1887
Volume 24, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Introduction, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/ijcl.00012.int-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.00012.int
2019-08-27
2019-12-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bybee, J.
    (2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  2. Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.
    (1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64(3), 501–538. 10.2307/414531
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
  3. Fried, M., & Östman, J.-O.
    (2004) Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. InM. Fried & J.-O. Östman (Eds.), Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective (pp.11–86). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.2.02fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.2.02fri [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hanks, P.
    (2004) Corpus Pattern Analysis. InG. Williams, & S. Vessier (Eds), Euralex Proceedings. (Vol.I, pp.87–98). Lorient: Université de Bretagne-Sud.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Herbst, T., & Schüller, S.
    (2008) Introduction to Syntactic Analysis: A Valency Approach. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hilpert, M.
    (2018) Three open questions in diachronic construction grammar. InE. Coussé, P. Andersson & J. Olofsson (Eds.), Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar (pp.21–39). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.21.c2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.21.c2 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hunston, S.
    (2002) Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hunston, S., & Francis, G.
    (2000) Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.4 [Google Scholar]
  11. Michaelis, L. A.
    (2005) Entity and event coercion in a symbolic theory of syntax. InJ.-O. Östman, & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions (pp.45–87). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.3.04mic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.04mic [Google Scholar]
  12. Perek, F.
    (2015) Argument Structure in Usage-based Construction Grammar: Experimental and Corpus-based Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.17 [Google Scholar]
  13. Sinclair, J. M.
    (1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (2004) Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London & New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S.
    (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
  16. Stubbs, M.
    (2001) Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.00012.int
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error