Volume 21, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The tool (Brezina et al. 2015) allows collocational networks to be identified within corpora, enabling corpus analysis to go beyond two-way collocation. This paper aims to illustrate the types of linguistic relationships that can appear when more than two words are considered, using graph theory to account for the different types of collocational “shapes” that can be formed within networks. Using the reference corpus, the BE06, examples of different types of graphs were obtained and analysed in order to form an understanding of the sorts of relationships between words that occur in particular shapes. The analysis indicates that concepts from graph theory can be usefully integrated into corpus analysis of collocation as well as showing the potential for a more sophisticated understanding of the company that words keep.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Alonso, A. , Millon, C. , & Williams, G
    (2011) Collocational networks and their application to an E-Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Verbs in Science (DicSci). In I. Kosem & K. Kosem (Eds.), Electronic Lexicography in the 21st Century: New Applications for New Users: Proceedings of eLex 2011, Bled, 10-12 November 2011 (pp.12–22).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anthony, L
    (2014) AntConc(Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available fromwww.laurenceanthony.net/ (last accessedJune 2016).
  3. Baker, P
    (2005) Public Discourses of Gay Men. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2009) The BE06 Corpus of British English and recent language change. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 312–337. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.14.3.02bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.3.02bak [Google Scholar]
  5. (2014) Using Corpora to Analyse Gender. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, D. Conrad, S. , & Cortes, V
    (2004) If you look at…: Lexical bundles in University teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405. doi: 10.1093/applin/25.3.371
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brezina, V. , McEnery, T. , & Wattam, S
    (2015) Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre [Google Scholar]
  8. Church, K.W. , & Hanks, P
    (1990) Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Durrant, P. , & Doherty, A
    (2010) Are high frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6 (2), 125–155. doi: 10.1515/cllt.2010.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2010.006 [Google Scholar]
  10. Eeg-Olofsson, M. , & Altenberg, B
    (1994) Discontinuous recurrent word combinations in the London-Lund Corpus. In U. Fries , G. Tottie & P. Schneider (Eds.), Creating and Using English Language Corpora. Papers from the 14th ICAME Conference (pp.63–77). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Firth, J.R
    (1957) Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gries, S. Th
    (2013) 50-something years of work on collocations: What is or should be next…International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(1), 137–166. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.18.1.09gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.1.09gri [Google Scholar]
  13. Harris, J.M
    (2000) Combinatorics and Graph Theory. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4757‑4803‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4803-1 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoey, M
    (2005) Lexical Priming. A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hunston, S
    (2002) Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
  16. McEnery, T
    (2006) Swearing in English: Bad Language, Purity and Power from 1586 to the Present. Abington: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Phillips, M.K
    (1983) Lexical macrostructure in science text (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Phillips, M
    (1985) Aspects of Text Structure: An Investigation of the Lexical Organisation of Text. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1989) Lexical Structure of Text. Birmingham: ELR, University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Scott, M
    (1999) WordSmith Tools version 3 [Computer Software]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2016) WordSmith Tools version 7 [Computer Software]. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stubbs, M
    (1995) Collocations and semantic profiles. Functions of Language, 2(1), 23–55. doi: 10.1075/fol.2.1.03stu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.2.1.03stu [Google Scholar]
  23. (2001) Words and Phrases. London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. West, D.B
    (2000) Introduction to Graph Theory (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Williams, G
    (1998) Collocational networks: Interlocking patterns of lexis in a corpus of plant biology research articles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 3(1), 151–171. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.3.1.07wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.3.1.07wil [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): collocation; graph; GraphColl; methods; network
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error