1887
Volume 24, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) and Non-AAC Workplace Corpus (ANAWC) (Pickering & Bruce, 2009). The corpus is the first resource of its kind that makes it possible to systematically study the typical language patterns of both AAC users and comparable non-AAC users in the workplace. We discuss the origin of the corpus and give an account of the methodology used for its collection and transcription. We also introduce several publications that demonstrate the novel qualitative and quantitative findings that can be generated on the basis of the corpora. This kind of research will be crucial to guide future developments in AAC development for workplace applications.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.17088.pic
2019-08-05
2019-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Balandin, S., & Iacono, T.
    (1998) A few well-chosen words. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(4), 147–161. 10.1080/07434619812331278326
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619812331278326 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P.
    (1998) Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Management of Severe Communication Disorders in Children and Adults. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biber, D.
    (1988) Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  4. (1995) Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2006) University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bloch, S.
    (2005) Co-constructing meaning in acquired speech disorders: Word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. InK. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis (pp.38–55). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230287853_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287853_3 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2011) Anticipatory other-completion of augmentative and alternative communication talk: A conversation analysis study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(3), 261–269. 10.3109/09638288.2010.491574
    https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.491574 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bloch, S. & Wilkinson, R.
    (2009) Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Identifying sources of understandability problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44(5): 769–783. 10.1080/13682820802546969
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820802546969 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2011) Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Methods of resolving understandability problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 46(5): 510–523. 10.1111/j.1460‑6984.2011.00076.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00076.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Bouchard, J.
    (2016) Spelling as a last resort: The use of spelling in workplace interaction by speakers with a speech impairment. InL. Pickering, E. Friginal, & S. Staples (Eds.). Talking at Work (pp.55–78). London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑49616‑4_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49616-4_3 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bruce, C.
    (2008) Critically analyzing workplace discourse to inform AAC Device Design. Paper presented at the2008 Clinical AAC Research Conference, Charlottesville, VA.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bryen, D. N.
    (2008) Vocabulary to support socially-valued adult roles. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(4), 294–301. 10.1080/07434610802467354
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610802467354 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bryen, D. N., Potts, B. B., & Carey, A. C.
    (2007) So you want to work? What employers say about job skills, recruitment and hiring employees who rely on AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(2), 126–139. 10.1080/07434610600991175
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610600991175 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheng, W.
    (2004) // → did you TOOK //(rise) from the miniBAR //: What is the practical relevance of a corpus-driven language study to practitioners in Hong Kong’s hotel industry?. InU. Connor & A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the Professions (pp.141–166). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.16.07che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.07che [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & M. Warren
    (2005) The creation of a prosodically transcribed intercultural corpus: The Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English (prosodic). ICAME Journal, 29, 47–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R.
    (1995) What is participatory research?Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. 10.1016/0277‑9536(95)00127‑S
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S [Google Scholar]
  17. Di Ferrante, L.
    (2016) “I love red hair. My wife has strawberry”: Discursive strategies and social identity in the workplace. InL. Pickering, E. Friginal, & S. Staples (Eds.), Talking at Work (pp.79–98). London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑49616‑4_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49616-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2013) Small Talk at Work: A Corpus-based Discourse Analysis of AAC and Non-AAC Device Users (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University-Commerce. Commerce, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dominowska, E.
    (2002) A Communication Aid with Context-aware Vocabulary Prediction (Unpublished masters dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Friginal, E.
    (2008) The Language of Outsourced Call Centers: A Corpus-based Study of Cross-cultural Interaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff, AZ.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2009) The Language of Outsourced Call Centers: A Corpus-based Study of Cross-cultural Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.34
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.34 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2015) Telephone interactions: A multidimensional comparison. InV. Cortes, & E. Csomay, (Eds.), Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber (pp.25–48). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.66.02fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.66.02fri [Google Scholar]
  23. Friginal, E., Pearson, P., Di Ferrante, L., Pickering, L., & Bruce, C.
    (2013) Linguistic characteristics of AAC discourse in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 15(3), 279–298. 10.1177/1461445613480586
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613480586 [Google Scholar]
  24. Friginal, E., Pickering, L., & Bruce, C.
    (2016) Narrative and informational dimensions of AAC discourse in the workplace. InL. Pickering, E. Friginal, & S. Staples (Eds.), Talking at Work (pp.27–54). London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑49616‑4_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49616-4_2 [Google Scholar]
  25. Graves, J.
    (2000) Vocabulary needs in augmentative and alternative communication: A sample of conversational topics between staff providing services to adults with learning difficulties and their service users. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(3), 113–119. 10.1046/j.1468‑3156.2000.00060.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3156.2000.00060.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Handford, M.
    (2010) The Language of Business Meetings. Tokyo: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139525329
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139525329 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2017, July). Corpus analysis of workplace discourse: The case of the construction industry. Paper presented at theCorpus Linguistics Conference 2017 (CL2017), Birmingham, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Higginbotham, D. J.
    (1990) Considering single subject experimental designs in social interaction and discourse research. InJ. Brodin & E. Björck-Åkesson (Eds.), Methodological Issues in Research in Augmentative and Alternative Communication (pp.79–85). Stockholm: The Swedish Handicap Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Higginbotham, D. J., & Bedrosian, J. L.
    (1995) Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 11–13. 10.1080/07434619512331277099
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619512331277099 [Google Scholar]
  30. Higginbotham, D. J., & Caves, K.
    (2002) AAC performance and usability issues: The effect of AAC technology on the communicative process. Assistive Technology, 14(1), 45–57. 10.1080/10400435.2002.10132054
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2002.10132054 [Google Scholar]
  31. Higginbotham, D. J., Lesher, G. W., Moulton, B. J., & Roark, B.
    (2012) The application of natural language processing to augmentative and alternative communication. Assistive Technology, 24(1), 14–24. 10.1080/10400435.2011.648714
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2011.648714 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hill, K.
    (2001, March12 2007) Achieving success in AAC: Assessment and intervention. Retrieved fromaacinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Achieving-Success-In-AAC.pdf (last accessedFebruary 2019).
  33. Hoag, L., Bedrosian, J., McCoy, K., & Johnson, D.
    (2004) Trade-offs between informativeness and speed of message delivery in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1270–1285. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2004/096)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/096) [Google Scholar]
  34. Holmes, J.
    (2000) Victoria University of Wellington’s Language in the Workplace Project: An overview. Language in the Workplace Occasional Papers 1. Retrieved fromwww.victoria.ac.nz/lals/centres-and-institutes/language-in-the-workplace/docs/ops/op1.pdf (last accessedFebruary 2019).
  35. Holmes, J. & Stubbe, M.
    (2003) Power & Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. London, UK. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Koester, A.
    (2006) Investigating Workplace Discourse. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203015742
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203015742 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2010) Workplace Discourse. New York, NY: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. McNaughton, D., & Bryen, D. N.
    (2002) Enhancing participation in employment through AAC technologies. Assistive Technology, 14(1), 58–70. 10.1080/10400435.2002.10132055
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2002.10132055 [Google Scholar]
  39. Nelson, M.
    (2000) A Corpus-based Study of Business English and Business English Teaching Materials (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Manchester, UK. Manchester.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pickering, L. & Bruce, C.
    (2009) The AAC and non-AAC workplace corpus (ANAWC) [Collection of Electronic Texts]. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pickering, L., Pearson, P., Bouchard, J., Lomotey, C. F., & Di Ferrante, L.
    (2011) Small talk at work: Comparison of AAC and non-AAC user corpora. Paper presented at theConference of the American Association for Corpus Linguistics 2011, Atlanta, GA.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Rifkin, S. B.
    (1990) Community Participation in MCH/FP Programmes: An Analysis Based on Case Study Material. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Stubbe, M.
    (2001) From office to production line: Collecting data for the Wellington Language in the Workplace Project. Language in the Workplace Occasional Papers 2. Retrieved fromwww.victoria.ac.nz/lals/centres-and-institutes/language-in-the-workplace/docs/ops/op2.pdf (last accessedFebruary 2019)
  44. Tönsing, K., & Alant, E.
    (2004) Topics of social conversation in the work place: A South African perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(2), 89–102. 10.1080/07434610410001699762
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610410001699762 [Google Scholar]
  45. Venkatagiri, H. S.
    (1995) Techniques for enhancing communication productivity in AAC: A review of research. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(3), 36–45. 10.1044/1058‑0360.0404.36
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0404.36 [Google Scholar]
  46. Warren, M.
    (2004) // ↘so what have YOU been WORking on REcently //: Compiling a specialized corpus of spoken business English. InU. Connor and T. Upton (Eds.). Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics (pp.115–140). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.16.06war
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.06war [Google Scholar]
  47. Wisenburn, B., & Higginbotham, D. J.
    (2008) An AAC application using speaking partner speech recognition to automatically produce contextually relevant utterances. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(2), 100–109. 10.1080/07434610701740448
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701740448 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.17088.pic
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.17088.pic
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error