1887
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8706
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

We pursue an agreement-based analysis of the bare numeral phrases in Chinese. Bare numeral phrases in Chinese often occur with the marker in the preverbal position. With the marker, a bare numeral phrase obtains an individual-denoting reading, which has an existential meaning. In contrast, several syntactic environments do not need the marker, and the bare numeral phrase obtains the quantity-denoting reading. In addition to the existential marker, we observe that the distributions of the two readings are correlated to the lower (root) modals (Mod) and the middle aspects (Asp). We argue that the correlation can be analyzed through syntactic feature agreement. That is, the bare numeral phrase carries an unvalued quantificational feature in the null D, and its unvalued feature is valued by the corresponding existential marker, Asp, and/or Mod heads through (multiple) agreement. We argue that the proposed feature agreement mechanism can improve upon the (Extended) Mapping Hypothesis (Diesing 1992Tsai 19992001) under the Minimalist Program.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.17002.wen
2018-08-10
2019-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abusch, D.
    (1994) The scope of indefinites Natural Language Semantics , 2, 83–135.10.1007/BF01250400
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01250400 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexiadou, A. , Haegeman, L. M. V. , and Stavrou, M.
    (2007) Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207491
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207491 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, M. , and Travis, L.
    (1997) Mood as verbal definiteness in a "tenseless" language. Natural Language Semantics, 5, 149–203.10.1023/A:1008262802401
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008262802401 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatt, R.
    (1999) Covert Modality in Non-Finite Contexts. (PhD Dissertation), University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boeckx, C. , and Stjepanovic, S.
    (2001) Head-ing toward PF. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(2), 345–355.10.1162/00243890152001799
    https://doi.org/10.1162/00243890152001799 [Google Scholar]
  6. Carlson, G.
    (2008) Patterns in the Semantics of Generic Sentences. In J. Gueron and J. Lecarme (Eds.), Time and Modality (pp.17–38). Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑8354‑9_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8354-9_2 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheng, L. -L. S.
    (1991) On the Typology of Wh-questions. (PhD Dissertation), MIT, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1995) On DOU-Quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 4, 197–234.10.1007/BF01731509
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731509 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chomsky, N.
    (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin , D. Michael , and J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step (pp.89–156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2001) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp.1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2008) On phases. In R. Freidin , C. P. Otero , & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory (pp.133–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cinque, G.
    (1999) Adverbs and functional heads: a cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Diesing, M.
    (1992) Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Frampton, J. , and Gutmann, S.
    (2002) Crash-proof syntax. In S. D. Epstein & T. D. Seely (Eds.), Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program (pp.90–105). Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470755662.ch5
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755662.ch5 [Google Scholar]
  16. Grimshaw, J.
    (1979) Complement Selection and the Lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 10(3), 279–326.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2000) Locality and Extended Projection. In P. Coopmans , M. Everaert , and J. Grimshaw (Eds.), Lexical Specification and Insertion (pp.115–133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.197.07gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.197.07gri [Google Scholar]
  18. Hacquard, V.
    (2006) Aspects of Modality. (PhD Dissertation), MIT, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2009) On the interaction of aspect and modal auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32(3), 279–315.10.1007/s10988‑009‑9061‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9061-6 [Google Scholar]
  20. Heim, I.
    (1982) The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. (PhD Dissertation), University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hiraiwa, K.
    (2005) Dimensions of Symmetry in Syntax: Agreement and Clausal Architecture. (PhD Dissertation), MIT, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Horn, L.
    (1969) A Presuppositional Approach to Only and Even . chicago Linguistic Society (CLS), 5, 98–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang, C. -T. J.
    (1982) Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. (PhD Dissertation), MIT, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1988)  Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language, 64, 274–311.10.2307/415435
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415435 [Google Scholar]
  25. (1990) Shuo shi he you [On ‘be’ and ‘have’ in Chinese]. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica59: 43–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jackendoff, R.
    (1972) Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Karttunen, L. , and Peters, S.
    (1979) Conventional Implicature. In C. -K. Oh and D. A. Dinneen (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol 11: Presupposition (Vol.11, pp.1–56). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Klein, W.
    (1994) Time in Language. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Klein, W. , Li, P. , and Hendriks, H.
    (2000) Aspect and Assertion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18(4), 723–770.10.1023/A:1006411825993
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006411825993 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kratzer, A.
    (1981) The notional category of modality. In H. J. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser (Eds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts (pp.38–74). New York: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (1989) An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 607–653.10.1007/BF00627775
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627775 [Google Scholar]
  32. Krifka, M. , Pelletier, F. , Carlson, G. , ter Meulen, A. , Chierchia, G. , and Link, G.
    (1995) Genericity. In G. Carlson and F. Pelletier (Eds.), The Generic Book (pp.1–124). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, Y. -H. A.
    (1998) Argument Determiner Phrases and Number Phrases. Linguistic Inquiry, 29(4), 693–702.10.1162/ling.1998.29.4.693
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.1998.29.4.693 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2014) Born empty. Lingua, 151, 43–68.10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.013 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lin, J. -W.
    (1998) Distributivity in Chinese and its implications. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 201–243.10.1023/A:1008299031574
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008299031574 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2003) Temporal Reference in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 12, 259–311.10.1023/A:1023665301095
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023665301095 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lin, T. -H. J.
    (2004) Aspect, Distributivity, and Wh/QP Interaction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 5(3), 615–642.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Matthewson, L.
    (1999) On the interpretation of wide-scope indefinites. Natural Language Semantics, 7, 79–134.10.1023/A:1008376601708
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008376601708 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pesetsky, D. , and Torrego, E.
    (2007) The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features. In S. Karimi , V. Samiian , and W. K. Wilkins (Eds.), Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.101.14pes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.101.14pes [Google Scholar]
  40. Piñόn, C.
    (2003) Being able to. WCCFL, 22, 384–397.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pollock, J. -Y.
    (1989) Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(3), 365–424.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Portner, P.
    (2009) Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Reinhart, T.
    (1997) Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20, 335–397.10.1023/A:1005349801431
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005349801431 [Google Scholar]
  44. Rizzi, L.
    (1997) The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp.281–337). Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  45. Rooth, M.
    (1985) Association with Focus. (PhD Dissertation), University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Smith, C.
    (1991) The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978‑94‑015‑7911‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7911-7 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tsai, W. -T. D.
    (1999) On Economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies. New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (2001) On Subject Specificity and Theory of Syntax-Semantics Interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 10, 129–168.10.1023/A:1008321327978
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008321327978 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2004) Tan you ren, you de ren, han you xie ren [On "you ren", "you de ren" and "you xie ren"]. Han Yu Xue Bao [Chinese Linguistics] 2004(2), 16–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tsai, C. -Y. E.
    (2016) On "quantity" number phrases in Mandarin. Talk given in Academia Sinica, Taiwan. Nov. 28th, 2016.
  51. Williams, E.
    (1994) Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2006) The Subject-Predicate Theory of There. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(4), 648–651.10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.648
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.648 [Google Scholar]
  53. Winter, Y.
    (1997) Choice functions and the scopal semantics of indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20, 399–467.10.1023/A:1005354323136
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005354323136 [Google Scholar]
  54. Xiang, M.
    (2008) Plurality, Maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin Dou . Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17, 227–245.10.1007/s10831‑008‑9025‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9025-9 [Google Scholar]
  55. Zeijlstra, H.
    (2004) Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. (PhD Dissertation), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. (2012) There is only one way to agree. The Linguistic Review, 29(3), 491–539.10.1515/tlr‑2012‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2012-0017 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.17002.wen
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.17002.wen
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error