Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8706
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8714
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper aims to explain the development of “zhě” serving as a conditional marker mainly in Late Archaic Chinese and to show that the conditional marker “zhě” derives from the nominalizer “zhě”. The grammaticalization of “zhě” is at the level of pragmatic inference, which shows an interaction of nominalization, topicality, and conditionality. Nominalization directly makes the original clause lose its ability to confirm the factuality of the event, and the nominalized construction then is endowed with a generic meaning, which is in some way related to conditionals. Specifically, the contexts triggering this grammaticalization can be summarized as follows: Firstly, the construction “VP/clause + zhě” always occupies the topic position; secondly, VPs/clauses in that construction always represent a kind of non-factual event, which means that the semantic feature of the VPs/clauses is non-factual or unreal. Furthermore, there are two clues, namely modal auxiliary and negator, which can help identify the non-factual event.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aldridge, E.
    (2009) The Old Chinese Determiner zhe. InCrisma, P. & Longobardi, G. (Eds.). Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory (pp.233–248). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560547.003.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560547.003.0014 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2013) Object relative clause in Archaic Chinese. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 58(2), 239–265. 10.1017/S0008413100003029
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100003029 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, M., & Vinokurova, N.
    (2009) On Agent Nominalizations and Why They Are Not like Event Nominalizations. Language, 85, 517–56. 10.1353/lan.0.0144
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0144 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bisang, W.
    (2014) On the strength of morphological paradigms – a historical account of radical pro-drop”. InRobbeets, M. and Bisang, W. (Eds.). Paradigm Change in Historical Reconstruction: The Transeurasian Languages and Beyond (pp.23–60). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.161.07bis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.161.07bis [Google Scholar]
  5. (2016) Finiteness, nominalization, and information structure. InChamoreau, C. & Estrada-Fernández, Z. (Eds.). Finiteness and Nominalization (pp.13–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.113.02bis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.113.02bis [Google Scholar]
  6. Comrie, D. & Thompson, S.
    (1985) Lexical nominalizations. InT. Shopen (ed.). Language typology and syntactic description. Vol.III. 349–398. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Deutscher, G.
    (2009) Nominalization and the origin of subordination. InTalmy Givon & Masayoshi Shibatani. (Eds). Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-cognition, Evolution (pp.199–214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.85.08nom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.85.08nom [Google Scholar]
  8. Diewald, G.
    (1999) A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. Paper presented at the symposium on “New Reflections on Grammaticalization,” Potsdam, 17–19 June, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dobson, W.
    (1959) Late Archaic Chinese, A Grammatical Study. Toronto: University of Toronto. 10.3138/9781442631564
    https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442631564 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dong, X.
    (2004) Cong huati jiegou dao fuju jiegou: yi “zhe” he “suo” de gongneng yanbian wei li [Derivation of conditional markers from topical contexts: the case study of zhe and suo], inTakashima, K. & Jiang, S. (Eds.). Meaning and Form: Essays in Pre-Modern Chinese Grammar (pp.291–304). München: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Eans, N. & Wilkins, D.
    (1998) The knowing ear: An Australian test of universal claims about the semantic structure of sensory verbs and their extension into the domain of cognition. (Arbeitspapier 32, NF.) Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Givón, T.
    (1990) Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction. Vol.2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.syn2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.syn2 [Google Scholar]
  13. (1993) English grammar: a function-based introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.engram1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.engram1 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gong, B.
    (2017) Shanggu hanyu jiasheju yanjiu [A Study on Hypothetical Sentences in Ancient Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Grice, H. P.
    (1967) Logic and conversation [The William James lectures]. Harvard University.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Haiman, J.
    (1978) Conditionals are topics. Language54(3), 564–589. 10.1353/lan.1978.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1978.0009 [Google Scholar]
  17. Harbsmeier, C.
    (1981) Aspects of Classical Chinese Syntax. London: Curzon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Heine, B.
    (2002) On the role of context in grammaticalization. InWischer, Ilse & Gabriele Diewald. (Eds.). New reflections on grammaticalization (pp.83–101). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.08hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.08hei [Google Scholar]
  19. He, L.
    (2004) Zuozhuan Xuci Yanjiu [Functional Categories in the Zuozhuan]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hopper, P., & Thompson, S.
    (1984) The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Lauguage, 60(4), 703–752.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, C.
    (1984) On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 531–574.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ida, M.
    (2012) Yueyu de tiaojian fenju biaoji “ge” [The conditional marker ge in Cantonese]. Studies of Chinese languages, 5, 458–468.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiang, L.
    (2002) Shijianci shi he hou de yufahua. [The grammaticalization of temporal words Shi and Hou]. Studies of Chinese languages, 4, 291–301.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jiang, L., Xia, C., Zhao, K. and Guo, W.
    (1998) Xianqin shi jianshang cidian [A dictionary of pre-Qin poetry appreciation]. Shanghai: Shanghai Cishu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kabak, B., & Schiering, R.
    (2004) A corpus study on the distribution of Turkish ise and its clitic form. Turkic Languages, 8, 232–244.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lambrecht, K.
    (1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form. London & New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  27. Langacker, R.
    (1997) Generics and Habituals. InAthanasiadu, A. & René, D. (Eds.). On Conditionals Again (pp.191–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cilt.143.11lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.143.11lan [Google Scholar]
  28. Lehmann, C.
    (1988) Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage. InHaiman, J. and Thompson, S. A. (Eds.). Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse (pp.181–225). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tsl.18.09leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.09leh [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, C., & Thompson, S.
    (1976) Subject and topic: a new typology of language, inLi, C. N. (Ed.) Subject and Topic (pp.457–90). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, Q.
    (2017) Shanggu hanyu “zhuzhiwei” jiegou de huatixing ji qi xiangguan wenti [The Topicality of “Subject+zhī (之)+Predicate” Structure in Ancient Chinese and Relevant Issues]. Research in Ancient Chinese Language, 2, 62–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu, D.
    (2004) Huati biaoji cong he er lai? [Where is the Topic Maker From? – The Universality and Peculiarity in Grammaticalization] (pp.6–15). InShi, F. and Shen, Z. (Eds.). Joy of Research – A Festschrift in honor of professor William S-Y Wang on his seventieth birthday. Tianjin: Nankai University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2019a) “Ruguo” de 31 zhong (huo 68 zhong) duiying xingshi – Wujiang tongli hua de tiaojian biaoji [31 (or 86) Counterparts of If: The Rich Inventory of Conditional Markers in the Wujiang (Tongli) Dialect of Wu Chinese]. Fangyan [Dialect], 1, 6–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2019b) Wujiang Tongli hua de tiaojian biaoji zhe ji qi laiyuan lice [The conditional marker tsØ52 in the Wujiang Tongli dialect of Wu Chinese and its historical source]. Yuyan yanjiu jikan [Bulletin of Linguistic Studies], 24, 163–177.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lü, S.
    (1982 [1942/1944]) Zhongguo Wenfa Yaolue [The Outline of Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Malchukov, A.
    (2004) Nominalization, Verbalization: Constraining a Typology of Transcategorial Operations. München: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2006) Constraining nominalization: function/form competition. Linguistics, 44, 973–1009. 10.1515/LING.2006.032
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2006.032 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mei, G.
    (2015) Shanggu hanyu yuga gangyao [Outline of Archaic Chinese Grammar]. Taipei: Sanmin Shuju.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Peyraube, A.
    (1997) On word order in Archaic Chinese. Cahiers de linguistique – Asie orientale26(1), 3–20. 10.3406/clao.1997.1502
    https://doi.org/10.3406/clao.1997.1502 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pulleyblank, E. G.
    (1995) Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver: UBC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    (2019) What is nominalization? Towards the theoretical foundations of nominalization. InZariquiey, (Eds.), Nominalization in Languages of the Americas (pp.15–167). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tsl.124.02shi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.02shi [Google Scholar]
  42. Sun, H.
    (2015) Shanggu hanyu “zhe” de suowei zizhi biaoji gongneng zai yi [Revisiting the grammatical functions of the so-call ed “self-reference marker” zhe in ancient Chinese]. Studies of Chinese languages, 2, 133–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Traugott, E., Meulen, A., Reilly, J. and Ferguson, C.
    (1986) On Conditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753466
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, L.
    (1958) Hanyu shigao [A Historical Introduction to Chinese]. Beijing: Kexue Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (1998 [1962]) Gudai hanyu [Ancient Chinese]. Beijing:Zhonghua Shuju.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang, Y., & Fang, Y.
    (1992) Zhonggu hanyu yuci li shi [An Interpretation of Medieval Chinese Words]. Jilin: Jilin Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wu, H. & Shen, J.
    (2017) Guhanyu “zhe”: zizhi he zhuanzhi ruhe tongyi [How to unify the usages of zhe(者) in Pre-Qin Chinese]. Studies of the Chinese Language, 3, 277–289.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Xing, J.
    (2015) A Comparative Study of Semantic Change in Grammaticalization and Lexicalization in Chinese and Germanic Languages. Studies in Language, 39, 593–633. 10.1075/sl.39.3.03xin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.3.03xin [Google Scholar]
  49. Xing, X.
    (2005) Shenbei jinyu yanhe fangyan yuanwanglei xuni yuqi de biaoda shouduan [The Subjective Mood of Wish in the Seven Counties along the Yellow River in North Shaanxi Belonging to Jin Dialect]. Linguistic Research, 2, 44–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu, L., & Liu, D.
    (1998) Huati de jiegou yu gongneng [The Structure and Functions of Topics]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang, B., & He, L.
    (1992) Gu hanyu yufa ji qi fazhan [Ancient Chinese Grammar and Its Development]. Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Yap, F., & Matthews, S.
    (2008) The development of nominalizers in East Asian and Tibeto-Burman languages. InLópez-Couso, M., & Seoane, E. (Eds.). Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives (pp.309–341). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tsl.76.15yap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.76.15yap [Google Scholar]
  53. Yap, F., & Wang, J.
    (2011) From light noun to nominalizer and more: The grammaticalization of “zhe” and “suo” in Old and Middle Chinese. InYap, F., Grunow-Hårsta, K., and Wrona, J. (Eds.). Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives (pp.61–108). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tsl.96.02yap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.02yap [Google Scholar]
  54. Yuan, Y.
    (1997) Zhe de yufa gongneng ji qi lishi yanbian [On zhe’s grammatical function and its historical development]. Social Sciences in China, 3, 160–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang, Y.
    (2004) Xizhou hanyu yufa yanjiu [Study on the grammar of Western Zhou Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. (2016) Chutu xianqin wenxian xuci fazhan yanjiu [A Study of the development of the function word in the pre-Qin documents unearthed]. Guangzhou: Jinan University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhou, F.
    (1961) Zhongguo gudai yufa [A historical grammar of Ancient Chinese], Part I: Syntax. Taipei: The institute of history and philology, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. (1990 [1972]) Zhongguo gudai yufa [A historical grammar of Ancient Chinese], Part III: Substitution. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhu, D.
    (1983) Zizhi he zhuanzhi: Hanyu mingcihua biaoji “de, zhe, suo, zhi” de yufa gongneng he yuyi gongneng [Self-referring and other-referring expressions]. Fangyan [Dialect], 1, 16–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Zürcher, E.
    (1977) Late Han vernacular elements in the earliest Buddhist translations. Journal of the Chinese language Teachers Association, 12(3), 177–203.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conditional; grammaticalization; nominalization; topic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error