1887
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-8706
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This work investigates the division of labor between mood and illocutionary force in syntax by examining three modal construals encoded by the speaker-oriented adverb ‘best’ (deontic, epistemic and evidential) in Mandarin, and accounts for a cluster of syntactic and pragmatic properties it is associated with. Very much in line with Tsai’s (2015a2015b and 2015d) modal system in Mandarin, it is observed that each type of can co-occur with its matching modal auxiliary in the fashion of Cinque’s (1999) ‘location-in-Spec’ hypothesis and encodes a certain type of illocutionary force. One persistent question is how substantiates illocutionary force in syntax, while its designated position is not situated in the licensing domain of ForceP. As far as the left periphery is concerned, this work argues for a conspiracy between syntax, semantics and pragmatics to ensure the success in activating the Bidirectional Agree relation between speech act, force and mood. We argue for a speech act layer (Sa*P) externally merging to CP (Speas and Tenny, 2003), whose head values the uninterpretable speech act feature [Sa] on Force0 via the Bidirectional Agree to trigger its interface with the utterance content (CP). Meanwhile, following Kempchinsky’s (2009) idea, it is further argued in this work that Force0 hosts the uninterpretable feature [W] which has to be checked and valued by the modal construals of to determine the irrealis-realis mood. An immediate implication is that ForceP serves as a gateway to not only mood but also speech act at the interface. Several issues involved in dealing with are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.20011.jhe
2022-06-07
2024-04-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aoun, Joseph and Yen-hui Audrey, Li
    (1993) Wh-elements in situ: syntax or LF?Linguistic Inquiry, 24(2), 199–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin, John Langshaw
    (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Mark
    (2008) The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619830
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619830 [Google Scholar]
  4. Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts and Michelle, Sheehan
    (2014) Complexity in comparative syntax: The view from modern parametric theory. InFrederick J. Newmeyer and Laurel B. Preston (Eds.), Measuring grammatical complexity (pp.103–129). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685301.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685301.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng, Lai-Shen Lisa
    (1997) On the typology of wh-questions. Garland, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chomsky, Noam
    (2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. InMartin, Roger; Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp.89–155). Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2001) Derivation by phase. InM. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp.1–52). Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cinque, Guglielmo
    (1999) Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dong, Xiu fang
    (2004) Further grammaticalization of “shiti”: From functional word to word-internal element. Contemporary Linguistics, 1, 35–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Emonds, Joseph
    (1970) Root and structure-preserving transformations. PhD dissertation, MIT
  11. Ernst, Thomas
    (2002) The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Haegeman, Liliane
    (2003a) Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language, 18(4), 317–339. 10.1111/1468‑0017.00230
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00230 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2003b) Notes on long adverbial fronting in English and the left periphery. Linguistic Inquiry, 34(4), 640–649. 10.1162/ling.2003.34.4.640
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2003.34.4.640 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2006) Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua, 116(10), 1651–1669. 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.014 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2010) The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua, 120(3), 628–648. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2012a) The syntax of main clause phenomena: Deriving truncation. InLobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman, and Rachel Nye (Eds.), Main clause phenomena: New horizons (pp.113–134). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/la.190.05hae
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.05hae [Google Scholar]
  17. (2012b) Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and the composition of the left periphery: The cartography of syntactic structures (Volume 8). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858774.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858774.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Haegeman, Liliane and Virginia, Hill
    (2013) The syntacticization of discourse. InFolli, R., R. Truswell and C. Sevdali (Eds.), Syntax and its Limits (pp.370–390). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hooper, Joan B. & Sandra Thompson
    (1973) On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(4), 465–497.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang, C.-T. James and Masao, Ochi
    (2004) Syntax of the hell: Two types of dependencies. InK. Moulton & M. Wolf (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS34 (pp.279–294). MA: GLSA Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, C.-T. James, Yen-hui Audrey, Li and Yafei Li
    (2009) The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166935
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166935 [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang, C.-T. James
    (2014) On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. InAudrey Li, Andrew Simpson and Wei-tien Dylan Tsai (Eds.), Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective (pp.1–48). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945658.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945658.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kasher, Asa
    (1998) Pragmatics, critical concepts. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kellert, Olga and Sebastian, Lauschus
    (2016) The question particle o in some Tuscan dialects: Fiorentino, Pisano, and Crespinese. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 28(2), 69–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kempchinsky, Paula
    (2009) What can the subjunctive disjoint reference effect tell us about the subjunctive?Lingua, 119(12), 1788–1810. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  26. Larson, Richard
    (1988) On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), 335–391.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee, Chingkwei Adrienne
    (2007) “Kan” as a performative verb in Mandarin Chinese: A case of interaction between semantics/pragmatics and syntactic structure. Chung Hsing Journal of the Humanities, 38, 433–450.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, Yen-hui Audrey
    (1992) Indefinite wh in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, 125–55. 10.1007/BF00130234
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130234 [Google Scholar]
  29. Liang, Kai
    (2018) Xiàndài hànyǔ ‘Xshuāngyīn-shì’ de cíhuì uà yánjiū (Research on lexicalization of ‘Xdisyllabic-de’ in modern Chinese). MA thesis, Heilongjian University.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lin, Jo-Wang
    (2014) Wh-expressions in Mandarin Chinese. InAndrew Simpson, James Huang and Audrey Li (Eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics (pp.180–207). Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584552.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584552.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lu, Pu-sheng
    (2010) The lexicalization of emotional adverb zuihao. Journal of Fuyang Teachers College, 4, 19–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Luo, Zhubi
    (2012) Analysis on the subjectification of zuihao. Journal of Central South University of Technology (Social Science), 18(5), 228–233.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Neeleman, Ad and Hans, van de Koot
    (2017) Syntactic haplology. InMartin Everaert and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax (2nd Ed.) (pp.685–710). Oxford: Wiley. 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom084
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom084 [Google Scholar]
  34. Palmer, F. R.
    (2001) Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
  35. Pietrandrea, Paola
    (2007) The grammatical nature of some epistemic-evidential adverbs in spoken Italian. Rivista di Linguistica, 19(1), 39–63
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rizzi, Luigi
    (1997) The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. InLiliane Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar: A handbook in generative syntax (pp.281–337). Kluwer: Dordrecht. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2004) Locality and the left periphery. InAdriana Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structure (Vol.3) (pp.223–251). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Searle, J.
    (1976) The classification of illocutionary acts. Language and Society, 5, 1–24. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sigurðsson, H. Á. and J. Maling
    (2012) Silent heads. In byLaura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro and Cecilia Poletto (Eds.), Functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures (Vol.8) (pp.368–378). New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746736.003.0028
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746736.003.0028 [Google Scholar]
  40. Speas, Margaret
    (2004) Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua, 114(3), 255–276. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(03)00030‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00030-5 [Google Scholar]
  41. Speas, Peggy and Carol, Tenny
    (2003) Configurational properties of point of view roles. InAnna Maria Di, Sciullo (Ed.), Asymmetry in Gramma: Syntax and Semantics (Vol.1) (pp.315–345). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.57.15spe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.57.15spe [Google Scholar]
  42. Tenny, Carol
    (2000) Core events and adverbial modification. InTenny, C., Pustejovsky, J. (Ed.), Events as grammatical objects (pp.285–334). CSLI Publications, Stanford.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan
    (1994) On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
  44. (1999) On lexical courtesy. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8, 39–73. 10.1023/A:1008354312243
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008354312243 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2010a) High Applicatives are not high enough: A cartographic Solution. Manuscript, National Tsing Hua University.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (2010b) Tan Hanyu motaici de fenbu yu quanshi zhi duiying guanxi [On the syntax-semantics correspondences of Chinese modals]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 3, 208–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (2015a) A tale of two peripheries: Evidence from Chinese adverbials, light verbs, applicatives and object fronting. InWei-tien Dylan Tsai (Ed.), The cartography of Chinese syntax: The cartography of syntactic structures (Vol.11) (pp.1–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (2015b) A Case of V2 in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 36(2), 81–108. 10.1515/scl‑2015‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/scl-2015-0006 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2015c) On the topography of Chinese modals. InUr Shlonsky (Ed.), Beyond Functional Sequence, (pp.275–294). New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2015d) From microscopic view to cosmic perspective- generative landscape of Chinese syntax. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (2017) On split affectivity in Chinese. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series, 47(2), 407–432.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2019) Mood prominence and silent modals of Chinese. Language Sciences, 1, 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Winchester, Lindley
    (2019) Concord and agreement features in Modern Standard Arabic. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 91. 10.5334/gjgl.710
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.710 [Google Scholar]
  54. Xing, Sudan
    (2015a) The lexicalization and tokenization of modal adverb “zuihao”. Journal of International Chinese Studies, 1, 194–203.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (2015b) Yǔqìfùcí zuìhǎo de duōjiǎodù yánjiū (Multiple perspectives on the analysis of the mood adverb zuìhǎo). MA thesis, Shanghai Normal University.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Yang, Chong-Yu Barry
    (2014) Shenme gen Shenme ‘What and What’. Manuscript, National United University, Taiwan.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Yu, Rex Xin-Xian
    (2015) Modals and mood particles in Mandarin Chinese and Mayrinax Atayal. PhD dissertation, National Tsing Hua University.
  58. Yue, Yao
    (2010) On the subjective marker of suggestion in Chinese adverb zuihao. Linguistic Sciences, 2, 143–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang, Bin
    (2001) A dictionary of modern Chinese function words. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.20011.jhe
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.20011.jhe
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cartography; illocutionary force; mood prominence; syntax-pragmatics interface
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error