1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8706
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

摘要

本文通过对含有光杆动宾结构和体标记的汉语非自足句的考察,提出这些句子不合法的原因在于它们都是非限定句。在对非限定句做出的功能定义的基础上,本文指出事件句的时间理解需要三类抽象“时间”,即事件时间(Situation Time, SitT),声称/指称时间(Topic/Reference Time, TT),和说话时间(Utterance Time, UT)。在此基础上,我们进一步指出限定句的骨架的必有成分包括 CP, TP, AspP 和 VP(即 VP-e)。因此,本文讨论的句子之所以不合法,可以归因于骨架的不完整。同时,本文也检验了几种修补该类句子的手段,指出其目的多是加强了谓语的潜在的事件性,以满足限定事件句骨架的需要。由此,本文提出了一种分析汉语非自足句的新的理论框架。

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.19002.syb
2020-01-14
2025-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, John M.
    (1997) Finiteness and auxiliarihood. From runes to romance: A festschrift for Gunnar Perssón on his sixtieth birthday, ed.Mats Rydén, Henryk Kardela, Johan Nordlander and Bengt Odenstedt, Umeå: University of Umeå, 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cáo, Dàogēn 曹道根
    (2018) Zài lùn Hànyǔ shìfǒu yǒu xiàndìng hé fēixiàndìng qūfēn再论汉语是否有限定和非限定区分 [Revisiting the finite vs. non-finite distinction in Chinese]. Dāngdài Yǔyánxué当代语言学20/1, 19–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chu, Chauncey C.
    (2009) Relevance and the discourse functions of Mandarin Utterance Final Particles. Language and Linguistics Compass3/1, 282–299. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00105.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00105.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Dowty, David
    (1979) Word meaning and Montague Grammar, Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
  5. Gù, Yáng 顾阳
    (2008) Shí tài, shízhì lǐlùn yǔ Hànyǔ shíjiān cānzhào yánjiū时态、时制理论与汉语时间参照研究 [Tense, tense theory and time reference in Chinese]. InShěn Yáng 沈阳, Féng Shènglì 冯胜利 (eds.) Dāngdài yǔyánxué lǐlùn hé Hànyǔ yánjiū当代语言学理论和汉语研究 [Current linguistic theories and studies in Chinese], 97–119. Běijīng Shāngwù yìnshūguǎn 北京商务印书馆.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Guéron, Jacqueline and Teun Hoekstra
    (1995) The temporal interpretation of predication. Small clauses [Syntax and semantics 28], ed.Anna Cardinaletti and Maria-Teresa Guasti, 77–107. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hé, Yáng 贺阳
    (1994) Hànyǔ wánjù chéngfēn chūtàn汉语完句成分初探 [Exploring sentence-completing elements in Chinese]. Yǔyán Jiàoxué yǔ Yánjiū语言教学与研究4, 26–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoekstra, Teun, Nina Hyams and Misha Becker
    (1999) The role of the specifier and finiteness in early grammar. Specifiers. Minimalist approaches, ed.David Adger, Susan Pintzuk, Barbara Plunkett and George Tsoulas, 252–270. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hu, Jianhua, Haihua Pan and Liejiong Xu
    (2001) Is there a finite vs. nonfinite distinction in Chinese?Linguistics39:1117–1148. 10.1515/ling.2001.043
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.043 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hú, Jiànhuá 胡建华 and Shí Dìngxǔ 石定栩
    (2005) Wánjù tiáojiàn yǔ zhǐchēng tèzhēng de yǔnzhǔn完句条件与指称特征的允准 [Conditions on sentence completion and the licensing of referential features]. Yǔyán Kēxué语言科学4/5, 42–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang, C.-T. James
    (1982) Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Huang, Nick
    (2018) Control complements in Mandarin Chinese: implications for restructuring and the Chinese finiteness debate. Journal of East Asian Linguistics27/4, 347–376. 10.1007/s10831‑018‑9185‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-018-9185-1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Jīn, Tíngēn 金廷恩
    (1999) Hànyǔ wánjù chéngfēn shuōlüè汉语完句成分说略 [Brief discussion of sentence completing elements in Chinese]. Hànyǔ Xuéxí汉语学习6, 8–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jìng, Chéng 竟成
    (1996) Hànyǔ de chéngjù guòchéng hé shíjiān gàiniàn de biǎodá汉语的成句过程和时间概念的表达 [The process of building sentences in Chinese and the expression of the concept of time]. Yǔwén Yánjiū语文研究1, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Katz, Graham
    (1995) Stativity, genericity and temporal reference, Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2003) Event arguments, adverb selection and the Stative Adverb Gap. Modifying Adjunctsed.Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn and Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 455–474. 10.1515/9783110894646.455
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894646.455 [Google Scholar]
  17. Klein, Wolfgang
    (1994) Time in language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kǒng, Lìngdá 孔令达
    (1994) Yǐngxiǎng Hànyǔ jùzi zìzú de yǔyán xíngshì影响汉语句子自足的语言形式 [Language forms influencing the self-sufficiency of Chinese sentences]. Zhōngguó Yǔwén中国语文6, 434–440.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kratzer, Angelika
    (1998) More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory VIII, ed.Devron Strolovitch and Aaron Lawson, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications/Cornell University, 92–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, Charles and Sandra Thompson
    (1981) Mandarin Chinese. A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Y.-H. Audrey
    (1990) Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑1898‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1898-6 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin, Jo-wang
    (2003) Selectional restrictions of tenses and temporal reference of Chinese bare sentences. Lingua113/3, 271–302. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(02)00089‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00089-X [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah
    (2011) Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Syntax, 14, 48–73. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2010.00145.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00145.x [Google Scholar]
  24. (2012) Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics48, 151–186. 10.1017/S0022226711000272
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000272 [Google Scholar]
  25. Matthewson, Lisa
    (2002) An underspecified Tense in St’át’imcets. Paper presented atWECOL2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nikolaeva, Irina
    (2013) Unpacking finiteness. Canonical morphology and syntax, ed.Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina and Greville Corbett. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 99–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ed. (2007) Finiteness. Theoretical and empirical foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Reichenbach, Hans
    (1947) Elements of symbolic logic, Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rizzi, Luigi
    (1997) The fine structure of the left periphery, Elements of Grammar, ed.Liliane Haegeman, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 281–337. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  30. Sīmǎ, Líng 司马翎 [Rint Sybesma] and Hsieh Feng-fan 谢峰凡
    (2008) Shēngchéng yǔfǎ lǐlùn yǔ Hànyǔ yǔqìcí yánjiū生成语法理论与汉语语气词研究 [Generative grammatical theory and the research into Chinese modal particles]. InShěn Yáng 沈阳, Féng Shènglì 冯胜利 (eds.) Dāngdài yǔyánxué lǐlùn hé Hànyǔ yánjiū当代语言学理论和汉语研究 [Current linguistic theories and studies in Chinese], 364–374. Běijīng Shāngwù yìnshūguǎn 北京商务印书馆.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun, Hongyuan
    (2014) Temporal Construals of bare predicates in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, Universities of Leiden and Nantes. [www.lotpublications.nl/Documents/373_fulltext.pdf].
  32. Sybesma, Rint
    (2007) Whether we Tense-agree overtly or not. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 580–587. 10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.580
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.580 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2017) Finiteness. Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, ed.Rint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C.-T. James Huang & James Myers, Leiden: Brill, VolII, 233–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sybesma, Rint and Li Boya
    (2007) The dissection and structural mapping of Cantonese sentence final particles. Lingua117/10, 1739–1783. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  35. Tāng, Tíngchí 湯廷池
    (2000) Hànyǔ de “xiàndìng zǐjù” yǔ “fēixiàndìng zǐjù”. 漢語的“限定子句”與“非限定子句” [“Finite” and “non-finite” sentences in Chinese]. Yǔyán jì Yǔyánxué語言暨語言學1, 191–214.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tang, Chih-Chen Jane
    (1990) Chinese phrase structure and the extended X’-theory. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan
    (2008) Tense anchoring in Chinese. Lingua, 118, 675–686. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhang, Niina
    (2016) Identifying Chinese dependent clauses in the forms of subjects. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 25/3, 275–311. 10.1007/s10831‑016‑9146‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-016-9146-5 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.19002.syb
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): aspect; finiteness; Mandarin; tense; ; 完句成分; ; 自足句; 限定句
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error