An introduction to the ANAWC

References

1. Balandin, S., & Iacono, T.
   (1998) A few well-chosen words. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(4), 147–161. 10.1080/07434619812331278326
   https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619812331278326 [Google Scholar]
2. Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P.
   (1998) Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Management of Severe Communication Disorders in Children and Adults. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Biber, D.
   (1988) Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
4. Biber, D.
   (1995) Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871 [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, D.
   (2006) University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.23
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 [Google Scholar]
6. Bloch, S.
   (2005) Co-constructing meaning in acquired speech disorders: Word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. InK. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis (pp.38–55). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230287853_3
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287853_3 [Google Scholar]
7. Bloch, S.
   (2011) Anticipatory other-completion of augmentative and alternative communication talk: A conversation analysis study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(3), 261–269. 10.3109/09638288.2010.491574
   https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.491574 [Google Scholar]
8. Bloch, S. & Wilkinson, R.
   (2009) Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Identifying sources of understandability problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44(5): 769–783. 10.1080/13682820802546969
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820802546969 [Google Scholar]
9. Bloch, S. & Wilkinson, R.
   (2011) Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Methods of resolving understandability problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 46(5): 510–523. 10.1111/j.1460‑6984.2011.00076.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00076.x [Google Scholar]
10. Bouchard, J.
    (2016) Spelling as a last resort: The use of spelling in workplace interaction by speakers with a speech impairment. InL. Pickering, E. Friginal, & S. Staples (Eds.). Talking at Work (pp.55–78). London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑49616‑4_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49616-4_3 [Google Scholar]
11. Bruce, C.
    (2008) Critically analyzing workplace discourse to inform AAC Device Design. Paper presented at the2008 Clinical AAC Research Conference, Charlottesville, VA.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bryen, D. N.
    (2008) Vocabulary to support socially-valued adult roles. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(4), 294–301. 10.1080/07434610802467354
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610802467354 [Google Scholar]
13. Bryen, D. N., Potts, B. B., & Carey, A. C.
    (2007) So you want to work? What employers say about job skills, recruitment and hiring employees who rely on AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(2), 126–139. 10.1080/07434610600991175
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610600991175 [Google Scholar]
14. Cheng, W.
    (2004) // → did you TOOK //(rise) from the miniBAR //: What is the practical relevance of a corpus-driven language study to practitioners in Hong Kong’s hotel industry?. InU. Connor & A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the Professions (pp.141–166). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.16.07che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.07che [Google Scholar]
15. Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & M. Warren
    (2005) The creation of a prosodically transcribed intercultural corpus: The Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English (prosodic). ICAME Journal, 29, 47–68.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R.
    (1995) What is participatory research?Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. 10.1016/0277‑9536(95)00127‑S
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S [Google Scholar]
17. Di Ferrante, L.
    (2016) “I love red hair. My wife has strawberry”: Discursive strategies and social identity in the workplace. InL. Pickering, E. Friginal, & S. Staples (Eds.), Talking at Work (pp.79–98). London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑49616‑4_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49616-4_4 [Google Scholar]
18. Di Ferrante, L.
    (2013) Small Talk at Work: A Corpus-based Discourse Analysis of AAC and Non-AAC Device Users (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University-Commerce. Commerce, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dominowska, E.
    (2002) A Communication Aid with Context-aware Vocabulary Prediction (Unpublished masters dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Friginal, E.
    (2008) The Language of Outsourced Call Centers: A Corpus-based Study of Cross-cultural Interaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff, AZ.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Friginal, E.
    (2009) The Language of Outsourced Call Centers: A Corpus-based Study of Cross-cultural Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.34
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.34 [Google Scholar]
22. Friginal, E.
    (2015) Telephone interactions: A multidimensional comparison. InV. Cortes, & E. Csomay, (Eds.), Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber (pp.25–48). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.66.02fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.66.02fri [Google Scholar]
23. Friginal, E., Pearson, P., Di Ferrante, L., Pickering, L., & Bruce, C.
    (2013) Linguistic characteristics of AAC discourse in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 15(3), 279–298. 10.1177/1461445613480586
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613480586 [Google Scholar]
24. Friginal, E., Pickering, L., & Bruce, C.
    (2016) Narrative and informational dimensions of AAC discourse in the workplace. InL. Pickering, E. Friginal, & S. Staples (Eds.), Talking at Work (pp.27–54). London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑49616‑4_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49616-4_2 [Google Scholar]
25. Graves, J.
    (2000) Vocabulary needs in augmentative and alternative communication: A sample of conversational topics between staff providing services to adults with learning difficulties and their service users. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(3), 113–119. 10.1046/j.1468‑3156.2000.00060.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3156.2000.00060.x [Google Scholar]
26. Handford, M.
    (2010) The Language of Business Meetings. Tokyo: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139525329
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139525329 [Google Scholar]
27. Handford, M.
    (2017, July). Corpus analysis of workplace discourse: The case of the construction industry. Paper presented at theCorpus Linguistics Conference 2017 (CL2017), Birmingham, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Higginbotham, D. J.
    (1990) Considering single subject experimental designs in social interaction and discourse research. InJ. Brodin & E. Björck-Åkesson (Eds.), Methodological Issues in Research in Augmentative and Alternative Communication (pp.79–85). Stockholm: The Swedish Handicap Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Higginbotham, D. J., & Bedrosian, J. L.
    (1995) Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 11–13. 10.1080/07434619512331277099
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619512331277099 [Google Scholar]
30. Higginbotham, D. J., & Caves, K.
    (2002) AAC performance and usability issues: The effect of AAC technology on the communicative process. Assistive Technology, 14(1), 45–57. 10.1080/10400435.2002.10132054
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2002.10132054 [Google Scholar]
31. Higginbotham, D. J., Lesher, G. W., Moulton, B. J., & Roark, B.
    (2012) The application of natural language processing to augmentative and alternative communication. Assistive Technology, 24(1), 14–24. 10.1080/10400435.2011.648714
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2011.648714 [Google Scholar]
32. Hill, K.
    (2001, March12 2007) Achieving success in AAC: Assessment and intervention. Retrieved fromaacinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Achieving-Success-In-AAC.pdf (last accessedFebruary 2019).
33. Hoag, L., Bedrosian, J., McCoy, K., & Johnson, D.
    (2004) Trade-offs between informativeness and speed of message delivery in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1270–1285. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2004/096)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/096) [Google Scholar]
34. Holmes, J.
    (2000) Victoria University of Wellington’s Language in the Workplace Project: An overview. Language in the Workplace Occasional Papers 1. Retrieved fromwww.victoria.ac.nz/lals/centres-and-institutes/language-in-the-workplace/docs/ops/op1.pdf (last accessedFebruary 2019).
35. Holmes, J. & Stubbe, M.
    (2003) Power & Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. London, UK. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Koester, A.
    (2006) Investigating Workplace Discourse. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203015742
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203015742 [Google Scholar]
37. Koester, A.
    (2010) Workplace Discourse. New York, NY: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
38. McNaughton, D., & Bryen, D. N.
    (2002) Enhancing participation in employment through AAC technologies. Assistive Technology, 14(1), 58–70. 10.1080/10400435.2002.10132055
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2002.10132055 [Google Scholar]
39. Nelson, M.
    (2000) A Corpus-based Study of Business English and Business English Teaching Materials (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Manchester, UK. Manchester.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Pickering, L. & Bruce, C.
    (2009) The AAC and non-AAC workplace corpus (ANAWC) [Collection of Electronic Texts]. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Pickering, L., Pearson, P., Bouchard, J., Lomotey, C. F., & Di Ferrante, L.
    (2011) Small talk at work: Comparison of AAC and non-AAC user corpora. Paper presented at theConference of the American Association for Corpus Linguistics 2011, Atlanta, GA.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Rifkin, S. B.
    (1990) Community Participation in MCH/FP Programmes: An Analysis Based on Case Study Material. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Stubbe, M.
    (2001) From office to production line: Collecting data for the Wellington Language in the Workplace Project. Language in the Workplace Occasional Papers 2. Retrieved fromwww.victoria.ac.nz/lals/centres-and-institutes/language-in-the-workplace/docs/ops/op2.pdf (last accessedFebruary 2019)
44. Tönsing, K., & Alant, E.
    (2004) Topics of social conversation in the work place: A South African perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(2), 89–102. 10.1080/07434610410001699762
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610410001699762 [Google Scholar]
45. Venkatagiri, H. S.
    (1995) Techniques for enhancing communication productivity in AAC: A review of research. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(3), 36–45. 10.1044/1058‑0360.0404.36
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0404.36 [Google Scholar]
46. Warren, M.
    (2004) // ↘so what have YOU been WORking on REcently //: Compiling a specialized corpus of spoken business English. InU. Connor and T. Upton (Eds.). Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics (pp.115–140). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.16.06war
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.06war [Google Scholar]
47. Wisenburn, B., & Higginbotham, D. J.
    (2008) An AAC application using speaking partner speech recognition to automatically produce contextually relevant utterances. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(2), 100–109. 10.1080/07434610701740448
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701740448 [Google Scholar]