1887
Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811

Abstract

Abstract

The research reported in this article examines Noun Phrase (NP) syntactic complexity in the writing of Spanish EFL secondary school learners in Grades 7, 8, 11 and 12 in the International Corpus of Crosslinguistic Interlanguage. Two methods were combined: a manual parsing of NPs and an automatic analysis of NP indices using the (). Our results revealed that it is in premodifying slots that syntactic complexity in NPs develops. We argue that two measures, (i) nouns and modifiers (a syntactic complexity index) and (ii) determiner + multiple premodification + head (a NP type obtained as a result of a corpus-driven analysis), can be used as indices of syntactic complexity in young Spanish EFL learner language development. Besides offering a learner-language-driven taxonomy of NP syntactic complexity, the paper underscores the strength of using combined methods in SLA research.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.17058.die
2020-04-16
2020-07-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijcl.17058.die.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.17058.die&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alexopoulou, T., Michel, M., Murakami, A., & Meurers, D.
    (2017) Task effects on linguistic complexity and accuracy: A large-scale learner corpus analysis employing natural language processing techniques. Language Learning, 67(S1), 180–208. 10.1111/lang.12232
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12232 [Google Scholar]
  2. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biber, D., & Gray, B.
    (2010) Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20. 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2011) Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics, 15(2), 223–250. 10.1017/S1360674311000025
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674311000025 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2016) Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511920776
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920776 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K.
    (2011) Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?Tesol Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. 10.5054/tq.2011.244483
    https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bulté, B., & Housen, A.
    (2014) Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 42–65. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  8. Byrnes, H., & Sinicrope, C.
    (2008) Advancedness and the development of relativization in L2 German: A curriculum-based longitudinal study. InL. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities (pp.109–138). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chan, T. P., & Liou, H. C.
    (2005) Effects of web-based concordancing instruction on EFL students’ learning of verb–noun collocations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 231–251. 10.1080/09588220500185769
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220500185769 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen, J.
    (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies, M.
    (2015) Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Version 2.2. Retrieved from: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/AMUDUW (last accessedNovember 2019).
  12. Díez-Bedmar, M. B.
    (2010) From secondary school to university: The use of the English article system by Spanish learners. InB. Bellés-Fortuño, M. C. Campoy, & Ll. Gea-Valor (Eds.), Exploring Corpus Linguistics in English Language Teaching (pp.45–55). Castelló: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2015) Article use and criterial features in Spanish EFL writing: A pilot study from CEFR A2 to B2 levels. InM. Callies & S. Götz (Eds.), Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment (pp.163–190). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Díez-Bedmar, M. B., & Papp, Sz.
    (2008) The use of the English article system by Chinese and Spanish learners. InG. Gilquin, Sz. Papp, & M. B. Díez-Bedmar (Eds.), Linking up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research (pp.147–175). Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401206204_007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401206204_007 [Google Scholar]
  15. Díez-Bedmar, M. B., & Pérez-Paredes, P.
    (2012) A cross-sectional analysis of the use of the English articles in Spanish learner writing. InY. Tono, Y. Kawaguchi, & M. Minegishi (Eds.), Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research (pp.139–157). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tufs.4.13die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tufs.4.13die [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O'Donnell, M. B.
    (2016) Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Foster, P., & Tavakoli, P.
    (2009) Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency, and lexical diversity. Language Learning, 59(4), 866–896. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00528.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00528.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Granger, S.
    (1996) From CA to CIA and back: An integrated contrastive approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. InK. Aijmer, B. Altenberg, & M. Johansson (Eds.), Languages in Contrast: Text-based Cross-Linguistic Studies (pp.37–51). Lund: Lund University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2015) Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), 7–24. 10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra [Google Scholar]
  20. Hawkins, J., & Filipović, L.
    (2012) Criterial Features in L2 English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Housen, A., & Kuiken, F.
    (2009) Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. 10.1093/applin/amp048
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048 [Google Scholar]
  22. Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
    (Eds.) (2012) Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.32
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ionin, T., & Díez-Bedmar, M. B.
    (in press). Article use in Russian and Spanish learner writing at CEFR B1 and B2 levels: effects of proficiency, native language, and specificity. InB. S. W. Le Brun & M. Paquot Eds. Learner Corpora and Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B.
    (1977) Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kobayashi, T.
    (2008) Usage of countable and uncountable nouns by Japanese learners of English: Two studies using the ICLE error-tagged Japanese sub-corpus. National Institute of Informatics Scholarly and Academic Information Navigator, 816(10), 73–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kyle, K.
    (2016) Measuring Syntactic Development in L2 Writing: Fine Grained Indices of Syntactic Complexity and Usage-based Indices of Syntactic Sophistication (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
  27. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (1997) Chaos/Complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Lingusitics, 18(2), 141–165. 10.1093/applin/18.2.141
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. 10.1093/applin/aml029
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029 [Google Scholar]
  29. Laufer, B., & Waldman, T.
    (2011) Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61(2), 647–672. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00621.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00621.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Leńko-Szymańska, A.
    (2012) The role of conventionalised language in the acquisition and use of articles by EFL learners. InY. Tono, Y. Kawaguchi, & M. Minegishi (Eds.), Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research (pp.83–103). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tufs.4.10len
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tufs.4.10len [Google Scholar]
  31. Lu, X.
    (2010) Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474–496. 10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu [Google Scholar]
  32. (2011) A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. Tesol Quarterly, 45(1), 36–62. 10.5054/tq.2011.240859
    https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240859 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2017) The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01232_1.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01232_1.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Luzón Marco, M. J.
    (2011) Exploring atypical verb+noun combinations in learner technical writing. International Journal of English Studies, 11(2), 77–95. 10.6018/ijes/2011/2/149651
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2011/2/149651 [Google Scholar]
  35. McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
    (2012) Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Musgrave, J., & Parkinson, J.
    (2014) Getting to grips with noun groups. ELT Journal, 68(2), 145–154. 10.1093/elt/cct078
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct078 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ortega, L.
    (2003) Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 Proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 4(4), 492–518. 10.1093/applin/24.4.492
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2009) Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Osborne, J.
    (2004) Articles and non-count nouns in learner English: Perception and production. InB. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Practical Applications in Language and Computers (PALC 2003) (pp.359–369). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Paquot, M.
    (2019) The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research. Second Language Research, 35(1), 121–145. 10.1177/0267658317694221
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317694221 [Google Scholar]
  41. Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J.
    (2014) Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 48–59. 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
    (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Rayson, P.
    (2008) From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519–549. 10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray [Google Scholar]
  44. Rimmer, W.
    (2006) Measuring grammatical complexity: The Gordian knot. Language Testing, 23(4), 497–519. 10.1191/0265532206lt339oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532206lt339oa [Google Scholar]
  45. Römer, U.
    (2016) Teaming up and mixing methods: Collaborative and cross-disciplinary work in corpus research on phraseology. Corpora, 11(1), 113–129. 10.3366/cor.2016.0087
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2016.0087 [Google Scholar]
  46. Skehan, P.
    (1989) Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Approach to Child Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Tono, Y., & Díez-Bedmar, M. B.
    (2014) Focus on learner writing at the beginning and intermediate stages: The ICCI corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(2), 163–177. 10.1075/ijcl.19.2.01ton
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.2.01ton [Google Scholar]
  49. Tsai, K. J.
    (2015) Profiling the collocation use in ELT textbooks and learner writing. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 723–740. 10.1177/1362168814559801
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814559801 [Google Scholar]
  50. UCLES/CUP
    UCLES/CUP (2011) English Profile: Introducing the CEFR for English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from: www.englishprofile.org/images/pdf/theenglishprofilebooklet.pdf (last accessedNovember 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  51. VanPatten, B.
    (2002) Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52(4), 755–803. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00203
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00203 [Google Scholar]
  52. Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Van Dijk, M.
    (2008) Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214–231. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2008.00715.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00715.x [Google Scholar]
  53. Vyatkina, N.
    (2012) The development of second language writing complexity in groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus study. The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 576–598. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01401.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01401.x [Google Scholar]
  54. (2013) Specific syntactic complexity: Developmental profiling of individuals based on an annotated learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97(S1), 11–30. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01421.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01421.x [Google Scholar]
  55. Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y.
    (1998) Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.17058.die
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.17058.die
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error