Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8706
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8714
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In their article published in this journal, Pan and Jiang (2015) challenge the claims and proposals made in Cheng and Huang (1996) concerning both the distributional patterns and interpretive strategies for donkey anaphora in Mandarin conditional. They claim that all three types of conditionals ( and bare conditionals) allow either a -phrase or a pronoun in the consequent clause, and that both the -phrase and the pronoun may be either unselectively bound or interpreted by the E-type strategy. We show that, except for an observation already mentioned and accommodated in Cheng and Huang’s (1996) analysis of -conditionals, their distributional claims are incorrect. It is also shown that the interpretative flexibility they propose is untenable, as it leaves a number of otherwise well-predicted properties unaccounted for.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Cheng, L. L.-S.
    (1991) On the Typology of Wh-Questions. Doctoral dissertation, M.I.T., Cambridge: MA., U.S.A.
  2. Cheng, L. L.-S., & Huang, C.-T. J.
    (1996) Two types of donkey sentences. Natural Language Semantics4:121–163. 10.1007/BF00355411
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355411 [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans, G.
    (1980) Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry11:337–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Han, C.-H.
    (2002) Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions. Lingua112:201–229. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(01)00044‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00044-4 [Google Scholar]
  5. Heim, I.
    (1982) The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, U.S.A.
  6. (1990) E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy13:137–178. 10.1007/BF00630732
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630732 [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang, C.-T. J., & Ochi, M.
    (2004) Syntax of the hell: two types of dependencies. NELS 34, Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, pp.279–294.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kadmon, N.
    (1987) On unique and non-unique reference and asymmetric quantification. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, U.S.A.
  9. Kuo, C.-M.
    (1996) The interaction between daodi and wh-phrases in Mandarin Chinese. Ms., University of Southern California.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, Y.-H. A.
    (1992) Indefinite wh in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics1:125–155. 10.1007/BF00130234
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130234 [Google Scholar]
  11. Lin, J.-W.
    (1996) Polarity licensing and wh-phrase quantification in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, U.S.A.
  12. (1998) On existential polarity wh-phrases in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics7, 219–255. 10.1023/A:1008284513325
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008284513325 [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, M.
    (2016) Mandarin wh-conditionals as interrogative conditionals. Proceedings of SALT26: 814–835 2016 10.3765/salt.v26i0.3955
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3955 [Google Scholar]
  14. Pan, H., & Jiang, Y.
    (2015) The bound variable hierarchy and donkey anaphora in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics2:159–192. 10.1075/ijchl.2.2.01pan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.2.2.01pan [Google Scholar]
  15. Sadock, J. M.
    (1971) Queclaratives. InPapers from the seventh regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 223–232. Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Xiang, Y.
    (2016) Interpreting questions with non-exhaustive answers. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, U.S.A.
  17. Yu, X.
    (1965) Yiwen daici de renzhi yongfa [on the “wh-ever” use of interrogative pronouns]. Zhongguo Yuwen30–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): bare-; donkey anaphora; Mandarin; ruguo- and dou-conditionals
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error