1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
  4. Volume 9, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-8706
  • E-ISSN: 2213-8714
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In the event quantity construction, ‘much’ is a quantity adjective. What ‘much’ modifies is the root of the verb and the root has to move to the light verb position to be categorically defined. The quantity adjective ‘much’ functions to introduce a measure function which measures the event denoted by the verb along the dimension valued by the assignment function , and the domain to which the measure function applies must be monotonic. So, the ‘modification’ relation between the quantity adjective ‘much’ and its modifyee essentially differs from that between a typical gradable adjective like ‘sweat’ and its modifyee. This explains how the quantity adjective ‘much’ differs from the typical adjective in syntax and semantics.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.21005.liu
2022-12-06
2024-10-03

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.21005.liu
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arad, M.
    (2005) Roots and patterns: Hebrew morphosyntax. Dordrecht: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bošković, Ž.
    (2005) On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica, 59 (1), 1–45. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2005.00118.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00118.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, M.-M.
    (2013) The V-duō construction in Mandarin Chinese. Master Thesis, National Chiao Tung University.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng, L. L.-S.
    (2007) Verb copying in Mandarin Chinese. InN. Corver & J. Nunes (Eds.), The copy theory of movement on the PF side (pp.151–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.107.07che
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.107.07che [Google Scholar]
  5. (2012) Verb doubling in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 22(1), 1–37. 10.1007/s10831‑012‑9095‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-012-9095-6 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chierchia, G.
    (1998) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6(4), 339–405. 10.1023/A:1008324218506
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cresswell, M. J.
    (1977) The semantics of degree. InB. Partee (Ed.), Montague grammar (pp.261–292). New York, NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Dowty, D.
    (1979) Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
  9. (1991) Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547–619. 10.1353/lan.1991.0021
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021 [Google Scholar]
  10. Erlewine, M. Y.
    (2020) Anti-locality and subject extraction. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 1–38. 10.5334/gjgl.1079
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1079 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ernst, T.
    (1996) Chinese evidence for semi-arguments. InC.-C. Cheng, J. L. Packard & J. H. S. Yoon (Eds.), Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 26(1/2), 117–132. Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois Urbana.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Halle, M., & Marantz, A.
    (1993) Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. InK. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building201 (pp.111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Harley, H.
    (2009) Compounding in distributed morphology. InR. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of compounding (pp.129–144). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Heim, I., & Kratzer, A.
    (1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hsieh, I.-T.
    (2019) Q-adjectives in Mandarin and the interpretation of nominal phrases. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 6(1), 46–75. 10.1075/ijchl.18006.hsi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.18006.hsi [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang, C.-T. J.
    (1982) Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  17. Huang, C.-T. J., Li, Y.-H. A., & Li, Y.-F.
    (2009) The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166935
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166935 [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang, S.-Z.
    (2006) Property theory, adjectives, and modification in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 15(4), 343–369. 10.1007/s10831‑006‑9002‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-006-9002-0 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jackendoff, R.
    (1990) Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kratzer, A.
    (1996) Severing the external argument from its verb. InJ. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp.109–137). Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8617‑7_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  21. Krifka, M.
    (1992) Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. InI. A. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical matters (pp.29–53). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M.
    (2005) Argument realization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610479
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610479 [Google Scholar]
  23. Levinson, L.
    (2010) Arguments for pseudo-resultative predicates. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28(1), 135–182. 10.1007/s11049‑010‑9089‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9089-x [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Liao, W.-W.
    (2004) The architecture of aspect and duration. Master Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin, T.-H.
    (2001) Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
  27. Lin, J.-W.
    (2004) Hànyŭ de wángchéng dòngcí: Èrshí nián yĭhòu. (Accomplishment verbs in Mandarin Chinese: 20 years later). Paper presented at the9th International Symposium on Chinese Language and Linguistics. National Taiwan University, Taiwan.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. (2014) The adjective of quantity duō ‘many/much’ and differential comparatives in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1(2), 163–191. 10.1075/ijchl.1.2.01lin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.1.2.01lin [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, C.-S. L.
    (2018) A comparative with two standards of comparison. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 5(2), 195–225. 10.1075/ijchl.17003.liu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.17003.liu [Google Scholar]
  30. (2020) The adjective dà in Taiwanese Mandarin: Degree, measurement and roots. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 29(2), 119–157. 10.1007/s10831‑020‑09206‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-020-09206-8 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lü, S.-X.
    (1980) Xiàndài hànyŭ bābăi cí (Eight hundred words in modern Chinese). Běijīng: Shāngwù Ynshūguăn.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Marantz, A.
    (1984) On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (1997) No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), 201–225.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Merchant, J.
    (2019) Roots don’t select, categorial heads do: Lexical selection of PPs may vary by category. The Linguistic Review, 36(3), 325–341. 10.1515/tlr‑2019‑2020
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2019-2020 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nakanishi, K.
    (2004) On comparative quantification in the verbal domain. InR. B. Young (Ed.), Proceedings of SALTXIV1, 179–196. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. 10.3765/salt.v14i0.2912
     https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v14i0.2912 [Google Scholar]
  36. Paul, W.
    (2002) Proxy categories in phrase structure theory and the Chinese VP. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale, 311, 137–174. 10.1163/19606028‑90000103
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-90000103 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pylkkänen, L.
    (2008) Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ramchand, G.
    (1997) Aspect and predication: The semantics of argument structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Rothstein, S.
    (2004) Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9780470759127
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470759127 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schwarzschild, R.
    (2002) The grammar of measurement. InB. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of SALTXII1, 225–245. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. (2006) The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrase. Syntax, 9(1), 67–110. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2006.00083.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2006.00083.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Solt, S.
    (2015) Q-adjectives and the semantics of quantity. Journal of Semantics, 32(2), 221–273. 10.1093/jos/fft018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/fft018 [Google Scholar]
  43. Sybesma, R.
    (1999) The Mandarin vP. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9163‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9163-8 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tai, J. H.-Y.
    (1984) Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four categories. InT. David, M. Veena & D. Joseph (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on lexical semantics. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Tenny, C.
    (1992) The aspectual interface hypothesis. InI. A. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical matters (pp.1–27). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. (1994) Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1150‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1150-8 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tsao, F.-F.
    (1987) On the so-called ‘verb-coyping’ construction in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers’ Association, 21, 13–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Vendler, Z.
    (1967) Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 10.7591/9781501743726
     https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501743726 [Google Scholar]
  49. von Stechow, A.
    (1984) Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics, 3(1), 1–77. 10.1093/jos/3.1‑2.1
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/3.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wellwood, A.
    (2015) On the semantics of comparison across categories. Linguistics and Philosophy, 38(1), 67–101. 10.1007/s10988‑015‑9165‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-015-9165-0 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2019) The meaning of more. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198804659.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198804659.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wellwood, A., Hacquard, V., & Pancheva, R.
    (2012) Measuring and comparing individuals and events. Journal of Semantics, 29(2), 207–228. 10.1093/jos/ffr006
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffr006 [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhu, D.-X.
    (1982) Yúfǎ jiǎngyì (Lecture notes on grammar). Běijīng: Shāngwù Ynshūguăn.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijchl.21005.liu
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): event; measure function; monotonicity; quantity adjective; root

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error