1887
Volume 16, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Scholars of language have begun to explore the popular academic topic that is “risk” and to establish the viability of corpus linguistics for such analysis. We extend existing scholarship by analyzing the noun lemma RISK over the last two decades of contemporary American discourse with recourse to the . Using the corpus procedures of frequency analysis, concordance contextual analysis, collocational analysis, and a variation on distinctive-collexeme analysis, we revisit the often under-supported assertion that RISK is semantically negative, and then investigate the semantic potential for , a phenomenon associated with economic and adventuring sectors. Data suggest that RISK is genre sensitive, predominantly negative, and heavily medical in shared meaning across genres, and further, that evidence for is minimal. A phrase of interest in recent corpus work — — is shown to be sensitive perhaps more to constructional constraints than to semantic prosody.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.16.4.02har
2011-12-22
2019-08-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.16.4.02har
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): COCA , corpus linguistics , distinctive-collexeme analysis , lexical priming , risk and semantic prosody
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error