Annotating dialogue acts in speech data

References

1. Alexandersson, J., Buschbeck-Wolf, B., Fujinami, T., Maier, E., Reithinger, N., Schmitz, B., & Siegel, M.
   (1997) Dialogue Acts in VERBMOBIL-2. Report 204. DFKI GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany. www.jaist.ac.jp/~fuji/docs/papers/Verbmobil/report204/vmrep204.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allen, J. F., Schubet, L. K., Ferguson, G., Heeman, P., Hwang, C. H., Kato, T., Light, M., Martin, N. G., Miller, B. W., Poesio, M., & Traum, D. R.
   (1994) The TRAINS project: A Case Study in Building Conversational Planning Agent. TRAINS technical note 94–3. The University of Rochester. people.ict.usc.edu/~traum/Papers/TRAINS93.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
3. Allen, J., & Core, M.
   (1997) Draft of DAMSL: Dialog Act Markup in Several Layers. https://www.cs.rochester.edu/research/cisd/resources/damsl/RevisedManual/
   [Google Scholar]
4. AMI
   AMI (2005) Guidelines for Dialogue Act and Addressee Annotation Version 1.0. groups.inf.ed.ac.uk/ami/corpus/Guidelines/dialogue_acts_manual_1.0.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
5. Austin, J. L.
   (1975) How to Do Things with Words (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
6. Barras, C., Geoffrois, E., Wu, Z., & Liberman, M.
   (2000) Transcriber: Development and use of a tool for assisting speech corpora production. Speech Communication, 33(1–2), 5–22. 10.1016/S0167‑6393(00)00067‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00067-4 [Google Scholar]
7. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
   (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bunt, H.
   (1994) Context and Dialogue Control. Think Quarterly, 31, 19–34.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bunt, H.
   (1995) Dynamic interpretation and dialogue theory. InM. M. Taylor, F. Neel, & D. G. Bouwhuis. (Eds.), The Structure of Multimodal Dialogue (pp.139–188). John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.99.10bun
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.99.10bun [Google Scholar]
10. Bunt, H.
    (2009) The DIT++ taxonomy for functional dialogue markup. InD. Heylen, C. Pelachaud, R. Catizone, & D. Traum. AMAAS 2009 Workshop ‘Towards a Standard Markup Language for Embodied Dialogue Acts’ Proceedings (pp.13–23). Budapest. https://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~jeff/aamas09/pdf/04_Workshop/w16.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bunt, H.
    (2019) Guidelines for Using ISO Standard 24617-2. https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/guidelines-for-using-iso-standard-24617-2
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bunt, H. C., & Black, B.
    (2000) The ABC of computational pragmatics. InH. C. Bunt & W. Black. (Eds.), Computational Pragmatics: Abduction, Belief and Context. John Benjamins. 10.1075/nlp.1.01bun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.1.01bun [Google Scholar]
13. Clark, A., & Popescu-Belis, A.
    (2004) Multi-level Dialogue Act Tags. InProceedings of the 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue at HLT-NAACL 2004 (pp.163–170). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/W04-2328/
    [Google Scholar]
14. De Felice, R., Darby, J., Fisher, A., & Peplow, D.
    (2013) A classification scheme for annotating speech acts in a business email corpus. ICAME Journal, 371, 71–105. clu.uni.no/icame/ij37/Pages_71-106.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dhillon, R., Bhagat, S., Carvey, H., & Shriberg, E.
    (2004) Meeting Recorder Project: Dialog Act Labeling Guide. ICSI Technical Report TR-04-002. www1.icsi.berkeley.edu/ftp/pub/speech/papers/MRDA-manual.pdf. 10.21236/ADA607947
    https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA607947 [Google Scholar]
16. Di Eugenio, B., Jordan, P. W., & Pylkkänen, L.
    (1998) The COCONUT Project: Dialogue Annotation Manual. ISP Technical Report 98-1, University of Pittsburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Godfrey, J., & Holliman, E.
    (1997) Switchboard-1 Release 2. Linguistic Data Consortium. https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC97S62
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hyland, K.
    (2005) Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Irie, Y., Matsubara, S., Kawaguchi, N., Yamaguchi, Y., & Inagaki, Y.
    (2006) Layered speech-act annotation for spoken dialogue corpus. InLREC 2006 (pp.1584–1589). www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2006/
    [Google Scholar]
20. ISO 24617-2
    ISO 24617-2 (2012) ISO DIS 24617-2 Language resource management – Semantic annotation framework (SemAF), Part 2: Dialogue acts. Geneva.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jurafsky, D.
    (2004) Pragmatics and computational linguistics. InL. R. Horn & G. Ward. (Eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp.578–604). Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jurafsky, D., Shriberg, E., & Biasca, D.
    (1997) Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL shallow-discourse-function annotation. Coders manual, draft 13. University of Colorado at Boulder & +SRI International. https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/ws97/manual.august1.html
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kang, S., Kim, H., & Seo, J.
    (2010) A reliable multidomain model for speech act classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 311, 71–74. 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.08.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2009.08.013 [Google Scholar]
24. Kirk, J. M.
    (2013) Beyond the structural levels of language: An introduction to the SPICE-Ireland corpus and its uses. InJ. Cruickshank & R. McColl Millar. (Eds.), After the Storm: Papers from the Forum for Research on the Languages of Scotland and Ulster Triennial Meeting (pp.207–232). Forum for Research on the Languages of Scotland and Ireland. https://www.abdn.ac.uk/sll/documents/Kirk-Beyond-the-Structural-Levels-of-Language.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
25. Klein, M.
    (1999) An overview of the state of the art of coding schemes for dialogue act annotation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1(1692), 274–279. 10.1007/3‑540‑48239‑3_50
    https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48239-3_50 [Google Scholar]
26. Klein, M., Bernsen, N. O., Davies, S., Dybkjær, Garrido, J., Kasch, H., Mengel, A., Pirrelli, V., Poesio, M., Quazza, S., & Soria, C.
    (1998) MATE Deliverable D1.1: Supported Coding Schemes. 4. Dialogue Acts. www.dfki.de/mate/d11/chap4.html
    [Google Scholar]
27. Leech, G. N.
    (1980) Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.i.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.i.5 [Google Scholar]
28. Leech, G., & Weisser, M.
    (2003) Generic speech act annotation for task-oriented dialogues. InD. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson, & T. McEnery. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference. Lancaster University, UCREL Technical Papers, vol. 161. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/doc_library/linguistics/leechg/leech_and_weisser_2003.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
29. Leech, G., Weisser, M., Wilson, A., & Grice, M.
    (2000) Survey and guidelines for the representation and annotation of dialogue. InD. Gibbon, I. Mertins, & R. Moore. (Eds), Handbook of Multimodal and Spoken Language Systems (pp.10–11). Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Levinson, S. C.
    (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
31. Levinson, S. C.
    (2017) Speech acts. InY. Huang. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics (pp.199–216).
    [Google Scholar]
32. McAllister, P. G.
    (2015) Speech acts: A synchronic perspective. InK. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann. Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook (pp.29–51). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Meteer, M.
    (1995) Dysfluency Annotation Stylebook for the Switchboard Corpus. University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Morris, C. W.
    (1938) Foundations of the theory of signs. InO. Neurath, R. Carnap, & C. Morris. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science (pp.77–138). University of Chicago Pess.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Park, J., & Kim, Y.
    (2018) A novel speech-act coding scheme to visualize the intention of crew communications to cope with simulated off-normal conditions of nuclear power plants. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1781, 236–246. 10.1016/j.ress.2018.05.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.05.013 [Google Scholar]
36. Qadir, A., & Riloff, E.
    (2011) Classifying sentences as speech acts in message board posts. InProceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp.748–758). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/D11-1069/
    [Google Scholar]
37. Searle, J. R.
    (1979) Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
38. Vail, A. K., & Boyer, K. E.
    (2014) Identifying effective moves in tutoring: On the refinement of dialogue act annotation schemes. InS. Trausan-Matu, K. Elizabeth Boyer, M. Crosby, & Kitty Panourgia. (Eds.), ITS 2014, LNCS84741 (pp.199–209). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑07221‑0_24
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_24 [Google Scholar]
39. Verdonik, D., Kosem, I., Zwitter Vitez, A., Krek, S., & Stabej, M.
    (2013) Compilation, transcription and usage of a reference speech corpus: The case of the Slovene corpus GOS. Language Resources and Evaluation Journal, 47(4), 1031–1048. 10.1007/s10579‑013‑9216‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-013-9216-5 [Google Scholar]
40. Weisser, M.
    (2014) Speech act annotation. InK. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann. (Eds.), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook (pp.84–113). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139057493.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057493.005 [Google Scholar]
41. Weisser, M.
    (2016) DART – The dialogue annotation and research tool. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 12(2), 355–388. 10.1515/cllt‑2014‑0051
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0051 [Google Scholar]
42. Weisser, M.
    (2018) How to Do Corpus Pragmatics on Pragmatically Annotated data: Speech acts and Beyond. John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.84
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.84 [Google Scholar]
43. Weisser, M.
    (2019a) The DART Taxonomy v. 3. martinweisser.org/DART_scheme.html
    [Google Scholar]
44. Weisser, M.
    (2019b) The DART annotation scheme: Form, applicability & application. Studia Neophilologica, 91 (2), 131–153. 10.1080/00393274.2019.1616218
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2019.1616218 [Google Scholar]
45. Weisser, M.
    (2020) Speech acts in corpus pragmatics: Making the case for an extended taxonomy. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 25(4), 400–425. 10.1075/ijcl.19023.wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19023.wei [Google Scholar]
46. Zhao, T., & Kawahara, T.
    (2019) Joint dialog act segmentation and recognition in human conversations using attention to dialog context. Computer Speech & Language, 571, 108–127. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0885230818304030. 10.1016/j.csl.2019.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2019.03.001 [Google Scholar]