oa Navigating the cultural turn

References

1. Blackburn, Perry. L.
   (2007) The Code Model of Communication: A Powerful Metaphor in Linguistic Metatheory. SIL e-books. www.sil.org/resources/publications/entry/9249
   [Google Scholar]
2. de Saussure, F., Bally, C., Sechehaye, A., & Riedlinger, A.
   (1986) Course in General Linguistics. Open Court.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Escobar, Arturo
   (2018) Designs for the pluriverse: radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822371816
   https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371816 [Google Scholar]
4. Feast, L., & Vogels, C.
   (2021) ‘Opening the door’: An authentic approach to decolonizing arts education in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1386/adch_00030_1
   https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00030_1 [Google Scholar]
5. Grice, H. Paul
   (1957) Meaning. The Philosophical Review, (), –. 10.2307/2182440
   https://doi.org/10.2307/2182440 [Google Scholar]
6. Grosse, Gerlind, Scott-Phillips, Thomas C., & Tomasello, Michael
   (2013) Three-year-olds hide their communicative intentions in appropriate contexts. Developmental Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/a0032017
   https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032017 [Google Scholar]
7. Ka’ai-Mahuta, Rachel
   (2020) Māori World View: Weekly content — Week 1, Blackboard. https://blackboard.aut.ac.nz/
8. Maynard Smith, John, & Harper, David
   (2003) Animal Signals. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198526841.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198526841.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
9. Noel, L.-A., Ruiz, A., van Amstel, F. M. C., Udoewa, V., Verma, N., Botchway, N. K., Lodaya, A., & Agrawal, S.
   (2023) Pluriversal Futures for Design Education. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, (), –. 10.1016/j.sheji.2023.04.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2023.04.002 [Google Scholar]
10. Quesque, François, Apperly, Ian, Baillargeon, Renée, Baron-Cohen, Simon, Becchio, Cristina, Bekkering, Harold, Bernstein, Daniel, Bertoux, Maxime, Bird, Geoffrey, Bukowski, Henryk, Burgmer, Pascal, Carruthers, Peter, Catmur, Caroline, Dziobek, Isabel, Epley, Nicholas, Erle, Thorsten Michael, Frith, Chris, Frith, Uta, Galang, Carl Michael, Gallese, Vittorio, Grynberg, Delphine, Happé, Francesca, Hirai, Masahiro, Hodges, Sara D., Kanske, Philipp, Kret, Mariska, Lamm, Claus, Nandrino, Jean Louis, Obhi, Sukhvinder, Olderbak, Sally, Perner, Josef, Rossetti, Yves, Schneider, Dana, Schurz, Matthias, Schuwerk, Tobias, Sebanz, Natalie, Shamay-Tsoory, Simone, Silani, Giorgia, Spaulding, Shannon, Todd, Andrew R., Westra, Evan, Zahavi, Dan, & Brass, Marcel
    (2024, 2024/04/11). Defining key concepts for mental state attribution. Communications Psychology, (), . 10.1038/s44271‑024‑00077‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00077-6 [Google Scholar]
11. Rameka, Lesley
    (2016, 2016/12/01). Kia whakatōmuri te haere whakamua: ‘I walk backwards into the future with my eyes fixed on my past’. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, (), –. 10.1177/1463949116677923
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949116677923 [Google Scholar]
12. Reddy, Michael J.
    (1979) The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. InAndrew Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Robbins, Philip & Drayson, Zoe
    (2025) Modularity of Mind. InEdward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2025/entries/modularity-mind
    [Google Scholar]
14. Shannon, C. E.
    (1948) A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, (), –. 10.1002/j.1538‑7305.1948.tb01338.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x [Google Scholar]
15. Sless, David, & Shrensky, Ruth
    (2023) A new semiotics: An introductory guide for students. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Sousa, Ronald de
    (2008) Grades of communication. InPatrizia d’Ettorre & David P. Hughes (Eds.), Sociobiology of Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216840.003.0016
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216840.003.0016 [Google Scholar]
17. Sperber, D.
    (2005) Modularity and Relevance: How Can a Massively Modular Mind Be Flexible and Context-Sensitive?InP. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179675.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179675.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
18. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
    (2025) Rethinking ostensive communication in an evolutionary, comparative, and developmental perspective. Psychological Review. Advance online publication. 10.1037/rev0000565
    https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000565 [Google Scholar]
19. Sperber, Dan, & Wilson, Deirdre
    (1995) Relevance: communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell (1986)
    [Google Scholar]
20. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L.
    (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. InJ. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
21. Wilson, Deirdre, & Sperber, Dan
    (2012) Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370 [Google Scholar]