Syntax of causative-passive correlation from a cross-linguistic perspective

References

1. Burzio, Luigi
   (1986) Italian Syntax: A Government and Binding Approach. Kluwer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑4522‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7 [Google Scholar]
2. Chomsky, Noam
   (2000) Minimalist Inquiries. InRoger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, eds., Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. The MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chiu, H-C Bonnie
   (1995) An object clitic projection in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics4: 77-117. 10.1007/BF01731613
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731613 [Google Scholar]
4. Ding, Shengshu (丁声树)
   (1961) 《现代汉语语法讲话》Xiandai Hanyu Yufa Jianghua [Lectures on Modern Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Folli, Rafaella, and Heidi, Harley
   (2007) Causation, obligation, and argument structure: on the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry38: 197–238. 10.1162/ling.2007.38.2.197
   https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.2.197 [Google Scholar]
6. Guasti, Maria-Teresa
   (1996) Semantic restrictions in Romance causatives and the incorporation approach. Linguistic Inquiry27: 294–313.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Guasti, Maria-Teresa
   (2006) Analytic causatives. InM. Everaert, and van Riemsdijk, eds., The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Vol.1: 142–172. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch6
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch6 [Google Scholar]
8. Han, Jingquan (韩景泉)., and Haihua, Pan (潘海华)
   (2016) 汉语保留宾语结构句法生成的最简分析Hanyu baoliu binyu-jiegou jufa shengcheng de zuijian fenxi [A minimalist account of the syntactic derivation of Chinese retained object constructions]. 《语言教学与研究》Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Research]. 179: 41–53.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Homer, Vincent, Tomoko, Ishizuka, and Dominique, Sportiche
   (2009) The locality of clitic placement and the analysis of French causatives. 7th GLOW in Asia Conference. The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, India.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hu, Jianhua (胡建华)., and Mengmeng, Yang (杨萌萌)
    (2015) ‘致使-被动’结构的句法Zhishi-Beidong jiegou de jufa [The causative-passive opposition and correlation in Chinese]. 《当代语言学》Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 17: 36–53.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hu, Jianhua, and Haihua, Pan
    (2009) Decomposing the aboutness condition for Chinese topic constructions. The Linguistic Review26: 371–384. 10.1515/tlir.2009.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2009.014 [Google Scholar]
12. Hu, Xiaoshi
    (2017) Les constructions causatives du français et du chinois [The Causative Constructions in French and in Chinese]. PhD dissertation. Université Paris Diderot.
13. Hu, Xiaoshi
    (2018) Explorer la structure interne des constructions causatives du français [Exploring the internal structure of French causatives]. Canadian Journal of Linguistics63: 70–99. 10.1017/cnj.2017.42
    https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2017.42 [Google Scholar]
14. Huang, C.-T. James
    (1999) Chinese passives in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies. 29: 423–509.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Huang, C.-T., James, Y.-H., Audrey, Li, and Yafei, Li
    (2009) The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166935
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166935 [Google Scholar]
16. Ippolito, Michela
    (2000) Remarks on the Argument Structure of Romance Causative. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kayne, Richard
    (1975) French Syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kayne, Richard
    (2005) Some notes on comparative syntax, with special reference to English and French. InG. Cinque, & R. Kayne, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, 3–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Liu, Na
    (2016) The structures of Chinese long and short Bei passives revisited. Language and Linguistics. 17: 857–889. 10.1177/1606822X16660938
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1606822X16660938 [Google Scholar]
20. Pan, Haihua (潘海华)., and Jingquan, Han (韩景泉)
    (2008) 汉语保留宾语结构的句法生成机制Hanyu baoliu binyu jiegou de jufa shengcheng jizhi [The syntactic mechanism of retained object constructions in Chinese]. 《中国语文》Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language]. 327: 511–576.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Pan, Haihua, and Jianhua, Hu
    (2008) A semantic-pragmatic interface account of (dangling) topics in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics40: 1966–1981. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.005 [Google Scholar]
22. Roberts, Ian
    (2010) Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
23. Rouveret, Alain
    (2015) Arguments minimalistes, une présentation du Programme Minimaliste de Noam Chomsky [Minimalist Arguments: a Presentation of Noam Chomsky’s Minimalist Program]. ENS Lyon éditions. 10.4000/books.enseditions.5588
    https://doi.org/10.4000/books.enseditions.5588 [Google Scholar]
24. Rouveret, Alain, and Jean-Roger, Vergnaud
    (1980) Specifying reference to the subject: French causatives and conditions on representaions. Linguisic Inquiry11: 97–202.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Saina, Wuyun, and Haihua, Pan
    (2014a) A study on the influence of Chinese passives on center transitions in discourse. Language and Linguistics. 15: 265–293.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Saina, Wuyun, and Haihua, Pan
    (2014b) The inter-sentential function of Mandarin bei passives. Chinese Language and Discourse. 5: 252–280.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Shi, Dingxu
    (1997) Issues on Chinese passives. Journal of Chinese Linguistics. 25: 41–70.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Shi, Dingxu (石定栩)., and Jianhua, Hu (胡建华)
    (2005) ‘被’的句法地位Bei de jufa diwei [The syntactic status of Bei]. 《当代语言学》Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics]. 7: 213–224.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Tang, Chi-Chen Jane
    (2001) Functional projections and adverbial expressions in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 2: 203–241.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Tang, Sze-Wing
    (2001) A complementation approach to Chinese passives and its consequences. Linguistics39: 257–295. 10.1515/ling.2001.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.011 [Google Scholar]
31. Tang, Sze-Wing (邓思颖)
    (2004) 作格化和汉语被动句Zuogehua he hanyu beidongju [Ergativization and Chinese passives]. 《中国语文》Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language]. 301: 291–301.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Tang, Sze-Wing (邓思颖)
    (2008) 汉语被动句句法分析的重新思考Hanyu beidongju jufa fenxi de chongxin sikao [Syntactic analysis of Chinese passives]. 《当代语言学》Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 10: 308–319.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ting, Jen
    (1998) Deriving the Bei-construction in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics7: 319–360. 10.1023/A:1008340108602
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008340108602 [Google Scholar]
34. Tsai, Wei-Tien. Dylan
    (1994) On Economizing the Theory of A-bar Dependencies. PhD dissertation. MIT.
35. Wang, Li
    (1992 [1943]) 《中国现代语法》Zhongguo Xiandai Yufa [The grammar of modern Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Zhu, Jialei (朱佳蕾)., and Dongfan, Hua (花东帆)
    (2018) 被动主动句——认识把字句句法语义的新视角Beidong zhudong ju: renshi ba-zi ju jufa yuyi de xin shijiao [Passive active sentence: a new perspective on the syntax and the semantics of ba-construction]. 《语言教学与研究》Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 189: 56–68.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
    (1985) The relation between morphophonology and morphosyntax: The case of Romance causative. Linguistic Inquiry16: 247–289.
    [Google Scholar]