Metaphoric moral framing and image-text relations in the op-ed genre

References

1. Abdel-Raheem, A.
   (2013) Metaphor of the global financial crisis after 2008: Reconstructing confidence by Arab and Western financial medias. Sciences de la Société, 88, 160–182. 10.4000/sds.446
   https://doi.org/10.4000/sds.446 [Google Scholar]
2. Abdel-Raheem, A.
   (2016) The JOURNEY metaphor and moral political cognition. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22(3), 373–401. 10.1075/pc.22.3.06abd
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.3.06abd [Google Scholar]
3. Abdel-Raheem, A.
   (2017) Can cartoons influence Americans’ attitudes toward bailouts?Visual Communication Quarterly, 24(3), 179–191. 10.1080/15551393.2016.1230472
   https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2016.1230472 [Google Scholar]
4. Abell, C.
   (2005) Pictorial implicature. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 63(1), 55–66. 10.1111/j.0021‑8529.2005.00181.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.00181.x [Google Scholar]
5. Barthes, R.
   (1961/1986) The photographic message. In S. Sontag (Ed.), A Barthes reader (pp.194–210). New York: Hill & Wang.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barthes, R.
   (1964/1986) The responsibility of forms (trans. R. Howard ). Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bateman, J.
   (2008) Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bateman, J.
   (2014) Text and image: a critical introduction to the visual-verbal divide. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Beniger, J. R.
   (1983) Does television enhance the shared symbolic environment? Trends in labeling of editorial cartoons, 1948–1980. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 103–111. 10.2307/2095148
   https://doi.org/10.2307/2095148 [Google Scholar]
10. Black, M.
    (1962) Models and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Black, M.
    (1979) More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.19–43). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bounegru, L. , & Forceville, C.
    (2011) Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10(2), 209–229. 10.1177/1470357211398446
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357211398446 [Google Scholar]
13. Cameron, L. , & Deignan, A.
    (2003) Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3),149–160. 10.1207/S15327868MS1803_02
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1803_02 [Google Scholar]
14. Chilton, P. , & Lakoff, G.
    (1989) Foreign policy by metaphor. CRL Newsletter, 3(5), 5–19.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chomsky, N.
    (1995) Education is ignorance. In N. Chomsky (1996), Class Warfare: Interviews with David Barsamian. UK: Pluto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cortés de los Ríos, M.
    (2010) Cognitive devices to communicate the economic crisis: An analysis through covers in The Economist. Ibérica, 20, 81–106. Retrieved fromwww.aelfe.org/documents/04_20_Cortes.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fauconnier, G. , & Turner, M.
    (1998) Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. 10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1 [Google Scholar]
18. Feinberg, M. , & Wehling, E.
    (2018) A moral house divided: How idealized family models impact political cognition. PLoS ONE, 13(4): e0193347. 10.1371/journal.pone.0193347
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193347 [Google Scholar]
19. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–254.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Forceville, C.
    (1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203272305
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203272305 [Google Scholar]
21. Forceville, C.
    (2014) Relevance Theory as a model for multimodal communication. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual communication (pp.51–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Forceville, C. , & Urios-Aparisi, E.
    (2009) Introduction. In C. Forceville , & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp.3–17). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215366
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366 [Google Scholar]
23. Franklin, M. B.
    (1988) “Museum of the mind”: an inquiry into the titling of artworks. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3(1), 157–174. 10.1207/s15327868ms0303_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0303_4 [Google Scholar]
24. Glucksberg, S.
    (1991) Beyond literal meanings: The psychology of allusion. Psychological Science, 2(3), 146–152. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.1991.tb00122.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00122.x [Google Scholar]
25. Glucksberg, S.
    (2001) Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
26. Glucksberg, S. , & Keysar, B.
    (1993) How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.401–424). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.020 [Google Scholar]
27. Gombrich, E.
    (1982) The image and the eye: Further studies in the psychology of pictorial representation. Oxford: Phaidon.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gordon, M.
    (March14 1977) All the art that’s fit to befuddle. New York, 10(11), 49–52.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Grady, J.
    (2007) Metaphor. In D. Geeraetes , & C. Hurberts (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.188–213). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Grady, J. , Oakley, T. , & Coulson S.
    (1999) Blending and metaphor. In W. Gibbs , & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp.101–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.175.07gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.07gra [Google Scholar]
31. Hampe, B.
    (2005) From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197532
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532 [Google Scholar]
32. Jakobson, R.
    (1960).Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp.350–77). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Keysar, B. , & Glucksberg, S.
    (1992) Metaphor and communication. Poetics Today, 13(4), 633–658. 10.2307/1773292
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1773292 [Google Scholar]
34. Kövecses, Z.
    (2000) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture and body in human feeling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kövecses, Z.
    (2015) Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
36. Koller, V. , & Davidson, P.
    (2008) Social exclusion as conceptual and grammatical metaphor: a cross-genre study of British policy making. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 307–331. 10.1177/0957926508088963
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088963 [Google Scholar]
37. Kraus, J.
    (2012) All the art that’s fit to print (And some that wasn’t): Inside the New York Times Op-Ed page. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kress, G. , & van Leeuwen, T.
    (1996) Reading Images. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Lakoff, G.
    (1996) Moral politics: How conservatives and liberals think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lakoff, G.
    (1999, December). Metaphorical thought in foreign policy: Why strategic framing matters. University of California at Berkeley & Rockridge Institute. Retrieved fromframeworksinstitute.org/assets/files/PDF_GII/metaphorical_thought.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
41. Lakoff, G.
    (2006a) Whose freedom? The battle over America’s most important idea. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lakoff, G.
    (2006b) Thinking points: Communicating our American values and vision. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Lakoff, G.
    (2008) The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st century politics with an 18th century brain. New York, NY: Viking.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Lakoff. G.
    (2013, November 13). Systemic causation and Syria: Obama’s framing problem. The Huffington Post. Retrieved fromwww.huffingtonpost.com/george-lakoff/systemic-causation-and-sy_b_3916092.html
    [Google Scholar]
45. Lakoff, G.
    (2014) The ALL NEW Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Lakoff, G. , & Turner, M.
    (1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
49. Lakoff, G. , & Wehling, E.
    (2012a) The little blue book: the essential guide to thinking and talking democratic. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Lakoff, G. , & Wehling, E.
    (2012b, June14). Why the conservative worldview exalts selfishness. The Alternet. Retrieved fromwww.alternet.org/story/155875/lakoff%3A_why_the_conservative_worldview_exalts_selfishness
    [Google Scholar]
51. Lapakko, D.
    (2009) Argumentation: Critical thinking in action. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Martinec, R. , & Salway, A.
    (2005) A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication, 4(3), 339–374. 10.1177/1470357205055928
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205055928 [Google Scholar]
53. Mueller, B.
    (2011) Dynamics of international advertising: Theoretical and practical perspectives. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Ninkovich, F.
    (1994) Modernity and power: A history of the domino theory in the twentieth century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Ritchie, D.
    (2013) Metaphor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Salway, A. , & Martinec, R.
    (2002) Some ideas for modeling image-text combinations. Surrey: University of Surrey. Retrieved fromepubs.surrey.ac.uk/508/1/fulltext.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
57. Sperber, D. , & Wilson, D.
    (1995) Relevance theory: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Steen, G.
    (2007) Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.10 [Google Scholar]
59. Stenvoll, D.
    (2008) Slippery slope in political discourse. In T. Carver , & J. Pikalo (Eds.), Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world (pp.28–40). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Wehling, E.
    (2013) A nation under joint custody: How conflicting family models divide US politics. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Wehling, E.
    (2016) Moral disgust at its best: The important role of low-level mappings and structural parallelism in political disgust and disease metaphors. In Gola, E. , & Ervas, F. (Eds.), Metaphor and communication (pp.189–200). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.5.10weh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.5.10weh [Google Scholar]
62. Wehling, E. , Feinberg, M , Saslow, L. , Melvær, W. , & Lakoff, G.
    (2014) A moral house divided: How idealized family models explain political polarization. (Manuscript submitted for publication)
    [Google Scholar]