oa The rise of colligations

References

1. Arnon, I., & Clark, E. V.
   (2011) Why Brush Your Teeth is better than Teeth – Children’s word production is facilitated in familiar sentence-frames. Language Learning and Development, 7(2), 107–129. 10.1080/15475441.2010.505489
   https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2010.505489 [Google Scholar]
2. Baayen, R. H.
   (1989) A Corpus-Based Approach to Morphological Productivity: Statistical Analysis and Psycholinguistic Interpretation. PhD Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Amsterdam: Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baayen, R. H.
   (1992) Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. InG. E. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991. Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑2516‑1_8
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2516-1_8 [Google Scholar]
4. Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
   Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (2020) Deutsches Textarchiv: Grundlage für ein Refernzkorpus der neuhochdeutschen Sprache [German Text Archive: Foundation for a Reference Corpus of the New High German Language]. www.deutschestextarchiv.de/
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bolinger, D.
   (1976) Meaning and Memory. Forum Linguisticum1(1), 1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bosworth, J., & Toller, T. N.
   (1921) An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary, Based on the Manuscript Collections of the Late Joseph Bosworth. Oxford University Press. www.bosworthtoller.com/
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bozzone, C.
   (2014) Constructions: A New Approach to Formularity, Discourse, and Syntax in Homer [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles]. eScholarship University of California. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6kg0q4cx
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bozzone, C.
   (Forthcoming). Homeric constructions, their productivity, and the development of Epic Greek. InL. van Beek Ed. Proceedings of the Conference “Language Change in Epic Greek and other Oral Traditions”. Brill.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bybee, J.
   (2006) Form usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language82(4), 711–733. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
10. Bybee, J.
    (2007) Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
11. Bybee, J.
    (2010) Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
12. Bybee, J., & Scheibman, J.
    (1999) The effect of usage on constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics, 37(4), 575–596. 10.1515/ling.37.4.575
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.4.575 [Google Scholar]
13. Davies, M.
    (2004) British National Corpus (fromOxford University Press). RetrievedJuly 28, 2020fromhttps://www.english-corpora.org/bnc
    [Google Scholar]
14. Davies, M.
    (2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 600 million words, 1990-present. RetrievedOctober 21, 2019fromhttps://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
    [Google Scholar]
15. Davies, M.
    (2010–) The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400 million words, 1810–2009. RetrievedJuly 28, 2020fromhttps://www.english-corpora.org/coha
    [Google Scholar]
16. Davies, M.
    (2015) Handsard Corpus. Part of the SAMUELS project. RetrievedJuly 28, 2020fromhttps://www.english-corpora.org/hansard
    [Google Scholar]
17. Davies, M.
    (2017) Early English Books Online. Part of the SAMUELS project. RetrievedJuly 28, 2020fromhttps://www.english-corpora.org/eebo
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cameron, A., Amos, A. C., dePaolo, A., Liuzza, R., & Momma, H.
    (2018) The Dictionary of Old English: A–I. Dictionary of Old English Project. https://doe.utoronto.ca/
    [Google Scholar]
19. dePaolo, A., Wilkin, J. P., & Xiang, X.
    (2009) Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. https://tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doecorpus/
    [Google Scholar]
20. Donnhauser, K., Gippert, J., & Lühr, R.
    (2015) Referenzkorpus Altdeutsch. https://www.deutschdiachrondigital.de/
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ellis, N.
    (2006) Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics27(1), 1–24. 10.1093/applin/ami038
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami038 [Google Scholar]
22. Evert, S.
    (2004) The Statistics of Word Cooccurrences: Word Pairs and Collocations [Doctoral dissertation, Universität Stuttgart]. elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/volltexte/2005/2371/
    [Google Scholar]
23. Firth, R.
    (1964) Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gries, S. Th.
    (2009) Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203880920
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880920 [Google Scholar]
25. Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–43. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
26. Grimm, J.
    (1854–1961) Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob und Wilhelm Grimm [German Dictionary by Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm]. Hirzel. www.woerterbuchnetz.de/DWB
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hackstein, O.
    (2012a) When words coalesce: Chunking and morphophonemic extension. InH. Craig Melchert (Ed.), The Indo-European Verb. Proceedings of the Conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Los Angeles 13–15 September 2010 (pp.87–104). Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hackstein, O.
    (2012b) Das Gedächtnis der Sprache. Sprachwandel und Gegenwart – welche Bedeutung besitzt die sprachliche Vergangenheit für die Gegenwart? [The Memory of language. Language change and the present day – what significance does the linguistic past have for the present?] Akademie Aktuell. Zeitschrift der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften01/2012, 12–17. https://www.academia.edu/14253166/
    [Google Scholar]
29. Haiman, J.
    (1994) Ritualization and the development of language. InW. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on Grammaticalization. (pp.3–28). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.109.07hai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.109.07hai [Google Scholar]
30. Hirzel
    Hirzel (2006–) Mittelhochdeutsches Wörterbuch. www.mhdwb-online.de/
    [Google Scholar]
31. Holmberg, A.
    (2015) Verb second. InT. Kiss & A. Alexiadou (Eds.), Syntax: Theory and Analysis. de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kennison, S.
    (2001) Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 81, 132–138. 10.3758/BF03196149
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196149 [Google Scholar]
33. Kupietz, M.
    (Ed.) (2019) Das Deutsche Referenzkorpus – DeReKo. RetrievedOctober 21, 2019fromhttps://cosmas2.ids-mannheim.de/cosmas2-web/
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kuryłowicz, J.
    (1945) Le nature des procès dits analogiques [The nature of so-called analogical processes]. Acta Linguistica, 51, 15–37. 10.1080/03740463.1945.10410880
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.1945.10410880 [Google Scholar]
35. Labov, W.
    (1989) The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change, 11, 85–97. 10.1017/S0954394500000120
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000120 [Google Scholar]
36. Labov, W.
    (2001) Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 2: Social Factors. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lehecka, T.
    (2015) Collocation and colligation. InJ-O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics Online (pp.1–20). John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/online/hop/. 10.1075/hop.19.col2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.19.col2 [Google Scholar]
38. Levshina, N.
    (2015) How to do Linguistics with R. John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
39. Lewis, R. E.
    (Ed.) (1952–2001) Middle English Dictionary. University of Michigan Press 1952–2001 Online edition inMiddle English Compendium. Frances McSparran, (Eds.). University of Michigan Library, 2000–2018. Available online atquod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary/. 10.3998/mpub.6334
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6334 [Google Scholar]
40. Meillet, A.
    (1937) Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indo-européennes [Introduction to the Comparative Study of the Indo-European Languages] (8th ed.). Hachette.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Meyer, D., Zeileis, A., Hornik, K., Gerber, F., & Friendly, M.
    (2017) vcd: Visualizing Categorical Data (Version 1.4-5) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vcd/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
42. Oxford University Press
    Oxford University Press (1884–) The Oxford English Dictionary Online. https://www.oed.com
    [Google Scholar]
43. Pinault, G.-J.
    (2015) The formation of Buddhist languages, as exemplified by the Tocharian evidence. InM. Malzahn, M. Peyrot, H. Fellner, & T.-S. Illés (Eds.), Tocharian Texts in Context, International Conference on Tocharian Manuscripts and Silk Road Culture, Vienna, June 25–29th, 2013 (pp.159–185). Hempen.
    [Google Scholar]
44. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.5.2) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
45. Sinclair, J.
    (1998) The lexical item. InE. Weigand (Ed.), Contrastive Lexical Semantics (pp.1–24). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.171.02sin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.171.02sin [Google Scholar]
46. Schmid, H.-J.
    (2000) English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110808704
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808704 [Google Scholar]
47. Walz, M.
    (1892) Garel von dem blüenden Tal: Ein höfischer Roman aus dem Artussagenkreis von dem Pleier [Garel of the Flowering Valley: A Courtly Novel from the Arthurian Cycle by Der Pleier]. Wagner’sche Universitäts-Buchhandlung.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Wegera, K.-P., & Klein, T.
    (2016) Referenzkorpus Mittelhochdetusch. https://www.linguistics.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/rem/
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wiechmann, D.
    (2008) On the computation of collostruction strength: Testing measures of association as expressions of lexical bias. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistics Theory4(2), 253–90. 10.1515/CLLT.2008.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2008.011 [Google Scholar]
50. Wray, A.
    (2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519772
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772 [Google Scholar]
51. Zeldes, A.
    (2012) Productivity in Argument Selection: From Morphology to Syntax. de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110303919
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110303919 [Google Scholar]