Phonological CorpusTools

References

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L.
   (1995) The CELEX Lexical Database: English Linguistic Guide. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved fromhttps://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/docs/LDC96L14/eug_let.pdf (last accessedAugust 2019).
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bod, R., Hay, J., & Jannedy, S.
   (Eds.) (2003) Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5582.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5582.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
3. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
   (2019) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.50) [Computer program]. Retrieved fromwww.praat.org (last accessedMarch 2019).
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brent, M. R.
   (1999) An efficient, probabilistically sound algorithm for segmentation and word discovery. Machine Learning, 34(1–3), 71–105. 10.1023/A:1007541817488
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007541817488 [Google Scholar]
5. Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
   (2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 [Google Scholar]
6. Bybee, J. L.
   (2001) Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612886
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886 [Google Scholar]
7. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M.
   (1968) The Sound Pattern of English. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cohen Priva, U.
   (2008) Using information content to predict phone deletion. InN. Abner & J. Bishop (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp.90–98). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Durand, J., Gut, U., & Kristoffersen, G.
   (Eds.) (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571932.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571932.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
10. Ernestus, M.
    (2011) Gradience and categoricality in phonological theory. InM. van Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology (pp.2115–2136). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0089
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0089 [Google Scholar]
11. Frisch, S.
    (2011) Frequency effects. InM. van Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology (pp.2137–2163). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0090
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0090 [Google Scholar]
12. Goldsmith, J., & Riggle, J.
    (2012) Information theoretic approaches to phonological structure: The case of Finnish vowel harmony. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30(3), 859–896. 10.1007/s11049‑012‑9169‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-012-9169-1 [Google Scholar]
13. Greenberg, J. H., & Jenkins, J.
    (1964) Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English. Word, 20(1–3), 157–177. 10.1080/00437956.1964.11659816
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659816 [Google Scholar]
14. Hall, K. C.
    (2009) A Probabilistic Model of Phonological Relationships from Contrast to Allophony (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hall, K. C.
    (2013) A typology of intermediate phonological relationships. The Linguistic Review, 30(2), 215–275. doi:  10.1515/tlr‑2013‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2013-0008 [Google Scholar]
16. Hall, K. C.
    (submitted). Corpora and phonological analysis. InB. E. Dresher & H. Van der Hulst Eds. The Handbook of the History of Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hall, K. C., Allen, B., Fry, M., Mackie, S., & McAuliffe, M.
    (2015) Calculating functional load with pronunciation variants. Paper presented at theWorkshop on Modeling Variability in Speech, Institute for Natural Language Processing, Stuttgart, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hall, K. C., Jaeger, T. F., Hume, E., & Wedel, A.
    (2018a) The role of predictability in shaping phonological patterns. Linguistics Vanguard, 4(s2), 1–15. 10.1515/lingvan‑2017‑0027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0027 [Google Scholar]
19. Hall, K. C., Pine, A., & Schwan, M. D.
    (2018b) Doing phonological corpus analysis in a fieldwork context. InL. Matthewson, E. A. Guntly & M. Rochemont (Eds.), Wa7 Xweysás i Nqwal’utteníha i Ucwalmícwa: He Loves the People’s Languages: Essays in honour of Henry Davis (pp.615–630). Vancouver, BC: UBC Occasional Papers in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hayes, B.
    (2009) Introductory Phonology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hockett, C. F.
    (1966) The quantification of functional load: A linguistic problem. U.S. Air Force Memorandum RM-5168-PR.
    [Google Scholar]
22. International Phonetic Association
    International Phonetic Association (Ed.) (1999) The Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Johnson, K.
    (2004) Massive reduction in conversational American English. InK. Yoneyama & K. Maekawa (Eds.), Spontaneous Speech: Data and Analysis (pp.29–54). Tokyo: The International Institute for Japanese Language.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Khorsi, A.
    (2012) On morphological relatedness. Natural Language Engineering, 19(4), 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A.
    (1951) On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(1), 79–86. 10.1214/aoms/1177729694
    https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729694 [Google Scholar]
26. Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B.
    (1998) Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear Hear, 19(1), 1–36. 10.1097/00003446‑199802000‑00001
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001 [Google Scholar]
27. Pierrehumbert, J. B.
    (2003) Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. InR. Bod, J. Hay & S. Jannedy (Eds.), Probabilistic Linguistics (pp.177–228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pinnow, E., & Connine, C. M.
    (2014) Phonological variant recognition: Representations and rules. Language and Speech, 57(1), 42–67. 10.1177/0023830913479105
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830913479105 [Google Scholar]
29. Pitt, M. A.
    (2009) The strength and time course of lexical activation of pronunciation variants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 896–910.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pitt, M. A., Dilley, L., Johnson, K., Kiesling, S., Raymond, W., Hume, E., & Fosler-Lussier, E.
    (2007) Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech (2nd Release). Retrieved fromwww.buckeyecorpus.osu.edu (last accessedAugust 2019).
31. Rose, Y., MacWhinney, B., Byrne, R., Hedlund, G., Maddocks, K., O’Brien, P., & Wareham, T.
    (2006) Introducing Phon: A software solution for the study of phonological acquisition. InD. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.489–500). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Rose, Y., & MacWhinney, B.
    (2014) The PhonBank Project: Data and software-assisted methods for the study of phonology and phonological development. InJ. Durand, U. Gut & G. Kristoffersen (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology (pp.308–401). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Vaden, K. I., Halpin, H. R., & Hickok, G. S.
    (2009) Irvine Phonotactic Online Dictionary (Version 2.0). Retrieved fromwww.iphod.com (last accessedAugust 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
34. Vitevitch, M. S. & Luce, P. A.
    (2004) A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(3), 481–487. doi:  10.3758/BF03195594
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195594 [Google Scholar]
35. Wedel, A., Kaplan, A., & Jackson, S.
    (2013) High functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: A corpus study. Cognition, 128(2), 179–186. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.002 [Google Scholar]
36. Wells, J. C.
    (n.d.). Computer-coding the IPA: A Proposed Extension of SAMPA. London: University College London. Retrieved fromhttps://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/sampa/ipasam-x.pdf (last accessedAugust 2019).
    [Google Scholar]