The revelation of ancient Chinese to semantic compositionality in discourse reporting

References

1. Austin, J. L.
   (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Capone, A.
   (2016) The Pragmatics of Indirect Reports: Socio-philosophical Considerations. Cham: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cappelen, H., & Lepore, E.
   (1997) Varieties of quotation. Mind, 106(423), 429–450. 10.1093/mind/106.423.429
   https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/106.423.429 [Google Scholar]
4. Cappelen, H., & Lepore, E.
   (2006) Qutation, Context Sensitivity, Signs and Expressions. Philosophical Issues, 16(1), 43–64. 10.1111/j.1533‑6077.2006.00102.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-6077.2006.00102.x [Google Scholar]
5. Cappelen, H., & Lepore, E.
   (2019) Semantics for Quotation. InKumiko Murasugi & Robert Stainton (Eds.), Philosophy and Linguistics (pp.209–222). London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429301612‑8
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429301612-8 [Google Scholar]
6. Davidson, D.
   (1979) Quotation. Theory and Decision, 11(1), 27–40. 10.1007/BF00126690
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126690 [Google Scholar]
7. De Brabanter, P.
   (2010) The Semantics and Pragmatics of Hybrid Quotations. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(2), 107–120. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2009.00185.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00185.x [Google Scholar]
8. De Brabanter, P.
   (2017) Why Quotation Is Not a Semantic Phenomenon, and Why It Calls for a Pragmatic Theory. InIlse Depraetere & Raphael Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line (pp.227–254). Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑32247‑6_14
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32247-6_14 [Google Scholar]
9. Durrant, S., Li, W., & Schaberg, D.
   (Trans.) (2016) Zuo Tradition = Zuozhuan: Commentary on the “Spring and Autumn Annals”. Seattle and London: The University of Washington Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Frege, G.
    (1948) Sense and Reference. The Philosophical Review, 57(3), 209–230. 10.2307/2181485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2181485 [Google Scholar]
11. Frege, G.
    (1967) Begriffsschrift, a Formula Language, Modeled upon that of Arithmetic, for Pure Thought [1879]. InJean van Heijenoort (Ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic (pp.1–82). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Frege, G.
    (1997a) Function and Concept (1891). InMichael Beaney (Ed.), The Frege Reader (pp.130–148). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Frege, G.
    (1997b) Letter to Marty, 29.8.1882. InMichael Beaney (Ed.), The Frege Reader (pp.79–83). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Frege, G., Geach, P. T., & Black, M.
    (1951) On Concept and Object. Mind, 60(238), 168–180. 10.1093/mind/LX.238.168
    https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LX.238.168 [Google Scholar]
15. Hu, S.
    (1922) The Development of the Logical Method in Ancient China (1st edn.). Shanghai: The Oriental Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Lycan, W. G.
    (2019) Philosophy of Language: A Contemporary Introduction (3rd edn.). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Maier, E.
    (2014) Mixed quotation: The grammar of apparently transparent opacity. Semantics and Pragmatics, 7(7), 1–67. 10.3765/sp.7.7
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.7.7 [Google Scholar]
18. Mei, Guang
    (2018) Shànggǔ Hànyǔ Yǔfǎ Gāngyào (An Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar). Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Quine, W. V. O.
    (1981) Mathematical Logic (Rev. edn.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Recanati, F.
    (2000) Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: An Essay on Metarepresentation. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5163.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5163.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
21. Recanati, F.
    (2001) Open Quotation. Mind, 110(439), 637–687. 10.1093/mind/110.439.637
    https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/110.439.637 [Google Scholar]
22. Richard, M.
    (2009) Opacity. InErnest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0027
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0027 [Google Scholar]
23. Russell, B.
    (1910) Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 111, 108–128. 10.1093/aristotelian/11.1.108
    https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/11.1.108 [Google Scholar]
24. Russell, B.
    (1919) The philosophy of logical atomism. The Monist, 29(2), 190–222. 10.5840/monist19192922
    https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19192922 [Google Scholar]
25. Soames, S.
    (2010) Philosophy of Language. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400833931
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400833931 [Google Scholar]
26. Soames, S.
    (2013) Cognitive Propositions. Philosophical Perspectives, 271, 479–501. 10.1111/phpe.12030
    https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12030 [Google Scholar]
27. Szabó, Z. G., & Thomason, R. H.
    (2019) Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Tarski, A.
    (1956) The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages. InLogic, Semantics, Mathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938 (pp.152–278). Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Von Humboldt, W.
    (2020) On Language. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Wittgenstein, L.
    (2001) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness, Trans.). London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Yang, B.
    (2009) Chūnqiū Zuǒzhuàn Zhù (A Scholium of Zuo’s Commentary on the “Spring and Autumn Annals”) (3rd edn.). Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Yang, B., & Xu, T.
    (Trans.) (2016) Báihuà Zuǒzhuàn (Zuozhuan in Modern Chinese). Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Yao, Z.
    (2015) Shànggǔ Hànyǔ Yǔfǎ Shǐ (History of Classical Chinese Grammar from the Shang Dynasty to the Western Han Dynasty). Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Press.
    [Google Scholar]