BasiScript

References

1. Balota, D., Yap, M., & Cortese, M. J.
   (2006) Visual word recognition. InM. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp.285–376). Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑012369374‑7/50010‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50010-9 [Google Scholar]
2. Bracken, S., & Fischel, J. E.
   (2008) Family reading behaviour and literacy skills in preschool children from low-income backgrounds. Early Education and Development, 19(1), 45–67. 10.1080/10409280701838835
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280701838835 [Google Scholar]
3. Chiu, S. I., Hong, F. Y., & Hu, H. Y.
   (2015) The effects of family cultural capital and reading motivation on reading behaviour in elementary school students. School Psychology International, 36(1), 3–17. 10.1177/0143034314528488
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034314528488 [Google Scholar]
4. Clark, C., & Teravainen, A.
   (2017) Book Ownership and Reading Outcomes. London: National Literacy Trust.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Drijbooms, E., Groen, M., & Verhoeven, L.
   (2017) How executive functions predict development in syntactic complexity of narrative writing in the upper elementary grades. Reading & Writing, 30(1), 209–231. 10.1007/s11145‑016‑9670‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9670-8 [Google Scholar]
6. Evers-Vermeul, J., & Sanders, T.
   (2009) The emergence of Dutch connectives; how cumulative cognitive complexity explains the order of acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 36(4), 829–854. 10.1017/S0305000908009227
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908009227 [Google Scholar]
7. Fayol, M., & Mouchon, S.
   (1997) Production and comprehension of connectives in the written modality: A study of written French. InC. Pontecorvo (Ed.), Writing Development: An Interdisciplinary View (pp.193–204). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/swll.6.15fay
   https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.6.15fay [Google Scholar]
8. Johannes, K., Wilson, C., & Landau, B.
   (2016) The importance of lexical verbs in the acquisition of spatial prepositions: The case of in and on. Cognition, 157, 174–189. 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.022
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.022 [Google Scholar]
9. Kent, S., & Wanzek, J.
   (2016) The relationship between component skills and writing quality and production across developmental levels: A meta-analysis of the last 25 years. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 570–601. 10.3102/0034654315619491
   https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315619491 [Google Scholar]
10. Meints, K., Plunkett, K., Harris, P. L., & Dimmock, D.
    (2002) What is ‘on’ and ‘under’ for 15-, 18-, and 24-month-olds? Typicality effects in early comprehension of spatial prepositions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(1), 113–130. 10.1348/026151002166352
    https://doi.org/10.1348/026151002166352 [Google Scholar]
11. Penning de Vries, B., & Tellings, A.
    (forthcoming). Development of connective frequency in Dutch child-directed texts: a corpus analysis.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L.
    (2001) The lexical quality hypothesis. InL. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of Functional Literacy (pp.189–214). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Peterson, C., & McCabe, A.
    (1987) The connective “and”: Do older children use it less as they learn other connectives?Journal of Child Language, 14(2), 375–381. 10.1017/S0305000900012988
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012988 [Google Scholar]
14. Rayson, P., & Garside, R.
    (2000) Comparing Corpora using Frequency Profiling. InProceedings of the workshop on Comparing Corpora, 38th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2000), 1–6. Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Tellings, A., Hulsbosch, M., Vermeer, A., & van den Bosch, A.
    (2014) BasiLex: An 11.5 million word corpus of Dutch texts written for children. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands, 4, 191–208.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Van den Bosch, A., Busser, G. J., Daelemans, W., & Canisius, S.
    (2007) An efficient memory-based morphosyntactic tagger and parser for Dutch. InF. van Eynde, P. Dirix, I. Schuurman, & V. Vandeghinste (Eds.), Selected Papers of the 17th Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Meeting (CLIN-17, Leuven), (pp.99–114). Utrecht: LOT. Retrieved fromhttps://ilk.uvt.nl/downloads/pub/papers/tadpole-final.pdf (last accessedSeptember 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
17. Van Gompel, M.
    (2014) FoLiA: Format for linguistic annotation. Documentation, Technical Report Language and Speech Technology Technical Report Series LST-14-01, Radboud University Nijmegen.
    [Google Scholar]