Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8706
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8714
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



There is general agreement on the main features of the process through which the phonology of modern standard Chinese has evolved over three millennia from that of Old Chinese. However, according to general linguistic theory, that phonological history is impossible: the theory claims that no human language can evolve in the manner in which Chinese is believed to have evolved. Furthermore, this particular strand of general linguistic theory has recently been corroborated through stringent statistical testing. Thus there is a glaring contradiction between two areas of scholarship, and to date there has been little recognition by the scholarly community of the need to resolve this contradiction, indeed little willingness to admit its existence. I argue that the contradiction is real and serious, and needs resolution.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baerman, M.
    (2011) Defectiveness and homophony avoidance. Journal of Linguistics, 47, 1–29. 10.1017/S0022226710000022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226710000022 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baxter, W. H.
    (1992) A handbook of Old Chinese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110857085
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857085 [Google Scholar]
  3. Behr, W.
    (2015) Comments on Sampson 2015. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 43, 719–32. 10.1353/jcl.2015.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0013 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bybee, J.
    (2002) Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change, 14, 261–90. 10.1017/S0954394502143018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394502143018 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, M.
    (1977) The time dimension: contributions toward a theory of sound change. InWang 1977 10.1515/9783110802399.197
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110802399.197 [Google Scholar]
  6. Egerod, S.
    (1982) How not to split tones – the Chaozhou case. 方言 1982 vol., issue3, pp.169–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hill, N. W.
    (2014) Grammatically conditioned sound change. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8, 211–29. 10.1111/lnc3.12073
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12073 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2016) A refutation of Song’s (2014) explanation of the ‘stop coda problem’ in Old Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 3, 270–81. 10.1075/ijchl.3.2.04hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.3.2.04hil [Google Scholar]
  9. Kahneman, D.
    (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaplan, A.
    (2011) How much homophony is normal?Journal of Linguistics, 47, 631–71. 10.1017/S0022226711000053
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000053 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2015) Reply to Sampson 2013. Diachronica, 32, 268–76. 10.1075/dia.32.2.04kap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.2.04kap [Google Scholar]
  12. Karlgren, B.
    (1954) Compendium of phonetics in Ancient and Archaic Chinese. Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, 26, 211–367.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. King, R. D.
    (1967) Functional load and sound change. Language, 43, 831–52. 10.2307/411969
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411969 [Google Scholar]
  14. Krishnamurti, Bh
    (1978) Areal and lexical diffusion of sound change. Language, 54, 1–20. 10.2307/412996
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412996 [Google Scholar]
  15. Labov, W.
    (1981) Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy. Language, 57, 267–308. 10.2307/413692
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413692 [Google Scholar]
  16. Martinet, A.
    (1955) Economie des changements phonétiques. Bern: Francke.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Osthoff, H. & Brugman, K.
    (1878) Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen, vol.1. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Pulleyblank, E. G.
    (1982) Review of Wang 1977. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 10, 392–416.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sampson, G. R.
    (2013) A counterexample to homophony avoidance. Diachronica, 30, 579–91. 10.1075/dia.30.4.05sam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.30.4.05sam [Google Scholar]
  20. (2015) A Chinese phonological enigma. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 43, 679–91 & 740–53. A version is reprinted in Sampson, The linguistics delusion, Sheffield and Connecticut: Equinox 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Schuessler, A.
    (2009) Minimal Old Chinese and Later Han Chinese: a companion to Grammata Serica Recensa. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
  22. Silverman, D.
    (2015) Comments on Sampson 2015. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 43, 697–702. 10.1353/jcl.2015.0019
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2015.0019 [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang, W. S.-Y.
    (1969) Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language, 45, 9–25. 10.2307/411748
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411748 [Google Scholar]
  24. (Ed.) (1977) The lexicon in phonological change. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110802399
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110802399 [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, W. S.-Y. & Lien Chinfa
    (1993) Bidirectional diffusion in sound change. InC. Jones (Ed.), Historical linguistics: problems and perspectives. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Wedel, A., Jackson, S., & Kaplan, A.
    (2013) Functional load and the lexicon: evidence that syntactic category and frequency relationships in minimal lemma pairs predict the loss of phoneme contrasts in language change. Language and Speech, 56, 395–417. 10.1177/0023830913489096
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830913489096 [Google Scholar]
  27. Wedel, A., Kaplan, A., & Jackson, S.
    (2013) High functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: a corpus study. Cognition, 128, 179–86. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Wells, J. C.
    (1982) Accents of English (3vols). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611759
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611759 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): functional load; functional yield; homophones; homophony avoidance; mergers
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error