1887
Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0142-5471
  • E-ISSN: 1569-979X

Abstract

Abstract

Artificially intelligent systems () are increasingly becoming the ubiquitous, unseen arbiters of our social, civic and familial lives. Ever increasing computational power, combined with almost limitless data, has led to a turning point in the way artificial intelligence assists, judges, and cares for humans. In the wake of such power we must ask ourselves what it is that we are making inherently unknowable as the world becomes more predictable, managed, and discrete. Building on the work of black feminists Sylvia Wynter and Hortense Spillers, I perform a reading of the “flesh”. I aim to hint towards a different field of relations and a knowledge politic premised on unknowability and the radical potential of the subjugated to foster new imaginaries of the human fluid enough to weather instability. This piece troubles the boundaries inscribed between things. Settled in the flesh of blackness, we are reminded of the ways that blackness floods the landscape of productive reason while holding outlier ways of being beyond Western Man. This paper seeks to return to the pulse found within the flesh as a critical site for thinking through alternate ways of being, within the messiness, the unstable, the precarious; finding life born of transition, the pulse within discord.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25.1.05mor
2020-03-16
2020-04-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/idj.25.1.05mor.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25.1.05mor&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. AI Now Institute
    AI Now Institute (2018) Litigating algorithms: Challenging government use of algorithmic decision systems (Report, in collaboration with Center on Race, Inequality, and the Law, Electronic Frontier Foundation).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. [Google Scholar]
  3. Eubanks, V.
    (2018) Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fanon, F.
    (1968) Black skin, white masks. New York, NY: Grove Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Frequently Asked Questions
    Frequently Asked Questions (2017, December15). Retrieved fromhttps://www.thehumanproject.org/faq/
  6. Kurgan, L.
    (2013) Close up at a distance: Mapping, technology, and politics. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lorde, A.
    (2015) Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Berkeley, CA: Crossing Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mattern, S.
    (2018) Databodies in Codespace. Places Journal. doi:  10.22269/180417
    https://doi.org/10.22269/180417 [Google Scholar]
  9. Mckittrick, K.
    (2011) On plantations, prisons, and a black sense of place. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(8), 947–963. doi:  10.1080/14649365.2011.624280
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2011.624280 [Google Scholar]
  10. Noble, S. U.
    (2018) Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York, NY: New York University Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5 [Google Scholar]
  11. Oliver, M. L., & Shapiro, T. M.
    (1995) Black wealth/white wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. O’Neil, C.
    (2018) Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rothstein, R.
    (2017) The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Spillers, H. J.
    (1987) Mama’s baby, Papa’s maybe: An American grammar book. Diacritics, 17(2), 64–81. doi:  10.2307/464747
    https://doi.org/10.2307/464747 [Google Scholar]
  15. (1994) The crisis of the negro intellectual: A post-date. Boundary 2, 21(3), 65–116. doi:  10.2307/303601
    https://doi.org/10.2307/303601 [Google Scholar]
  16. Terry, J., & Urla, J.
    (Eds.) (1999) Deviant bodies: Critical perspectives on difference in science and popular culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. The Human Project
    The Human Project (2017, November20). Retrieved fromwww.thehumanproject.org/
  18. Weheliye, A. G.
    (2014) Habeas viscus: Racializing assemblages, biopolitics, and black feminist theories of the human. Durham: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822376491
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376491 [Google Scholar]
  19. Woods, C.
    (2017) Development arrested: The blues and plantation power in the Mississippi delta. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wynter, S.
    (1999) ProudFlesh: New Afrikan Journal of Culture, Politics and Consciousness (online).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25.1.05mor
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25.1.05mor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): artificial intelligence , black studies and machine bias
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error