Volume 21, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The paper aims to demonstrate the usefulness of a novel corpus-based approach to analyzing Halliday’s transitivity for application to critical discourse analysis (CDA). The approach expands transitivity analysis beyond the traditional profiling of participant roles and process types at grammatical level to conceptual subcategorization, in light of the fact that CDA researchers often end up delving into the meanings of individual processes as part of their transitivity analyses. The paper introduces a scheme for annotating transitivity both at grammatical and conceptual levels on the basis of Halliday & Matthiessen (2004) and applies it to a case study examining news reports from two ideologically opposed South Korean newspapers on a nationwide public movement against US beef imports. The analysis reveals that the two newspapers contrast with each other in representing the riot police and the demonstrators as Actor and Goal in material processes grammatically and in processes of violence conceptually.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Austin, J.L
    (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ball-Rokeach, S.J
    (2009) The legitimation of violence. In J.F. Short, Jr & M.E. Wolfgang (Eds.), Collective Violence (pp.100–111). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bang, M
    (2003) A Corpus-based Study of Representation of Foreign Countries in the South Korean Press. (Unpublished master’s dissertation). University of Birmingham, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, P
    (2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, P. , Gabrielatos, C. , KhosraviNik, M. , Krzyzanowski, M. , McEnery, T. , & Wodak, R
    (2008) A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306. doi: 10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, P. , & McEnery, T
    (2005) A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(2), 97–226. doi: 10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak [Google Scholar]
  7. Behnam, B. , & Zenouz, R.M
    (2008) A contrastive critical analysis of Iranian and British newspaper reports on the Iran nuclear power program. In N. Nørgaard (Ed.), Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use (pp.199–218). Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Burton, D
    (1982) Through glass darkly: Through dark glasses. In R. Carter (Ed.), Language and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Stylistics (pp.194–214). London: George Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Caffarel, A. , Martin, J.R. , & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M
    (Eds.) (2004) Language Typology, A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.253
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.253 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cotterill, J
    (2001) Domestic discord, rocky relationships: Semantic prosodies in representations of marital violence in the O. J. Simpson trial. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 291–312. doi: 10.1177/0957926501012003002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Coulthard, M
    (1985) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Essex: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Eggins, S
    (2004) An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Entman, R.M
    (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01304.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Fairclough, N
    (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1995a) Critical Discourse Analysis. New York, NY: Longman Group Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1995b) Media Discourse. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2000) New labour, New Language?London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2001) Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.121–138). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2003) Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2009) A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.162–186). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fowler, R
    (1991) Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1996) Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Friendly, M
    (2013) Working with categorical data with R and the vcd and vcdextra packages. Retrieved fromcran.r-project.org/web/packages/vcdExtra/vignettes/vcd-tutorial.pdf (last accessed July 2013).
  25. Goatly, A
    (2004) Corpus linguistics, systemic functional grammar and literary meaning: A critical analysis of Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. Ilha do Desterro, 46, 115–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gallardo, B.C
    (2006) Analysis of a literary work using systemic-functional grammar. In L. Barbara & T.B. Sardinha (Eds.). Proceedings of the 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress (pp.735–762). São Paulo: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Retrieved fromwww.pucsp.br/isfc/Welcome.html (last accessedMay 2012).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gamson, W
    (1992) Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hardy, D.E
    (2007) The Body in Flannery O’Connor’s Fiction: Computational Technique and Linguistic Voice. Columbia, SC: The University of South Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Halliday, M.A.K
    (1971) Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into William Golding’s The Inheritors. In S.S. Chatman (Ed.), Literary Style: A Symposium (pp.330–368). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Halliday, M.A.K. , & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M
    (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hubbard, E.H
    (1999) Love, war and lexicogrammar: Transitivity and characterization in The Moor’s Last Sigh. In I. Biermann & A. Combrink (Eds.), Poetics, Linguistics, History: Discourses of War and Conflict, Proceedings of The Poetics and Linguistics Association Conference (pp.314–327). Potchefstroom: Potchefstroom University.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Im, Y.J
    (2009) A comparative analysis of news frame on U.S. Beef Imports and candlelight vigils. Hankuk Enlol Chengpo Hakpo, 46, 109–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Iyengar, S
    (1991) Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Iyengar, S. , & Simon, A
    (1993) News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-setting, priming and framing. Communication Research, 20(3), 365–383. doi: 10.1177/009365093020003002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365093020003002 [Google Scholar]
  36. Jamila, H
    (2009) The ‘cartoons controversy’: A critical discourse analysis of English-language Arab newspaper discourse. Discourse & Society, 20(1), 33–57. doi: 10.1177/0957926508097094
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508097094 [Google Scholar]
  37. Janks, H
    (2002) Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. In M.J. Toolan (Ed.), Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Concepts in Linguistics (pp.26–42). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ji, Y. , & Shen, D
    (2004) Transitivity and mental transformation: Sheila Watson’s The Double Hook . Language and Literature, 13(4), 335–348. doi: 10.1177/0963947004046284
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947004046284 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kennedy, C
    (1982) Systemic grammar and its use in literary analysis. In R. Carter (Ed.), Language and Literature (pp.82–99). London: Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Koller V
    (2004) Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230511286
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511286 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kurtz, L
    (2008) Preface. In L. Kurts (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace and Conflict (2nd ed.) (pp.xix–xxv). Oxford: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Machin, D. , & Thornborrow, J
    (2006) Lifestyle and the depoliticisation of agency: Sex as power in women’s magazines. Social Semiotics, 16(1), 173–188. doi: 10.1080/10350330500487968
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330500487968 [Google Scholar]
  43. Manan, S
    (2001) Re-reading the media: A stylistic analysis of Malaysian media coverage of Anwar and the Reformasi Movement. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 11(4), 34–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Martin, J.R
    (1999) Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Huston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text (pp.142–175). Oxford: OUR.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Martin, J.R. , & Rose, D
    (2003) Working with Discourse, Meaning beyond the Clause. New York, NY: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Martin, J.R. , & White, P.P.P
    (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  47. Martinez, M.A
    (2002) From ‘‘Under the Rose’’ to V: A linguistic approach to human agency in Pynchon’s fiction. Poetics Today, 23(4), 633–656. doi: 10.1215/03335372‑23‑4‑633
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-23-4-633 [Google Scholar]
  48. Matheson, D
    (2005) Media Discourses: Analyzing Media Texts. Birkshire: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Mautner, G
    (2007) Mining large corpora for social information: The case of elderly . Language in Society, 36(1), 51–72. doi: 10.1017/S0047404507070030
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070030 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2008) Analysing newspapers, magazines and other print media. In R. Wodak & M. Krzyzanowski (Eds.), Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences (pp.30–53). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (2009a) Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Ed.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.122–143). London & Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2009b) Corpora and critical discourse analysis. In P. Baker (Ed.), Contemporary Corpus Linguistics (pp.32–46). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Montgomery, M
    (1993) Language, character and action: A linguistic approach to the analysis of character in a Hemingway short story. In J.M. Sinclair , M. Hoey & G. Fox (Eds.), Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse (pp.127–142). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Nørgaard, N
    (2003) Systemic Functional Linguistics and Literary Analysis: A Hallidayan Approach to Joyce, a Joycean Approach to Halliday. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. O’Donnell, M
    (2007) UAM CorpusTool (Version 2.8.17) [Computer software]. Available fromwww.wagsoft.com/CorpusTool (last accessedNovember 2016).
  56. O’Halloran, K.A
    (2007a) The subconscious in James Joyce’s ‘Eveline’: A corpus stylistic analysis that chews on the ‘Fish hook’. Language and Literature, 16(3), 227–244. doi: 10.1177/0963947007072847
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007072847 [Google Scholar]
  57. (2007b) Critical discourse analysis and the corpus-informed interpretation of metaphor at the register level. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml046
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml046 [Google Scholar]
  58. Orpin, D
    (2005) Corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis: Examining the ideology of sleaze. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(1), 37–61. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.10.1.03orp
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.10.1.03orp [Google Scholar]
  59. Page, R.E
    (2003) ‘Cherie: lawyer, wife, mum’: Contradictory patterns of representation in media reports of Cherie Booth/Blair Ruth. Discourse & Society, 14(5), 559–579. doi: 10.1177/09579265030145002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030145002 [Google Scholar]
  60. Pan, Z. , & Kosicki, G.M
    (1993) Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75. doi: 10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963 [Google Scholar]
  61. R Core Team
    (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available fromhttps://www.R-project.org/ (last accessedSeptember 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Ryder, M.E
    (1999) Smoke and mirrors: Event patterns in the discourse structure of a romance novel. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(8), 1067–1080. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)80001‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)80001-0 [Google Scholar]
  63. Searle, J.R
    (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  64. Sharrock, W.W. , & Anderson, D.C
    (1981) Language, thought and reality again. Sociology, 15(2), 287–293. doi: 10.1177/003803858101500211
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003803858101500211 [Google Scholar]
  65. Simpson, P
    (1993) Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203312612
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203312612 [Google Scholar]
  66. Smith, J
    (2011, December11). How elite media strategies marginalize the Occupy Movement. Common Dreams. Retrieved fromhttps://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/12/11-5 (last accessedFebruary 2013)
  67. Stubbs, M
    (1997) Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis. In A. Ryan & A. Wray (Eds.), Evolving Models of Language (pp.100–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Teruya, K
    (2006) Systemic Functional Grammar of Japanese. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Teich, E
    (2009) Linguistic computing. In M.A.K. Halliday & J.J. Webster (Eds.), Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp.113–127). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Teo, P
    (2000) Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 7–49. doi: 10.1177/0957926500011001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011001002 [Google Scholar]
  71. Thetela, P
    (2001) Critique discourses and ideology in newspaper reports: A discourse analysis of the South African press reports on the 1998 SADC’s military intervention in Lesotho. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 347–370. doi: 10.1177/0957926501012003004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003004 [Google Scholar]
  72. Thompson, G
    (2004) Introducing Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. (2008) From process to pattern: Methodological considerations in analyzing transitivity in text. In C. Jones & E. Ventola (Eds.), Language to Multimodality: New Developments in the Study of Ideational Meaning (pp.17–34). London: Equinox publishing Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. van Dijk, T.A
    (1993) Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
  75. van Leeuwen, T
    (1996) The representation of social actors. In. C.R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.32–70). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Wareing, S
    (1994) And then he kissed her: The reclamation of female characters in submissive roles in contemporary fiction. In K. Wales (Ed.), Feminist Linguistics in Literary Criticism (pp.117–136). Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Wodok, R
    (2001) What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodok & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.1–13). London: Sage Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9780857028020
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020 [Google Scholar]
  78. Wodak, R. , & Meyer, M
    (2009) Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodok & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.) (pp.1–33). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Widdowson, H.G
    (1995a) Discourse analysis: A critical view. Language and Literature, 4(3), 157–172. doi: 10.1177/096394709500400301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709500400301 [Google Scholar]
  80. (1995b) Review of Fairclough discourse and social change. Applied Linguistics, 16(4), 510–516. doi: 10.1093/applin/16.4.510
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.4.510 [Google Scholar]
  81. (1996) Reply to Fairclough: Discourse and interpretation: Conjectures and refutations. Language and Literature, 5(1), 57–69. doi: 10.1177/096394709600500106
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709600500106 [Google Scholar]
  82. (2004) Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. doi: 10.1002/9780470758427
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758427 [Google Scholar]
  83. Young, L. , & Harrison, C
    (Eds.) (2004) Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error