1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
  4. Volume 13, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8706
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper investigates the modern Chinese construction “X X” (经典中的经典, , classic among classics). Drawing on corpus-based method, we retrieved and manually annotated attested instances from BCC and CCL corpora, identified 440 tokens, and analyzed them within the framework of Cognitive Construction Grammar. The analysis focuses on three aspects: (i) the conditions for words to enter the “X” slots in the construction, (ii) the syntactic and semantic features of the construction, (iii) its cognitive motivations. The results show that “X” is flexible in word class but displays a clear preference for disyllabic and semantically salient items. Syntactically, the construction functions mainly as a predicative expression, while semantically it conveys a scalar evaluative meaning equivalent to “highly/most X,” typically with a positive stance. Its productivity is explained by multiple cognitive motivations, including inheritance within a constructional network, analogical extension, communicative efficiency, and pragmatic vagueness. These findings refine the description of the “X X” construction and contribute to usage-based accounts of Chinese constructional productivity.

© 2026 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.00043.wen
2026-05-21
2026-06-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.00043.wen
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bloomfield, L.
    (1935) Language. George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Boas, H., & Sag, I.
    (2012) Sign-based construction grammar. CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bybee, J.
    (2013) Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. InT. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chomsky, N.
    (1957) Syntactic structures. Mouton. 10.1515/9783112316009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 [Google Scholar]
  5. Croft, W.
    (2013) Radical construction grammar. InT. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 211–232). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0012 [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans, V., & Green, M.
    (2006) Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Fan, Z. Q.
    (2015) 同语式“N是N”的理解机制新探: 动态范畴构建视角 [A new interpretation of tautologies from the perspective of dynamic category construction theory]. Foreign Language Education, 36(4), 28–32. 10.16362/j.cnki.cn61‑1023/h.2015.04.008
     https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2015.04.008 [Google Scholar]
  8. Fan, Z. Y.
    (2015) “X中的X”格式句法语义分析 [Syntactic and semantic analysis of “X zhong de X” construction]. Chinese Language Learning, (2), 14–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. (2009) The nature of generalization in language, Cognitive Linguistics, (1), 93–127. 10.1515/COGL.2009.005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.005 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2019) Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9780691183954
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691183954 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hilpert, M.
    (2019) Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781474433624
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474433624 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoffmann, T.
    (2017) From constructions to construction grammars. InB. Dancygier (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 284–309). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316339732.019
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.019 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2021) Multimodal construction grammar: From multimodal constructs to multimodal constructions. InX. Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 78–92). Routledge. 10.4324/9781351034708‑6
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034708-6 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ji, Y. M.
    (2016) 汉语主观极量构式“N中的N” [On subjective maximum construction “N zhong de N” in Chinese]. Chinese Language Learning, (3), 22–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang, C. Z., & Wen, X.
    (2023) 保留宾语被动构式的语义及其理据性 [Semantics of retained-object passive construction and its motivation]. Foreign Languages in China, 20(4), 46–53. 10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672‑9382.2023.04.013
     https://doi.org/10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2023.04.013 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kay, P.
    (2013) The limits of construction grammar. InT. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 32–48). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. I): Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2017) Ten lectures on the basics of cognitive grammar. Brill. 10.1163/9789004347458
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004347458 [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, X. Y.
    (2022) 现代汉语中的助词“之”及其与“的”的关系 [The particle “zhi” in the modern Chinese and its relation with “de”]. Jinan Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 44(12), 81–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu, Y. H.
    (2011) “里” “中” “内”隐喻意义的认知语言学考察 [A cognitive linguistics study on the metaphorical meaning of “li”, “zhong” and “nei”]. Foreign Languages Bimonthly, 34(3), 7–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Si, W. G. & Wen, X.
    (2022) 现代汉语“V1OV2的”构式的句法语义特征及形成理据[The syntactic and semantic features of the “V1OV2 de” construction in modern Chinese and its motivations]. Modern Foreign Languages, (6), 744–755.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Taylor, J. R.
    (2002) Cognitive grammar. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198700333.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198700333.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Traugott, E. C.
    (2007) The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(4), 523–557. 10.1515/COG.2007.027
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.027 [Google Scholar]
  28. Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
    (2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, J.
    (2007) 表量级递推的“N中的N” [The “N zhong de N” recursive table of degrees of magnitude]. Social Sciences in Guangxi, (5). 145–148.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, L.
    (1980) 汉语史稿 [The outline of Chinese history]. Zhonghua Book Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, M. L.
    (2010) 汉语语用含糊的成因及实现方式 [The implementation way and pragmatic function of pragmatic vagueness in the communication of Chinese language]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Social Science Edition), 10(5). 140–144. 10.13968/j.cnki.1009‑9107.2010.05.012
     https://doi.org/10.13968/j.cnki.1009-9107.2010.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  32. Wen, X.
    (2021) 语言演化的三个逻辑原则——演化语言学探索之一 [The three logical principles of language evolution: An exploration of evolutionary linguistics]. English Studies, (2), 92–101.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (2022) Construction pragmatics: A brief sketch. LEGE ARTIS, Language yesterday, today, tomorrow, 7(1), 249–266.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. (2024) 文化认知语言学初探 [An exploration of cultural cognitive linguistics], Foreign Languages and Literature, 40(5), 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Wen, X. & Qu, Y. X.
    (2022) 构式语法研究四十年 [Research on construction grammar in the past four decades]. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (6), 19-27+144-145. 10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.004898
     https://doi.org/10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.004898 [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang, B. J.
    (1994) 词类活用的功能解释 [Functional explanation of word class inflection]. Studies of the Chinese Language, (5), 339–346.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang, J. N.
    (2017) 汉语“X 中之/的 X ”结构的构式化路径 [The Constructionalization Path of the “X zhī zhōng/de X” Structure in Chinese]. Journal of Ningxia University (Humanities&Social Sciences Edition), (1), 19–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhu, J.
    (2013) 汉语“N 中的/之 N ”格式及其构式化研究 [A study on “N zhong de/zhi N” format and its constructionalization in Chinese]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, (3), 51–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. BCC Chinese Corpus (BCC 汉语语料库)
    BCC Chinese Corpus (BCC 汉语语料库), 北京语言大学语料库中心 [Corpus Center of Beijing Language and Culture University]. bcc.blcu.edu.cn/
  40. CCL Chinese Corpus (CCL 语料库)
    CCL Chinese Corpus (CCL 语料库), 北京大学中国语言学研究中心 [Center for Chinese Linguistics of Peking University]. ccl.pku.edu.cn:8080/ccl_corpus/
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.00043.wen
Loading
The syntactic and semantic features of the “X zhōng de [中的] X” construction in modern Chinese and its motivations
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 13, 1 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.00043.wen
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.00043.wen
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.00043.wen
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Cognitive Construction Grammar; cognitive motivation; construction; “X zhōng de X” construction

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error