1887
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The goal of this study is to identify the dimensions of variation across American television programs, following the multidimensional analysis (MD) framework introduced by Biber (1988). Although television is a major form of mass communication, there has been no previous large-scale MD study of television dialogue. A large corpus containing the key types of contemporary American television programs was collected, annotated with the , and subjected to multi-dimensional analysis, which indicated four factors of statistically correlated linguistic features. Each of these factors was interpreted communicatively to reveal the underlying dimensions of variation on American television, namely “Exposition and discussion vs. Simplified interaction” (Dimension 1), “Simulated conversation” (Dimension 2), “Recount” (Dimension 3) and “Engaging presentation” (Dimension 4). This article presents, illustrates, and discusses each of these dimensions, showing the macro linguistic patterns in use across hundreds of American television programs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.15014.ber
2019-07-02
2019-08-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Surmi, M.
    (2012) Authenticity and TV shows: A multidimensional analysis perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 671–694.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berber Sardinha, T.
    (2014) Comparing Internet and pre-Internet registers. InT. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp.81–105). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.60.03ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.60.03ber [Google Scholar]
  3. Berber Sardinha, T., & Veirano Pinto, M.
    (2017a) American television and off-screen registers: A corpus-based comparison. Corpora, 12(1), 85–114. 10.3366/cor.2017.0110
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2017.0110 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2017b, July). A linguistic typology of American television programs. Paper presented at theCorpus Linguistics 2017 Conference (CL2017), Birmingham, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2019) Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350023857
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857 [Google Scholar]
  6. Berber Sardinha, T., Veirano Pinto, M., Mayer, C., Zuppardi, M. C., & Kauffmann, C.
    (2019) Adding registers to a previous Multi-dimensional Analysis. InT. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues (pp.165–188). London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350023857.0017
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0017 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bednarek, M.
    (2010) The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2011) The language of fictional television: A case study of the ‘dramedy’ Gilmore Girls. English Text Construction, 4(1), 54–83. 10.1075/etc.4.1.04bed
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.4.1.04bed [Google Scholar]
  9. (2012) ‘Get us the hell out of here’: Keywords and trigrams in fictional television series. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(1), 35–62. 10.1075/ijcl.17.1.02bed
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.1.02bed [Google Scholar]
  10. (2016, October). Corpus linguistics and profanity (‘Bad’ language, swear words, curse words, taboo words…). Plenary presented at theThird Asia Pacific Corpus Linguistics Conference (APCLC 2016), Beijing, China.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Besnier, N.
    (1988) The linguistic relationships of spoken and written Nukulaelae registers. Language, 64(4), 707–736. 10.2307/414565
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414565 [Google Scholar]
  12. Biber, D.
    (1988) Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  13. (1990) Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 5(4), 257–269. 10.1093/llc/5.4.257
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/5.4.257 [Google Scholar]
  14. (1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. 10.1093/llc/8.4.243
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/8.4.243 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2006) University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 [Google Scholar]
  16. Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A.
    (2007) Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.28
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.28 [Google Scholar]
  17. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (1999) The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cantos Gomez, P.
    (2013) Statistical Methods in Language and Linguistic Research. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Carroll, R. L.
    (1985) Television news. InB. G. Rose (Ed.), TV Genres: A Handbook and Reference Guide (pp.213–236). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Csomay, E., & Petrovic, M.
    (2012) ‘Yes, your honor!’: A corpus-based study of technical vocabulary in discipline-related movies and TV shows. System, 40(2), 305–315. 10.1016/j.system.2012.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dant, T.
    (2012) Television and the Moral Imaginary: Society Through the Small Screen. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137035554
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035554 [Google Scholar]
  22. Egbert, J.
    (2019) Corpus design and representativeness. InT. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues (pp.125–144). London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350023857.0010
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0010 [Google Scholar]
  23. Egbert, J., & Staples, S.
    (2019) Doing multi-dimensional analysis in SPSS, SAS and R. InT. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues (pp.27–42). London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350023857.0015
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0015 [Google Scholar]
  24. Frank, R. E., Becknell, J. C., & Clokey, J. D.
    (1971) Television program types. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(2), 204–11. 10.2307/3149762
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3149762 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fonseca de Araújo, R.
    (2017) A Linguagem dos Reality TV Shows Norte-Americanos: Análise e Classificação [The Language of North-American Reality TV Shows: Analysis and Classification] (Unpublished master’s thesis). São Paulo Catholic University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Friginal, E., & Hardy, J. A.
    (2014) Conducting multi-dimensional analysis using SPSS. InT. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp.298–316). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.60.10fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.60.10fri [Google Scholar]
  27. Gray, B.
    (2019) Tagging and counting linguistic features for Multi-dimensional Analysis. InT. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues (pp.43–66). London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350023857.0011
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0011 [Google Scholar]
  28. Johansson, S.
    (1995) The encoding of spoken texts. Computers and Humanities, 29(2), 149–159. 10.1007/BF01830708
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01830708 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kozloff, S.
    (1992) Narrative theory and television. InR. C. Allen (Ed.), Channels of Discourse, Reassembled: Television and Contemporary Criticism (pp.52–76). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lieberman, M.
    (1983) The verbal language of television. Journal of Reading, 26(7), 602–609.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lorenzo-Dus, N.
    (2009) Television Discourse: Analysing Language in the Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑11717‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-11717-5 [Google Scholar]
  32. Marshall, J., & Werndly, A.
    (2002) The Language of Television. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203994382
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994382 [Google Scholar]
  33. Montgomery, M.
    (2007) The Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Murray, S., & Quellette, L.
    (2004) Reality TV: Remaking Television Culture. New York, NY: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Quaglio, P.
    (2009) Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.36
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.36 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rao, V. R.
    (1975) Taxonomy of television programs based on viewing behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 12(3), 355–8. 10.2307/3151237
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3151237 [Google Scholar]
  37. Richardson, K.
    (2010) Television Dramatic Dialogue: A Sociolinguistic Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374056.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374056.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rose, B. G.
    (1985) Introduction. InB. G. Rose (Ed.), TV Genres: A Handbook and Reference Guide (pp.3–10). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. SAS Institute Inc.
    SAS Institute Inc. (2015) SAS University Edition [Computer software]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Shimazumi, M.
    (forthcoming). Dimensions of Variation on British Television. (Unpublished manuscript).
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Stephens, M.
    (2000) The history of television. InGrolier Multimedia Encyclopedia. New York, NY: Grolier. Retrieved fromhttps://www.nyu.edu/classes/stephens/History​%20​of​%20​Television​%20​page.htm (last accessedFebruary 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tamborini, R., Mastro, D., Chory-Assad, R. M., & Huang, R. H.
    (2000) The color of crime and the court: A content analysis of minority representation on television. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 639–653. 10.1177/107769900007700312
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700312 [Google Scholar]
  43. Tolson, A.
    (2001) Talking about talk: The academic debates. InA. Tolson (Ed.), Television Talk Shows: Discourse, Performance, Spectacle (pp.7–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410600950
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600950 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2006) Media Talk: Spoken Discourse on TV and Radio. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Veirano Pinto, M.
    (2014) Dimensions of variation in North American movies. InT. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp.109–149). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.60.04vei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.60.04vei [Google Scholar]
  46. (2018) Variation in movies and television programs: The impact of corpus sampling. InV. Werner (Ed.), The Language of Pop Culture (pp.139–161). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315168210‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315168210-7 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wasko, J.
    (2010) Introduction. InJ. Wasko (Ed.), A Companion to Televison (pp.1–13). London: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Webb, S., & Bacue, A.
    (1999) Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59(2), 335–366. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00509.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00509.x [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.15014.ber
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.15014.ber
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error