Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0142-5471
  • E-ISSN: 1569-979X



The British Medical Journal has recently started making visual abstracts to summarise published research studies. These 1024 × 1024 px images give a quick overview of a trial’s participants, design, and key findings. These visual abstracts are designed to help busy health professionals and researchers get a quick overview of newly published research. The present article describes simple pragmatic evaluations of these visual abstracts: analysis of social media stats and an opportunistic reader survey. Our goals were to identify how useful our readers found this new visual format, and whether there were any improvements we could make. The social media stats were initially very promising. Longer term performance over several visual abstracts, however, was not as strong, suggesting a possible halo effect provided by the novelty of a new presentation format. The survey proved to be a quick and valuable way of getting feedback on the design of the initial template, and resulted in several design adjustments.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 license.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B.
    (2019) Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature. Retrieved fromhttps://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00857-9
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheng, K., Chen, Y., Larson, K., & Rolandi, M.
    (2017) Proving the value of visual design in scientific communication. Information Design Journal, 23(1), 80–95. doi:  10.1075/idj.23.1.09che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.23.1.09che [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper, B. B.
    (2013) How Twitter’s expanded images increase clicks, retweets and favorites. Retrieved fromhttps://blog.bufferapp.com/the-power-of-twitters-new-expanded-images-and-how-to-make-the-most-of-it
  4. Hall, E.
    (2013) Just enough research. New York, NY: A Book Apart.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hopewell, S., Clarke, M., Moher, D., Wager, E., Middleton, P., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., the CONSORT Group
    (2008) CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet, 371(9609):281–283. Retrieved fromwww.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/consort-abstracts/
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ibrahim, A. M., Lillemoe, K. D., Klingensmith, M. E., and Dimick, J. B.
    (2017) Visual abstracts to disseminate research on social media: A prospective, case-control crossover study. Annals of Surgery, 266(6), e46–e48. doi:  10.1097/SLA.0000000000002277
    https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002277 [Google Scholar]
  7. Krug, S.
    (2010) Rocket surgery made easy. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pferschy-Wenzig, E-M., Pferschy, U., Wang, D., Mocan, A., & Atanasov, A. G.
    (2016) Does a graphical abstract bring more visibility to your paper?Molecules, 21(9), 1247. doi:  10.3390/molecules21091247
    https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21091247 [Google Scholar]
  9. Pinantoan, A.
    (2015) How to massively boost your blog traffic with these 5 awesome image stats. Retrieved fromhttps://buzzsumo.com/blog/how-to-massively-boost-your-blog-traffic-with-these-5-awesome-image-stats/
  10. Schulz, K. F.
    (1997) The quest for unbiased research: Randomized clinical trials and the consort reporting guidelines. Annals of Neurology, 41(5), 569–573. doi:  10.1002/ana.410410504
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410410504 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error