Volume 20, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The classical Chinese text tells us that the meaning of a word, or a text, is not fixed, but consists of the many perspectives offered in debate. Each new contribution interprets what has been said and thus adds to its meaning. This is akin to the approach of modern hermeneutics. What a text means is determined by its intertextual links to previous texts, and by the traces it leaves in its subsequent interpretations. The practical approach of philology and the methodology of corpus linguistics provide the foundation of the task of interpretation, by establishing the textual evidence on which interpretation has to rest. My paper exemplifies the ’s strategy in moving on from the textual evidence to their manifold interpretations, thus interweaving corpus linguistics, philology and hermeneutics.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Berkson, M
    (1996) Language: The guest of reality – Zhuangzi and Derrida on language, reality, and skillfulness. In P. Kjellberg & P.J. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi (pp. 97–126). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloor, D
    (1991) Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Burik, S
    (2010) Thinking on the edge: Heidegger, Derrida, and the Daoist Gateway (men 門). Philosophy East and West, 60(4), 499–516. doi: 10.1353/pew.2010.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2010.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, S
    (2014) Considering Asia and teaching the Daoist way: Understanding identity, community, and ecology in connection, perspective, and practice. In D. Jones & M. Marion (Eds.), The Dynamics of Cultural Counterpoint in Asian Studies (pp. 127–140). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ch’ine, E.T
    (1984) The conception of language and the use of paradox in Buddhism and Taoism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 11(4), 375–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑6253.1984.tb00314.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.1984.tb00314.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Froese, K
    (2013) Humour as the playful sidekick to language in the Zhuangzi. Asian Philosophy, 23(2), 137–152. doi: 10.1080/09552367.2013.776236
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2013.776236 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gadamer, H.-G
    (2004) Truth and Method (2nd ed.). London, UK: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Goh, I
    (2011) Chuang Tzu’s becoming-animal. Philosophy East and West, 61(1), 110–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hansen, C
    (1992) A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hermanns, F
    (2003) Linguistische Hermeneutik. In A. Linke , H.-P. Ortner & P.R. Portmann-Tzelikas (Eds.), Sprache und mehr: Ansichten einer Linguistik der sprachlichen Praxis (pp. 125–163). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hesse, M
    (1980) Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hogan, R
    (2010) Getting It Right with Tao: A Contemporary Spin on the Tao Te Ching. New York, NY: Channel V Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Keenan, J.P
    (1993) Mahāyāna theology: A dialogue with critics. Buddhist-Christian Studies, 13, 15–44. doi: 10.2307/1389870
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1389870 [Google Scholar]
  14. Latour, B. , & Woolgar, S
    (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. London, UK: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lau, D.C
    (1963) Dao de Jing of Laozi. Translation. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Legge, J
    (1891) The Texts of Taoism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1971) Confucian Analects, The Great Learning & The Doctrine of the Mean. Chatham, MA: Dover Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mair, V.H
    (1998) Wandering on the Way: Early Taoist Tales and Parables of Chuang Tzu (2nd ed.). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mead, G.H
    (1967) Mind, Self, and Society: From The Standpoint Of A Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226516608.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226516608.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Nelson, E.S
    (2008) Questioning dao: Skepticism, mysticism, and ethics in the Zhuangzi. The International Journal of the Asian Philosophical Association, 1, 5–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Palmer, M
    (2006) The Book of Zhuangzi. London, UK: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rorty, R
    (1999) Philosophy and Social Hope. London, UK: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Schrift, A.D
    (1990) Nietzsche and the Question of Interpretation. London, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schwitzgebel, E
    (1996) Zhuangzi’s attitude towards language and his skepticism. In P. Kjellberg & P.J. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi (pp. 68–96). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith, T.L
    (2008) The Language of Paradox and Poetics: A Comparative Study of Zhuangzi and Kierkegaard. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oxford, OH: Miami University.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Stevenson, F.W
    (2006) Zhuangzi’s dao as background noise. Philosophy East and West, 56(2), 301–331. doi: 10.1353/pew.2006.0025
    https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2006.0025 [Google Scholar]
  27. Sun, Z
    (2015) Language, Discourse, and Praxis in Ancient China. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑54865‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54865-9 [Google Scholar]
  28. Tanaka, K
    (2004) The limit of language in Daoism. Asian Philosophy, 14(2), 191–205.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Tang, Y
    (1999) Language, truth, and literary interpretation: A cross-cultural examination. Journal of the History of Ideas, 60(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1353/jhi.1999.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.1999.0010 [Google Scholar]
  30. Teubert, W
    (2003) Writing, hermeneutics, and corpus linguistics. Logos and Language, 4(2), 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2010a) Translation equivalence and interpretive corpus linguistics: The case of ‘孝’[xiao], translated as filial piety . In F. Čermák , P. Corness & A. Klégr (Eds.), InterCorp: Exploring a Multilingual Corpus (pp. 31–53). Praha, Czech Republic: Lidové Noviny Nakladatelstvi.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2010b) Meaning, Discourse and Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511770852
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770852 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2013) Was there a cat in the garden? Knowledge between discourse and the monadic self. Language and Dialogue, 3(2), 273–297. doi: 10.1075/ld.3.2.07teu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.3.2.07teu [Google Scholar]
  34. . (forthcoming). Widening the remit.
  35. Thompson, K.O
    (1995) When a “white horse” is not a “horse”. Philosophy East and West, 45(4), 481–499. doi: 10.2307/1399790
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1399790 [Google Scholar]
  36. Vişan, F
    (2001) Zhuangzi’s point of view about language. The Romanian Journal of Chinese Studies, 1(1). Retrieved fromchinesestudies.tripod.com/visan2.html (last accessOctober 2015).
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Vrubliauskaitė, A
    (2014) Language in Zhuangzi: How to say without saying?International Journal of Area Studies, 9(1), 75–90. doi: 10.2478/ijas‑2014‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.2478/ijas-2014-0005 [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, Y
    (2003) Linguistic Strategies in Daoist and Chan Buddhism. London, UK: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203451144
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203451144 [Google Scholar]
  39. Watson, B
    (1968) The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. York, B
    (2014) Practical Skepticism: Sextus Empiricus and Zhuangzi. (Unpublished MA dissertation). Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ziporyn, B
    (2009) Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): hermeneutics; interpretation; meaning; philology; Zhuangzi
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error