1887
Volume 23, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

An important component of fluent linguistic production and a key distinguishing feature of particular modes, registers and genres is the multi-word expressions referred to as ‘lexical bundles’. These are extended collocations which appear more frequently than expected by chance, helping to shape meanings and contributing to our sense of coherence and distinctiveness in a text. These strings have been studied extensively, particularly in academic writing in English, but little is known about how they may have changed over time. In this paper we explore changes in their use and frequency over the past 50 years, drawing on a corpus of 2.2 million words taken from top research journals in four disciplines. We find that bundles are not static and invariant markers of research writing but change in response to new conditions and contexts, with the most interesting changes within disciplines. The paper also discusses methodological approaches to studying bundles diachronically.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.17080.hyl
2018-12-27
2019-09-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anthony, L.
    (2014) AntConc (Version 3.4.3 w) [Computer software]. Tokyo: Waseda University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biber, D.
    (2006) University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2009) A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 275–311. 10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bib [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, D., & Barbieri, F.
    (2007) Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263–28610.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V.
    (2004) If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405. 10.1093/applin/25.3.371
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, D., & Gray, B.
    (2016) Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511920776
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920776 [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman Grammar of Written and Spoken English. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Butler, C.
    (1998) Collocational frameworks in Spanish. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 3(1), 1–32. 10.1075/ijcl.3.1.02but
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.3.1.02but [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Y.-H., & Baker, P.
    (2010) Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 student writing. Language, Learning and Technology, 14(2), 30–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2016) Investigating criterial discourse features across second language development: Lexical bundles in rated learner essays. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 849–880.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N.
    (2008) Formulaic Sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers?Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 72–89. 10.1093/applin/amm022
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm022 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cortes, V.
    (2004) Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397–423. 10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2006) Teaching lexical bundles in the disciplines: An example from a writing intensive history class. Linguistics and Education, 17(4), 391–406. 10.1016/j.linged.2007.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2015) Situating lexical bundles in the formulaic language spectrum: Origins and functional analysis developments. InV. Cortes & E. Csomay (Eds.), Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber (pp.197–218). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.66.09cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.66.09cor [Google Scholar]
  15. Culpeper, J., & Kytö, M.
    (2002) Lexical bundles in early modern English dialogues. InT. Fanego, B. Méndez-Naya & E. Seoane (Eds.), Sound, Words, Texts and Change (pp.45–63). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.224.06cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.224.06cul [Google Scholar]
  16. Firth, J. R.
    (1951) Modes of meaning. InJ. R. Firth (Ed.), Papers in Linguistics 1934–51 (pp.190–215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Glynos, J., & Howarth, D.
    (2007) Logics of Critical Explanation in Social Political Theory. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203934753
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934753 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoey, M.
    (2005) Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hyland, K.
    (2004) Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2008a) Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41–62. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2008.00178.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00178.x [Google Scholar]
  21. (2008b) As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21. 10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2012) Bundles in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 150–169. 10.1017/S0267190512000037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000037 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hyland, K., & Jiang, K.
    (2016a) Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33(3), 251–27410.1177/0741088316650399
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316650399 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2016b) “We must conclude that…”: A diachronic study of academic engagement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 29–42. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2018) “We believe that…”: Changes in an academic stance marker. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 38(2), 139–161. 10.1080/07268602.2018.1400498
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2018.1400498 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hyland, K., & Tse, P.
    (2005) Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 123–139. 10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kopaczyk, J.
    (2012) Applications of the lexical bundles method in historical corpus research. InP. Pezik (Ed.), Corpus Data across Languages and Disciplines (pp.83–95). Berlin: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2013) The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs: Standardization and Lexical Bundles, 1380–1560. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945153.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945153.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ma, G. H.
    (2009) A study of four-word lexical bundles in English major students’ timed writing. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 41(1), 54–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Meunier, F., & Granger, S.
    (2008) Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.138
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.138 [Google Scholar]
  31. Nattinger, J., & DeCarrico, J.
    (1992) Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pang, W.
    (2010) Lexical bundles and the construction of an academic voice: A pedagogical perspective. Asian EFL Journal, 47, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Salazar, D.
    (2014) Lexical Bundles in Native and Non-native Scientific Writing: Applying a Corpus-Based Study to Language Teaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.65
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.65 [Google Scholar]
  34. Scott, M., & Tribble, C.
    (2006) Textual Patterns. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.22 [Google Scholar]
  35. Simpson, R.
    (2004) Stylistic features of academic speech: The role of formulaic expressions. InT. Upton & U. Connor (Eds.), Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics (pp.37–64). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.16.03sim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.03sim [Google Scholar]
  36. Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N.
    (2010) An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512. 10.1093/applin/amp058
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sinclair, J.
    (1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wei, N. X.
    (2007) Phraseological characteristics of Chinese learners’ spoken English: Evidence of lexical chunks from COLSEC. Modern Foreign Languages, 30(3), 280–291.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wray, A.
    (2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511519772
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772 [Google Scholar]
  40. Wray, A. & Perkins, M.
    (2000) The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language and Communication, 20, 1–28. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(99)00015‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.17080.hyl
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.17080.hyl
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): academic writing , diachronic change and lexical bundles
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error