1887
image of Revisiting Cybersyn

Abstract

This article reactivates the interrupted legacy of Project Cybersyn by reconfiguring Stafford Beer’s Viable System Model as a participatory infrastructure for information design. Through workshops with twelve Latin American diaspora participants in the UK, we demonstrate three methodological innovations: (1) cultural citation, which reactivates 1970s visual materials alongside contemporary institutional documents; (2) an approach that privileges affective and relational engagement over data extraction; and (3) the workshop-as-deliverable, which reconceptualizes participatory encounters as legitimate design outputs. Counter-visualizations produced through collage and collective annotation challenge universalist conventions while remaining accountable to situated knowledge. This work positions information design as a cultural practice grounded in specific trajectories, offering methodological alternatives to extractive research patterns.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25009.wil
2026-05-12
2026-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/idj.25009.wil/idj.25009.wil.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25009.wil&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aragüez, M.
    (2021) Building calculated uncertainty: Cedric Price’s Interaction Centre. arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, (), –. 10.1017/s1359135521000233
    https://doi.org/10.1017/s1359135521000233 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bardzell, S.
    (2012) Feminist HCI: Taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.–). Association for Computing Machinery. 10.1145/1753326.1753521
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521 [Google Scholar]
  3. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P. A.
    (2012) Agonistic participatory design: Working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign, (), –. 10.1080/15710882.2012.672577
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.672577 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beer, S.
    (1972) Brain of the firm: The managerial cybernetics of organization. Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (1981) Brain of the firm (2nd ed.). John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1994) Beyond dispute: The invention of team syntegrity. John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonsiepe, G.
    (1999) Interface: An approach to design. Jan van Eyck Akademie.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F.
    (2020) Data feminism. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F.
    (1987) A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DeLanda, M.
    (2006) A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Espejo, R.
    (1990) The viable system model. Systems Practice, (), –. 10.1007/BF01062728
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062728 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall, P., & Davila, P.
    (2022) Critical visualization: Rethinking the representation of data. Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Haraway, D.
    (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, (), –. 10.2307/3178066
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066 [Google Scholar]
  14. Holert, T.
    (2024) „ca. 1972” Gewalt — Umwelt — Identität — Methode. Spector Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kennedy, H., Hill, R. L., Aiello, G., & Allen, W.
    (2016) The work that visualisation conventions do. Information. Communication & Society, (), –. 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1153126
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1153126 [Google Scholar]
  16. Maulen, D.
    (2018) 1972: A South American formulation of the interface concept. InF. Portal (Ed.), Bienes públicos = Common goods: Reenactment of an archive on design and politics in Chile: INTEC, 1970–1973 (pp.–). Consejo Nacional de la Cultura y las Artes.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Medina, E.
    (2011) Cybernetic revolutionaries: Technology and politics in Allende’s Chile. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/8417.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8417.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Meyer, R.
    (2019) From artefacts to interfaces: Gui Bonsiepe and the re-definition of industrial design, c. 1970. Interface Critique Journal, , –. 10.11588/ic.2019.2.66996
    https://doi.org/10.11588/ic.2019.2.66996 [Google Scholar]
  19. McIlwaine, C. J., & Bunge, D.
    (2016) Towards Visibility: the Latin American Community in London. In Towards Visibility: the Latin American Community in London. Trust for London.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mouffe, C.
    (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nieto Larrain, I., Mariátegui, J.-C., & Maulén de los Reyes, D.
    (2022) Back and forth: cybernetics interrelations and how it spread in Latin America. AI & Society, , –. 10.1007/s00146‑021‑01333‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01333-7 [Google Scholar]
  22. Parry, K.
    (2018) Generative assembly after Katrina. Critical Inquiry, (), –. 10.1086/696923
    https://doi.org/10.1086/696923 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2022) A theory of assembly: From museums to memes. University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Price, C.
    (1984) Works II. Architectural Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J.
    (2008) Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, (), –. 10.1080/15710880701875068
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068 [Google Scholar]
  26. von Foerster, H.
    (2003) Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer. 10.1007/b97451
    https://doi.org/10.1007/b97451 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25009.wil
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/idj.25009.wil
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error