(2009) Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. InA. Lüdeling, & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook (Vol.2, pp.181–208). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
(2005) Logical and typological arguments for Radical Construction Grammar. InJ.-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions (pp.273–314). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.3.11cro
(2012) Paradigmatic integration. InK. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections (pp.111–134). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.130.05die
(2004) Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal?InW. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What Makes Grammaticalization – A Look from its Fringes and its Components (pp.21–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2003) On language, change, and language change – or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. InB. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp.3–180). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756393
(2017) The development of non-deontic BE BOUND TO in a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar perspective. Lingua, 199, 72–93. 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.07.012
(2015) Grammaticalisation as paradigmatisation. InA. D. M. Smith, G. Trousdale, & R. Waltereit (Eds.), New Directions in Grammaticalization Research (pp.261–292). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste