Electronic supplement analysis of multiple texts

References

1. Baker, P., & Ellece, S.
   (2011) Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. New York, NY: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, P., & McEnery, T.
   (2015) Who benefits when discourse gets democratised? Analysing a Twitter corpus around the British Benefits Street debate. InP. Baker & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpora and Discourse Studies (pp.244–265). Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1057/9781137431738_12
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738_12 [Google Scholar]
3. Bauman, Z.
   (2004) Work, Consumerism and the New Poor (2nd edition). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cassiman, S. A.
   (2008) Resisting the neo-liberal poverty discourse: On constructing deadbeat dads and welfare queens. Sociology Compass, 2(5), 1690–1700. 10.1111/j.1751‑9020.2008.00159.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00159.x [Google Scholar]
5. Derrida, J.
   (1976) Of Grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fairclough, N.
   (2001) Language and Power (2nd edition). London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Jackson, J.
   (2016, March17). Independent, Mirror, Express and Star Suffer Sharp Fall in Traffic. Guardian. Retrieved fromhttps://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/mar/17/independent-mirror-express-and-star-suffer-sharp-fall-in-traffic (last accessedNovember 2019).
   [Google Scholar]
8. Jewell, J.
   (2014, November7). Love them or hate them, BTL comments have changed journalism forever. The Conversation. Retrieved fromhttps://theconversation.com/love-them-or-hate-them-btl-comments-have-changed-journalism-forever-33816 (last accessedNovember 2019).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Katz, M. B.
   (2013) The Undeserving Poor (2nd edition). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Kehoe, A., & Gee, M.
    (2012) Reader comments as an aboutness indicator in online texts: Introducing the Birmingham Blog Corpus. Varieng, 12. Retrieved fromwww.helsinki.fi/varieng/journal/volumes/12/kehoe_gee/ (last accessedNovember 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kiesling, S. F.
    (2009) Style as stance. InA. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives (pp.171–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
12. Levitas, R., Head, E., & Finch, N.
    (2006) Lone mothers, poverty and social exclusion. InC. Pantazis, D. Gordon, & R. Levitas (Eds.), Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain (pp.405–430). Bristol: The Policy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Lorenzo-Dus, N., & Marsh, S.
    (2012) Bridging the gap: Interdisciplinary insights into the securitization of poverty. Discourse and Society, 23(3), 274–296. 10.1177/0957926511433453
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511433453 [Google Scholar]
14. Lundström, R.
    (2013) Framing fraud: Discourse on benefit cheating in Sweden and the UK. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 630–645. 10.1177/0267323113502737
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113502737 [Google Scholar]
15. McKenzie, L.
    (2015) Getting By: Estates, Class and Culture in Austerity Britain. London: Polity. 10.2307/j.ctt1t8928t
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t8928t [Google Scholar]
16. O’Halloran, K.
    (2010) Critical reading of a text through its electronic supplement. Digital Culture and Education, 2(2), 210–229.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ochs, E.
    (1992) Indexing gender. InA. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (pp.335–358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Paterson, L. L., & Gregory, I. N.
    (2019) Representations of Poverty and Place. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑93503‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93503-4 [Google Scholar]
19. Paterson, L. L., Coffey-Glover, L., & Peplow, D.
    (2016) Negotiating stance within discourses of class: Reactions to Benefits Street. Discourse & Society, 27(2), 195–214. 10.1177/0957926515611558
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515611558 [Google Scholar]
20. Rayson, P.
    (2008) From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519–549. 10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray [Google Scholar]
21. Rayson, P.
    (2009) Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment [Computer software]. Computing Department, Lancaster University. Available fromucrel.lancs.ac.uk/wmatrix/ (last accessedNovember 2019).
22. Roberts, C.
    (2017) The language of ‘welfare dependency’ and ‘benefit cheats’: Internalising and reproducing the hegemonic and discursive rhetoric of ‘benefit scroungers’. InA. Mooney & E. Sifaki (Eds.), The Language of Money and Debt (pp.189–204). Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑57568‑1_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57568-1_8 [Google Scholar]
23. Scott, M.
    (1997) PC analysis of key words – and key key words. System, 25(2), 33–245. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(97)00011‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00011-0 [Google Scholar]
24. Scott, M.
    (2012) WordSmith Tools (Version 6) [Computer software]. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Scott, M.
    (n.d.). Downloading BNC or ANC word lists. Retrieved fromhttps://lexically.net/downloads/BNC_wordlists/downloading%20BNC.htm (last accessedNovember 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
26. Skeggs, B.
    (1997) Formations of Class and Gender. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Taylor, C.
    (2013) Searching for similarity using corpus-assisted discourse studies. Corpora, 8(1), 81–113. 10.3366/cor.2013.0035
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0035 [Google Scholar]
28. van der Bom, I., Paterson, L. L., Peplow, D., & Grainger, K.
    (2018) ‘It’s not the fact they claim benefits but their useless, lazy, drug taking lifestyles we despise’: Analysing audience responses to Benefits Street using live tweets. Discourse, Context & Media, 21, 36–45. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.11.003 [Google Scholar]
29. Wood, H., & Skeggs, B.
    (Eds.) (2011) Reality Television and Class. London: British Film Institute/Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]