Lexical bundles in university course materials

References

1. Allen, D.
   (2010) Lexical bundles in learner writing: An analysis of formulaic language in the ALESS learner corpus. Komaba Journal of English Education, 1, 105–127.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alquraishi, M. A.
   (2014) Lexical Bundles in an Advanced INTO CSU Writing Class and Engineering Texts: A Functional Analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anderson, N.
   (2015) Academic reading expectations and challenges. InN. Evans, N. Anderson & W. Eggington (Eds.), ESL Readers and Writers in Higher Education: Understanding Challenges, Providing Support (pp.95–109). New York, NY: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biber, D.
   (2009) A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 275–311. 10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bib
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bib [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, D., & Barbieri, F.
   (2007) Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263–286. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003 [Google Scholar]
6. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
   (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V.
   (2004) If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405. 10.1093/applin/25.3.371
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371 [Google Scholar]
8. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V.
   (2003) Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial taxonomy. InA. Wilson, P. Rayson & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Biber, D., & Gray, B.
   (2013) Nominalizing the verb phrase in academic science writing. InB. Aarts, J. Close, G. Leech & S. Wallis (Eds.), The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora (pp.99–132). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139060998.006
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060998.006 [Google Scholar]
10. Bybee, J.
    (2010) Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
11. Chen, L.
    (2010) An investigation of lexical bundles in ESP textbooks and electrical engineering introductory textbooks. InD. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication (pp.107–125). New York, NY: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chen, Y.-H., & Baker, P.
    (2010) Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 30–49.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cortes, V.
    (2002) Lexical Bundles in Published and Student Academic Writing in History and Biology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cortes, V.
    (2004) Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397–423. 10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001 [Google Scholar]
15. Cortes, V.
    (2008) A comparative analysis of lexical bundles in academic history writing in English and Spanish. Corpora, 3(1), 43–58. 10.3366/E1749503208000063
    https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503208000063 [Google Scholar]
16. Dym, C. L., & Little, P.
    (2009) Engineering Design: A Project-based Introduction (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Evans, N., Anderson, N., & Eggington, W.
    (2015) ESL Readers and Writers in Higher Education: Understanding Challenges, Providing Support. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315762654
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315762654 [Google Scholar]
18. Grabe, W.
    (2009) Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hartshorn, J., Evans, N., Egbert, J., & Johnson, A.
    (2017) Discipline-specific reading expectation and challenges for ESL learners in US universities. Reading in a Foreign Language, 29(1), 33–60.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hsu, W.
    (2014) The most frequent opaque formulaic sequences in English-medium college textbooks. System, 47, 146–161. 10.1016/j.system.2014.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.10.001 [Google Scholar]
21. Hyland, K.
    (2008) As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21. 10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001 [Google Scholar]
22. Hyland, K.
    (2012) Bundles in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 150–169. 10.1017/S0267190512000037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000037 [Google Scholar]
23. Hyland, K., & Milton, J.
    (1997) Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183–205. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(97)90033‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3 [Google Scholar]
24. Lammi, M.
    (2013) Engineering design thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 24(2), 55–77.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Leech, G.
    (2000) Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented research. Language Learning, 50(4), 675–724. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00143
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00143 [Google Scholar]
26. Leńko-Szymańska, A.
    (2014) The acquisition of formulaic language by EFL learners: A cross-sectional and cross-linguistic perspective. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(2), 225–251. 10.1075/ijcl.19.2.04len
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.2.04len [Google Scholar]
27. Mudraya, O.
    (2006) Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional model. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 25(2), 235–256. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.002 [Google Scholar]
28. Nekrasova-Beker, T., & Becker, A.
    (2017) Integrating project-based learning into English for specific-purposes classrooms: A case study of Engineering. InM. Long (Ed.), Language for Specific Purposes: Trends in Curriculum Development (pp.101–125). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Rayson, P.
    (2009) Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment [Computer Software]. Lancaster: Lancaster University. Available fromucrel.lancs.ac.uk/wmatrix/ (last accessedJune 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Scott, M., & Tribble, C.
    (2006) Textual Patterns. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.22 [Google Scholar]
31. Schmitt, N., Grandage, S., & Adolphs, S.
    (2004) Are corpus-derived recurrent clusters psycholinguistically valid?InN. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing, and Use (pp.127–151). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.9.08sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.9.08sch [Google Scholar]
32. Todd, R. W.
    (2017) An opaque engineering word list: Which words should a teacher focus on?English for Specific Purposes, 45, 31–39. 10.1016/j.esp.2016.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.08.003 [Google Scholar]
33. Ward, J.
    (2007) Collocation and technicality in EAP engineering. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 6(1), 18–35. 10.1016/j.jeap.2006.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.10.001 [Google Scholar]
34. Wood, D., & Appel, R.
    (2014) Multiword constructions in first year business and engineering university textbooks and EAP textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 15, 1–13. 10.1016/j.jeap.2014.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.03.002 [Google Scholar]