汉语类指成分的库藏地位及其句法后果 [The inventory status of kind-denoting elements in Chinese and its syntactic consequences]

References

1. 白鸽[Bai, G]
   (2018) 光杆名词短语类指功能的跨语言考察[A cross-linguistic investigation into the generic function of bare NPs]. 外语教学与研究[Foreign Language Teaching and Research], 31:342–355.
   [Google Scholar]
2. 白鸽[Bai, G]
   (2020) 入库范畴表达与非入库范畴表达的跨语言比较———以指称、量化范畴为例 [A Cross-linguistic comparison of the manifestations of inventory-internal categories and Inventory-external categories: The case of referability and quantification]. 当代语言学[Contemporary Linguistics], 41:567–586.
   [Google Scholar]
3. 陈平[Chen, P]
   (1987) 释汉语中与名词性成分相关的四组概念[Four definition groups related to Chinese nominal elements]. 中国语文[Studies of the Chinese Language], 21:81–92.
   [Google Scholar]
4. 陈平[Chen, P]
   (2016) 汉语定指范畴和语法化问题[Chinese definite category and grammaticalization]，当代修辞学[Contemporary Rhetoric], 41:1–13.
   [Google Scholar]
5. 陈玉洁[Chen, Y]
   (2007) 量名结构与量词的定语标记功能[The classifier-noun construction and classifiers as attributive markers]. 中国语文[Studies of the Chinese Language], 61:516–530
   [Google Scholar]
6. 戴庆厦、傅爱兰[Dai, Q. & Fu, A
   ] (2001) 藏缅语的述宾结构——兼与汉语比较[Predicate-object structure of Tibeto-Burman languages: comparison with Chinese], 方言[Dialect], 41:289–300.
   [Google Scholar]
7. 丁声树等[Ding, S] 原署名“中国科学院语言研究所语法小组”
   , (原署名“中国科学院语言研究所语法小组”) originally authored as “Grammar Group of Institute of Linguistics of Chinese Academy of Sciences] (1953) 语法讲话 (七)[Lectures of grammar VII]. 中国语文[Studies of the Chinese Language], 11:16–20.
   [Google Scholar]
8. 黄正德等[(著)Huang, C-T James, Y-H Audrey Li and Yafei Li
   2006)], 张和友[(译)Zhang, Heyou, translated by (2013)] 汉语句法学[The Syntax of Chinese], Beijing: World Publishing Corporation.
   [Google Scholar]
9. 李临定[Li, L]
   (1986) 现代汉语句型[Mandarin sentence structure], Beijing: The Commercial Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. 刘丹青[Liu, D]
    (1996) 词类和词长的相关性──汉语语法的“语音平面”丛论之二[The correlation of word classes and word length: the phonological plane of Chinese grammar II]. 南京师大学报[Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)], 21:112–119.
    [Google Scholar]
11. 刘丹青[Liu, D]
    (2002) 汉语类指成分的语义属性和句法属性[Semantic and syntactic properties of kind-denoting elements in Chinese].中国语文[Studies of the Chinese Language], (05):411-422+478-479.
    [Google Scholar]
12. 刘丹青[Liu, D]
    (2011) 语言库藏类型学构想[Linguistic inventory typology: A proposal for a new approach of linguistic typology]. 当代语言学[Contemporary Linguistics], 41:289–303, 379.
    [Google Scholar]
13. 刘丹青[Liu, D]
    (2020) 浙北吴语的类指表达:一种罕见的类指显赫型方言[Generic expressions in northern Zhejiang Wu dialects: A rare type of genericity-mighty dialects].中国语文[Studies of the Chinese Language], 41:395–412.
    [Google Scholar]
14. 刘丹青[Liu, D]
    (2021) 语言单位的义项非独立观[The non-independence view of semes of linguistic elements]. 世界汉语教学[Chinese Teaching in the World], 21:147–165.
    [Google Scholar]
15. 刘丹青[Liu, D]
    (2022a) 导语：语言库藏类型学的理念和方法及新描写主义[Linguistic inventory typology: its ideas, methods, and relationship with New Descriptivism]. 当代语言学[Contemporary Linguistics], 51:633–638.
    [Google Scholar]
16. 刘丹青[Liu, D]
    (2022b) 汉语论元否定句的类型归属及其库藏背景[The typological grouping of term negation in Chinese and its inventory background]. 语言教学与研究[Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], 11:38–53.
    [Google Scholar]
17. 刘丹青[Liu, D]
    (2023) 类指成分的话题化功能及其成因[The topicalization of kind-denoting elements in Chinese and its motivations]. 世界汉语教学[Chinese Teaching in the World], 11:14–28.
    [Google Scholar]
18. 吕叔湘[Lyu, S]
    (1948) 把字用法的研究[On the use of the Pre-Transitive ba]，《金陵、齐鲁、华西大学中国文化会刊》第八卷[Journal of Chinese Culture edited by Jinling University, Qilu University and Huaxi University, Vol.8]，此据吕叔湘《汉语语法论文集 (增订本)[referring to Papers on Chinese grammar by Lyu S.], Beijing: The Commercial Press, 19841, 176–199.
    [Google Scholar]
19. 单韵鸣[Shan, Y]
    (2007) 粤语有定的“量+名”结构——基于交际话语和SVO语序的制约[Definite classifier-noun structure in Cantonese: based on communicative discourse analysis and constrains of SVO word order], 华南理工大学学报 (社会科学版)[Journal of South China University of Technology(Social Science Edition)], 51:47–50.
    [Google Scholar]
20. 石汝杰、刘丹青[Shi, R] & Liu, D
    ] (1985) 苏州方言量词的定指用法及其变调[Definite usage and tone sandhi of classifiers in the Suzhou Dialect]. 语言研究[Studies in Language and Linguistics],11:160–166.
    [Google Scholar]
21. 孙天琪[Sun, T]
    (2009) 谈汉语中旁格成分作宾语现象[On oblique objects in Chinese]. 汉语学习[Chinese Language Learning], 31:70–77.
    [Google Scholar]
22. 王力[Wang, L]
    (1989) 《汉语语法史》[History of Chinese Grammar].Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. 野田尚史[(著)Noda Hisashi] written by], 张麟声[(译)Zhang Linsheng]
    translated by] (2003) 日语主题助词は与主语助词が[Topic Particle は and Subject Particle が in Japanese]，Beijing: People’s Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. 赵淑华、张宝林[Zhao, S] & Zhang, B
    ] (1996) 离合词的确定与离合词的性质[Identification and nature of ionized words]. 语言教学与研究[Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], 11:40–51.
    [Google Scholar]
25. 赵元任[written byChao, Y]
    (1948) 李荣编译[edited and translated by Li, R]. (1952). 北京口语语法[Mandarin primer: An intensive course in spoken Chinese], Beijing: China Youth Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
26. 周小兵[Zhou, X]
    (1997) 广州话量词的定指功能[Definitive function of classifiers in Cantonese]. 方言[Dialect], 11:45–47.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Abney, S.
    (1987) The English Noun Phrase and Its Sentential Aspect. Ph.D. Dissertation，MIT.
28. Carlson, G.
    (1977) A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1(3):413–456. 10.1007/BF00353456
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353456 [Google Scholar]
29. Carlson, G. & F. Pelletier
    (eds.) (1995) The generic book. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R.
    (1998) Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic inquiry, 30(4):509–542. 10.1162/002438999554192
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192 [Google Scholar]
31. Chierchia, G.
    (1998) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics–6(4):339–405. 10.1023/A:1008324218506
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506 [Google Scholar]
32. Dayal, V.
    (1992) The singular-plural distinction in Hindi generics. InC. Barker, & D. Dowty (Eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) II (OSU Working Papers in Linguistics,39–57Columbus, OH: Ohio State University. 10.3765/salt.v2i0.3041
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v2i0.3041 [Google Scholar]
33. Krifka, M., F. J. Pelletier, G. N. Carlson, A. Meulen, G. Link and G. Chierchia
    (1995) Genericity: An Introduction. InC. Carlson & F. Pelletier (eds.) The generic book, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 1–124.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    (2004) World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press
    [Google Scholar]
35. Huang, C.-T. James
    (1987) Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. InE. Reuland & A. ter Meulen (eds.) The Representation of (In)definiteness, MTI Press 1987, Chapter 9, 226–253.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Jenks, Peter
    (2018) Articulated Definiteness without Articles, Linguistic Inquiry, 49(3):503–536. 10.1162/ling_a_00280
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00280 [Google Scholar]
37. Longobardi, Giuseppe
    (1996) The syntax of N-raising: a minimalist theory. OTS Working Papers96–0051: 1–55.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Li, C. N. and S. Thompson
    (1976) Subject and topic: A new typology of language . InC. N. Li, (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 457–498.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Rijkhoff, J.
    (2002) The Noun Phrase. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237822.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237822.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
40. Tsao, Feng-fu
    (1979) A Functional Study of Topic in Chinese: The First Step towards DiscourseAnalysis. Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Wilkinson, K.
    (1995) The common noun kind. InC. Carlson & F. Pelletier (eds.) The generic book, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 383–397.
    [Google Scholar]