1887
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0142-5471
  • E-ISSN: 1569-979X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Considering the current demands for the inclusion of diversity in most sectors of society, how to contemplate the question of place of speech in the discursive dimension of graphic/information design? This article presents a brief conceptual panorama of the relation between discourse and place of speech. In order to better understand this relation, we consider it both within the theoretical and practical scope of graphic/information design. At first, the poststructuralist influence on graphic design is presented and, then, the notion of place of speech is discussed, drawing attention to its uses and contradictions. Finally, the importance of giving a place to speech is highlighted, and heuristic orientations towards the discursive dimension of contemporary graphic/information design are proposed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/idj.24.1.05bec
2018-01-01
2019-08-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AIGA
    (2016, April 20). Diversity & Inclusion Initiative [Online]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.aiga.org/diversity-and-inclusion-initiative/
  2. Almeida Junior, L. , & Nojima, V. L.
    (2010) Retórica do design gráfico: Da prática à teoria. São Paulo: Blucher.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardzell, S.
    (2010) Feminist HCI: Taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2010: HCI For All (pp.1301–1310). Atlanta: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnard, M.
    (2005) Graphic design as communication. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benveniste, E.
    (1995) O vocabulário das instituições indo-européias, v. II. Campinas: Ed. Unicamp.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Berger, J.
    (2008) Ways of seeing. London: Penguin Classics.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bomeny, M. H. W.
    (2009) O panorama do design gráfico contemporâneo: A construção, a desconstrução e a nova ordem (Doctoral dissertation). Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, São Paulo.
  8. Braun, S. G.
    (2016, June28).Space, time, and body asunder: Mapping the voices of the hiroshima archive [Online]. Retrieved fromwww.stevengbraun.com/dev/hiroshima-archive/
  9. Buchanan, R.
    (1995) Rethoric, humanism and design. In R. Buchanan & V. Margolin (Eds.), Discovering design: Explorations in design studies (pp.23–66). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Carrier, D.
    (2002) Rosalind Krauss and American philosophical art criticism: From formalism to beyond postmodernism. London: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins, M. & Papadakis, A.
    (1989) Post-modern design (pp.179–195). New York: Rizzoli.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Crow, D.
    (2010) Visible signs: An introduction to semiotics in the visual arts. Switzerland: AVA Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dass, A.
    (2013, November20). Humanae: Work in progress [Online]. Retrieved fromhumanae.tumblr.com/about
  14. Dixon, C. & Baines, P.
    (2013) Signs: Lettering in the environment. London: Laurence King.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dobson, T. & Dobson, S. C.
    (2017) Tip of the icon: Examining socially symbolic indexical signage. Dialectic, 1(1), 61–90. 10.3998/dialectic.14932326.0001.106
    https://doi.org/10.3998/dialectic.14932326.0001.106 [Google Scholar]
  16. Drabinski, E.
    (2013) Queering the catalog: Queer theory and the politics of correction. The Library Quarterly, 83(2), 94–111. 10.1086/669547
    https://doi.org/10.1086/669547 [Google Scholar]
  17. Drucker, J.
    (1994) The visible word: Experimental typography and modern art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Emanuel, B.
    (2017) A retórica da Interação (Doctoral dissertation). Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Escola Superior de Desenho Industrial, Rio de Janeiro.
  19. Engelke, A.
    (2017, September). Pureza e poder: os paradoxos da política identitária. Piauí, 132, 40–45. Retrieved frompiaui.folha.uol.com.br/materia/pureza-e-poder/
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Foucault, M.
    (1996) A ordem do discurso. São Paulo: Loyola.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2000) As palavras e as coisas: uma arqueologia das ciências humanas. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Giacomin, J.
    (2014) What is human centered design?The Design Journal, 17(4), 606–623. 10.2752/175630614X14056185480186
    https://doi.org/10.2752/175630614X14056185480186 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gorter, D. , Marten, H. F. , & Mensel, L.
    (Eds.) (2012) Minority languages in the linguist landscape. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230360235
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360235 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hendren, S.
    (2016, February19). An icon is a verb: About the project. The Accessible Icon Project [Online]. Retrieved fromaccessibleicon.org/#an-icon-is-a-verb
  25. Kim, H. H.
    (Ed.) (2018) Graphic design discourse: Evolving theories, ideologies, and processes of visual communication. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kinross, R.
    (1994) Fellow Readers: Notes on Multiplied Language. London: Hyphen Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kruger, B.
    (1994) Remote control: Power, cultures, and the world of appearances. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. LaRossa, B.
    (2017, March11). The architecture of graphic design’s discourse. Design Observer. Retrieved fromhttps://designobserver.com/feature/the-architecture-of-graphic-designsdiscourse/39694
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lavin, M.
    (2001) Clean new world: Culture, politics, and graphic design. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lupton, E. , & Miller, A.
    (1996) Design writing research: Writing on graphic design. London: Phaidon.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lupton, E.
    (1996) Mixing messages: Graphic design in contemporary culture. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McCoy, K.
    (2009) Typography as discourse. In H. Armstrong (Ed.), Graphic design theory: Readings from the field (pp.81–83). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Northeastern University
    (2016) Design for diversity: An IMLS national forum project [Online] Retrieved fromhttps://dsg.neu.edu/research/design-for-diversity/
  34. Oudshoorn, N. , Neven, L. , & Stienstra, M.
    (2016) How diversity gets lost: Age and gender in design practices of information and communication technologies. Journal of Women & Aging, 28(2), 170–185. 10.1080/08952841.2015.1013834
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2015.1013834 [Google Scholar]
  35. Poynor, R.
    (2003) No more rules: Graphic design and postmodernism. London: Laurence King.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ribeiro, D.
    (2017) O que é lugar de fala?Belo Horizonte: Letramento, Justificando.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Spinillo, C. G.
    (2012) Graphic and cultural aspects of pictograms: An information ergonomics viewpoint. Work, 41(Suppl 1), 3398–3403. 10.3233/WOR‑2012‑0615‑3398
    https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0615-3398 [Google Scholar]
  38. Steinweber, P. , & Koller, A.
    (2007, June30). Similar diversity [Online]. Retrieved fromsimilardiversity.net/about/
    [Google Scholar]
  39. West, E.
    (2015, June4). Signing for a gender neutral future. Two Twelve [Online]. Retrieved fromwww.twotwelve.com/voice/signing-for-a-gender-neutral-future.html
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/idj.24.1.05bec
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): criticism , discourse studies , graphic design , information design and theory
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error