances, Adaptive Responses and Sensory Integration by Autistic Children. International Journal of Design, 8(3).
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Babacan, H., & Gill, G. K.
    (2012) Developing a cultural responsiveness framework in healthcare systems: an Australian example. Diversity and Equality in Health and Care, 9(1).
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bridgelal Ram, M., Grocott, P. R., & Weir, H. C.
    (2008) Issues and challenges of involving users in medical device development. Health Expectations, 11(1), 63–71. 10.1111/j.1369‑7625.2007.00464.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00464.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Chander, J.
    (2020) Disability rights and the emergence of disability studies. InDisability Studies in India (pp.61–77). Routledge India. 10.4324/9780367818401‑4
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367818401-4 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chavalkul, Y., Saxon, A., & Jerrard, R. N.
    (2011) Combining 2D and 3D design for novel packaging for older people. International Journal of Design, 5(1), 43–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Christensen, K. M., Collins, S. D., Holt, J. M., & Phillips, C. N.
    (2006) The relationship between the design of the built environment and the ability to egress of individuals with disabilities. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 2(3).
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Clarkson, P. J., & Coleman, R.
    (2015) History of inclusive design in the UK. Applied ergonomics, 461, 235–247. 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  10. Corsini, L., Jagtap, S., & Moultrie, J.
    (2022) Design with and by Marginalized People in Humanitarian Makerspaces. International Journal of Design, 16(2), 91–. 10.57698/v16i2.07
     https://doi.org/10.57698/v16i2.07 [Google Scholar]
  11. Costanza-Chock, S.
    (2020) Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Comincioli, E., Hakoköngäs, E., & Masoodian, M.
    (2022) Identifying and Addressing Implicit Ageism in the Co-Design of Services for Aging People. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7667. 10.3390/ijerph19137667
     https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137667 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cardoso, C., & Clarkson, P. J.
    (2012) Simulation in user-centred design: helping designers to empathise with atypical users. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(1), 1–22. 10.1080/09544821003742650
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09544821003742650 [Google Scholar]
  14. De Couvreur, L., Dejonghe, W., Detand, J., & Goossens, R.
    (2013) The role of subjective well-being in co-designing open-design assistive devices. International Journal of Design, 7(3), 57–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dean, K. K., Wentworth, G., & LeCompte, N.
    (2019) Social exclusion and perceived vulnerability to physical harm. Self and Identity, 18(1), 87–102. 10.1080/15298868.2017.1370389
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1370389 [Google Scholar]
  16. D’Olivo, P., Kelly L A van Bindsbergen, Huisman, J., Grootenhuis, M. A., & Rozendaal, M. C.
    (2020) Designing Tactful Objects for Sensitive Settings: A Case Study on Families Dealing with Childhood Cancer. International Journal of Design, 14(2), 103–.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Doetsch, J. N., Schlösser, C., Barros, H., Shaw, D., Krafft, T., & Pilot, E.
    (2023) A scoping review on the impact of austerity on healthcare access in the European Union: rethinking austerity for the most vulnerable. International Journal for Equity in Health, 22(1), 1–13. 10.1186/s12939‑022‑01806‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01806-1 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ellis, R. D., & Kurniawan, S. H.
    (2000) Increasing the usability of online information for older users: A case study in participatory design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12(2), 263–276. 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1202_6
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1202_6 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A.
    (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative science quarterly, 46(2), 229–273. 10.2307/2667087
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2667087 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fisk, R. P., Dean, A. M., Alkire, L., Joubert, A., Previte, J., Robertson, N., & Rosenbaum, M. S.
    (2018) Design for service inclusion: creating inclusive service systems by 2050. Journal of Service Management, 29(5), 834–858. 10.1108/JOSM‑05‑2018‑0121
     https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2018-0121 [Google Scholar]
  21. Frisby, W., Crawford, S., & Dorer, T.
    (1997) Reflections on participatory action research: The case of low-income women accessing local physical activity services. Journal of Sport Management, 11(1), 8–28. 10.1123/jsm.11.1.8
     https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.11.1.8 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gemser, G., de Bont, C., Hekkert, P., & Friedman, K.
    (2012) Quality perceptions of design journals: The design scholars’ perspective. Design Studies, 33(1), 4–23. 10.1016/j.destud.2011.09.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Giovanangeli, A., & Oguro, S.
    (2016) Cultural responsiveness: A framework for re-thinking students’ interculturality through study abroad. Intercultural Education, 27(1), 70–84. 10.1080/14675986.2016.1144328
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2016.1144328 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gordon, M., Henderson, R., Holmes, J. H., Wolters, M. K., & Bennett, I. M.
    (2016) Participatory design of ehealth solutions for women from vulnerable populations with perinatal depression. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 23(1), 105–109. 10.1093/jamia/ocv109
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv109 [Google Scholar]
  25. Grossman, L. V., Masterson Creber, R. M., Benda, N. C., Wright, D., Vawdrey, D. K., & Ancker, J. S.
    (2019) Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 26(8–9), 855–870. 10.1093/jamia/ocz023
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz023 [Google Scholar]
  26. Essen, A., & Ostlund, B.
    (2011) Laggards as Innovators? Old Users as Designers of New Services & Service Systems. International Journal of Design, 5(3), 89–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Gu, D., Andreev, K., & Dupre, M. E.
    (2021) Major trends in population growth around the world. China CDC weekly, 3(28), 604. 10.46234/ccdcw2021.160
     https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2021.160 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hallegatte, S., Vogt-Schilb, A., Rozenberg, J., Bangalore, M., & Beaudet, C.
    (2020) From poverty to disaster and back: A review of the literature. Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, 41, 223–247. 10.1007/s41885‑020‑00060‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-020-00060-5 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hart, J., Albadra, D., Paszkiewicz, N., Adeyeye, K., & Copping, A.
    (2022) End user engagement in refugee shelter design: Contextualising participatory process. Design Studies, 801, 101107-. 10.1016/j.destud.2022.101107
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101107 [Google Scholar]
  30. Harvard, Å., & Løvind, S.
    (2002, June). “Psst”-ipatory Design: Involving artists, technologists, students and children in the design of narrative toys. InProceedings of PDC (Vol.21, pp.377–381).
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Hay, L., Duffy, A. H., McTeague, C., Pidgeon, L. M., Vuletic, T., & Grealy, M.
    (2017) A systematic review of protocol studies on conceptual design cognition: Design as search and exploration. Design Science, 31, e10. 10.1017/dsj.2017.11
     https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.11 [Google Scholar]
  32. Herlihy, P. H.
    (2003) Participatory research mapping of indigenous lands in Darien, Panama. Human Organization, 62(4), 315–331. 10.17730/humo.62.4.fu05tgkbvn2yvk8p
     https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.62.4.fu05tgkbvn2yvk8p [Google Scholar]
  33. Hille, T.
    (2011) Modern schools: a century of design for education. John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Höysniemi, J., Hämäläinen, P., & Turkki, L.
    (2003) Using peer tutoring in evaluating the usability of a physically interactive computer game with children. Interacting with computers, 15(2), 203–225. 10.1016/S0953‑5438(03)00008‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00008-0 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hussain, S., Sanders, E. B. -N., & Steinert, M.
    (2012) Participatory design with marginalized people in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities experienced in a field study in Cambodia. International Journal of Design, 6(2), 91–109.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Ince Yenilmez, M.
    (2015) Economic and social consequences of population aging the dilemmas and opportunities in the twenty-first century. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 101, 735–752. 10.1007/s11482‑014‑9334‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-014-9334-2 [Google Scholar]
  37. Imai, T., Takeo, H., Yoshimura, M., Sakata, A., Sakakibarai, N., & Sekine, C.
    (2010) Improving the usability and learnability of a home electric appliance with a long-term usability study. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(2–3), 173–187. 10.1080/09544820903316995
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820903316995 [Google Scholar]
  38. Isomursu, M., Kuutti, K., and Väinämö, S.
    (2004) Experience clip: method for user participation and evaluation of mobile concepts. In: Proceedings of the eighth conference on participatory design: artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices, 27–31 July 2004, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 10.1145/1011870.1011881
     https://doi.org/10.1145/1011870.1011881 [Google Scholar]
  39. Jena, P. K.
    (2020) Impact of pandemic COVID-19 on education in India. International journal of current research (IJCR), 121. 10.31235/osf.io/2kasu
     https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/2kasu [Google Scholar]
  40. Kambunga, A. P., Smith, R. C., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., & Otto, T.
    (2023) Decolonial design practices: Creating safe spaces for plural voices on contested pasts, presents, and futures. Design Studies, 861, 101170-. 10.1016/j.destud.2023.101170
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101170 [Google Scholar]
  41. Karaye, I. M., & Horney, J. A.
    (2020) The impact of social vulnerability on COVID-19 in the US: an analysis of spatially varying relationships. American journal of preventive medicine, 59(3), 317–325. 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.06.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  42. Karunakara, U., & Stevenson, F.
    (2012) Ending neglect of older people in the response to humanitarian emergencies. PLoS Medicine, 9(12), e1001357. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001357
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001357 [Google Scholar]
  43. Keele, S.
    (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Khaimani, J., Bhatia, A. P. S., Jeurkar, A., Rao, D., Chirmule, N., Misra, P., … & Sheth, S.
    (2022) Digital health initiatives can take better cognizance of marginalised communities in India. Journal of Global Health, 121. 10.7189/jogh.12.03069
     https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.03069 [Google Scholar]
  45. Keshavarz, M.
    (2020) Violent Compassions: Humanitarian Design and the Politics of Borders. Design Issues, 36(4), 20–32. 10.1162/desi_a_00611
     https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00611 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kjaersgaard, M. G., Knutz, E., & Markussen, T.
    (2021) Design games as fieldwork: Re-visiting design games from a design anthropological perspective. Design Studies, 731, 100994-. 10.1016/j.destud.2021.100994
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.100994 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kramer, J., Rao, V., & Agogino, A. M.
    (2022) Designing for Cervical Cancer Screening in Rural Nicaragua: A Case Study in the Informal Emergence of Complex Human-Centered Service Design. International Journal of Design, 16(2), 107–. 10.57698/v16i2.08
     https://doi.org/10.57698/v16i2.08 [Google Scholar]
  48. Lee, R.
    (2002) The demographic transition: three centuries of fundamental change. Journal of economic perspectives, 17(4), 167–190. 10.1257/089533003772034943
     https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003772034943 [Google Scholar]
  49. Li, C., Lee, C. F., & Xu, S.
    (2020) Stigma Threat in Design for Older Adults: Exploring Design Factors that Induce Stigma Perception. International Journal of Design, 14(1), 51–.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Li, Q., & Luximon, Y.
    (2018) Understanding Older Adults’ Post-adoption Usage Behavior and Perceptions of Mobile Technology. International Journal of Design, 12(3), 93–.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Lim, C. S. C.
    (2010) Designing inclusive ICT products for older users: taking into account the technology generation effect. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(2–3), 189–206. 10.1080/09544820903317001
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820903317001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Maguire, M., Peace, S., Nicolle, C., Marshall, R., Sims, R., Percival, J., & Lawton, C.
    (2014) Kitchen Living in Later Life: Exploring Ergonomic Problems, Coping Strategies and Design Solutions. International Journal of Design, 8(1).
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Maric, J.
    (2018) The gender-based digital divide in maker culture: features, challenges and possible solutions. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, (3), 147–168. 10.3917/jie.027.0147
     https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.027.0147 [Google Scholar]
  54. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S.
    (2010) Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on psychological science, 5(4), 420–430. 10.1177/1745691610375557
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557 [Google Scholar]
  55. McInnes, D. K., Li, A. E., & Hogan, T. P.
    (2013) Opportunities for engaging low-income, vulnerable populations in health care: a systematic review of homeless persons’ access to and use of information technologies. American journal of public health, 103(S2), e11–e24. 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301623
     https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301623 [Google Scholar]
  56. Mendola, D., & Pera, A.
    (2022) Vulnerability of refugees: Some reflections on definitions and measurement practices. International Migration, 60(5), 108–121. 10.1111/imig.12942
     https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12942 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mould, O., Cole, J., Badger, A., & Brown, P.
    (2022) Solidarity, not charity: Learning the lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic to reconceptualize the radicality of mutual aid. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 47(4), 866–879. 10.1111/tran.12553
     https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12553 [Google Scholar]
  58. Nazari, S., Rad, G. P., Sedighi, H., & Azadi, H.
    (2015) Vulnerability of wheat farmers: Toward a conceptual framework. Ecological indicators, 521, 517–532. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  59. Nguyen, M., & Mougenot, C.
    (2022) A systematic review of empirical studies on multidisciplinary design collaboration: Findings, methods, and challenges. Design Studies, 811, 101120. 10.1016/j.destud.2022.101120
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101120 [Google Scholar]
  60. O’Neill, J., Tabish, H., Welch, V., Petticrew, M., Pottie, K., Clarke, M., … & Tugwell, P.
    (2014) Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 67(1), 56–64. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  61. Ostroff, E.
    (2011) Universal design: an evolving paradigm. Universal design handbook.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … & Moher, D.
    (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International journal of surgery, 881, 105906. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906 [Google Scholar]
  63. Perdue, W. C., Stone, L. A., & Gostin, L. O.
    (2003) The built environment and its relationship to the public’s health: the legal framework. American journal of public health, 93(9), 1390–1394. 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1390
     https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1390 [Google Scholar]
  64. Rayed, M., Elahi, T., Arefin Shimon, S. S., & Ahmed, N.
    (2023, April). MFS Design in Appstore-enabled Smart Featurephones for Low-literate, marginalised Communities. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.1–19).
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Rose, E. J.
    (2016) Design as Advocacy: Using a Human-Centered Approach to Investigate the Needs of Vulnerable Populations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 427–445. 10.1177/0047281616653494
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616653494 [Google Scholar]
  66. Rufat, S., Tate, E., Burton, C. G., & Maroof, A. S.
    (2015) Social vulnerability to floods: Review of case studies and implications for measurement. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 141, 470–486. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.013 [Google Scholar]
  67. Ruecker, S.
    (2016) Information Design as Principled Action: Making Information Accessible, Relevant, Understandable, and Useable. Design Issues, 32(3), 118–119. 10.1162/DESI_r_00410
     https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_r_00410 [Google Scholar]
  68. Sheehan, N. W.
    (2011) Indigenous Knowledge and Respectful Design: An Evidence-Based Approach. Design Issues, 27(4), 68–80. 10.1162/DESI_a_00106
     https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00106 [Google Scholar]
  69. Sreeraj, S. S., Unnikrishnan, A., Vishnu, K., Kennith, N. E., Anand, S., & Ramesh, M. V.
    (2020) Empowerment of women self-help groups: Human centered design of a participatory iot solution. In2020 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC) (pp.1–8). IEEE. 10.1109/GHTC46280.2020.9342858
     https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC46280.2020.9342858 [Google Scholar]
  70. Stankov, U., & Gretzel, U.
    (2020) Tourism 4.0 technologies and tourist experiences: a human-centred design perspective. Information Technology & Tourism, 22(3), 477–488. 10.1007/s40558‑020‑00186‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-020-00186-y [Google Scholar]
  71. Stone, K.
    (2023) Reparative Game Creation: Designing For and With Psychosocial Disability. Design Issues, 39(1), 14–26. 10.1162/desi_a_00703
     https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00703 [Google Scholar]
  72. Takahashi, I., Oki, M., Bourreau, B., Kitahara, I., & Suzuki, K.
    (2018) An Empathic Design Approach to an Augmented Gymnasium in a Special Needs School Setting. International Journal of Design, 12(3), 111-125.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Thomas, A.
    (2006) Design, Poverty, and Sustainable Development. Design Issues, 22(4), 54–65. 10.1162/desi.2006.22.4.54
     https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2006.22.4.54 [Google Scholar]
  74. Thomas, K., Hardy, R. D., Lazrus, H., Mendez, M., Orlove, B., Rivera-Collazo, I., … & Winthrop, R.
    (2019) Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: A social science review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(2), e565. 10.1002/wcc.565
     https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.565 [Google Scholar]
  75. Tironi, M.
    (2018) Speculative prototyping, frictions and counter-participation: A civic intervention with homeless individuals. Design Studies, 591, 117–138. 10.1016/j.destud.2018.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  76. Tobiasson, H., Sundblad, Y., Walldius, Å., & Hedman, A.
    (2015) Designing for Active Life: Moving and Being Moved Together with Dementia Patients. International Journal of Design, 9(3), 47–.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Tsai, W. C., Rogers, W. A., & Lee, C. F.
    (2012) Older adults’ motivations, patterns, and improvised strategies of using product manuals. International Journal of Design, 6(2), 55-65.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C.
    (1977) Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & organization studies, 2(4), 419–427. 10.1177/105960117700200404
     https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200404 [Google Scholar]
  79. Tutenel, P., & Heylighen, A.
    (2021) Interweaving vulnerability and everyday design: Encounters around an aquarium in a paediatric oncology ward. Design Studies, 731, 101004–. 10.1016/j.destud.2021.101004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101004 [Google Scholar]
  80. Valk, C. A. L., Lovei, P., Cornelis, H., Chuang, Y., Visser, T., Pu, P., & Lu, Y.
    (2021) Identifying a Motivational Profile for Older Adults Towards Increased Physical Activity. International Journal of Design, 15(1), 17-.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Von Hoffman, A.
    (2009) Housing and planning: A century of social reform and local power. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(2), 231–244. 10.1080/01944360902774087
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360902774087 [Google Scholar]
  82. Weightman, A. P. H., Preston, N., Holt, R., Allsop, M., Levesley, M., & Bhakta, B.
    (2010) Engaging children in healthcare technology design: developing rehabilitation technology for children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(5), 579–600. 10.1080/09544820802441092
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820802441092 [Google Scholar]
  83. Willen, S. S., Knipper, M., Abadía-Barrero, C. E., & Davidovitch, N.
    (2017) Syndemic vulnerability and the right to health. The Lancet, 389(10072), 964–977. 10.1016/S0140‑6736(17)30261‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30261-1 [Google Scholar]
  84. Yeates, K., Lohfeld, L., Sleeth, J., Morales, F., Rajkotia, Y., & Ogedegbe, O.
    (2015) A global perspective on cardiovascular disease in vulnerable populations. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 31(9), 1081–1093. 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.06.035
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2015.06.035 [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhu, Q., & Luo, J.
    (2023) Toward Artificial Empathy for human-centred Design: A Framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10583.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/idj.23011.ron
Loading
From vulnerability to accessibility, and expansion possibilities
Information Design Journal 29, 55 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.23011.ron
/content/journals/10.1075/idj.23011.ron
/content/journals/10.1075/idj.23011.ron
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cultural responsiveness; design process; information design; vulnerability; vulnerable populations

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error