1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
  4. Volume 6, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8706
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article investigates the previously undocumented focus-sensitiveness of certain scope-bearing expressions in Mandarin, and argues that the syntactic effects of this property should be accommodated by a structure that involves multiple dependencies and inherited dependencies. At the empirical side, it is shown that in Mandarin, certain quantificational expressions as well as typical focusing adverbs have to occur at positions where they (i) c‑command and (ii) be as close as possible to the contrastive foci that they associate with. The similarity to the typical association-with-focus configurations is captured under a unified Agree analysis that incorporated previous variable-adjunction-site analysis for focusing particles in German, while the additional dependencies in these structures are accounted for by multiple Agree and feature inheritance. This analysis is compared with some alternative approaches, which do not have equal empirical coverage or require more complex theoretical assumptions.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.19003.shu
2019-07-02
2023-06-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.19003.shu
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aldridge, Edith
    2010 Clause-internal wh-movement in Archaic Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics19.1–36. 10.1007/s10831‑009‑9054‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-009-9054-z [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Stephen R.
    1972 How to get even. Language48: 893–906. 10.2307/411993
     https://doi.org/10.2307/411993 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baltin, Mark, and Chris Collins
    2001 The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.. 10.1002/9780470756416
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756416 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bayer, Josef
    1999 Bound focus or how association with focus be achieved without going semantically astray?InThe grammar of focus, ed. byGeorges Rebuschi and Laurice Tuller, 55–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.24.03bay
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.24.03bay [Google Scholar]
  5. Beaver, I. David and Brady Z. Clark
    2008 Sense and sensitivity: how focus determines meaning. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444304176
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304176 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beghelli, Filippo, Stowell, Tim
    1997 Distributivity and negation. InWays of scope taking, ed. byAnna Szabolcsi, 71–107. Dordrecht: Kluwer Publications. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5814‑5_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5814-5_3 [Google Scholar]
  7. Belletti, Adriana
    2004 Aspects of the low IP area. InThe structure of CP and IP, ed. byL. Rizzi, 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Boeckx, Cedric
    2004 Long-distance agreement in Hindi: theoretical implications. Studia Linguistica58, 23–36. 10.1111/j.0039‑3193.2004.00108.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0039-3193.2004.00108.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Büring, Daniel and Katharina Hartmann
    2001 The syntax and semantics of focus- sensitive particles in German. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory19: 229–281. 10.1023/A:1010653115493
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010653115493 [Google Scholar]
  10. Büring, Daniel
    1996 Interpretation and movement: Towards an economy-theoretic treatment of German ‘Mittelfeld’ word order. Ms., University of Frankfurt.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng, Lisa L.-S.
    2008 Deconstructing the shi…de construction. The Linguistic Review25: 235–266. 10.1515/TLIR.2008.007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TLIR.2008.007 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chomsky, Noam
    2001 Derivation by phrase. InKen Hale: a life in language, ed.Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  13. 2004 Beyond explanatory adequacy. InStructure and beyond: the cartography of syntactic structures, vol3, ed. byAdriana Belletti, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 2007 Approaching UG from below. InInterfaces + recursion = language?: Chomsky’s Minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics, ed. byUli Sauerland and Gans-Martin Gärtner, 1–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 2008 On phases. InFoundational issues in linguistic theory: essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, ed. byRobert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 133–166. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999 Adverbs and functional heads: a cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Diesing, Molly
    1992 Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dretske, Fred I.
    1972 Contrastive Statements. Philosophical Review81, 411–37. 10.2307/2183886
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2183886 [Google Scholar]
  19. Drubig, H. Bernhard
    2003 Toward a typology of focus and focus constructions. Linguistics41: 1–50. 10.1515/ling.2003.003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.003 [Google Scholar]
  20. Engels, Eva
    2004 Adverb placement: An Optimality Theoretical approach. PhD dissertation. University of Potsdam.
  21. Ernst, Thomas
    1994 Functional categories and the Chinese Infl. Linguistics32: 191–212. 10.1515/ling.1994.32.2.191
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.2.191 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2002 The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Ernst, Thomas and Chengchi Wang
    1995 Object preposing in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics4: 235–260. 10.1007/BF01731510
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731510 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fox, Danny
    1995 Economy and scope. Natural Language Semantics3: 283–341. 10.1007/BF01248820
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01248820 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2000 Economy and semantic interpretation: A study of scope and variable binding. Cambridge: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Fox, Danny & David Pesetsky
    2005 Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics31. 1–45. 10.1515/thli.2005.31.1‑2.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2005.31.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Grewendorf, Günther
    2005 The discourse configurationality of scrambling. InThe free word order phenomenon: its syntactic sources and diversity, ed. byJoachim Sabel and Mamoru Saito, 75–135. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Haegeman, Liliane, and Terje Lohndal
    2010 Negative concord and (Multiple) Agree: A case study of West Flemish. Linguistic Inquiry41: 181–211. 10.1162/ling.2010.41.2.181
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2010.41.2.181 [Google Scholar]
  29. Herburger, Elena
    2000 What counts: focus and quantification. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7201.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7201.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hinterwimmer, Stephan
    2008 Q-adverbs as selective binders: The quantificational variability of free relatives and definite DPs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199208
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199208 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2011 Information structure and truth-conditional semantics. InSemantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol.2, ed. byKlaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn, and Paul Portner, 1875–1908. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hiraiwa, Ken
    2000 Multiple Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in Japanese. Ms, MIT, Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 2005 Dimensions of symmetry in syntax: agreement and clausal architecture. PhD dissertation. MIT.
  34. Hoeksema, Jack & Frans Zwarts
    1991 Some remarks on focus adverbs. Journal of semantics8: 51–70. 10.1093/jos/8.1‑2.51
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/8.1-2.51 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hole, Daniel P.
    2004 Focus and background marking in Mandarin Chinese: system and theory behind cái, jiù, dou, and ye. London: Routledge Curzon. 10.4324/9780203565193
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203565193 [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang, C.-T. James
    1982 Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD dissertation. MIT.
  37. Huddleston, Rodney D., and Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002 The Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Irurtzun, Aritz
    2007 The grammar of focus at the interfaces. PhD dissertation. University of the Basque Country.
  39. Jaeger, Florian and Michael Wagner
    2003 Association with focus and linear order in German. Ms., Stanford University.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Jackendoff, Ray
    1972 Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Koopman, Hilda
    1984 The syntax of verbs. Dordrecht: Foris.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Kratzer, Angelika
    2004 Interpreting focus: Presupposed or expressive meanings? A comment on Geurts and van de Sandt. Theoretical Linguistics30: 123–136. 10.1515/thli.2004.002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2004.002 [Google Scholar]
  43. Krifka, Manfred
    1990 Four thousand ships passed through the lock: Object-induced measure functions on events. Linguistics and Philosophy13: 487–520. 10.1007/BF00627291
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627291 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2006 Association with focus phrases. InThe architecture of focus, ed. byValéria Molár and Susanne Winkler, 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110922011.105
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110922011.105 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2007 Basic notions of information structure. InWorking Papers of the SFB 632, Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS) 6, ed. byCaroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, and Manfred Krifka, 13–56. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 2016 Quantification and information structure. InThe Oxford handbook of information structure, ed. ByCaroline Féry and Shinichiro Ishihara, 251–269. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Li, Charles and Sandra A. Thompson
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Li, Y.-H. Audrey
    1985 Abstract Case in Mandarin Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of South California.
  49. 2014 Quantification and scope. InThe Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, ed. byC.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li, and Andrew Simpson, 208–247. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584552.ch9
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584552.ch9 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lin, Jo-wang
    1998 Distributivity in Chinese and its implications. Natural Language Semantics6: 201–243. 10.1023/A:1008299031574
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008299031574 [Google Scholar]
  51. Miyagawa, Shigeru
    2010 Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Nunes, Jairo
    2001 Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry32: 303–344. 10.1162/00243890152001780
     https://doi.org/10.1162/00243890152001780 [Google Scholar]
  53. Partee, Barbara
    1991 Topic, focus, and quantifications. InProceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory I, ed. byS. Moore and A. Wyner, 257–280. Ithaca: Cornell University.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Paul, Waltraud, and John Whitman
    2008 Shi…de focus clefts in Mandarin Chinese. The Linguistic Review25: 413–451. 10.1515/TLIR.2008.012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TLIR.2008.012 [Google Scholar]
  55. Pollock, Jean-Yves
    1989 Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry20: 365–424.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Reinhart, Tanya
    1997 Wh-in-situ in the framework of the Minimalist Program. Natural Language Semantics6: 29–56. 10.1023/A:1008240014550
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008240014550 [Google Scholar]
  57. Reis, Marga
    2005 On the syntax of so-called focus particles in German – a reply to Büring and Hartmann 2001. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory23: 459–483. 10.1007/s11049‑004‑0766‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-004-0766-5 [Google Scholar]
  58. Richards, Marc
    2004 Object shift and scrambling in North and West Germanic: A case study in symmetrical syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
  59. Richards, Marc D.
    2007 On feature inheritance: An argument from the Phase Impenetrablity Condition. Linguistic Inquiry38: 563–572. 10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.563
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.563 [Google Scholar]
  60. Rooth, Mats
    1985 Association with focus. PhD dissertation. University of Massachusetts.
  61. Saito, Mamoru & Naoki Fukui
    1998 Order in phrase structure and movement. Linguistic Inquiry29: 439–474. 10.1162/002438998553815
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553815 [Google Scholar]
  62. Shu, Chih-hsiang
    2011 Sentence adverbs in the kingdom of Agree. PhD dissertation. State University of New York at Stony Brook.
  63. Shyu, Shu-ing
    1995 The syntax of focus and topic in Mandarin Chinese. PhD dissertation. University of Southern California.
  64. Soh, Hooi-ling
    1998 Object scrambling in Chinese. PhD dissertation. MIT.
  65. Sudhoff, Stephan
    2010 Focus particles in German: Syntax, prosody, and information structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/la.151
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.151 [Google Scholar]
  66. Thráinsson, Höskuldur
    2001 Object shift and scrambling. InHandbook of contemporary syntactic theory, ed. byMark Baltin and Chris Collins, 148–202. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.. 10.1002/9780470756416.ch6
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756416.ch6 [Google Scholar]
  67. Travis, Lisa
    1984 Parameters and effects of word order variation. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
  68. Tsai, W.-T. Dylan
    2008a Left periphery and how-why alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics17: 83–115. 10.1007/s10831‑008‑9021‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9021-0 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2008b Object specificity in Chinese: a view from the vP periphery. The Linguistic Review25: 479–502. 10.1515/TLIR.2008.014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TLIR.2008.014 [Google Scholar]
  70. Vallduví, Enric
    1990 The Informational Component, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
  71. Wagner, Michael
    2006 Association by movement: evidence from NPI-licensing. Natural Language Semantics. 14: 297–324. 10.1007/s11050‑007‑9005‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9005-z [Google Scholar]
  72. Wilkinson, Karina
    1996 The scope of even. Natural Language Semantics4: 193–215. 10.1007/BF00372819
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372819 [Google Scholar]
  73. Zeijlstra, Hedde
    2004 Sentential negation and negative concord. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
  74. 2012 There is only one way to Agree. The Linguistic Review29: 491–539. 10.1515/tlr‑2012‑0017
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2012-0017 [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang, Nina Ning
    1997 Syntactic dependencies in Mandarin Chinese. PhD dissertation. University of Toronto.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.19003.shu
Loading
On embedded contrastive focus in Mandarin Chinese
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 6, 76 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.19003.shu
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.19003.shu
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.19003.shu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): association with focus; embedded contrastive focus; focus construction; quantificational construction; syntax-semantics interface

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error