Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This study extends the theory of local grammars by making the case that local grammars can also be employed to better and more fully describe the patterns of co-selection found in collocational frameworks (Renouf & Sinclair 1991). The term collocational framework was originally used to describe the co-selection of two grammatical words which frame an intervening lexical word. In the present study a more inclusive definition is adopted and the number of intervening words is not limited. While there have been a small number of studies related to collocational frameworks there has been no attempt so far to see whether it is possible to describe their local grammars. To illustrate the feasibility of identifying the local grammars of collocational frameworks, four collocational frameworks are studied here: , , , and and their local grammars are identified and discussed.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ahmad, K. , Cheng, D. , & Almas, Y
    (2006) Multi-lingual sentiment analysis of financial news streams. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Grid Technology for Financial Modeling and Simulation (pp.1–8). Palermo, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnbrook, G
    (2002) Defining Language: A Local Grammar of Definition Sentences. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.11 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnbrook, G. , & Sinclair, J
    (2001) Specialised corpus, local and functional grammars. In M. Ghadessy , A. Henry & R.L. Roseberry (Eds.), Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice (pp. 237–276). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.5.15bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.5.15bar [Google Scholar]
  4. Bednarek, M
    (2008) Emotion Talk across Corpora. Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230285712
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285712 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhatia V. , & Bhatia, A
    (2011) Legal discourse across cultures and socio‐pragmatic contexts. World Englishes, 30(4), 481–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2011.01727.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2011.01727.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, D. , Johansson, S. , Leech, G. , Conrad, S. , Finegan, E. , & Quirk, R
    (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, UK: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brezina, V. , McEnery, T. , & Wattam, S
    (2015) Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre [Google Scholar]
  8. Carter, R. , & McCarthy, M
    (2006) Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng, W. , & Warren, M
    (2005) // à well I have a DIFferent // æ THINking you know //: Disagreement in Hong Kong business discourse: A corpus-driven approach. In M. Gotti & F. Bargiela (Eds.), Asian Business Discourse(s) (pp. 241–270). Frankfurt main, Germany: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheng, W. , Greaves, C. , Warren, M
    (2006) From n-gram to skipgram to concgram. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(4), 411–433. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.11.4.04che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.4.04che [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng, W. , Greaves, C. , Sinclair, J. , & Warren, M
    (2009) Uncovering the extent of the phraseological tendency: Towards a systematic analysis of concgrams. Applied Linguistics, 30(2), 236–252. doi: 10.1093/applin/amn039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn039 [Google Scholar]
  12. Curtotti, M. , & McCreath, E.C
    (2011) A corpus of Australian contract language: Description, profiling and analysis. Proceedings of the 13 th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 199–208). New York, NY: ACM.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Greaves, C
    (2009) ConcGram 1.0: A Phraseological Search Engine. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Greaves, C. , & Warren, M
    (2010) What can a corpus tell us about multi-word units?In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 212–226). London, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gross, M
    (1993) Local grammars and their representation by finite automata. In M. Hoey (Ed.), Data, Description, Discourse. Papers on the English Language in honour of John McH. Sinclair (pp.26–38). London, UK: Harper-Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M
    (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). London, UK: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hunston, S
    (2002) Pattern grammar, language teaching, and linguistic variation. In R. Reppen , S.M. Fitzmaurice & D. Biber (Eds.), Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation (pp. 167–183). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.9.11hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.9.11hun [Google Scholar]
  18. Hunston, S. , & Francis, G
    (2000) Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.4 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hunston, S. , & Sinclair, J
    (2000) A local grammar of evaluation. In S. Hunston & Thompson, G . (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 75–100). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jacobsson, B
    (2002) The indefinites some and any in linguistic theory and actual usage. Studia Neophilologica, 74(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/00393270252956160
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00393270252956160 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kadmon, N. , & Landman, F
    (1993) Any. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16 (4), 353–422. doi: 10.1007/BF00985272
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985272 [Google Scholar]
  22. Luzon-Marco, M.J
    (2000) Collocational frameworks in medical research papers: A genre-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 19(1), 63–86. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(98)00013‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00013-1 [Google Scholar]
  23. Martin, J.R. & White, P.R.R
    (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mason, O
    (2004) Automatic processing of local grammar patterns. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Colloquium for the UK Special Interest Group Computational Linguistics . Retrieved fromwww.cs.bham.ac.uk/~mgl/cluk/papers/mason.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Renouf, A. , & Sinclair, J
    (1991) Collocational frameworks in English. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in the honour of Jan Svartvik (pp. 128–143). London, UK: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sinclair, J
    (1992) Collins COBUILD English Usage. London, UK: Harper Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2007a) Defining the Definiendom. In G. de Schryver (Ed.), A Way with Words: Recent Advances in Lexical Theory and Analysis: A Festschrift for Patrick Hanks (pp. 37–47). Kampala, Uganda: Menha Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2007b) Collocation reviewed [manuscript]. Tuscan Word Centre, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sinclair, J. , Bullon, S. , Krishnamurthy, R. , Manning, E. , & Todd, J
    (1990) Collins COBUILD English Grammar. London, UK: HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Warren, M
    (2009) Why concgram?In C. Greaves , ConcGram 1.0: A phraseological search engine (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2013) I mean I only really wanted to dry me towels because. ..: Organisational frameworks across modes, registers, and genres. In M. Charles , N. Groom & S. John (Eds.), Corpora, Grammar, Text and Discourse (pp. 181–199). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.73.07war
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.73.07war [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error