The Zhuangzi, hermeneutics and (philological) corpus linguistics

References

1. Berkson, M
   (1996) Language: The guest of reality – Zhuangzi and Derrida on language, reality, and skillfulness. In P. Kjellberg & P.J. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi (pp. 97–126). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bloor, D
   (1991) Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Burik, S
   (2010) Thinking on the edge: Heidegger, Derrida, and the Daoist Gateway (men 門). Philosophy East and West, 60(4), 499–516. doi: 10.1353/pew.2010.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2010.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Chen, S
   (2014) Considering Asia and teaching the Daoist way: Understanding identity, community, and ecology in connection, perspective, and practice. In D. Jones & M. Marion (Eds.), The Dynamics of Cultural Counterpoint in Asian Studies (pp. 127–140). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ch’ine, E.T
   (1984) The conception of language and the use of paradox in Buddhism and Taoism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 11(4), 375–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑6253.1984.tb00314.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.1984.tb00314.x [Google Scholar]
6. Froese, K
   (2013) Humour as the playful sidekick to language in the Zhuangzi. Asian Philosophy, 23(2), 137–152. doi: 10.1080/09552367.2013.776236
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2013.776236 [Google Scholar]
7. Gadamer, H.-G
   (2004) Truth and Method (2nd ed.). London, UK: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Goh, I
   (2011) Chuang Tzu’s becoming-animal. Philosophy East and West, 61(1), 110–133.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hansen, C
   (1992) A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hermanns, F
    (2003) Linguistische Hermeneutik. In A. Linke , H.-P. Ortner & P.R. Portmann-Tzelikas (Eds.), Sprache und mehr: Ansichten einer Linguistik der sprachlichen Praxis (pp. 125–163). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hesse, M
    (1980) Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hogan, R
    (2010) Getting It Right with Tao: A Contemporary Spin on the Tao Te Ching. New York, NY: Channel V Books.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Keenan, J.P
    (1993) Mahāyāna theology: A dialogue with critics. Buddhist-Christian Studies, 13, 15–44. doi: 10.2307/1389870
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1389870 [Google Scholar]
14. Latour, B. , & Woolgar, S
    (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. London, UK: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lau, D.C
    (1963) Dao de Jing of Laozi. Translation. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Legge, J
    (1891) The Texts of Taoism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Legge, J
    (1971) Confucian Analects, The Great Learning & The Doctrine of the Mean. Chatham, MA: Dover Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Mair, V.H
    (1998) Wandering on the Way: Early Taoist Tales and Parables of Chuang Tzu (2nd ed.). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mead, G.H
    (1967) Mind, Self, and Society: From The Standpoint Of A Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226516608.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226516608.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
20. Nelson, E.S
    (2008) Questioning dao: Skepticism, mysticism, and ethics in the Zhuangzi. The International Journal of the Asian Philosophical Association, 1, 5–19.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Palmer, M
    (2006) The Book of Zhuangzi. London, UK: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Rorty, R
    (1999) Philosophy and Social Hope. London, UK: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Schrift, A.D
    (1990) Nietzsche and the Question of Interpretation. London, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Schwitzgebel, E
    (1996) Zhuangzi’s attitude towards language and his skepticism. In P. Kjellberg & P.J. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi (pp. 68–96). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Smith, T.L
    (2008) The Language of Paradox and Poetics: A Comparative Study of Zhuangzi and Kierkegaard. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oxford, OH: Miami University.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Stevenson, F.W
    (2006) Zhuangzi’s dao as background noise. Philosophy East and West, 56(2), 301–331. doi: 10.1353/pew.2006.0025
    https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2006.0025 [Google Scholar]
27. Sun, Z
    (2015) Language, Discourse, and Praxis in Ancient China. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑54865‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54865-9 [Google Scholar]
28. Tanaka, K
    (2004) The limit of language in Daoism. Asian Philosophy, 14(2), 191–205.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Tang, Y
    (1999) Language, truth, and literary interpretation: A cross-cultural examination. Journal of the History of Ideas, 60(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1353/jhi.1999.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.1999.0010 [Google Scholar]
30. Teubert, W
    (2003) Writing, hermeneutics, and corpus linguistics. Logos and Language, 4(2), 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Teubert, W
    (2010a) Translation equivalence and interpretive corpus linguistics: The case of ‘孝’[xiao], translated as filial piety . In F. Čermák , P. Corness & A. Klégr (Eds.), InterCorp: Exploring a Multilingual Corpus (pp. 31–53). Praha, Czech Republic: Lidové Noviny Nakladatelstvi.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Teubert, W
    (2010b) Meaning, Discourse and Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511770852
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770852 [Google Scholar]
33. Teubert, W
    (2013) Was there a cat in the garden? Knowledge between discourse and the monadic self. Language and Dialogue, 3(2), 273–297. doi: 10.1075/ld.3.2.07teu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.3.2.07teu [Google Scholar]
34. Teubert, W
    . (forthcoming). Widening the remit.
35. Thompson, K.O
    (1995) When a “white horse” is not a “horse”. Philosophy East and West, 45(4), 481–499. doi: 10.2307/1399790
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1399790 [Google Scholar]
36. Vişan, F
    (2001) Zhuangzi’s point of view about language. The Romanian Journal of Chinese Studies, 1(1). Retrieved fromchinesestudies.tripod.com/visan2.html (last accessOctober 2015).
    [Google Scholar]
37. Vrubliauskaitė, A
    (2014) Language in Zhuangzi: How to say without saying?International Journal of Area Studies, 9(1), 75–90. doi: 10.2478/ijas‑2014‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.2478/ijas-2014-0005 [Google Scholar]
38. Wang, Y
    (2003) Linguistic Strategies in Daoist and Chan Buddhism. London, UK: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203451144
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203451144 [Google Scholar]
39. Watson, B
    (1968) The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. York, B
    (2014) Practical Skepticism: Sextus Empiricus and Zhuangzi. (Unpublished MA dissertation). Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Ziporyn, B
    (2009) Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]