1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
  4. Volume 4, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8706
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper discusses the syntax and semantics of and four types of phrases containing in Mandarin. I defend the view that should be analyzed as a plural morpheme as first argued in Li (1999) but argue against the analysis of positing in the D position or treating it as a definite determiner. It will be shown that definiteness is not inherent to and that is compatible with numerals and classifiers and should be in a position local to nouns. I propose an analysis of as an associative plural and explain the properties of the four types of expressions containing within a Neocarlsonian account of bare nominals. The formal account of the syntax and semantics of phrases containing advanced in this paper shows that it is not necessary to assume a functional category D that is always invisible in the grammar of Mandarin in order to account for the behaviors of its nominal arguments and argues for the lack of DP projections in Mandarin.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.16015.jia
2017-12-30
2024-09-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.16015.jia
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acquaviva, P.
    (2008) Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aikhenvald, A. Y.
    (2000) Classifiers: a typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford University Press, New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Alonso-Ovalle, L. & Paula, M. -B.
    (2010) Modal Indefinites. Natural Language Semantics, 18(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1007/s11050‑009‑9048‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-009-9048-4 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson, C.
    (2015) Numerical approximation using some. In H. Zeijlstra & E. Csipak (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 19, 54–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Alexiadou, A.
    (2011) Plural mass nouns and the morpho-syntax of number. In M. B. Washburn , K. McKinney-Bock , E. Varis , A. Sawyer & B. Tomaszewicz (Eds.), WCCFL28: Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 33–41. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Alexiadou, A. , Haegeman, L. M. & Stavrou, M.
    (2007) Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110207491
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207491 [Google Scholar]
  7. Allan, K.
    (1977) Classifiers. Language, 53, 285–311. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0043
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0043 [Google Scholar]
  8. Biswas, P.
    (2014) Bangla associative plural: -ra: a cross-linguistic comparison with Chinese men and Japanese -tachi . In R. E. Santana-LaBarge (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 56–65. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Borer, H.
    (2005) Structuring sense, volume 1: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Borer, H. & Ouwayda, S.
    (2010) Men and their apples: Dividing plural and agreement plural. Talk presented atGLOW in Asia VIII, Beijing.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bošković, Zeljko
    2005 On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica59: 1–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2005.00118.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00118.x [Google Scholar]
  12. 2007 On the locality and motivation of move and agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry38: 589–644. doi: 10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.589
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.589 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bošković, Z.
    (2008) What will you have, DP or NP?InProceedings of 37th Conference of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society, 101–114. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bošković, Ž. & I. -T. C. Hsieh
    (2013) On word order, binding relations, and plurality in Chinese Noun Phrases. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 8, 173–204.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Brugè, L.
    (2000) Categorie Funzionali del nome nelle lingue Romanze. Milan: Cisalpino.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. (2002) The positions of demonstratives in the extended nominal projection. In G. Cinque (Eds.), Functional Structure in DP and IP, 15–53. Oxford University Press, New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Butler, L. K.
    (2012) Crosslinguistic and experimental evidence for non-number plurals. Linguistic Variation, 12, 27–56. doi: 10.1075/lv.12.1.02but
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.1.02but [Google Scholar]
  18. Carlson, G. N.
    (1977) Reference to kinds in English. Doctoral Dissertation, University of. Massachusetts, Amherst.
  19. (1989) The Semantic Composition of English Generic Sentences. In G. Chierchia , B. Partee & R. Turner (Eds.), Properties, Types and Meaning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 167–192. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2723‑0_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2723-0_5 [Google Scholar]
  20. Chao, Y. R.
    (1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Cheng, L. -S. , L. & Sybesma, R.
    (1999) Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 509–542. doi: 10.1162/002438999554192
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192 [Google Scholar]
  22. Cheng, L. -S. L. , Doetjes, J. & Sybesma, R.
    (2008) How universal is the Universal Grinder. Linguistic in the Netherlands, 50–62. doi: 10.1075/avt.25.08che
     https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.25.08che [Google Scholar]
  23. Cheng, L. -S. L. & Sybesma, R.
    (2012) Classifiers and DP. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(4), 634–650. doi: 10.1162/ling_a_00109
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00109 [Google Scholar]
  24. Cheung, C. -H.
    (2003) An Investigation of the Jingpo Nominal Structure. Doctoral Dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  25. Chierchia, G.
    (1984) Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published in 1988 by Garland, New York.
  26. (1998) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405. doi: 10.1023/A:1008324218506
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2010) Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese, 174, 99–149. doi: 10.1007/s11229‑009‑9686‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9686-6 [Google Scholar]
  28. Corbett, G. G.
    (2000) Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139164344
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164344 [Google Scholar]
  29. Dayal, V.
    (1992) The Singular-Plural Distinction in Hindi Generics, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory II: OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, 40, 39–58. doi: 10.3765/salt.v2i0.3041
     https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v2i0.3041 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2004) Number Marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(4), 393–450. doi: 10.1023/B:LING.0000024420.80324.67
     https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LING.0000024420.80324.67 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2011) Bare Noun Phrases. In C. Maienborn , K. von Heusinger , & P. Portner (eds), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, 33(2), 1087–1108.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. (2012) Bangla classifiers: Mediating between kinds and objects. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 24(2), 195–226.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (2014) Bangla plural classifiers. Language and Linguistics, 15(1). doi: 10.1177/1606822X13506151
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1606822X13506151 [Google Scholar]
  34. Dékány, É.
    (2011) A profile of the Hungarian DP – The interaction of lexicalization, agreement and linearization with the functional sequence. Doctoral dissertation. University of Tromsø.
  35. De Belder, M.
    (2008) Size matters: Towards a syntactic decomposition of countability. In N. Abner & J. Bishop (Eds.), WCCFL27, 116–122. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. (2011) A morphosyntactic decomposition of countability in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 14(3), 203–240. doi: 10.1007/s10828‑011‑9045‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-011-9045-0 [Google Scholar]
  37. den Besten, H.
    (1996) Associative DPs. In C. Cremers & M. den Dikken (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands1996, 13–24. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. del Gobbo, F.
    (1999) Nominal phrases in Mandarin and Cantonese. UCI Working Papers in Linguistics, 5, 11–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Doetjes, J.
    (1997) Quantifiers and selection: On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.
  40. (2012) Count/mass distinctions across languages. In C. Maienborn , K. von Heusinger , & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: an international handbook of natural language meaning, 3, 2559–2580. De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Elbourne, P.
    (2001) E-type Anaphora as NP-Deletion, Natural Language Semantics, 9, 241–288. doi: 10.1023/A:1014290323028
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014290323028 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2005) Situations and Individuals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Fukui, N.
    (1988) Deriving the differences between English and Japanese: a case study in parametric syntax. English Linguistics, 5, 249–270. doi: 10.9793/elsj1984.5.249
     https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.5.249 [Google Scholar]
  44. Gebhardt, L.
    (2009) Numeral classifiers and the structure of DP. Doctoral. dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
  45. Giusti, G.
    (1997) The categorial status of determiners. In L. Haegeman (Eds.), The New Comparative Syntax, 94–124. Cambridge University Press. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. (2002) The functional structure of noun phrases. A bare phrase structure approach. In G. Cinque (Eds.), Functional structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, 1, 54–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Goral, D. R.
    (1979) Numeral classifier systems: A Southeast Asian cross-linguistic analysis. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 41, 1–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Gou, E. , Rao, G. , Xiao, X. , & Zang, J.
    (2016) Dashuju beijingxia BCC yuliaoku de yanzhi [The construction of the BCC Corpus in the age of Big Data]. Yuliaoku yuyanxue [Corpus Linguistics] (1).
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Harbour, D.
    (2011) Valence and atomic number. Linguistic Inquiry, 42, 561–594. doi: 10.1162/LING_a_00061
     https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00061 [Google Scholar]
  50. Heim, I. & Kratzer, A.
    (1998) Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Hsieh, M. -L.
    (2008) The internal structure of Noun Phrases in Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics Book Series in Chinese Linguistics 2. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Huang, C. -T. J. Li, A. , & Li, Y.
    (2009) The syntax of Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166935
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166935 [Google Scholar]
  53. Huang, C. -T. J.
    (2014) On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In A. Li , A. Simpson & W. -T. D. Tsai (Eds.), Chinese Syntax in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 1–48. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945658.003.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945658.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  54. Iljic, R.
    (1994) Quantification in Mandarin Chinese: Two Markers of Plurality. Linguistics, 32: 91–116. doi: 10.1515/ling.1994.32.1.91
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.1.91 [Google Scholar]
  55. Imai, M. , & Gentner, D.
    (1997) A crosslinguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62, 169–200. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(96)00784‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00784-6 [Google Scholar]
  56. Ionin, T. , & Matushansky, O.
    (2006) The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics, 23, 315–360. doi: 10.1093/jos/ffl006
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffl006 [Google Scholar]
  57. Jiang, L. J.
    (2009) Monotonicity and measure phrases in Chinese. InProceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 45(1), 303–317.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. (2012) Nominal arguments and language variation. Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.
  59. (2015) Marking (in)definiteness in classifier languages. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics, 8, 417–449.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Kayne, R. S.
    (2005) A note on the syntax of quantity in English. InMovement and silence, 176–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.003.0008
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  61. Kaplan, D.
    (1989) Demonstratives. In J. Almog , J. Perry & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Kurafuji, T.
    (2004) Plural morphemes, definiteness, and the notion of semantic parameter. Language and Linguistics, 5.1, 211–242.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Kramer, R.
    (2009) Definite markers, phi-features, and agreement: A morphosyntactic investigation of the Amharic DP. Doctoral dissertation, UC Santa Cruz.
  64. (2010) The Amharic definite marker and the syntax-morphology interface. Syntax, 13, 196–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2010.00139.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00139.x [Google Scholar]
  65. (2016) A split analysis of plurality. Linguistic Inquiry, 47(3), 527–559. doi: 10.1162/LING_a_00220
     https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00220 [Google Scholar]
  66. Kratzer, A.
    (2009) Making a pronoun: fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 187–237. doi: 10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.187
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.187 [Google Scholar]
  67. Krifka, M.
    (1995) Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and English. In G. Carlson & F. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book, 398–411. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Krifka, M. , Pelletier, F. J. , Gregory N. Carlson , ter Meulen, A. , Link, G. , & Chierchia, G.
    (1995)  Genericity: An introduction . In G. N. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book, 1–124. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Kwon, S. , and A. Zribi-Hertz
    (2004) Number from a syntactic perspective: Why plural marking looks ‘truer’ in French than in Korean. In O. Bonami and P. C. Hofherr (Eds.), Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics5, 133–158.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Lecarme, J.
    (2002) Gender “Polarity”: Theoretical aspects of Somali nominal morphology. In Paul Boucher & Marc Plenat (Eds.), Many morphologies, 109–141. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Li, P. , Dunham, Y. & Carey, S.
    (2009) Of substance: The nature of language effects on entity construal. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 487–524. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.12.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  72. Li, X. -P.
    (2011) On the Semantics of Classifiers in Chinese. Doctoral Dissertation, Bar Ilan University & University of Mainz.
  73. (2013) Numeral classifiers in Chinese: the syntax-semantics interface. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110289336
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110289336 [Google Scholar]
  74. Li, Y. -H. A.
    (1997) Structures and Interpretations of Nominal Expressions. Ms. University of Southern California, LA, California.
  75. (1998) Argument Determiner Phrases and Number Phrases. Linguistic Inquiry, 29 (4), 693–702. doi: 10.1162/ling.1998.29.4.693
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.1998.29.4.693 [Google Scholar]
  76. (1999) Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8, 75–99. doi: 10.1023/A:1008306431442
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306431442 [Google Scholar]
  77. Li, Y. -H. A. , & Feng, S.
    (2015) ‘yi’ zi shenglüe de yunlü tiaojian [The prosodic conditions on "yi"-deletion]. Linguistic Sciences, 14(1), 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Li, Y.
    (2015) Yetan hanyu mingci duanyu de neibu jiegou [Revisit the internal structure of Chinese noun phrases]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 2, 99–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Lima, S.
    (2014) The Grammar of individuation and counting. PhD Dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
  80. Longobardi, G.
    (1994) Reference and proper names: a theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 609–665.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Lü, S.
    (1944) ‘ge’ zi de yingyong fanwei, fulun danweici qian ‘yi’ zi de tuoluo. [On the usages of GE and the dropping of the numeral yi before classifiers]. Xihua Daxue zhongguo wenhua huikan, 145–175.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. (1947) Zhongguo Wenfa Yaolüe [Outline of Chinese Grammar], 1–3. Beijing: Xueyuan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. (1999) Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [800 Words in Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Press (1st edition, 1980).
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Mathieu, E.
    (2012) Flavors of division. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(4), 650–679. doi: 10.1162/ling_a_00110
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00110 [Google Scholar]
  85. (2013) On the plural of the singulative. In I. Kučerová (ed.), McGill working papers in Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. (2014) Many a plural. In A. Aguilar-Guevara , B. Le Bruyn & J. Zwarts (Eds), Weak referentiality, 157–181. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Mathieu, E. & Zareikar, G.
    (2015) Measure words, plurality, and cross-linguistic variation. Linguistic Variation, 15(2), 169–200. doi: 10.1075/lv.15.2.02mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.15.2.02mat [Google Scholar]
  88. Melchin, P.
    2015 Cross-Linguistic Variation in Nominal Functional Sequences and Pronoun Types. Ms. University of Ottawa.
  89. Mendia, J. A.
    (2016) Epistemic numbers. Presented atConSOLE XXIV, University of York, York United Kingdom.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Montague, R.
    (1974) Formal philosophy: selected papers of Richard Montague, edited with an introduction by R. Thomason . New Haven: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Moravcsik, E.
    (1994) Associative plurals. Presented atthe Pre-inaugural Meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology, Konstanz, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. (2003) A Semantic Analysis of Associative Plurals, Studies in Language, 27, 469–503. doi: 10.1075/sl.27.3.02mor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.02mor [Google Scholar]
  93. Nakanishi, K. & Tomioka, S.
    (2004) Japanese Plurals are Exceptional. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13, 113–140. doi: 10.1023/B:JEAL.0000019058.46668.c1
     https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEAL.0000019058.46668.c1 [Google Scholar]
  94. Neeleman, A. & SzendrőI, K.
    (2007) Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(4), 671–714. doi: 10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671 [Google Scholar]
  95. Norman, J.
    (1988) Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Noguchi, T.
    (1997) Two types of pronouns and variable binding. Language, 73, 773–797. doi: 10.1353/lan.1997.0021
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1997.0021 [Google Scholar]
  97. Ott, D.
    (2011) Diminutive-formation in German: Spelling out the classifier analysis. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 14(1), 1–46. doi: 10.1007/s10828‑010‑9040‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-010-9040-x [Google Scholar]
  98. Partee, B.
    (1986) Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk , D. de Jongh & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, 115–143. GRASS 8. Foris. Dordrecht.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Pelletier, F.
    (1975) Non-singular reference: some prelimiaries. Philosophia5:4. [Reprinted in: Mass terms: some philosophical problems. ed. by F. Pelletier 1979 Dordrecht: Reidel, 1–14.]
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Runić, J.
    (2014a) A new look at argument ellipsis: Evidence from Slavic. In H. -L. Huang , E. Poole & A. Rysling (Eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 43 (NELS 43). Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. (2014b) A new look at clitics, clitic doubling, and argument ellipsis: Evidence from Slavic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
  102. Rygaloff, A.
    (1973) Grammaire Éleméntaire du Chinois. Paris: PUF.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Sharvy, R.
    1980 A More General Theory of Definite Descriptions. The Philosophical Review, 89, 607–624. doi: 10.2307/2184738
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2184738 [Google Scholar]
  104. Solt, S.
    (2015) Q-adjectives and the semantics of quantity. Journal of semantics, 32(2), 221–273. doi: 10.1093/jos/fft018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/fft018 [Google Scholar]
  105. Sprouse, J. , Schutze, C. T. , & Almeida, D.
    (2013) A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua, 134, 219–248. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  106. Tang, C. -C. J.
    (1990) A note on the DP analysis of the Chinese noun phrase. Linguistics, 28, 337–354. doi: 10.1515/ling.1990.28.2.337
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1990.28.2.337 [Google Scholar]
  107. T’sou, B. K.
    (1976) The structure of nominal classifier systems. In P. N. Jenner , L. C. Thompson & S. Starosta (Eds.), Austroasiatic studies II, Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication, 13, 1215–1247. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Vassilieva, M.
    (2005) Associative and pronominal plurality. Doctoral Dissertation: Stony Brook University.
  109. Wiltschko, M.
    (2008) The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, 639–694. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑008‑9046‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9046-0 [Google Scholar]
  110. Wolter, L.
    (2006) That’s that: the semantics and pragmatics of demonstrative noun phrases. Doctoral dissertation, UCSC.
  111. Yang, S. -F. H.
    (2005) Plurality and Modification in Mandarin Noun Phrases. Doctoral Dissertation: The University of Texas at Austin.
  112. Yang, R.
    (2001) Common nouns, classifiers, and quantification in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Yorifuji, A.
    (1976) Men ni Tsuite [A Study of the Suffix –Men]. Area and Culture Studies26: 73–88. Tokyo: Tokyo Gaikokugo Daigaku Ronshu.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Yuan, J.
    (1961) Hanyu fangyan gaiyao [An outline of the Chinese dialects]. Beijing: Wenzi Gaige Chubanshe [Language Reform Publishing House].
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Zavala, R.
    (2000) Multiple classifier systems in Akatek Mayan. In G. Senft (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, pp.114–146. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Zhang, N. N.
    (2013) Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110304992
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110304992 [Google Scholar]
  117. Zweig, E.
    (2005) Nouns and adjectives in numeral NPs. InProceedings of the Northeast Linguistics Society35.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.16015.jia
Loading
Mandarin associative plural -men and NPs with -men
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 4, 191 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.16015.jia
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.16015.jia
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.16015.jia
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): (in)definite; -men; associative plurals; classifiers; DP; Mandarin; numerals; plurality

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error