oa Feeling numbers

References

1. Aristotle, Roberts, W. R., Bywater, I., & Solmsen, F.
   (1954) Rhetoric. New York: Modern Library.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bateman, S., Mandryk, R. L., Gutwin, C., Genest, A., McDine, D., & Brooks, C.
   (2010) Useful junk?: The effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.2573–2582). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:  10.1145/1753326.1753716
   https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753716 [Google Scholar]
3. Bateson, G.
   (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Booth, W. C.
   (1963) The rhetorical stance. College Composition and Communication, 14(3), 139–145. doi:  10.2307/355048
   https://doi.org/10.2307/355048 [Google Scholar]
5. Borgo, R., Abdul-Rahman, A., Mohamed, F., Grant, P. W., Reppa, I., Floridi, L., & Chen, M.
   (2012) An empirical study on using visual embellishments in visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12), 2759–2768. doi:  10.1109/TVCG.2012.197
   https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.197 [Google Scholar]
6. Borkin, M. A., Bylinskii, Z., Kim, N. W., Bainbridge, C. M., Yeh, C. S., Borkin, D., … Oliva, A.
   (2016) Beyond memorability: Visualization recognition and recall. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1), 519–528. doi:  10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467732
   https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467732 [Google Scholar]
7. Borkin, M. A., Vo, A. A., Bylinskii, Z., Isola, P., Sunkavalli, S., Oliva, A., & Pfister, H.
   (2013) What makes a visualization memorable?IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2306–2315. doi:  10.1109/TVCG.2013.234
   https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.234 [Google Scholar]
8. Boy, J., Pandey, A. V., Emerson, J., Satterthwaite, M., Nov, O., & Bertini, E.
   (2017) Showing people behind data: Does anthropomorphizing visualizations elicit more empathy for human rights data?InProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.5462–5474). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:  10.1145/3025453.3025512
   https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025512 [Google Scholar]
9. Buchanan, R.
   (1985) Declaration by design: Rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. Design Issues, 2(1), 4–22. doi:  10.2307/1511524
   https://doi.org/10.2307/1511524 [Google Scholar]
10. Campbell, G.
    (1776) The philosophy of rhetoric. (vol.1). London: W. Strahan. Retrieved fromhdl.handle.net/2027/njp.32101061812242
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dörk, M., Feng, P., Collins, C., & Carpendale, S.
    (2013) Critical InfoVis: Exploring the politics of visualization. InCHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.2189–2198). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:  10.1145/2468356.2468739
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468739 [Google Scholar]
12. Epstein, S.
    (1994) Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709–724. doi:  10.1037/0003‑066X.49.8.709
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709 [Google Scholar]
13. Funk, C., & Goo, S. K.
    (2015) A look at what the public knows and does not know about science (p. 40). Pew Research Center.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Haushofer, K.
    (1928) Die suggestive Karte. InK. Haushofer, E. Obst, H. Lautensach, & O. Maull (Eds.), Bausteine zur Geopolitik (pp.343–348). Leipzig: Kurt Vowinckel Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Harley, J. B.
    (1991) Can there be a cartographic ethics?Cartographic Perspectives, (10), 9–16. 10.14714/CP10.1053
    https://doi.org/10.14714/CP10.1053 [Google Scholar]
16. Haroz, S., Kosara, R., & Franconeri, S. L.
    (2015) ISOTYPE visualization: Working memory, performance, and engagement with pictographs. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.1191–1200). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:  10.1145/2702123.2702275
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702275 [Google Scholar]
17. Hoeken, H.
    (2001) Anecdotal, statistical, and causal evidence: Their perceived and actual persuasiveness. Argumentation, 15(4), 425–437. doi:  10.1023/A:1012075630523
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012075630523 [Google Scholar]
18. Holmes, N.
    (1984) Designer’s guide to creating charts and diagrams (2nd ed.). New York: Watson-Guptill.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Huff, D.
    (1954) How to lie with statistics. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hullman, J., & Diakopoulos, N.
    (2011) Visualization rhetoric: framing effects in narrative visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2231–2240. doi:  10.1109/TVCG.2011.255
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.255 [Google Scholar]
21. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H.
    (1989) Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 290–314. doi:  10.1037/0033‑2909.106.2.290
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.290 [Google Scholar]
22. Jones, G. E.
    (2011) How to lie with charts. LaPuerta Books and Media.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kogut, T., & Ritov, I.
    (2005) The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 106–116. doi:  10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.02.003 [Google Scholar]
24. Kostelnick, C.
    (2016) The re-emergence of emotional appeals in interactive data visualization. Technical Communication, 63(2), 116–135.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lee, S., Kim, S.-H., & Kwon, B. C.
    (2017) VLAT: Development of a visualization literacy assessment test. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(1), 551–560. doi:  10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598920
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598920 [Google Scholar]
26. Lee, S., Winterich, K. P., & Ross Jr., W. T.
    (2014) I’m moral, but I won’t help you: The distinct roles of empathy and justice in donations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 678–696. doi:  10.1086/677226
    https://doi.org/10.1086/677226 [Google Scholar]
27. Lumley, T., Diehr, P., Emerson, S., & Chen, L.
    (2002) The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annual Review of Public Health, 23(1), 151–169. doi:  10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140546
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140546 [Google Scholar]
28. Monmonier, M. S.
    (1996) How to lie with maps. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226029009.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226029009.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
29. Muehlenhaus, I.
    (2010) Lost in visualization: Using quantitative content analysis to identify, measure, and categorize political cartographic manipulations (Ph.D.). University of Minnesota, United States, Minnesota. Retrieved fromhttps://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.neu.edu/docview/305207782/abstract/73A8DC04E3AD4FC2PQ/1
    [Google Scholar]
30. Muehlenhaus, I.
    (2012) If looks could kill: The impact of different rhetorical styles on persuasive geocommunication. The Cartographic Journal, 49, 361–375. doi:  10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000032
    https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000032 [Google Scholar]
31. Muehlenhaus, I.
    (2013) The design and composition of persuasive maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40(5), 401–414. doi:  10.1080/15230406.2013.783450
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2013.783450 [Google Scholar]
32. Offenhuber, D.
    (2010) Visual anecdote. Leonardo, 43(4), 367–374. 10.1162/LEON_a_00010
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00010 [Google Scholar]
33. Pandey, A., Manivannan, A., Nov, O., Satterthwaite, M. L., & Bertini, E.
    (2014) The persuasive power of data visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12), 2211–2220. doi:  10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346419
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346419 [Google Scholar]
34. Pandey, A., Rall, K., Satterthwaite, M. L., Nov, O., & Bertini, E.
    (2015) How deceptive are deceptive visualizations? An empirical analysis of common distortion techniques. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.1469–1478). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:  10.1145/2702123.2702608
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702608 [Google Scholar]
35. Riche, N. H., Hurter, C., Diakopoulos, N., & Carpendale, S.
    (Eds.) (2018) Data-driven atorytelling. Boca Raton, Florida: A K Peters/CRC Press. 10.1201/9781315281575
    https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315281575 [Google Scholar]
36. Scherer, K. R.
    (2001) Emotions, psychological structure of. InN. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp.4472–4477). Oxford: Pergamon. doi:  10.1016/B0‑08‑043076‑7/01711‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01711-3 [Google Scholar]
37. Scherer, K. R.
    (2005) What are emotions? And how can they be measured?Social Science Information, 44(4), 695–729. doi:  10.1177/0539018405058216
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018405058216 [Google Scholar]
38. Segel, E., & Heer, J.
    (2010) Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6), 1139–1148. doi:  10.1109/TVCG.2010.179
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.179 [Google Scholar]
39. Shelter Animals Count. The National Database Project
    Shelter Animals Count. The National Database Project (2017) Retrieved fromhttps://www.shelteranimalscount.org
40. Slovic, P.
    (2007) “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), 79–95.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P.
    (2007) Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 143–153. doi:  10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.005 [Google Scholar]
42. Tactical Technology Collective
    Tactical Technology Collective (2014) Visualising Information for Advocacy (2nd ed.). Retrieved fromvisualisingadvocacy.org
    [Google Scholar]
43. Thudt, A., Perin, C., Willett, W., & Carpendale, S.
    (2017) Subjectivity in Personal storytelling with visualization. Information Design Journal, 23(1): 48–64. doi:  10.1075/idj.23.1.07thu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.23.1.07thu [Google Scholar]
44. Tufte, E. R.
    (1983) The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tyner, J. A.
    (1982) Persuasive cartography. Journal of Geography, 81, 140–144. doi:  10.1080/00221348208980868
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00221348208980868 [Google Scholar]
46. Vande Moere, A., Tomitsch, M., Wimmer, C., Christoph, B., & Grechenig, T.
    (2012) evaluating the effect of style in information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12), 2739–2748. doi:  10.1109/TVCG.2012.221
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.221 [Google Scholar]
47. Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mayorga, M., & Peters, E.
    (2014) Compassion fade: Affect and charity are greatest for a single child in need. PLoS ONE, 9(6). 10.1371/journal.pone.0100115
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100115 [Google Scholar]
48. Viegas, F. B., & Wattenberg, M.
    (2007) Artistic data visualization: Beyond visual analytics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (4564), 182–191. 10.1007/978‑3‑540‑73257‑0_21
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73257-0_21 [Google Scholar]
49. Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D.
    (1967) Pragmatics of human communication. W. W. Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Wood, D.
    (1991) How maps work. Cartographica, 29(3/4), 66–74.
    [Google Scholar]