1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
  4. Volume 5, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8706
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper aims to develop the empirical and theoretical basis for the necessity of motivating a cartographic approach (Rizzi 1997Cinque 1999) to the clausal structure of nonsententials (NSs) in Mandarin. Especially noteworthy about NSs is that they are able to encode clause type information, illocutionary force and the discourse roles and /, though their structure is considerably reduced. Following the line of reasoning in Sigurðsson & Maling (2012) and Tsai (2015a2015b), I show that NSs have a fully-fledged CP structure, according to the effects exerted upon their interpretation. Adopting Haegeman’s (2014) sa*P analysis of the discourse particle in West Flemish, I argue that NSs contain a suprasentential structure, a Speech Act layer, dominating ForceP and responsible for the encoding of the / relation sensitive to the immediate context. Crucially, it is argued that the discourse properties surrounding NSs pertain to the articulated CP structure of NSs. The major consequence of the proposed analysis is to show that the theory of discourse is closely tied to the architecture of grammar in general, adding weight to the view that the transparent syntax-discourse mapping results from a set of functional projections layered in the CP periphery.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.18001.jhe
2018-12-13
2024-12-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.18001.jhe
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adger, D.
    (2007) Three domains of finiteness: A minimalist perspective. InIrina Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp.3–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barton, E. & Progovac, L.
    (2005) Nonsententials in minimalism. InR. Elugardo and R. J. Stainton (Eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech (pp.71–93). Netherlands: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑2301‑4_4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2301-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barton, E.
    (1998) The grammar of telegraphic structures. Journal of English Linguistics, 26(1), 37–67. 10.1177/007542429802600103
     https://doi.org/10.1177/007542429802600103 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chomsky, N.
    (1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiang, Y.-C. Lucy
    (2015) On right dislocation in Mandarin Chinese. MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
  6. Cinque, G.
    (1999) Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Culicover, P. & Jackendoff, R.
    (2005) Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. De Cat, C.
    (2013) Root phenomena as interface phenomena: Evidence from non-sententials. InFolli, R., Sevdali, C. and Truswell, R. (Eds.), Syntax and its limits, (pp.122–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0007
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  9. De Cat, C. & Tsoulas, G.
    (2006) The structure of fragments in (child) French. In A. Belleti , E. Bennati , C. Chesi , E. Di Domenico , I. Ferrari (Eds.), Language acquisition and development proceedings of GALA 2005 (pp.142–147). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Erlewine, M. Y.
    (2017) Low sentence-final particles in Mandarin Chinese and the Final-over-Final Constraint. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 26, 37–75. 10.1007/s10831‑016‑9150‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-016-9150-9 [Google Scholar]
  11. Espinal, M. T.
    (2013) On the structure of vocatives. InBarbara Sonnenhauser and Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna (Eds.), Vocative!: Addressing between system and performance (pp.109–132). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110304176.109
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110304176.109 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fortin, C.
    (2007) Some (not all) nonsententials are only a phase. Lingua, 117(1), 67–94. 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.09.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  13. Grano, T.
    (2017) Finiteness contrasts without Tense? A view from Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 26(3), 259–299. 10.1007/s10831‑017‑9159‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-017-9159-8 [Google Scholar]
  14. Haegeman, L.
    (2014) West Flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica, 68(1), 116–139. 10.1111/stul.12023
     https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12023 [Google Scholar]
  15. Haegeman, L. & Greco, Ciro
    (2018) West Flemish V3 and the interaction of syntax and discourse. Journal Of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 21(1), 1–56. 10.1007/s10828‑018‑9093‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-018-9093-9 [Google Scholar]
  16. Haegeman, L. & Hill, V.
    (2013) The syntacticization of discourse. InFolli, R., R. Truswell and C. Sevdali (Eds.), Syntax and its limits (pp.370–390). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hill, V.
    (2007) Vocatives and the pragmatic-syntax interface. Lingua, 117, 2077–2105. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hsu, C.-W.
    (2016) Pragmatic functions of Mandarin Chinese utterance-initial Particles: A case study of Eh2 and Oh. MA Thesis, National Taiwan University.
  19. Huang, C.-T. J.
    (1984) On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 531–574.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. (1988) Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language, 64, 274–311. 10.2307/415435
     https://doi.org/10.2307/415435 [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, C.-T. J. Y.-H., Li, A. & Li, Y.-F.
    (2009) The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166935
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166935 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kayne, R.
    (1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Keiko, M.
    (2017) Very early utterances in child language: Implications for the minimalist theory. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series, 47(2), 361–381.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, B.
    (2006) Chinese sentence-final particles and the syntax of the periphery. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Leiden.
  25. Liao, W.-W. R.
    (2017) Remarks on the Final-over-Final Condition: A view from Chinese head-final structures. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 38(2): 93–118. 10.1515/scl‑2017‑0005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/scl-2017-0005 [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, D.-C.
    (2011) The nature of interjections: Pro-sentences. Chinese Teaching in the World, 2, 147–158.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, Y.-H., Pan, W.-Y. & Hu, Hua
    (2001) Shiyong xiandai hanyu yufa (Modern Chinese grammar). The Commercial Press
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Mao, T. & Meng, F.
    (2016) The cartographic project of the generative enterprise – An interview with Guglielmo Cinque. Language and Linguistics, 17(6), 917–936. 10.1177/1606822X16659002
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1606822X16659002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Merchant, J.
    (2001) The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. (2004) Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(6), 661–738. 10.1007/s10988‑005‑7378‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2006) Small structures: A sententialist perspective. InLjiljana Progovac, Kate Paesani, Eugenia Casielles and Ellen Barton (Eds.), The syntax of nonsententials: multidisciplinary perspectives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 93] (pp.77–91). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.93.05mer
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.93.05mer [Google Scholar]
  32. Moro, A.
    (2003) Notes on vocative case: A case study in clause structure. InQuer Josep, Jan Schroten, Mauro Scorretti, Petra Sleeman and Els Verheugd (Eds.), Romance language and linguistics theory 2001 [Current Issues in Linguistics Theory 245] (pp.247–261). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.245.15mor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.245.15mor [Google Scholar]
  33. Murphy, G. L.
    (1985) Psychological explanations of deep and surface anaphora. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 785–813. 10.1016/0378‑2166(85)90004‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90004-9 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pan, V. J., & Paul, W.
    (2016) Why Chinese sfps are neither optional nor disjunctors. Lingua, 170, 23–34. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.10.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  35. Paul, W.
    (2014) Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica, 68, 77–115. 10.1111/stul.12020
     https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12020 [Google Scholar]
  36. Portner, P.
    (2004) Vocatives, topics, and imperatives. Talk given atthe IMS Workshop on Information Structure.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. (2005) Instructions for interpretation as separate performatives. InKerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (Eds.), Information Structure and Grammar (pp.407–425). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.100.22por
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.100.22por [Google Scholar]
  38. Progovac, L.
    (2006) The syntax of nonsententials: Small clauses and phrases at the root. InLjiljana Progovac, Kate Paesani, Eugenia Casielles and Ellen Barton (Eds.), The syntax of nonsententials: Multidisciplinary perspectives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 93] (pp.33–61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.93.04pro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.93.04pro [Google Scholar]
  39. Rizzi, Luigi
    (1993/1994) Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root. Language Acquisition, 3, 371–393. 10.1207/s15327817la0304_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0304_2 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rizzi, L.
    (1997) The fine structure of the left periphery. InL. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp.281–338). Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2006) On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP Effects. InLisa Cheng and Norbert Corver (Eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on (pp.97–133). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Sag, I. A. & Hankamer, J.
    (1984) Toward a theory of anaphoric processing. Linguistics and Philosophy, 7, 325–345. 10.1007/BF00627709
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627709 [Google Scholar]
  43. Searle, J.
    (1976) The classification of illocutionary acts. Language and Society, 5, 1–24. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sigurðsson, H. Á. & Maling, J.
    (2012) Silent heads. InLaura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (Eds.), Functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structuresVol.7 (pp.368–378). New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746736.003.0028
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746736.003.0028 [Google Scholar]
  45. Stainton, R.
    (2006) Words and thoughts: Subsentences, ellipsis, and the philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250387.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250387.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sybesma, R.
    (2017) Finiteness. InSybesma, R. P. E., Behr, W., Gu, Y., Handel, Z., Huang, C. T. J., Myers, J. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguisticsVolume2 (pp.233–237). Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Ting, J.
    (2006) NegP and the particle Suo in Mandarin Chinese. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 32 (2), 71–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Tsai, W.-T. D.
    (2015a) A tale of two peripheries: Evidence from Chinse adverbials, light verbs, applicatives and object fronting. InWei-tien Dylan Tsai (Ed.), The cartography of Chinese syntax (pp.1–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. (2015b) On the Topography of Chinese modals. InUr Shlonsky (Ed.), Beyond functional sequence: The cartography of syntactic structuresVolume10 (pp.275–294). New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0015
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2017) On transitivizing unergatives and unaccusatives in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented the 2nd International Workshop on Syntactic Cartography (IWSC), Beijing.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Valmala, V.
    (2007) The syntax of little things. Paper presented at the 17th Colloquiumon on Generative Grammar, Girona.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Wei, T.-C.
    (2016) Fragment answers in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 3(1), 100–131. 10.1075/ijchl.3.1.04wei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.3.1.04wei [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, N. N.
    To appear. Sentence-final aspect particles as finite markers in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.18001.jhe
Loading
On the syntax-discourse interface of nonsententials in Mandarin
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 5, 252 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.18001.jhe
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.18001.jhe
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.18001.jhe
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discourse particles; Mandarin; nonsententials; sentence-final particles; speech act layer

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error