1887
image of Derivation and semantic autonomy
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The article focuses on the polysemy and usage patterns of the Polish lexeme “head” and its diminutive . Based on corpus methodology and cognitive linguistics analysis, it is argued that the two lexemes are too autonomous in their meanings than predicted by their morphological relatedness. As the two words cover different semantic domains, we observe that the diminutive suffix has developed a new function which signals lexicalization of meaning toward a non-human semantic domain, for example, material objects, plants, etc. Our research contributes to studies on Polish morphology and lexical semantics and to theoretical research on the polysemy of body part terms.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.20074.kra
2022-07-21
2022-08-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bacz, B.
    (2009) What’s in the head? Metaphorical expressions in Polish and English. LACUS Forum 27. Speaking and Comprehending (pp.63–74). Rice University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BAKITA, Baraza la Kiswahili la Taifa
    BAKITA, Baraza la Kiswahili la Taifa (2015) Kamusi Kuu ya Kiswahili. Longhorn.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barcelona, A.
    (2000) On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. InA. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective (pp.31–58). Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenzinger, M., & Kraska-Szlenk, I.
    (Eds.) (2014) The Body in Language: Comparative Studies of Linguistic Embodiment. Brill. 10.1163/9789004274297
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274297 [Google Scholar]
  5. Derkacz-Padiasek, T. I.
    (2010) Polysemy as a means to enrich the language of newspapers. Наукові записки. Серія “Філологічна, 13: 176–184.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Doroszewski, W.
    (Ed.) (1969) Słownik Języka Polskiego [Dictionary of Polish]. Polska Akademia Nauk. https://sjp.pwn.pl/
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Firth, J. R.
    (1957) Papers in Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gąsiorowski, P.
    (2017) The embarrassment of riches: ‘Head’ words in the Indo-European family. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting3 (pp.101–115). Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/yplm‑2017‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/yplm-2017-0005 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gries, S. Th.
    (2006) Corpus-based methods and cognitive semantics: The many senses of to run. InS. Th. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics (pp.57–99). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197709.57
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197709.57 [Google Scholar]
  10. Heine, B.
    (2014) The body in language: Observations from grammaticalization. InM. Brenzinger & I. Kraska-Szlenk (Eds.), The Body in Language: Comparative Studies of Linguistic Embodiment (pp.13–32). Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Heine, B., & T. Kuteva
    (2002) World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hilpert, M.
    (2007) Chained metonymies in lexicon and grammar: A cross-linguistic perspective on body-part terms. InG. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, Th. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction (pp.77–98). John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.136.07hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.07hil [Google Scholar]
  13. Janda, L. A.
    (2011) Metonymy in word-formation. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(2): 359–392. 10.1515/cogl.2011.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.014 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kleiber, G.
    (1990) La sémantique du prototype: Catégories et sens lexical [Prototype Semantics, Categories and Lexical Meaning]. Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kövecses, Z., & G. Radden
    (1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1): 37–77. 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kraska-Szlenk, I.
    (2014a) Semantic extensions of body part terms: Common patterns and their interpretation. Language Sciences, 44: 15–39. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2014b) Semantics of Body Part Terms: General Trends and a Case Study of Swahili. LINCOM.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (Ed.) (2019a) Embodiment in Cross-Linguistic Studies: The ‘Head’. Brill. 10.1163/9789004392410
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392410 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2019b) Metonymic extensions of the body part ‘head’ in mental and social domains. InI. Kraska-Szlenk (Ed.), Embodiment in Cross-Linguistic Studies: The ‘Head’ (pp.136–154). Brill. 10.1163/9789004392410_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392410_009 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kraska-Szlenk, I., & Wójtowicz, B.
    (2016, September15–17). Derivation and semantic autonomy: A corpus study of Polish głowa ‘head’ and its diminutive główka [Paper presentation]. 46th Poznań Linguistic Meeting, Poznań, Poland.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lipka, L.
    (2002) English Lexicology: Lexical Structure, Word Semantics and Word Formation. Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Maalej, Z., & Yu, N.
    (Eds.) (2011) Embodiment via Body Parts: Studies from Various Languages and Cultures. John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.31
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.31 [Google Scholar]
  25. Maziarz, M., Piasecki, M., Rudnicka, E., Szpakowicz, S., & Kędzia, P.
    (2016) plWordNet 3.0 – a Comprehensive Lexical-Semantic Resource. InN. Calzolari, Y. Matsumoto, & R. Prasad (Eds.), 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference: Technical Papers, December 11–16, 2016, Osaka, Japan (pp.2259–2268). ACL.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
    (2012) Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nagórko, A.
    (2006) Zarys gramatyki polskiej [An outline of Polish grammar]. PWN.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Newman, J., & Rice, S.
    (2004) Patterns of usage for English sit, stand and lie: A cognitively inspired exploration in corpus linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3): 351–396. 10.1515/cogl.2004.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.013 [Google Scholar]
  29. Pattillo, K.
    (2019) From head to toe: How languages extend the head to name body parts. InI. Kraska-Szlenk (Ed.), Embodiment in Cross-Linguistic Studies: The ‘Head’ (pp.124–135). Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pęzik, P.
    (2012) Wyszukiwarka PELCRA dla danych NKJP [PELCRA search engine for NKJP data]. InA. Przepiórkowski, M. Bańko, R. L. Górski, & B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Eds.), Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego (pp.253–273). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Przepiórkowski, A., Bańko, M., Górski, R. L., & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B.
    (Eds.) (2012) Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego [National Corpus of Polish]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
    (2014) On the nature and scope of metonymy in linguistic description and explanation: Towards settling some controversies. InJ. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp.143–166). Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sarnowski, M.
    (1987) Leksykalizacja deminutiwów w języku rosyjskim i polskim [Lexicalization of diminutives in Russian and Polish]. Slavica WratislaviensiaXLIV: 59–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1991a) Deminutiwum jako znak ironii [Diminutive as a sign of irony]. InJ. Puzynina & J. Anusiewicz (Eds.), Język a kultura. Vol. 3: Wartości w języku i tekście (pp.41–50). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (1991b) Quasi-deminutiwa w języku rosyjskim i polskim [Quasi-diminutives in Russian and Polish]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Yu, N., & Niemeier, S.
    (Eds.) (2008) Culture, Body, and Language: Conceptualizations of Internal Body Organs across Cultures and Languages. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199109
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199109 [Google Scholar]
  37. Smadja, F.
    (1993) Retrieving Collocations from Text: Xtract. Computational Linguistics, 19(1): 143–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Szymanek, B.
    (2010) A Panorama of Polish Word-Formation. Wydawnictwo KUL.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Taylor, J.
    (2003) Linguistic Categorization (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Will, I.
    (2019) The conceptualization of head among the Hausa based on verbal and nonverbal representation. InI. Kraska-Szlenk (Ed.), Embodiment in Cross-Linguistic Studies: The ‘Head’ (pp.157–182). Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yu, N.
    (2009) From Body to Meaning in Culture: Papers on Cognitive Semantic Studies of Chinese. John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.149
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.149 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.20074.kra
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.20074.kra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Polish ; polysemy ; head ; cognitive linguistics ; lexical semantics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error