1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
  4. Volume 12, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8706
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8714
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

This paper argues that different from the focus use of the additive particle ‘also’, the s in its scalar use and modal use should be analyzed as distinct linguistic elements, indicating the existence of three different s in Mandarin. We aim to demonstrate that the semantic differences among the three uses arise from the unique presupposition inherent in each, dictating distinct relationships between the prejacent and the activated alternative(s). Expanding upon this premise, we further demonstrate that the three s are positioned differently within the syntactic structure. Specifically, Additive functions as an IP adverb; Scalar , serving as the functional head of the Scal(arity)P, occupies a position higher in the CP; Modal is situated even higher than the projection of evidential adverbs. Additionally, we also discuss the restricted interchangeability and cooccurrence between Scalar and . Drawing on these observations, our research presents a comprehensive exploration of the multifaceted nature of the Mandarin particle .

© 2025 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.00033.yan
2025-06-10
2025-06-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.00033.yan
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijchl.00033.yan.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.00033.yan&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alleton, Viviane
    (1972) Les adverbes en Chinois moderne. Mouton & Co. 10.1515/9783111670560
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111670560 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ba, Dan, & Zhang, Yisheng
    (2012) “Dōu” yǔ “yě” zài rènzhǐ jù zhōng de yìtóng. [Differences between dou and ye in free choice sentences]. Guǎngxī Shīfàn Dàxué Xuébào, 48(4), 69–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Badan, Linda, & Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen
    (2015) Exclamatives in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 241, 383–413. 10.1007/s10831‑015‑9136‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-015-9136-z [Google Scholar]
  4. Beaver, David. I., & Clark, Brady. Z.
    (2008) Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444304176
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304176 [Google Scholar]
  5. Belletti, Adriana
    (2004) Aspects of the low IP area. The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, 21, 16–51. 10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biq, Yung-O.
    (1989) Ye as manifested on Three Discourse Planes: polysemy or abstraction. InH-Y. Tai & F. S. Hsueh (eds), Functionalism and Chinese Grammar (pp. 1–18). Chinese Language Teachers Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Brasoveanu, Adrian, & Szabolcsi, Anna
    (2013) Presuppositional too, postsuppositional too. InM. Aloni, M. Franke & F. Roelofsen (eds), The Dynamic, Inquisitive, and Visionary Life of φ,?φ, and ♢φ: A Festschrift for Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof, and Frank Veltman (pp. 55–64). ILLC Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Butler, Jonny
    (2003) A minimalist treatment of modality. Lingua, 113(10), 967–996. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(02)00146‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00146-8 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chao, Yuen Ren
    (1968) A Spoken Grammar of Chinese. University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Liping
    (2008) Dou: Distributivity and beyond. [Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University].
  11. Chen, Zhe
    (2017) The Classification of Chinese Adverbials, Interrupted Scopes and the Nature of Minimality in Non-Movement Dependencies. [Doctoral dissertation, University OF Wisconsin-Madison].
  12. Chen, Zhe, & Li, Yafei
    (2021) Bipartite Agentivity Expression in Chinese Passives. Syntax, 24(1), 123–141. 10.1111/synt.12203
     https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12203 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen
    (2009) On every type of quantificational expression in Chinese. InMonika Rathert and Anastasia Giannakidou (eds.), Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization (pp. 53–75). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199541089.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199541089.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, & Giannakidou, Anastasia
    (2013) The non-uniformity of wh-Indeterminates with free choice and polarity in Chinese. InGeorge Tsoulas and Kook-Hee Gill (eds.), The nature of quantification and crosslinguistic variation (pp. 123–154). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen
    (2017) Dōu都. InRint Sybesma, (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics. Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Chierchia, Gennaro
    (2013) Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697977.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697977.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cinque, Guglielmo
    (1999) Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. De Vries, Mark
    (2005) Coordination and syntactic hierarchy. Studia Linguistica59 (1), 83–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Dieseing, Molly
    1992 Indefinities, MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Dikken, Den Marcel, & Giannakidou, Anastasia
    (2002) From hell to polarity: “Aggressively non-d-linked” wh-phrases as polarity items. Linguistic Inquiry, 33(1), 31–61. 10.1162/002438902317382170
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902317382170 [Google Scholar]
  21. Eifring, Halvor
    (1995) Clause combination in Chinese. Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Ernst, Thomas
    (2004) The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Fang, Mei
    (2018) “Shuōshì” de huàyǔ gōngnéng jí xiāngguān cíhuì-huà wèntí [The discourse function of shuōshì and its lexicalization] Zhōngguó Yǔyán Xuébào, 181, 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Feng, Yuli, & Pan, Haihua
    (2023) Chinese Dou Quantification. InOxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.890
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.890 [Google Scholar]
  25. Giannakidou, Anastasia, & Cheng, Lisa
    (2006) (In)Definiteness, polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice. Journal of Semantics231, 135–183.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Green, Georgia
    (1968) On too and either, and not just too and either, either. Chicago Linguistic Society, 41, 22–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Guo, Rui
    (1998) “Yīgè rén (yě/dōu) méi lái” lèi jùshì de pèijià fēnxī [Valency of “one person ye/dou not come”]. InYuan YuLin & Guo Rui (eds.), Xiàndài Hànyǔ Pèijià Yǔfǎ Yánjiū, 21. Peking University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hansen, Maj-Britte M., & Terkourafi, Marina
    (2023) We need to talk about Hearer’s Meaning!. Journal of Pragmatics, 2081, 99–114. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.015
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.015 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hole, Daniel
    (2004) Focus and background marking in Mandarin Chinese: System and theory behind cái, jiù, dōu and yě. Routledge Curzon. 10.4324/9780203565193
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203565193 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2015) A distributed syntax for evaluative ‘only’sentences. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 34(1), 43–77. 10.1515/zfs‑2015‑0002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2015-0002 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2017) A crosslinguistic syntax of scalar and non-scalar focus particle sentences: The view from Vietnamese and Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 26(4): 389–409. 10.1007/s10831‑017‑9160‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-017-9160-2 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2023) The relationship between Chinese zhiyou ‘only’and cai: a matter of morphosyntax. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Hopper, Paul. J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    (2003) Grammaticalization. 2nd ed.Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hou, Xuechao
    (eds.) 1998 Xiàndài Hànyǔ Xūcí Cídiǎn [Dictionary of function words in contemporary Chinese]. Peking University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Issah, Samuel A.
    (2019) On the structure of A-bar constructions in Dagbani: Perspectives of “wh”-questions and fragment answers. [PhD dissertation, Goethe-University Frankfurt].
  36. Jasinskaja, Katja, & Zeevat Henk
    (2009) Explaining conjunction systems: Russian, English, German. InProceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 13(1), 231–246.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kaplan, Jeff
    (1984) Obligatory too in English. Language, 60 (3), 510–518. 10.2307/413989
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413989 [Google Scholar]
  38. Karttunen, Lauri, & Peters, Stanley
    (1979) Conventional lmplicature in Presupposition (pp. 1–56). Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kobuchi-Philip, Mana
    (2009) Japanese Mo: universal, additive and NPI. Journal of Cognitive Science, 101, 172–194. 10.17791/jcs.2009.10.2.173
     https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2009.10.2.173 [Google Scholar]
  40. König, Ekkehard
    (1991) The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Konig, Ekkehard, & Siemund, Peter
    (2000) Causal and concessive clauses: Formal and semantic relations. Topics in English Linguistics, 331: 341–360.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Krifka, Manfred
    (1995) The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis, 251, 209–257.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. (1999) Additive particles under stress. InD. Strolovitch, & A. Lawson (eds.), Proceedings of Semantic and Linguistic Theory (SALT)VIII1, 111–129.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Lassiter, Dan
    (2011) Measurement and modality: The scalar basis of modal semantics. [Doctoral dissertation, New York University].
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Li, Boya
    (2006) Chinese final particles and the syntax of the periphery. [Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University].
  46. Lin, Jo-Wang
    (1996) Polarity licensing and wh-phrase quantification in Chinese. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts].
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Lin, Tzong-hong. J.
    (2012) Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics481, 151–186. 10.1017/S0022226711000272
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000272 [Google Scholar]
  48. Liu, Mingming
    (2023a) Additivity, scalarity and Mandarin Universal wh’s. Natural Language Semantics, 1–40. 10.1007/s11050‑023‑09207‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-023-09207-y [Google Scholar]
  49. (2023b) Hànyǔ Duōgōngnéng Fùcí jí Xiāngguān Yǔfǎ Xiànxiàng de Shuāngxiàng Xìtǒng Xuéxiū [A bidirectional systematic study of multifunctional adverbs and related grammatical phenomena]. Peking University Press
  50. Liu, Yuehua
    (eds.) (2001) Shíyòng Xiàndài Hànyǔ Yǔfǎ [Practical modern Chinese grammar]. The Commercial Press.
  51. Lu, Fubo
    (1999) Yě de gòujù tiáojiàn jí qí yǔyòng wèntí [the licensing conditions of yě and its pragmatics]. Huádōng Shīfàn Dàxué Xuébào, 41, 120–123.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Lü, Shuxiang
    (eds.) (2010) Xiàndài Hànyǔ Bābǎi Cí [Eight hundred words in modern Chinese]. The Commercial Press.
  53. Ma, Zhen
    (1982) Shuō yě [on yě], Zhōngguó Yǔwén, 41: 283–287.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Mursell, Johannes
    (2021) The Syntax of Information-Structural Agreement. John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.268
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.268 [Google Scholar]
  55. Paris, Marie-Claude
    (1994) Position syntaxique et valeur discursive: le cas de’même’en chinois. Cahiers de linguistique-Asie orientale, 23(1), 241–253.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Pesetsky, David, & Torrego, Esther
    (2007) The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. Phrasal and clausal architecture, 262–294. 10.1075/la.101.14pes
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.101.14pes [Google Scholar]
  57. Roberts, Ian, & Roussou, Anna
    (2003) Syntactic change: a minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  58. Rooth, Mats
    (1985) Association with Focus. [Doctoral dissertation, UMASS].
  59. (1992) A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 11, 75–116. 10.1007/BF02342617
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617 [Google Scholar]
  60. (1996) Focus. InShalom Lappin (eds.). The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory (pp. 271–297). Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Sugimura, Hirofumi
    (1992) Xiàndài Hànyǔ ‘Yíwèn Dàicí + Yě/Dōu’ jiégòu de yǔyì fēnxī [Semantic analysis of ‘wh + ye/dou . . .’ in modern Chinese]. Shìjiè Hànyǔ Jiàoxué, 21(3): 166–172.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Sun, Yenan
    (2021) A bipartite analysis of zhiyou ‘only’ in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 30(4), 319–355. 10.1007/s10831‑021‑09228‑w
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-021-09228-w [Google Scholar]
  63. Sybesma, Rint
    (1996) Review of “The syntax of focus and topic in Mandarin Chinese” by Shyu Shu-ing. GLOT International21, 13–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Szabolcsi, Anna
    (2015) What do quantifier particles do?Linguistics and Philosophy, 381: 159–204. 10.1007/s10988‑015‑9166‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-015-9166-z [Google Scholar]
  65. Tovena, Lucia. M.
    (2006) Dealing with alternatives. InC. Ebert, & C. Endriss (eds.). Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 10 (2), 373–388. Zentrum für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft. 10.21248/zaspil.44.2006.324
     https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.44.2006.324 [Google Scholar]
  66. Tsai, Cheng-Yu. E.
    (2015) “Unifying Mandarin Dou-constructions”. InT. Bui, & D. Özyildiz (eds.), Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, GLSA, 165–174.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Tsai, Wei-Tien. D.
    (2001) On subject specificity and theory of syntax semantics interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 10 (2), 129–168. 10.1023/A:1008321327978
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008321327978 [Google Scholar]
  68. (2010) Tán Hànyǔ móutài cí de fēnbù yǔ quánshì zhī duìyìng guānxì [Discussion on the Correspondence between Chinese Modal Particles’ Distribution and Interpretation]. Zhōngguó Yǔwén, 31, 208–221.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. (2015a) Cóng Wéiguān dào Hóngguān: Hànyǔ Yǔfǎ de Shēngchéng Shìyè [From microscopic view to cosmic perspective: generative landscape of Chinese syntax]. The commercial press.
  70. (2015) On the topography of Chinese modals. Beyond functional sequence, 101, 275. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0015
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
  71. Tsai, Wei-Tien. D., & Yang, Ching-Yu. H.
    (2022) On the syntax of mirativity. New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax: Studies in honor of Yen-Hui Audrey Li, 2721, 431. 10.1075/la.272.15tsa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.15tsa [Google Scholar]
  72. Van Rooij, Robert
    (2003) Negative polarity items in questions: Strength as relevance. Journal of semantics, 20(3), 239-273. 10.1093/jos/20.3.2
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/20.3.2 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wiedenhof, Jeroen
    (2015) A grammar of Mandarin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.197
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.197 [Google Scholar]
  74. Winterstein, Grégoire
    (2009) The meaning of the additive too: presupposition and discourse similarity. InN. Bezhanishvili, S. Löbner, K. Schwabe, & L. Spada (eds.), International Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Language, and Computation (pp. 322–341). Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Xiang, Ming
    (2008) Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin dou. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 171, 227–245. 10.1007/s10831‑008‑9025‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9025-9 [Google Scholar]
  76. Xiang, Yimei
    (2020) Function alternations of the Mandarin particle Dou: Distributor, free choice licensor, and ‘even’. Journal of Semantics, 37(2): 171–217. 10.1093/jos/ffz018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffz018 [Google Scholar]
  77. Yang, Kairong
    (2002) ‘Yíwèn dàicí + yě/dōu + P’ de kěndìng yǔ fǒudìng [The positive/negative distribution of ‘wh-words + ye/dou + P’]. InHànyǔ Yǔfǎ Yánjiū de Xīn Tuòzhǎn [New exploration of study on Chinese grammar] 11, Zhejiang Education Publishing House.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Yang, Yiming
    (1988) Yě zì yǔyì chū tàn [A study on the semantics of ye]. Yǔyán Yánjiū, 29 (4), 56–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Yang, Zhaole
    (2019) Mandarin yě and scalarity. Studies in Chinese Linguistics,39 (2), 155–178.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. (2020) Yě, yě, yě: on the syntax and semantics of Mandarin yě. [Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University]
  81. (2023) Shì as a complementizer. (Preprint) To appear inJournal of Chinese Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Yuan, Yulin
    (2004) Dōu, yě, zài “wh+ dōu/yě + VP” zhōng de yǔyì gòngxiàn [The semantic contribution of dou and ye in the construction ‘wh. + dou/ye + VP’]. Yǔyán Kēxué, 3(5): 3–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Zanuttini, Raffaella, & Portner Paul
    (2003) Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language, 79(1):39–81. 10.1353/lan.2003.0105
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0105 [Google Scholar]
  84. Zhang, Ning
    (1997) Syntactic dependencies in Mandarin Chinese. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto].
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.00033.yan
Loading
Three yěs in Mandarin
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 12, 1 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.00033.yan
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.00033.yan
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.00033.yan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): additive particle; dōu; Mandarin yě; modal particle; scalarity

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error