增价型使役态的形态句法研究 [The morphosyntax of valency-increasing causatives]

References

1. Alotaibi, Y.
   (2022) Causative Constructions in Modern Standard Arabic. International Journal of English Linguistics, 12(3), 46–57. 10.5539/ijel.v12n3p46
   https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v12n3p46 [Google Scholar]
2. Arkadiev, P. M., & Pakerys, J.
   (2015) Lithuanian morphological causatives: a corpus-based study. InA. Holvoet & N. Nau (Eds.), Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic (pp.39–98). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/vargreb.2.01ark
   https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.2.01ark [Google Scholar]
3. Baratashvili, Z.
   (2019) The types of the causative construction in Georgian. Bull. Georg. Natl. Acad. Sci, 13(1), 126–136.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barðdal, J.
   (2015) Icelandic valency classes: oblique subjects, oblique ambitransitives and the actional passive. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.367–416). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110338812‑016
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-016 [Google Scholar]
5. Benedict, P. K.
   (1942) Thai, Kadai, and Indonesian: A New Alignment in Southeastern Asia. American Anthropologist, 44(4), 576–601. 10.1525/aa.1942.44.4.02a00040
   https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1942.44.4.02a00040 [Google Scholar]
6. Borsley, R. D., Tallerman, M., & Willis, D.
   (2007) The syntax of Welsh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486227
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486227 [Google Scholar]
7. Bruce, L.
   (1984) The Alamblak language of Papua New Guinea (East Sepik). (Pacific Linguistics, Series C, 81.) Canberra: Australian National University.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bugaeva, A.
   (2015) Valency classes in Ainu. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.807–854). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110338812‑025
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-025 [Google Scholar]
9. Bybee, J.
   (1985) Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
10. Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W.
    (1994) The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cennamo, M.
    (2015) Valency patterns in Italian. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.417–482). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110338812‑017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-017 [Google Scholar]
12. Chen, Shilin 陈士林等
    (1962) Liangshan Yiyu dongci de shidong fanchou凉山彝语动词的使动范畴 [The causative category of verbs in Liangshan Yi language], Zhongguo yuwen中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language], 8 & 91.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Colarusso, J.
    (1992) A grammar of the Kabardian language. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cole, P.
    (1983) The grammatical role of the causee in universal grammar. International Journal of American Linguistics, 49(2), 115–133. 10.1086/465778
    https://doi.org/10.1086/465778 [Google Scholar]
15. Comrie, B.
    (1974) Causatives and universal grammar. Transactions of the philological society, 73(1), 1–32. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.1974.tb01155.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1974.tb01155.x [Google Scholar]
16. Comrie, B.
    (1976) The syntax of causative constructions: cross-language similarities and divergences. InM. Shibatani (Ed.), The grammar of causative constructions (pp.259–312). Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004368842_011
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368842_011 [Google Scholar]
17. Comrie, B.
    (1985) Causative verb formation and other verb-deriving morphology. InT. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (Vol 3) (pp.309–348). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Comrie, B.
    (1989) Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Comrie, B.
    (2003) Causative. InW. J. Frawley (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics (2d ed. Vol. 1) (pp.281–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Comrie, B.
    (Ed) (2018) The world’s major languages. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315644936
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315644936 [Google Scholar]
21. Comrie, B., & Polinsky, M.
    (Eds.) (1993) Causatives and transitivity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.23 [Google Scholar]
22. Comrie, B., Khalilov, M., & Khalilova, Z.
    (2015) Valency and valency classes in Bezhta. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.541–570). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110338812‑019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-019 [Google Scholar]
23. Cổn, N. H.
    (2020) Syntactic Causative Constructions in Vietnamese: A Typological Perspective. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 7(2), 51–57.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Cui, Huiling 崔惠玲
    (2018) Chaoxianyu shiyi jiegou ji ge biaoji de leixing tezheng yanjiu朝鲜语使役结构及格标记的类型特征研究 [On the typological characteristics of causative constructions and case markers in Korean. Minzu yuwen民族语文 [Minority Languages of China], 51, 81–85.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Dai, Qingxi 戴庆厦
    (1981) Zaiwayu shidong fanchou de xingtai bianhua载瓦语使动范畴的形态变化 [The morphological changes of the causative category in Zaiwa language]. Minzu yuwen民族语文 [Minority Languages of China], 41, 36–41.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Daudey, G. H.
    (2014) A grammar of Wadu Pumi. PhD dissertation. La Trobe University.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dixon, R. M.
    (2000) A typology of causatives: form, syntax and meaning. InR. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald (Eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity (pp.30–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.003 [Google Scholar]
28. Dixon, R. M.
    (2012) Basic Linguistic Theory (Vol. 3), Further grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Dixon, R. M., & Aikhenvald, A. I.
    (Eds.) (2000) Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627750
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750 [Google Scholar]
30. Donaldson, B.
    (2007) German: An essential grammar. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203018583
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203018583 [Google Scholar]
31. Dunn, M. J.
    (1999) A grammar of Chukchi. PhD dissertation. Australian National University.
32. Enfield, N. J.
    (2008) A grammar of Lao. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Estrada-Fernández, Z., Tubino, M., & Villalpando, J.
    (2015) Valency classes in Yaqui. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.1359–1390). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110429343‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429343-012 [Google Scholar]
34. Evans, N.
    (2015) Valency in Nen. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.1069–1116). Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ge, Pingping 葛平平
    (2021) Yuyan leixingxue kuangjia xia de jufa bianjia yanjiu语言类型学框架下的句法变价研究 [Valency alternations and linguistic typology]. PhD dissertation. Nanjing University.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ge, P., & Comrie, B.
    (2022) Correlations of valency alternations and morphological types: A typological perspective. Lingua, 2731, 1–20. 10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103304
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103304 [Google Scholar]
37. Gerner, M.
    (2013) A grammar of Nuosu. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110308679
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110308679 [Google Scholar]
38. Givón, T.
    (1976) Some constraints on Bantu causativization. InM. Shibatani (Ed.), The grammar of causative constructions (pp.325–351). Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004368842_013
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368842_013 [Google Scholar]
39. Göksel, A., & Kerslake, C.
    (2004) Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203340769
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203340769 [Google Scholar]
40. Hammarström, H., Forkel, R., Haspelmath, M., & Bank, S.
    (2023) Glottolog 4.8. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atglottolog.org, Accessed on2023–08–11.).
    [Google Scholar]
41. Harris, A. C.
    (1981) Georgian syntax: A study in relational grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Haspelmath, M.
    1993 More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. InB. Comrie & M. Polinsky (Eds.), Causatives and Transitivity (pp.87–120). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.23.05has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.23.05has [Google Scholar]
43. Haspelmath, M.
    (2016) Universals of causative and anticausative verb formation and the spontaneity scale. Lingua Posnaniensis, 58(2), 33–63. 10.1515/linpo‑2016‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2016-0009 [Google Scholar]
44. Haspelmath, M., & Sims, A.
    (2010) Understanding morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
    (2002) World Lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
46. Hewitt, B. G.
    (1995) Georgian: A structural reference grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/loall.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.2 [Google Scholar]
47. Hiroshi, Ishimura 石村广
    (2016) Dongjieshi de zhishiyi he shidong yongfa de shuangyinhua动结式的致使意义和使动用法的双音化 [The causative meaning of Chinese resultative constructions and disyllabification of unmarked causative usage]，Dangdai Yuyanxue当代语言学 [Contemporary Linguistics], 18(3), 339–353.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Hiroshi, Ishimura 石村广
    (2019) 汉语动结式在语言类型上的两面性——从藏缅语的自动和使动的对立谈起 [Two typological features of resultative constructions in Mandarin Chinese: From the viewpoint of non-causative/causative alternation in the Tibeto-Burman languages]. Shijie Hanyu jiaoxue世界汉语教学 [Chinese Teaching in the World], 33(4), 443–455.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Holton, D., Mackridge, P., Philippaki-Warburton, I., & Spyropoulos, V.
    (2012) Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203802380
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203802380 [Google Scholar]
50. Hu, X.
    (2020) Syntax of causative-passive correlation from a cross-linguistic perspective. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 7(2), 90–112. 10.1075/ijchl.00007.hu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.00007.hu [Google Scholar]
51. Huang, Chenglong 黄成龙
    (2014) Leixingxue shiye zhong de zhishi jiegou类型学视野中的致使结构 [Causative constructions in the perspective of typology]. Minzu yuwen民族语文 [Minority Languages of China], 51, 3–21.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Jenny, M., & Hnin Tun, S. S.
    (2017) Burmese: A comprehensive grammar. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315651194
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315651194 [Google Scholar]
53. Joseph Dele Atoyebi
    (2015) Valency classes in Yorùbá. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.299–326). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110338812‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-014 [Google Scholar]
54. Kachru, Y.
    (2006) Hindi. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/loall.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.12 [Google Scholar]
55. Kász, C.
    (2015) Valency properties of verbs in Modern Standard Arabic. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.327–363). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110338812‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-015 [Google Scholar]
56. Kemmer, S., & Verhagen, A.
    (1994) The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events. Cognitive Linguistics51, 115–156. 10.1515/cogl.1994.5.2.115
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1994.5.2.115 [Google Scholar]
57. Kenesei, I., Vago, R. M., & Fenyvesi, A.
    (1998) Hungarian descriptive grammars. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Kishimoto, H., Kageyama, T., & Sasaki, K.
    (2015) Valency classes in Japanese. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.765–805). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110338812‑024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-024 [Google Scholar]
59. Kittilä, S.
    (2009) Causative morphemes as non-valency increasing devices. Folia Linguistica43(1), 67–94. 10.1515/FLIN.2009.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/FLIN.2009.002 [Google Scholar]
60. Kittilä, S.
    (2013) Causative morphemes as a de-transitivizing device: what do non-canonical instances reveal about causation and causativization?Folia linguistica, 47(1), 113–138. 10.1515/flin.2013.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2013.006 [Google Scholar]
61. Knott, J.
    (1995) The causative-passive correlation. InD. Bennett, T. Bynon & B. G. Hewitt (Eds.), Subject, voice, and ergativity, (pp.53–59). London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Kozinsky, I., & Polinsky, M.
    (1993) Causee and patient in the causative of transitive: Coding conflict or doubling of grammatical relations. InB. Comrie & M. Polinsky (Eds.), Causatives and Transitivity (pp.177–240). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.23.09koz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.23.09koz [Google Scholar]
63. Kulikov, L. I.
    (1993) The “second causative”: A typological sketch. InB. Comrie & M. Polinsky (Eds.), Causatives and Transitivity (pp.121–154). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.23.06kul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.23.06kul [Google Scholar]
64. Kulikov, L. I.
    (2001) Causatives. InL. I. Kulikov, M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook (pp.886–898). Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Kuroda, S. Y.
    (1965) Causative forms in Japanese. Foundations of language, 1(1), 30–50.
    [Google Scholar]
66. LaPolla, R. J.
    (2017) Overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. InG. Thurgood & R. J. Lapolla (Eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Second edition (pp.40–69). London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Lefebvre, C., & Brousseau, A. M.
    (2011) A grammar of Fongbe. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Lehmann, C.
    (2015) Valency classes in Yucatec Maya. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.1407–1461). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110429343‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429343-014 [Google Scholar]
69. Lehmann, C.
    (2016) Latin causativization in typological perspective. InP. Poccetti (Ed.), Latinitatis rationes: Descriptive and historical accounts for the Latin language (pp.917–942). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110431896‑057
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431896-057 [Google Scholar]
70. Lehmann, T.
    (1989) A grammar of Modern Tamil. Pondicherry: Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Levin, B.
    (1993) English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Li, X., Li, J., & Luo, Y.
    (2014) A Grammar of Zoulei, Southwest China. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Liang, Yinfeng 梁银峰
    (2006) Hanyu dongbu jiegou de chansheng yu yanbian汉语动补结构的产生与演变 [The emergence and evolution of Chinese verb complement structures]. Shnaghai: Xuelin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Lord, C. D.
    1989 Syntactic reanalysis in the historical development of serial verb constructions in languages of West Africa. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Lu, B., Zhang, G., & Bisang, W.
    (2015) Valency classes in Mandarin. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.709–764). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110338812‑023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-023 [Google Scholar]
76. Ma, Qinghua 马清华 & Ge, Pingping 葛平平
    (2020) Jufa bianjia de xitong donglixue yanjiu句法变价的系统动力学研究 [Research on the System Dynamics of Syntactic Valency Change]. Shanxi daxue xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban)山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版) [Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)], 43(5): 41–56.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Malchukov, A., & Nedjalkov, I. V.
    (2015) Valency classes in Even (North Tungusic) in a comparative Tungusic perspective. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.571–628). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110338812‑020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-020 [Google Scholar]
78. McDonald, M., & Stephen A. Wurm
    (1979) Basic materials in Waŋkumara (Galal̪i): Grammar, sentences and vocabulary. (Pacific Linguistics, Series B, 65.) Canberra: Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Miyaoka, O.
    (2015) Valency classes in Central Alaskan Yupik, an Eskimoan language. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.1165–1204). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110429343‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429343-008 [Google Scholar]
80. Mohanan, T.
    (1994) Argument structure in Hindi. Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Pan, Wuyun 潘悟云
    (1991) Shanggu Hanyu shidongci de quzhe xingshi上古汉语使动词的屈折形式 [The inflectional form of causative verbs in ancient Chinese]. Wenzhou shifan xueyuan xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban)温州师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版) [Journal of Wenzhou University(Natural Science Edition)], 21: 48–57.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Phan, Vu Tuan Anh 潘武俊英
    (2010) Yueyu cankao yufa: Jiyu xitong gongneng guan越语参考语法—基于系统功能观 [Vietnamese Reference Grammar: Based on Systemic Functionalism]. PhD dissertation. Minzu University of China.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Pinskter, H.
    (2015) Oxford Latin syntax (Vol. 1): The simple clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Polinsky, M.
    (1994) Double objects in causatives: Towards a study of coding conflict. Studies in Language, 19(1), 129–221. 10.1075/sl.19.1.05pol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19.1.05pol [Google Scholar]
85. Rhodes, R., & Valentine, R.
    (2015) Transitivity in Ojibwe. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.1205–1264). Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Riis, H. N.
    1854 Grammatical outline and vocabulary of the Oji-language, with especial reference to the Akwapim-dialect, together with a collection of proverbs of the natives. Basel: Bahnmaier.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Saad, G. N.
    (1982) Transivity, causation and passivization: A semantic-syntactic study of the verb in classical Arabic. London/Boston/Melbourne: Kegan Paul International.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Saeliao, T. 刘玉兰
    (2012) Taiguo Mianyu cankao yufa泰国勉语参考语法 [A reference grammar of Mien language in Thailand]. PhD dissertation. Minzu University of China.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Schäfer, F.
    (2009) The causative alternation. Language and linguistics compass, 3(2), 641–681. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2009.00127.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00127.x [Google Scholar]
90. Schikowski, R., Paudyal, N. & Bickel, B.
    (2015) Flexible valency in Chintang. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.1205–1264). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110338812‑022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-022 [Google Scholar]
91. Schultze-Berndt, E.
    (2015) Complex verbs, simple alternations: Valency and verb classes in Jaminjung. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.1117–1164). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110429343‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429343-007 [Google Scholar]
92. Seifart, F.
    (2015) Valency classes in Bora. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency Classes in the World’s Languages (pp.1481–1514). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110429343‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429343-015 [Google Scholar]
93. Shibatani, M.
    (1973) Semantics of Japanese causativization. Foundations of language, 9(3), 327–373.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Shibatani, M.
    (1976) The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. InM. Shibatani (Ed.), The Grammar of Causative Constructions (pp.1–40). Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004368842_002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368842_002 [Google Scholar]
95. Shibatani, M.
    (1990) The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Shibatani, M.
    (2002) Introduction: Some basic issues in the grammar of causation. InM. Shibatani (Ed.), The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation (pp.1–22). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.48.04shi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48.04shi [Google Scholar]
97. Shibatani, M., & Artawa, K.
    (2015) Balinese valency classes. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.765–805). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110429343‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429343-002 [Google Scholar]
98. Shibatani, M., & Chung, S. Y.
    (2001) Japanese and Korean causatives revisited. Kobe papers in linguistics, 31, 112–137. Kobe: Kobe University.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Shibatani, M., & Pardeshi, P.
    (2002) The causative continuum. InM. Shibatani (Ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation (pp.85–126). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.48.07shi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48.07shi [Google Scholar]
100. Song, Jae Jung
     (2006) Causatives: Semantics. InK. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp.265–268). Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/01027‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01027-0 [Google Scholar]
101. Song, Jae Jung
     (2014) Linguistic typology: Morphology and syntax. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315840628
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315840628 [Google Scholar]
102. Song, Wenhui 宋文辉
     (2019) Yuyan leixingxue shiye zhong de hanyu zhishi jiegou yanjiu语言类型学视野中的汉语致使结构研究 [Research on Chinese causative constructions from the perspective of linguistic typology]. Dongfang yuyanxue东方语言学 [Journal of East Linguistics], 11: 58–87.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Song, Yayun 宋亚云
     (2014) Hanyu zuoge dongci de lishi yanbian yanjiu汉语作格动词的历史演变研究 [A study on the historical evolution of Chinese ergative verbs]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
104. Sposato, A.
     (2015) A grammar of Xong. PhD dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
     [Google Scholar]
105. Sun, Hongkai 孙宏开, Hu, Zengyi 胡增益, & Huang Xing 黄行
     (2007) Zhongguo de yuyan中国的语言 [Languages of China]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
106. Sun, Hongkai 孙宏开
     (1998) Lun zangmianyu dongci de shidong yufa fanchou论藏缅语动词的使动语法范畴 [On the causative grammatical category of verbs in Tibetan-Burmese]. Minzu yuwen民族语文 [Minority Languages of China], 61: 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
107. Tan, Kerang 谭克让
     (1988) Zangyu dongci de zidongtai yu shidongtai藏语动词的自动态与使动态 [The inchoative and causative of verbs in Tibetan]. Minzu yuwen民族语文 [Minority Languages of China], 61: 42–50.
     [Google Scholar]
108. Thompson, L. C.
     (1987) A Vietnamese reference grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
     [Google Scholar]
109. Timberlake, A.
     (2004) A reference grammar of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
110. Vitale, A. J.
     (1981) Swahili syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. 10.1515/9783110847444
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110847444 [Google Scholar]
111. Washio, R.
     (1993) When causatives mean passive: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2(1), 45–90. 10.1007/BF01440583
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01440583 [Google Scholar]
112. Watanabe, H.
     (2015) Valency classes in Sliammon Salish. InA. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages (pp.1313–1358). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110429343‑011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429343-011 [Google Scholar]
113. Xu, Xijian 徐悉艰
     (1984) Jingpo yu de shidong fanchou景颇语的使动范畴 [The causative category of Jingpo language]. Minzu yuwen民族语文 [Minority Languages of China], 11: 35–42.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Ye, Feisheng 叶蜚声 & Xu, Tongqiang 徐通锵
     (2010) Yuyanxue gangyao语言学纲要 [Introduction to linguistics]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
115. Yuyan wenzi bianji weiyuanhui 语言文字编辑委员会
     Yuyan wenzi bianji weiyuanhui 语言文字编辑委员会 (1988) Zhongguo da baike quanshu·Yuyan wnezi中国大百科全书·语言文字 [Encyclopedia of China·Language and characters]. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.
     [Google Scholar]
116. Zhao, Jincan 赵金灿
     (2010) Yunnan Heqing baiyu yanjiu云南鹤庆白语研究 [Research on Bai Language of Heqing in Yunnan Province]. Ph.D dissertation. Minzu University of China.
     [Google Scholar]
117. Zhao, lüyuan 赵绿原
     (2019) Qinghai Minhe Gangou hua de zhishi jiegou青海民和甘沟话的致使结构 [Causative constructions in the Gangou dialect of Qinghai Province]. Zhongguo yuwen中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language], 21: 215–230.
     [Google Scholar]
118. Zhu, Minche 祝敏彻
     (1981) Gudai Hanyu de shidongju he yidongju古代汉语的使动句和意动句 [The causative and volitional action sentences in Ancient Chinese]. Lanzhou daxue xuebao (Shehui kexue ban)兰州大学学报（社会科学版）[Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences)], 11: 88–91.
     [Google Scholar]
119. Zúñiga, F., & Kittilä, S.
     (2019) Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316671399
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671399 [Google Scholar]