On the position of ReasonP

References

1. Aoun, J., & Y. -H. A. Li
   (1993) Syntax of Scope. MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bromberger, S.
   (1992) On what we know we don’t know: Explanation, theory, linguistics, and how questions shape them. University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chao, Y. -R.
   (1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chung, J. -Y. Z. & W. -T. D. Tsai
   (2020) Fei dianxing yiwenci de jufa cengji he yuyong xiaoying – cong bijiao yufa kan kejiahua de “magai” [On the syntactic cartography and pragmatic effects of non-canonical wh-questions: A comparative study of “what” in Hakka], Zhongguo yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 2020(2), 201–220.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Endo, Y.
   (2015) Two ReasonPs: What are*(n’t) you coming to US for?InU. Shlonsky. (Ed.), Beyond functional sequences (pp.220–231). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0012
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
6. Haegeman, L.
   (2006) Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD and the left periphery. InR. Zanuttini, H. Campos, E. Herburger, & P. Portner. (Eds.), Negation, tense and clausal architecture: Cross-linguistic investigations (pp.27–52). Georgetown University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Huang, C. -T. J.
   (1982) Logical relation in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
8. Huang, C. -T. J.
   (1984) Phrase structure, lexical integrity, and Chinese compounds. Journal of Chinese teachers association, 19(2), 53–78.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Huang, C. -T. J.
   (1988) Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language, 64, 274–311. 10.2307/415435
   https://doi.org/10.2307/415435 [Google Scholar]
10. Ko, H.
    (2005) Syntax of why-in-situ: Merge into [Spec,CP] in the overt syntax. Natural language and linguistic theory, 23, 867–916. 10.1007/s11049‑004‑5923‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-004-5923-3 [Google Scholar]
11. Koster, J.
    (1987) Domains and dynasty: the radical autonomy of syntax. Foris Publication. 10.1515/9783110808520
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808520 [Google Scholar]
12. Lasnik, H. and Mamoru, S.
    (1984) On the nature of proper government. Linguistic inquiry, 15, 235–289.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Li, Y. -H. A.
    (1985) Abstract case in Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.
14. Li, Y. -H. A.
    (1990) Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑1898‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1898-6 [Google Scholar]
15. Lin, J. -W.
    (1992) The syntax of zenmeyang ‘how’ and weishenme ‘why’ in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of east Asian linguistics, 1(3), 293–331. 10.1007/BF00130555
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130555 [Google Scholar]
16. Miyagawa, S.
    (2018) Agreement beyond phi. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Obenauer, H.
    (2006) Special interrogatives–left periphery, wh-doubling, and (apparently) optional elements. InJ. Doetjes & P. Gonzalez. (Eds.), Romance language and linguistic theory 2004 (Current issues in linguistic theory 278) (pp.247–273). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cilt.278.12obe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.278.12obe [Google Scholar]
18. Ochi, M.
    (2004) How come and other adjunct wh-phrases: a cross-linguistic perspective. Language and linguistics, 5(1), 29–57.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Pan, V. J.
    (2014) Deriving special questions in Mandarin Chinese: a comparative study. InJ. -U. Park and I. -J. Lee. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Seoul international conference on generative grammar (pp.349–368). The Korean Generative Grammar Circle.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Pan, V. J.
    (2015) Mandarin peripheral construals at the syntax-discourse interface. The Linguistic review, 32(4), 819–868. 10.1515/tlr‑2015‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2015-0005 [Google Scholar]
21. Pan, V. J.
    (2019) Architecture of the periphery in Chinese. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315158228
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158228 [Google Scholar]
22. Pesetsky, D.
    (2000) Phrasal movement and its kin. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5365.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5365.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
23. Pylkkanen, L.
    (2002) Introducing arguments. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
24. Rizzi, L.
    (1990) Relativized minimality. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Rizzi, L.
    (1997) The fine structure of the left periphery. InL. Haegeman. (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp.281–337). Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
26. Rizzi, L.
    (2001) On the position of “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. InG. Cinque & G. Salvi. (Eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to L. Renzi (pp.287–296). Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Rizzi, L.
    (2006) On the form of chains: criterial positions and ECP effects. InL. Cheng & N. Corver. (Eds.), Wh-movement: moving on (pp.97–133). MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Roberts, I.
    (2011) Head movement and the minimalist program. InC. Boeckx. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism (pp.195–219). Oxford University Press
    [Google Scholar]
29. Shao, J. -M.
    (1996) Xiandai hanyu yiwenju yanjiu [Studies on Chinese interrogative constructions]. Huadong Normal University Publisher.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Shao, J. -M. & X. -F. Zhao
    (1989) “Shenme” fei yiwen yongfa yanjiu [A study on the non-interrogative usages of “what”], Yuyan jiaoxue yu yanjiu [Language teaching and linguistic studies], 1, 26–40.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Shlonsky, U. & G. Soare
    (2011) Where’s ‘why’?Linguistic inquiry, 42, 651–669. 10.1162/LING_a_00064
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00064 [Google Scholar]
32. Soh, H. -L.
    (2005) Wh-in-situ in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistic inquiry, 36, 143–155. 10.1162/ling.2005.36.1.143
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2005.36.1.143 [Google Scholar]
33. Stepanov, A. & W. -T. D. Tsai
    (2008) Cartography and licensing of wh-adjuncts: a crosslinguistic perspective. Natural language and linguistic theory, 26(3), 589–638. 10.1007/s11049‑008‑9047‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9047-z [Google Scholar]
34. Sybesma, R.
    (1999) The Mandarin VP (Studies in natural language and linguistic theory44). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Szabolcsi, A. & F. Zwarts
    (1993) Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. Natural language semantics, 1(3), 235–284. 10.1007/BF00263545
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263545 [Google Scholar]
36. Takita, K. and B. C. -Y. Yang
    (2014) On multiple wh-questions with ‘why’ in Japanese and Chinese. InM. Saito. (Ed.), Japanese syntax in comparative perspective (pp.206–227). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945207.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945207.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
37. Tang, T. -C.
    (2000) Hanyu de xianding ziju yu feixiandian ziju [Finite and nonfinite clauses in Chinese], Language and linguistics, 1(1), 191–214.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Travis, L.
    (1984) Parameters and effects of word order variation, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT
39. Tsai, W. -T. D.
    (1994) On nominal islands and LF extraction in Chinese. Natural language & linguistic theory, 12 (1), 121–175. 10.1007/BF00992747
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992747 [Google Scholar]
40. Tsai, W. -T. D.
    (2008) Left periphery and how-why alternations. Journal of east Asian linguistics, 17(2), 83–115. 10.1007/s10831‑008‑9021‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9021-0 [Google Scholar]
41. Tsai, W. -T. D.
    (2011) Cong ‘zhe hua cong he shuo qi’ shuo qi [Speaking from ‘where should I begin?’], Yuyanxue luncong [Essays on Linguistics], 43, 194–208.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Tsai, W. -T. D.
    (2015a) On the topography of Chinese modals. InU. Shlonsky. (Ed.), Beyond functional sequence (pp.275–294). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
43. Tsai, W. -T. D.
    (2015b) A tale of two peripheries: Evidence from Chinese adverbials, light verbs, applicatives and object fronting. InW. -T. D. Tsai. (Ed.), The cartography of Chinese syntax: The cartography of syntactic Structures11 (pp.1–32). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Tsai, W. -T. D.
    (2016) Lun Hanyu neiwai qingdongci de fenbu yu quanshi [On the distribution and interpretation of inner and outer light verbs in Chinese], Yuyan kexue [Language science], 15(4), 362–376.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tsai, W. -T. D.
    (2021) On applicative why-questions in Chinese. InGabriela Soare (Ed.), Why is ‘why’ unique? Its syntactic and semantic properties (pp.197–218). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110675160‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110675160-007 [Google Scholar]
46. Wang, Chang-song
    (2017) Yunlü jufa jiaohu zuoyongxia de hanyu feidianxing yiwenci yanjiu – yi “V shenme(V)/(NP)” zhong de “shenme” weili. [A study on noncanonical wh particles from the syntax-prosody interface--a case study of shenme in ‘V shenme (V)/(NP)’ construction], Yunlü yufa yanjiu [Studies in Prosodic Grammar], 2(1), 73–100.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Yang, Yang & Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai
    (2019) Nianli yizhuan de yunlü yufa ji shiyan yanjiu [An experimental study of the prosodic syntax of force shift], Shijie Hanyu jiaoxue [Chinese teaching in the world], 33(1), 36–46.
    [Google Scholar]