1887
Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar

 

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.19091.tra
2020-04-16
2020-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baayen, R. H.
    (2008) Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2009) Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. InA. Lüdeling, & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook (Vol.2, pp.181–208). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barðdal, J.
    (2008) Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.8 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barðdal, J., Smirnova, E., Sommerer, L., & Gildea, S.
    (Eds.) (2015) Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergs, A., & Diewald, G.
    (Eds.) (2008) Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211757
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211757 [Google Scholar]
  6. Booij, G.
    (2010) Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, J. L.
    (2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  8. Campbell, L.
    (Ed.) (2001) Grammaticalization: A Critical Assessment [Special issue]. Language Sciences, 23(2–3).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Croft, W.
    (2005) Logical and typological arguments for Radical Construction Grammar. InJ.-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions (pp.273–314). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.3.11cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.11cro [Google Scholar]
  10. Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E.
    (2012) Paradigmatic integration. InK. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections (pp.111–134). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.130.05die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.130.05die [Google Scholar]
  11. Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
    (2005) Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614132
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614132 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hilpert, M., & Östman, J.-O.
    (Eds) (2014) Reflections on constructions across grammars [Special issue]. Constructions and Frames, 6(2). 10.1075/cf.6.2.01int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.6.2.01int [Google Scholar]
  13. Himmelmann, N. P.
    (2004) Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal?InW. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What Makes Grammaticalization – A Look from its Fringes and its Components (pp.21–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Joseph, B. D., & Janda, R. D.
    (2003) On language, change, and language change – or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. InB. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp.3–180). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756393
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393 [Google Scholar]
  15. Lehmann, C.
    (1995/2015) Thoughts on Grammaticalization (3rd rev. ed.). Berlin: Language Science Press. (Original work published 1982)
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Noël, D.
    (2017) The development of non-deontic BE BOUND TO in a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar perspective. Lingua, 199, 72–93. 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.07.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.07.012 [Google Scholar]
  17. Norde, M.
    (2009) Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Nørgård-Sørensen, J., & Heltoft, L.
    (2015) Grammaticalisation as paradigmatisation. InA. D. M. Smith, G. Trousdale, & R. Waltereit (Eds.), New Directions in Grammaticalization Research (pp.261–292). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Petré, P., & Van de Velde, F.
    (2018) The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language, 94(4), 867–901. 10.1353/lan.2018.0056
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0056 [Google Scholar]
  20. Schmid, H.-J., & Mantlik, A.
    2015 Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profile. Anglia, 133(4), 583–623. 10.1515/ang‑2015‑0056
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ang-2015-0056 [Google Scholar]
  21. Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. Th.
    (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
  22. Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
    (2013) Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.19091.tra
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error