Volume 20, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This paper shows how corpus methods can be usefully employed in the field of psychology of religion in triangulation with other empirical instruments. Current international surveys mirror an on-going transformation in subjective meanings in religious discourse cumulating in the question: what do people actually mean when they describe themselves as spiritual, religious or neither? The paper presents results of a cross-cultural study with 1,886 participants in the US and Germany. The thematic goal is to explore subjective understandings by examining personal definitions of and . Methodologically, the study shows how the key word procedure can be used to compare the semantic profile of subjective concepts between different languages and cultures by contrasting them to standard language and by using socio-biographical context variables to build contrasting sub-corpora. To control the in-equivalence of existing reference corpora in terms of size and design a so-called reference control corpus (RCC) is introduced.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Altmeyer, S
    (2011) Fremdsprache Religion? Sprachempirische Studien im Kontext religiöser Bildung. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (2015) Exploring the unknown: The language use of German RE-students writing texts about God. British Journal of Religious Education, 37(1), 20–36. doi: 10.1080/01416200.2013.830962
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2013.830962 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ammerman, N.T
    (2013) Spiritual but not religious? Beyond binary choices in the study of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(2), 258–278. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12024
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12024 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, P
    (2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London, UK: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2010) Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, P. , Gabrielatos, C. , & McEnery, T
    (2013.) Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word “muslim” in the British press 1998-2009. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 255–278. doi: 10.1093/applin/ams048
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams048 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barker, E
    (2007) Preface. In B.A. Kosmin & A. Keysar (Eds.), Secularism and Secularity: Contemporary International Perspectives Institute for the Study of Secularism in the Society and Culture (ISSSC) (pp.iii–iv). Retrieved fromprog.trincoll.edu/ISSSC/Book/Chapters.asp (last accessedJuly 2013).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bertelsmann Foundation
    (Ed.) (2009) What the World Believes: Analysis and Commentary on the Religion Monitor 2008. Gütersloh, Germany: Verlag Bertelsmann-Stiftung.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bondi, M. , & Scott, M
    (Eds.) (2010) Keyness in Texts. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.41
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.41 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dengler, R
    (1974) A general inquirer analysis of sixteenth century and contemporary catechisms. Computers and the Humanities, 8(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1007/BF02402453
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02402453 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dörnyei, Z
    (2007) Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fuller, R.C
    (2001) Spiritual, but not Religious: Understanding Unchurched America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/0195146808.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/0195146808.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gilquin, G. , & Gries, S. Th
    (2009) Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1515/CLLT.2009.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2009.001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Greenwald, D.F. , & Harder, D.W
    (2003) The dimensions of spirituality. Psychological Reports, 92(3), 975–980. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3.975
    https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3.975 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gries, S. Th
    (2008) Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403–437. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri [Google Scholar]
  16. Habermas, J
    (1984) Reason and the Rationalization of Society: The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1 ( Thomas MacCarthy , Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1987) Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason: The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2 ( Thomas MacCarthy , Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Harvey, K
    (2013) Investigating Adolescent Health Communication: A Corpus Linguistics Approach. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Heelas, P. , Woodhead, L. , Seel, B. , Szerszynski, B. , & Trusting, K
    (2005) The Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion is Giving Way to Spirituality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hood, R.W
    (2003) Spirituality and religion. In A.L. Greil , & D.G. Bromley (Eds.), Religion: Critical Approaches to Drawing Boundaries between Sacred and Secular (pp.241–264). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/S1061‑5210(03)10014‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-5210(03)10014-X [Google Scholar]
  21. Houtman, D. , & Aupers, S
    (2007) The spiritual turn and the decline of tradition: The spread of post-Christian spirituality in 14 Western countries, 1981-2000. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(3), 305–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑5906.2007.00360.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00360.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Keller, B. , Klein, C. , Swhajor-Biesemann, A. , Silver, C.F. , Hood, R.W. , & Streib, H
    (2013) The semantics of ‘spirituality’ and related self-identifications: A comparative study in Germany and the U.S.A. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 35(1), 71–100. doi: 10.1163/15736121‑12341254
    https://doi.org/10.1163/15736121-12341254 [Google Scholar]
  23. Keller, B. , Streib, H. , Silver, C.F. , Klein, C. , & Hood, R.W
    (in preparation). Design, methods, and sample characteristics of the Bielefeld-based cross-cultural study of “spirituality”. In H. Streib & R.W. Hood (Eds.), Semantics and Psychology of “Spirituality”: A Cross-cultural Analysis. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑21245‑6_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21245-6_4 [Google Scholar]
  24. LaCour, P. , Ausker, N.H. , & Hvidt, N.C
    (2012) Six understandings of the word “spirituality” in a secular country. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 34(1), 63–81. doi: 10.1163/157361212X649634
    https://doi.org/10.1163/157361212X649634 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mahlberg, M
    (2005) English General Nouns: A Corpus Theoretical Approach. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.20
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.20 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2007) Lexical items in discourse: Identifying local textual functions of sustainable development . In M. Hoey , M. Mahlberg , M. Stubbs & W. Teubert (Eds.), Text, Discourse and Corpora: Theory and Analysis (pp. 191–218). London, UK: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2014) Corpus linguistics and discourse analysis. In K.P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Pragmatics of Discourse: Handbooks of Pragmatics: Vol 3 (pp. 215–238). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214406‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214406-009 [Google Scholar]
  28. McEnery, T
    (2006) Swearing in English: Bad Language, Purity and Power from 1586 to the Present. London, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Oakes, M.P
    (2014) Literary Detective Work on the Computer. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/nlp.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.12 [Google Scholar]
  30. O’Keeffe, A. , & McCarthy, M
    (Eds.) (2012) The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. London, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Paquot, M. , & Bestgen, Y
    (2009) Distinctive words in academic writing: A comparison of three statistical tests for keyword extraction. In A. Jucker , D. Schreier & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse (pp. 247–269). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789042029101_014
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042029101_014 [Google Scholar]
  32. Partington, A
    (2010) Modern diachronic corpus-assisted discourse studies (MD-CADS) on UK newspapers: An overview of the project. Corpora, 5(2), 83–108. doi: 10.3366/cor.2010.0101
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0101 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pennebaker, J.W. , Mehl, M.R. , & Niederhoffer, K.G
    (2003) Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–577. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schlehofer, M.M. , Omoto, A.M. , & Adelman, J.R
    (2008) How do “religion” and “spirituality” differ? Lay definitions among older adults. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47(3), 411–425. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑5906.2008.00418.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00418.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Scott, M. , & Tribble, C
    (2006) Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.22 [Google Scholar]
  36. Scott, M
    (2015) WordSmith Tools Version 6. Liverpool, UK: Lexical Analysis Software.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sinclair, J
    (2004) Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Smart, N
    (1998) Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World’s Beliefs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Streib, H. , & Hood, R.W
    (2011) “Spirituality” as privatized experience-oriented religion: Empirical and conceptual perspectives. Implicit Religion, 14(4), 433–453. doi: 10.1558/imre.v14i4.433
    https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v14i4.433 [Google Scholar]
  40. Streib, H
    (2008) More spiritual than religious: Changes in the religious field require new approaches. In H. Streib , A. Dinter & K. Söderblom (Eds.), Lived Religion: Conceptual, Empirical and Practical-Theological Approaches (pp. 53–67). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill. doi: 10.1163/ej.9789004163775.i‑404.30
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004163775.i-404.30 [Google Scholar]
  41. Streib, H. , Hood, R.W. , Keller, B. , Csöff, R.-M. , & Silver, C
    (2009) Deconversion. Qualitative and Quantitative Results from Cross-Cultural Research in Germany and the United States of America. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. doi: 10.13109/9783666604393
    https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666604393 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tausczik, Y.R. , & Pennebaker, J.W
    (2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. doi: 10.1177/0261927X09351676
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676 [Google Scholar]
  43. Teubert, W
    (2007) Natural and human rights, work and property in the discourse of Catholic social doctrine. In M. Hoey , M. Mahlberg , M. Stubbs & W. Teubert (Eds.), Text, Discourse and Corpora: Theory and Analysis (pp. 89–126). London, UK: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2010) Meaning, Discourse and Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511770852
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770852 [Google Scholar]
  45. Teubert, W. , & Čermáková, A
    (2004) Directions in corpus linguistics. In M.A.K. Halliday , C. Yallop , W. Teubert & A. Cermakova (Eds.), Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction (pp.113–165). London, UK: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wynne, M
    (2008) Searching and concordancing. In A. Lüdeling , & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An international Handbook, Vol. 1 (pp. 706–737). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Zinnbauer, B.J. , Pargament, K.I. , Cole, B. , Rye, M.S. , Butter, E.M. , Belavich, T.G. , Hipp, K.M. , Scott, A.B. , & Kadar, J.L
    (1997) Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36(4), 549–564. doi: 10.2307/1387689
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1387689 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error