1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Information Design Journal
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Visual context in biological life cycle diagrams is associated with elevated empathy
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Diagrams are widely used in educational, instructional, and communication contexts, however affective responses to diagrams with the potential to influence motivation, learning, and behavior, have been overlooked. This paper presents a mixed-methods study, employing focus groups ( = 17) and a survey experiment ( = 194) to examine how visual context (a contextual background scene) in biological life cycle diagrams impacts affective responses. Results showed that the inclusion of visual context led to a modest increase in associative/affective empathy (  = 1.943,  = .027,  = 0.281). These findings demonstrate that visual design choices during the development of instructional graphics can have an impact on affective responses, in this case associative/affective empathy, with potentially important implications for education and communication settings.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25002.woo
2026-02-26
2026-03-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/idj.25002.woo
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/idj.25002.woo/idj.25002.woo.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25002.woo&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bachen, C. M., Hernández-Ramos, P., Raphael, C., & Waldron, A.
    (2016) How do presence, flow, and character identification affect players’ empathy and interest in learning from a serious computer game?Computers in Human Behavior, , –. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.043
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.043 [Google Scholar]
  2. Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Todd, R. M., Brummett, B. H., Shaw, L. L., & Aldeguer, C. M. R.
    (1995) Empathy and the collective good: Caring for one of the others in a social dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.68.4.619
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.619 [Google Scholar]
  3. Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K.
    (1981) Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (), –. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.290
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N.
    (2015) The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/14780887.2014.955224
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.955224 [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell, R. G., & Babrow, A. S.
    (2004) The role of empathy in responses to persuasive risk communication: Overcoming resistance to HIV prevention messages. Health Communication, (), –. 10.1207/S15327027HC1602_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1602_2 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cook, M. P.
    (2006) Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, (), –. 10.1002/sce.20164
     https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20164 [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis, M. H.
    (1983) A mulitdimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.44.1.113
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 [Google Scholar]
  8. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L.
    (2006) A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, (), –. 10.1111/j.0963‑7214.2006.00406.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Demetriou, H., & Nicholl, B.
    (2022) Empathy is the mother of invention: Emotion and cognition for creativity in the classroom. Improving Schools, (), –. 10.1177/1365480221989500
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480221989500 [Google Scholar]
  10. Forgas, J. P.
    (2008) Affect and cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, (), –. 10.1111/j.1745‑6916.2008.00067.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00067.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Fung, T. K. F., Griffin, R. J., & Dunwoody, S.
    (2018) Testing links among uncertainty, affect, and attitude toward a health behavior. Science Communication, (), –. 10.1177/1075547017748947
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017748947 [Google Scholar]
  12. Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., & White, C. S.
    (1989) Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, (), –. 10.1207/s1532690xci0601_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0601_2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Harp, S. F., & Maslich, A. A.
    (2005) The consequences of including seductive setails during lecture. Teaching of Psychology, (), –. 10.1207/s15328023top3202_4
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3202_4 [Google Scholar]
  14. JASP Team
    JASP Team (2024) JASP (Version 0.16) [Computer software].
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Klassen, S.
    (2006) A theoretical framework for contextual science teaching. Interchange, (), –. 10.1007/s10780‑006‑8399‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-006-8399-8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Krueger, R. A.
    (1994) Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A.
    (2000) Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Leutner, D.
    (2014) Motivation and emotion as mediators in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, , –. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  19. Malamed, C.
    (2009) Visual language for designers: Principles for creating graphics that people understand. Rockport Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Mathur, L., Spitale, M., Xi, H., Li, J., & Matarić, M. J.
    (2021) Modeling user empathy elicited by a robot storyteller. 2021 9th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), –. 10.1109/ACII52823.2021.9597416
     https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII52823.2021.9597416 [Google Scholar]
  21. Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M.
    (2004) The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (), –. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A.
    (2009) The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, (), –. 10.1177/0013916508318748
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748 [Google Scholar]
  23. Pauwels, L.
    (2006) Introduction: The role of visual representation in the production of scientific reality. InL. Pauwels (Ed.), Visual cultures of science: Rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication (pp.–). England, University Press of New.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., & Khazian, A. M.
    (2004) Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (), –. 10.1016/S0272‑4944(03)00022‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7 [Google Scholar]
  25. Shen, L.
    (2010a) Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Communication Research, (), –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2010.01381.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01381.x [Google Scholar]
  26. (2010b) On a scale of state empathy during message processing. Western Journal of Communication, (), –. 10.1080/10570314.2010.512278
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2010.512278 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2011) The effectiveness of empathy- versus fear-arousing antismoking PSAs. Health Communication, (), –. 10.1080/10410236.2011.552480
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.552480 [Google Scholar]
  28. Sobel, D.
    (2013) Beyond ecophobia: Reclaiming the heart in nature education. Orion Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Spitale, M., Okamoto, S., Gupta, M., Xi, H., & Matarić, M. J.
    (2022) Socially assistive robots as storytellers that elicit empathy. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, (), –. 10.1145/3538409
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3538409 [Google Scholar]
  30. Stiff, J. B., Dillard, J. P., Somera, L., Kim, H., & Sleight, C.
    (1988) Empathy, communication, and prosocial behavior. Communication Monographs, (), –. 10.1080/03637758809376166
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376166 [Google Scholar]
  31. Tam, K.-P.
    (2013) Dispositional empathy with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, , –. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  32. Tufte, E. R.
    (1983) The visual display of quantitative information. Press, Graphics.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Wald, D. M., Johnston, E. W., Wellman, N., Harlow, J., & Wald, D. M.
    (2021) How does personalization in news stories influence intentions to help with drought? Assessing the influence of state empathy and its antecedents. Frontiers in Communication, , . 10.3389/fcomm.2020.588978
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.588978 [Google Scholar]
  34. Walker, G. J., Stocklmayer, S. M., & Grant, W. J.
    (2011) Science theatre: Changing South African students’ intended behaviour towards HIV AIDS. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, (), –. 10.1080/09500693.2011.633939
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.633939 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wood, M., & Stocklmayer, S. M.
    (2018) Exploring the relationship between visual context and affect in diagram interpretation. InP. Chapman, G. Stapleton, A. Moktefi, S. Perez-Kriz, & F. Bellucci (Eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Vol., pp.–). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑91376‑6_46
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91376-6_46 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2021) Visual context and relevance in life cycle diagrams. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, (). 10.29333/ijese/9154
     https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/9154 [Google Scholar]
  37. Yue, D., Tong, Z., Tian, J., Li, Y., Zhang, L., & Sun, Y.
    (2021) Anthropomorphic strategies promote wildlife conservation through empathy: The moderation role of the public epidemic situation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, (), –. 10.3390/ijerph18073565
     https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073565 [Google Scholar]
  38. Zeyer, A., & Dillon, J.
    (2019) The role of empathy for learning in complex Science|Environment|Health contexts. International Journal of Science Education, (), –. 10.1080/09500693.2018.1549371
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1549371 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25002.woo
Loading
Visual context in biological life cycle diagrams is associated with elevated empathy
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.25002.woo
/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25002.woo
/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25002.woo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: empathy ; affect ; diagrams ; communication ; visual context

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error