1887
image of An exploration of critical information design through migrant voices
in Dubai’s public transport system
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study employs a critical information design lens to interrogate whose knowledge is represented and whose voices are excluded in public transport systems. Focusing on migrant workers in Dubai, UAE, it foregrounds issues of equity, representation, and participation in the design of mobility-related information. Drawing on field observations and a participatory workshop with eleven participants, the research brings forward overlooked narratives of navigating buses, metro, and water transport. The findings demonstrate how critical information design can amplify marginalized voices, foster inclusion, and reimagine transport information infrastructures as socially responsive and contextually grounded — moving beyond a narrow focus on clarity and efficiency.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25007.sel
2026-01-22
2026-02-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agboka, G. Y.
    (2013) Participatory Localization: A Social Justice Approach to Navigating Unenfranchised/Disenfranchised Cultural Sites. Technical Communication Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/10572252.2013.730966
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.730966 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agid, S., & Chin, E.
    (2019) Making and negotiating value: Design and collaboration with community led groups. CoDesign, (), –. 10.1080/15710882.2018.1563191
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1563191 [Google Scholar]
  3. Akama, Y., Hagen, P., & Whaanga-Schollum, D.
    (2019) Problematizing Replicable Design to Practice Respectful, Reciprocal, and Relational Co-designing with Indigenous People. Design and Culture, (), –. 10.1080/17547075.2019.1571306
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1571306 [Google Scholar]
  4. Akama, Y., Light, A., & Agid, S.
    (2023) Amplifying the politics in Service Design. Service Design and Innovation Conference, –. 10.3384/ecp203031
    https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp203031 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alajmi, A., Cantini, D., Maffi, I., & Melliti, I.
    (2025) Social Anthropology in the Arab World: The Fragmented History of an Uncomfortable Discipline. Berghahn Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ali, S.
    (2019) Dubai: Gilded Cage. Yale.ORIM.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. AlShehabi, O. H.
    (2021) Policing labour in empire: The modern origins of the Kafala sponsorship system in the Gulf Arab States. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, (), –. 10.1080/13530194.2019.1580183
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2019.1580183 [Google Scholar]
  8. Asad, M., & Le Dantec, C. A.
    (2015) Illegitimate Civic Participation: Supporting Community Activists on the Ground. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, –. 10.1145/2675133.2675156
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675156 [Google Scholar]
  9. Assaf, L., & Montagne, C.
    (2019) Urban Images and Imaginaries: Gulf cities through their representations. Arabian Humanities. Revue Internationale d’archéologie et de Sciences Sociales Sur La Péninsule Arabique/International Journal of Archaeology and Social Sciences in the Arabian Peninsula, . 10.4000/cy.4137
    https://doi.org/10.4000/cy.4137 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S.
    (2013) What is “critical” about critical design?Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, –. 10.1145/2470654.2466451
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466451 [Google Scholar]
  11. Baxter, M., & Lonsdale, M. dos S.
    (2023) Improving the design of public health infographics using a motion graphic educational resource to enhance design principle application. Information Design Journal, (), –. 10.1075/idj.23006.bax
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.23006.bax [Google Scholar]
  12. Baxter, M., Lonsdale, M. dos S., & Westland, S.
    (2021) Utilising design principles to improve the perception and effectiveness of public health infographics. Information Design Journal, (), –. 10.1075/idj.20017.bax
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.20017.bax [Google Scholar]
  13. Bjögvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.-A.
    (2012) Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges. Design Issues, (), –. 10.1162/DESI_a_00165
    https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00165 [Google Scholar]
  14. Boardsworth, K., Barlow, R., Wilson, B.-J., Wilson Uluinayau, T., & Signal, N.
    (2024) Toward Culturally Responsive Qualitative Research Methods in the Design of Health Technologies: Learnings in Applying an Indigenous Māori-Centred Approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, , 16094069241226530. 10.1177/16094069241226530
    https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241226530 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L.
    (1999) Sorting Things Out. 10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Braun, V., & Clarke, V.
    (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, (), –. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  17. Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rance, N.
    (2014) How to use thematic analysis with interview data (process research). 10.4135/9781473909847.N13
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473909847.N13 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cassell, C., & Symon, G.
    (2012) Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Costanza-Chock, S.
    (2020) Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Cranz, G.
    (2016) Ethnography for Designers. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315651262
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315651262 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dantec, C. A. L., & DiSalvo, C.
    (2013) Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science, (), –. 10.1177/0306312712471581
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712471581 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dickson, C., Reay, S. D., Douglas, R., & Nakarada-Kordic, I.
    (2017) Co-design to understand the tracheostomy product experiences of long-term tracheostomy users. Design for Health, (), –. 10.1080/24735132.2017.1386440
    https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2017.1386440 [Google Scholar]
  23. D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F.
    (2020) Data Feminism. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dourish, P.
    (2022) The Stuff of Bits: An Essay on the Materialities of Information. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dourish, P., & Mainwaring, S. D.
    (2012) Ubicomp’s colonial impulse. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, –. 10.1145/2370216.2370238
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370238 [Google Scholar]
  26. Drucker, J.
    (2014) Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Elsheshtawy, Y.
    (2009) Dubai: Behind an Urban Spectacle. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203869703
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869703 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2010) Little Space, Big Space: Everyday Urbanism in Dubai. Brown Journal of World Affairs, , .
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2012) Urban (im)mobility: Public encounters in Dubai. InUrban Theory Beyond the West. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Errichiello, G., & Nyhagen, L.
    (2021) “Dubai is a transit lounge”: Migration, temporariness and belonging among Pakistani middle-class migrants. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, (), –. 10.1177/01171968211013309
    https://doi.org/10.1177/01171968211013309 [Google Scholar]
  31. Frascara, J.
    (2005) Communication Design: Principles, Methods, and Practice. Allworth Press,U.S.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Frith, J., & Read, S.
    (2022) Introduction: Communication and design infrastructures. Commun. Des. Q. Rev, (), –. 10.1145/3507857.3507858
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3507857.3507858 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gardner, A.
    (2024) The Fragmentary City: Migration, Modernity, and Difference in the Urban Landscape of Doha, Qatar. Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Giaccardi, E., & Redström, J.
    (2020) Technology and More-Than-Human Design. Design Issues, (), –. Design Issues. 10.1162/desi_a_00612
    https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00612 [Google Scholar]
  35. Gibson, D.
    (2009) The Wayfinding Handbook: Information Design for Public Places. Princeton Architectural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Guest, G., M.MacQueen, K., & E.Namey, E.
    (2012) Applied Thematic Analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc. 10.4135/9781483384436
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gupta, A., Yadav, M., & Nayak, B. K.
    (2025) A Systematic Literature Review on Inclusive Public Open Spaces: Accessibility Standards and Universal Design Principles. Urban Science, (), . 10.3390/urbansci9060181
    https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9060181 [Google Scholar]
  38. Harrington, C., Erete, S., & Piper, A. M.
    (2019) Deconstructing Community-Based Collaborative Design: Towards More Equitable Participatory Design Engagements. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, (), :–:. 10.1145/3359318
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3359318 [Google Scholar]
  39. Huang, T. T. K., Aitken, J., Ferris, E., & Cohen, N.
    (2018) Design thinking to improve implementation of public health interventions: An exploratory case study on enhancing park use. Design for Health, (), –. 10.1080/24735132.2018.1541047
    https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2018.1541047 [Google Scholar]
  40. Jones, N. N.
    (2016) The Technical Communicator as Advocate: Integrating a Social Justice Approach in Technical Communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, (), –. 10.1177/0047281616639472
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616639472 [Google Scholar]
  41. Jureidini, R.
    (2014) Migrant Labour Recruitment to Qatar. QScience.com. https://www.qscience.com/content/978-9927-101-75-5
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kanna, A.
    (2011) Dubai, the City as Corporation (NED-New edition). University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttsqq1. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816656301.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816656301.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2017) Main trends in contemporary urban studies of the Middle East and North Africa. InA Research Agenda for Cities (pp.–). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781785363412/9781785363412.00028.xml. 10.4337/9781785363429.00028
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785363429.00028 [Google Scholar]
  44. Koskinen, I.
    (2023) Design, Empathy, Interpretation: Toward Interpretive Design Research. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/14346.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14346.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kostelnick, C.
    (2016, May). The Re-Emergence of Emotional Appeals in Interactive Data Visualization [Text]. Society for Technical Communication. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/stc/tc/2016/00000063/00000002/art00005
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kumar, R., & Roy, S. T.
    (2023) Graphic-Based Healthcare Information: Evaluation of Suitability Qualities for the Intended Population. InA. Chakrabarti & V. Singh (Eds.), Design in the Era of Industry 4.0, Volume 1 (pp.–). Springer Nature. 10.1007/978‑981‑99‑0293‑4_45
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0293-4_45 [Google Scholar]
  47. Le Dantec, C. A., & Fox, S.
    (2015) Strangers at the Gate: Gaining Access, Building Rapport, and Co-Constructing Community-Based Research. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, –. 10.1145/2675133.2675147
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675147 [Google Scholar]
  48. Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., & Sziarto, K. M.
    (2008) The Spatialities of Contentious Politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, (), –. 10.1111/j.1475‑5661.2008.00293.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00293.x [Google Scholar]
  49. Light, A., & Akama, Y.
    (2012) The human touch: Participatory practice and the role of facilitation in designing with communities. Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers — Volume 1, –. 10.1145/2347635.2347645
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2347635.2347645 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lock, O., Bednarz, T., Leao, S. Z., & Pettit, C.
    (2020) A review and reframing of participatory urban dashboards. City, Culture and Society, , . 10.1016/j.ccs.2019.100294
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2019.100294 [Google Scholar]
  51. Maanen, J. V.
    (1995) Representation in Ethnography. SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Malit Jr, F. T.
    (2025) Defying Social Inequality in the Gulf: Skilled Survivors’ Coping Routes, Racialized Capitalism, and Temporary Filipino Migrants in the UAE. Middle East Critique, (), –. 10.1080/19436149.2025.2456897
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2025.2456897 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mijksenaar, P., & Westendorp, P.
    (1999) Open Here: The Art of Instructional Design. Thames & Hudson.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Mohammad, R., & Sidaway, J. D.
    (2012) Spectacular Urbanization amidst Variegated Geographies of Globalization: Learning from Abu Dhabi’s Trajectory through the Lives of South Asian Men. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, (), –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2427.2011.01099.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01099.x [Google Scholar]
  55. Monson, M.
    (2023) Socially responsible design science in information systems for sustainable development: A critical research methodology. European Journal of Information Systems, (), –. 10.1080/0960085X.2021.1946442
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1946442 [Google Scholar]
  56. Müller, F.
    (2021) Design Ethnography: Epistemology and Methodology. Springer Nature. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑60396‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60396-0 [Google Scholar]
  57. Ngeh, J.
    (2025) ‘Bed-space’ housing in Dubai: African migrants, ambivalence towards authorities and gender differences. Ethnography, (), –. 10.1177/14661381221098610
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381221098610 [Google Scholar]
  58. Norval, C., Cornelius, K., Cobbe, J., & Singh, J.
    (2022) Disclosure by Design: Designing information disclosures to support meaningful transparency and accountability. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, –. 10.1145/3531146.3533133
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533133 [Google Scholar]
  59. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J.
    (2017) Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, (), 1609406917733847. 10.1177/1609406917733847
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ologeanu-Taddei, R.
    (2025) Values Behind the Code: Challenging Technological Neutrality in Information Systems Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, (). https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol57/iss1/21. 10.17705/1CAIS.05728
    https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05728 [Google Scholar]
  61. Parreñas, R. S.
    (2021) Unfree: Migrant Domestic Work in Arab States. Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9781503629660
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503629660 [Google Scholar]
  62. Pink, S.
    (2020) Doing Visual Ethnography. SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Pink, S., Fors, V., Lanzeni, D., Duque, M., Sumartojo, S., & Strengers, Y.
    (2022) Design Ethnography: Research, Responsibilities, and Futures. Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781003083665
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003083665 [Google Scholar]
  64. Redish, J.
    (2010) Technical Communication and Usability: Intertwined Strands and Mutual Influences. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, (), –. 10.1109/TPC.2010.2052861
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2010.2052861 [Google Scholar]
  65. Redström, J.
    (2006) Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design. Design Studies, (), –. 10.1016/j.destud.2005.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  66. Renard, A. L.
    (2021) Western Privilege: Work, Intimacy, and Postcolonial Hierarchies in Dubai. Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9781503629240
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503629240 [Google Scholar]
  67. Risse, M.
    (2025) Researching and Working on the Arabian Peninsula: Creating Effective Interactions. Springer Nature. 10.1007/978‑981‑96‑5326‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-5326-3 [Google Scholar]
  68. Rose, E., & Bingley, A.
    (2017) Migrating art: A research design to support refugees’ recovery from trauma — a pilot study. Design for Health, (), –. 10.1080/24735132.2017.1386499
    https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2017.1386499 [Google Scholar]
  69. Salvador, T., Bell, G., & Anderson, K.
    (1999) Design Ethnography. Design Management Journal (Former Series), (), –. 10.1111/j.1948‑7169.1999.tb00274.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.1999.tb00274.x [Google Scholar]
  70. Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J.
    (2008) Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, (), –. 10.1080/15710880701875068
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068 [Google Scholar]
  71. Selamet, J.
    (2024a) Amplifying local Dayak voices for designing Indigenous health systems in East Kalimantan. Design for Health, (), –. 10.1080/24735132.2024.2436284
    https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2024.2436284 [Google Scholar]
  72. (2024b) Towards local design intentions: A reflection on participatory design with Indigenous Dayak people in East Kalimantan. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops — Volume 2, , –. 10.1145/3661455.3669875
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3661455.3669875 [Google Scholar]
  73. Shah, D., Gupta, D., & Saini, S.
    (2024) Evolving Perspectives: Exploring Accessibility and Inclusivity in Spatial UI/UX. 2024 11th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), –. 10.1109/ICRITO61523.2024.10522459
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO61523.2024.10522459 [Google Scholar]
  74. Suchman, L.
    (2006) Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511808418
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808418 [Google Scholar]
  75. Tufte, E. R.
    (1998) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 2nd Ed. Graphics Pr.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Udoewa, V.
    (2022) An introduction to radical participatory design: Decolonising participatory design processes. Design Science, , . 10.1017/dsj.2022.24
    https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2022.24 [Google Scholar]
  77. Uggla, K.
    (2021) Interpreting Information Visualization. In10.16993/bbk. Stockholm University Press. 10.16993/bbk.e
    https://doi.org/10.16993/bbk.e [Google Scholar]
  78. Ulrichsen, K.
    (2016) The United Arab Emirates: Power, Politics and Policy-Making. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315748023
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315748023 [Google Scholar]
  79. Vakil, S., McKinney de Royston, M., Suad Nasir, N., & Kirshner, B.
    (2016) Rethinking Race and Power in Design-Based Research: Reflections from the Field. Cognition and Instruction, (), –. 10.1080/07370008.2016.1169817
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1169817 [Google Scholar]
  80. Villalba, C., Jaiprakash, A., Donovan, J., Roberts, J., & Crawford, R.
    (2021) Testing literature-based health experience insight cards in a healthcare service co-design workshop. CoDesign, (), –. 10.1080/15710882.2018.1563617
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1563617 [Google Scholar]
  81. Vora, N.
    (2008) Producing Diasporas and Globalization: Indian Middle-Class Migrants in Dubai. Anthropological Quarterly, (), –. 10.1353/anq.0.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.0.0010 [Google Scholar]
  82. (2013) Impossible Citizens: Dubai’s Indian Diaspora. Duke University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv1134f8d
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1134f8d [Google Scholar]
  83. Walton, R., Moore, K., & Jones, N.
    (2019) Technical Communication After the Social Justice Turn: Building Coalitions for Action. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429198748
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429198748 [Google Scholar]
  84. Wilson-Menzfeld, G., Erfani, G., Young-Murphy, L., Charlton, W., De Luca, H., Brittain, K., & Steven, A.
    (2025) Identifying and understanding digital exclusion: A mixed-methods study. Behaviour & Information Technology, (), –. 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2368087
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2368087 [Google Scholar]
  85. Yahia, O., Chohan, A. H., Arar, M., & Awad, J.
    (2025) Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility: A Systematic Review of Transit-Oriented Development for the Appraisal of Dubai Metro Stations. Smart Cities, (), . 10.3390/smartcities8010021
    https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8010021 [Google Scholar]
  86. Zallio, M., & Clarkson, P. J.
    (2021) Inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility in the built environment: A study of architectural design practice. Building and Environment, , . 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108352
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108352 [Google Scholar]
  87. Zhou, J., & Ujang, N.
    (2024) An Analysis of Pedestrian Preferences for Wayfinding Signage in Urban Settings: Evidence from Nanning, China. Buildings, (), . 10.3390/buildings14092986
    https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092986 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25007.sel
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25007.sel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error