1887
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0142-5471
  • E-ISSN: 1569-979X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

A personal view, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/idj.24.1.06waa-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/idj.24.1.06waa
2018-01-01
2019-09-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Black, A. , Luna, P. , Lund, O. , & Walker, S.
    (Eds.) (2017) Information design: research and practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. European Commission
    (2017) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council [Online]. Retrieved fromeur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0135
  3. Jackson, S. & Schneider, J.
    (2018) Cochrane Review as a “warranting device” for reasoning about health. Argumentation, 32, 241–272. 10.1007/s10503‑017‑9440‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-017-9440-z [Google Scholar]
  4. MEB/CBG
    (2018) Pictogrammen in bijsluiters: geef uw mening [Online]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.cbg-meb.nl/actueel/nieuws/2018/04/17/pictogrammen-in-bijsluiters-geef-uw-mening [In Dutch only].
  5. PAHO
    (2016) Pan American Health Organization Nutrient Profile Model [Online]. Retrieved fromiris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/18621
  6. Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry
    (2018) Public submissions: Fast facts [Online]. Retrieved fromhttps://financialservices.royalcommission.gov.au/Pages/default.aspx
  7. Toulmin, S.
    (1969) The uses of argument. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/idj.24.1.06waa
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error