A corpus-based approach to transitivity analysis at grammatical and conceptual levels

References

1. Austin, J.L
   (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ball-Rokeach, S.J
   (2009) The legitimation of violence. In J.F. Short, Jr & M.E. Wolfgang (Eds.), Collective Violence (pp.100–111). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bang, M
   (2003) A Corpus-based Study of Representation of Foreign Countries in the South Korean Press. (Unpublished master’s dissertation). University of Birmingham, UK.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, P
   (2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baker, P. , Gabrielatos, C. , KhosraviNik, M. , Krzyzanowski, M. , McEnery, T. , & Wodak, R
   (2008) A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306. doi: 10.1177/0957926508088962
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
6. Baker, P. , & McEnery, T
   (2005) A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(2), 97–226. doi: 10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak [Google Scholar]
7. Behnam, B. , & Zenouz, R.M
   (2008) A contrastive critical analysis of Iranian and British newspaper reports on the Iran nuclear power program. In N. Nørgaard (Ed.), Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use (pp.199–218). Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Burton, D
   (1982) Through glass darkly: Through dark glasses. In R. Carter (Ed.), Language and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Stylistics (pp.194–214). London: George Allen and Unwin.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Caffarel, A. , Martin, J.R. , & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M
   (Eds.) (2004) Language Typology, A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.253
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.253 [Google Scholar]
10. Cotterill, J
    (2001) Domestic discord, rocky relationships: Semantic prosodies in representations of marital violence in the O. J. Simpson trial. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 291–312. doi: 10.1177/0957926501012003002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003002 [Google Scholar]
11. Coulthard, M
    (1985) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Essex: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eggins, S
    (2004) An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Entman, R.M
    (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01304.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar]
14. Fairclough, N
    (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fairclough, N
    (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fairclough, N
    (1995a) Critical Discourse Analysis. New York, NY: Longman Group Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fairclough, N
    (1995b) Media Discourse. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fairclough, N
    (2000) New labour, New Language?London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fairclough, N
    (2001) Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.121–138). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fairclough, N
    (2003) Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fairclough, N
    (2009) A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.162–186). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fowler, R
    (1991) Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fowler, R
    (1996) Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Friendly, M
    (2013) Working with categorical data with R and the vcd and vcdextra packages. Retrieved fromcran.r-project.org/web/packages/vcdExtra/vignettes/vcd-tutorial.pdf (last accessed July 2013).
25. Goatly, A
    (2004) Corpus linguistics, systemic functional grammar and literary meaning: A critical analysis of Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. Ilha do Desterro, 46, 115–154.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gallardo, B.C
    (2006) Analysis of a literary work using systemic-functional grammar. In L. Barbara & T.B. Sardinha (Eds.). Proceedings of the 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress (pp.735–762). São Paulo: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Retrieved fromwww.pucsp.br/isfc/Welcome.html (last accessedMay 2012).
    [Google Scholar]
27. Gamson, W
    (1992) Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hardy, D.E
    (2007) The Body in Flannery O’Connor’s Fiction: Computational Technique and Linguistic Voice. Columbia, SC: The University of South Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Halliday, M.A.K
    (1971) Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into William Golding’s The Inheritors. In S.S. Chatman (Ed.), Literary Style: A Symposium (pp.330–368). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Halliday, M.A.K
    (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Halliday, M.A.K. , & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M
    (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hubbard, E.H
    (1999) Love, war and lexicogrammar: Transitivity and characterization in The Moor’s Last Sigh. In I. Biermann & A. Combrink (Eds.), Poetics, Linguistics, History: Discourses of War and Conflict, Proceedings of The Poetics and Linguistics Association Conference (pp.314–327). Potchefstroom: Potchefstroom University.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Im, Y.J
    (2009) A comparative analysis of news frame on U.S. Beef Imports and candlelight vigils. Hankuk Enlol Chengpo Hakpo, 46, 109–147.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Iyengar, S
    (1991) Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
35. Iyengar, S. , & Simon, A
    (1993) News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-setting, priming and framing. Communication Research, 20(3), 365–383. doi: 10.1177/009365093020003002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365093020003002 [Google Scholar]
36. Jamila, H
    (2009) The ‘cartoons controversy’: A critical discourse analysis of English-language Arab newspaper discourse. Discourse & Society, 20(1), 33–57. doi: 10.1177/0957926508097094
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508097094 [Google Scholar]
37. Janks, H
    (2002) Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. In M.J. Toolan (Ed.), Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Concepts in Linguistics (pp.26–42). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ji, Y. , & Shen, D
    (2004) Transitivity and mental transformation: Sheila Watson’s The Double Hook . Language and Literature, 13(4), 335–348. doi: 10.1177/0963947004046284
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947004046284 [Google Scholar]
39. Kennedy, C
    (1982) Systemic grammar and its use in literary analysis. In R. Carter (Ed.), Language and Literature (pp.82–99). London: Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Koller V
    (2004) Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230511286
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511286 [Google Scholar]
41. Kurtz, L
    (2008) Preface. In L. Kurts (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace and Conflict (2nd ed.) (pp.xix–xxv). Oxford: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Machin, D. , & Thornborrow, J
    (2006) Lifestyle and the depoliticisation of agency: Sex as power in women’s magazines. Social Semiotics, 16(1), 173–188. doi: 10.1080/10350330500487968
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330500487968 [Google Scholar]
43. Manan, S
    (2001) Re-reading the media: A stylistic analysis of Malaysian media coverage of Anwar and the Reformasi Movement. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 11(4), 34–54.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Martin, J.R
    (1999) Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Huston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text (pp.142–175). Oxford: OUR.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Martin, J.R. , & Rose, D
    (2003) Working with Discourse, Meaning beyond the Clause. New York, NY: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Martin, J.R. , & White, P.P.P
    (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
47. Martinez, M.A
    (2002) From ‘‘Under the Rose’’ to V: A linguistic approach to human agency in Pynchon’s fiction. Poetics Today, 23(4), 633–656. doi: 10.1215/03335372‑23‑4‑633
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-23-4-633 [Google Scholar]
48. Matheson, D
    (2005) Media Discourses: Analyzing Media Texts. Birkshire: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Mautner, G
    (2007) Mining large corpora for social information: The case of elderly . Language in Society, 36(1), 51–72. doi: 10.1017/S0047404507070030
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070030 [Google Scholar]
50. Mautner, G
    (2008) Analysing newspapers, magazines and other print media. In R. Wodak & M. Krzyzanowski (Eds.), Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences (pp.30–53). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Mautner, G
    (2009a) Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Ed.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.122–143). London & Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Mautner, G
    (2009b) Corpora and critical discourse analysis. In P. Baker (Ed.), Contemporary Corpus Linguistics (pp.32–46). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Montgomery, M
    (1993) Language, character and action: A linguistic approach to the analysis of character in a Hemingway short story. In J.M. Sinclair , M. Hoey & G. Fox (Eds.), Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse (pp.127–142). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Nørgaard, N
    (2003) Systemic Functional Linguistics and Literary Analysis: A Hallidayan Approach to Joyce, a Joycean Approach to Halliday. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
55. O’Donnell, M
    (2007) UAM CorpusTool (Version 2.8.17) [Computer software]. Available fromwww.wagsoft.com/CorpusTool (last accessedNovember 2016).
56. O’Halloran, K.A
    (2007a) The subconscious in James Joyce’s ‘Eveline’: A corpus stylistic analysis that chews on the ‘Fish hook’. Language and Literature, 16(3), 227–244. doi: 10.1177/0963947007072847
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007072847 [Google Scholar]
57. O’Halloran, K.A
    (2007b) Critical discourse analysis and the corpus-informed interpretation of metaphor at the register level. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml046
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml046 [Google Scholar]
58. Orpin, D
    (2005) Corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis: Examining the ideology of sleaze. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(1), 37–61. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.10.1.03orp
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.10.1.03orp [Google Scholar]
59. Page, R.E
    (2003) ‘Cherie: lawyer, wife, mum’: Contradictory patterns of representation in media reports of Cherie Booth/Blair Ruth. Discourse & Society, 14(5), 559–579. doi: 10.1177/09579265030145002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030145002 [Google Scholar]
60. Pan, Z. , & Kosicki, G.M
    (1993) Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75. doi: 10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963 [Google Scholar]
61. R Core Team
    (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available fromhttps://www.R-project.org/ (last accessedSeptember 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
62. Ryder, M.E
    (1999) Smoke and mirrors: Event patterns in the discourse structure of a romance novel. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(8), 1067–1080. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)80001‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)80001-0 [Google Scholar]
63. Searle, J.R
    (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
64. Sharrock, W.W. , & Anderson, D.C
    (1981) Language, thought and reality again. Sociology, 15(2), 287–293. doi: 10.1177/003803858101500211
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003803858101500211 [Google Scholar]
65. Simpson, P
    (1993) Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203312612
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203312612 [Google Scholar]
66. Smith, J
    (2011, December11). How elite media strategies marginalize the Occupy Movement. Common Dreams. Retrieved fromhttps://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/12/11-5 (last accessedFebruary 2013)
67. Stubbs, M
    (1997) Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis. In A. Ryan & A. Wray (Eds.), Evolving Models of Language (pp.100–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Teruya, K
    (2006) Systemic Functional Grammar of Japanese. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Teich, E
    (2009) Linguistic computing. In M.A.K. Halliday & J.J. Webster (Eds.), Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp.113–127). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Teo, P
    (2000) Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 7–49. doi: 10.1177/0957926500011001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011001002 [Google Scholar]
71. Thetela, P
    (2001) Critique discourses and ideology in newspaper reports: A discourse analysis of the South African press reports on the 1998 SADC’s military intervention in Lesotho. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 347–370. doi: 10.1177/0957926501012003004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003004 [Google Scholar]
72. Thompson, G
    (2004) Introducing Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Thompson, G
    (2008) From process to pattern: Methodological considerations in analyzing transitivity in text. In C. Jones & E. Ventola (Eds.), Language to Multimodality: New Developments in the Study of Ideational Meaning (pp.17–34). London: Equinox publishing Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
74. van Dijk, T.A
    (1993) Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
75. van Leeuwen, T
    (1996) The representation of social actors. In. C.R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.32–70). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Wareing, S
    (1994) And then he kissed her: The reclamation of female characters in submissive roles in contemporary fiction. In K. Wales (Ed.), Feminist Linguistics in Literary Criticism (pp.117–136). Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Wodok, R
    (2001) What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodok & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.1–13). London: Sage Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9780857028020
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020 [Google Scholar]
78. Wodak, R. , & Meyer, M
    (2009) Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodok & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.) (pp.1–33). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Widdowson, H.G
    (1995a) Discourse analysis: A critical view. Language and Literature, 4(3), 157–172. doi: 10.1177/096394709500400301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709500400301 [Google Scholar]
80. Widdowson, H.G
    (1995b) Review of Fairclough discourse and social change. Applied Linguistics, 16(4), 510–516. doi: 10.1093/applin/16.4.510
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.4.510 [Google Scholar]
81. Widdowson, H.G
    (1996) Reply to Fairclough: Discourse and interpretation: Conjectures and refutations. Language and Literature, 5(1), 57–69. doi: 10.1177/096394709600500106
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709600500106 [Google Scholar]
82. Widdowson, H.G
    (2004) Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. doi: 10.1002/9780470758427
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758427 [Google Scholar]
83. Young, L. , & Harrison, C
    (Eds.) (2004) Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]