Was late Modern English scientific writing impersonal?

References

1. Atkinson, D
   (1999) Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bazerman, C
   (1984) Modern evolution of the experimental report in physics: Spectroscopic articles in Physical Review, 1893-1980. Social Studies of Science, 14(2). 163–196. doi: 10.1177/030631284014002001
   https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014002001 [Google Scholar]
3. Beal, J
   (2004) English in Modern Times: 1700-1945. London: Hodder Arnold.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beal, J
   (2012) Late Modern English in its historical context. In I. Moskowich & B. Crespo (Eds.), Astronomy ‘Playne and Simple’: The Writing of Science between 1700 and 1900 (pp.1–14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.173.01beal
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.173.01beal [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, D
   (1988) Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
6. Biber, D
   (2001) Dimensions of variation among eighteenth-century speech-based and written registers. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies (pp.200–214). Essex: Pearson Education.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Biber, D. , & Conrad, S
   (2001) Introduction: Multi-dimensional analysis and the study of register variation. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies (pp.3–12). Essex: Pearson Education.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Biber, D. , Conrad, S. , & Reppen, R
   (1998) Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511804489
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489 [Google Scholar]
9. Biber, D. , & Finegan, E
   (1989) Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language, 65(3), 487–517. doi: 10.2307/415220
   https://doi.org/10.2307/415220 [Google Scholar]
10. Biber, D. , & Finegan, E
    (1997) Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In T. Nevalainen & L. Kahlas Tarkka (Eds.), To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen (pp.253–275). Helsinki: Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Biber, D. , & Finegan, E
    (2001a) Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies (pp.66–83). Essex: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Biber, D. , & Finegan, E
    (2001b) Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies (pp.108–123). Essex: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Biber, D. , Finegan, E. , & Atkinson, D
    (1994) ARCHER and its challenges: Compiling and exploring a Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers. In U. Fries , P. Schneider & G. Tottie (Eds.), Creating and Using English Language Corpora. Papers from the 14th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Zurich 1993 (pp.1–13). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Biber, D. , & Gray, B
    (2013) Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(2), 104–134.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Camiña, G
    (2012) Accounting for observations of the heavens in the 18th century: New nouns to explain old phenomena. In I. Moskowich & B. Crespo (Eds.), Astronomy ‘Playne and Simple’: The Writing of Science between 1700 and 1900 (pp.93–121). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.173.06cam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.173.06cam [Google Scholar]
16. Camiña, G
    (2013) Noun Formation in the Scientific Register of Late Modern English: A Corpus-Based Approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of A Coruña, A Coruña.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Camiña, G. , & Lareo, I
    (2016) Editorial policy in the Corpus of English Philosophy Texts . In I. Moskowich , G. Camiña , I. Lareo & B. Crespo (Eds.), ‘The Conditioned and the Unconditioned’: Late Modern English Texts on Philosophy (pp.45–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Carkin, S
    (2001) Pedagogic Language in Introductory Classes: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Textbooks and Lectures in Biology and Macroeconomics (Unpublished doctoral Dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Chafe, W. , & Danielewicz, J
    (1987) Properties of spoken and written language. In R. Horowitz & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending Oral and Written Language (pp.83–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Conrad, S
    (1996) Academic Discourse in Two Disciplines: Professional Writing and Student Development in Biology and History (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Conrad, S
    (2001) Variation among disciplinary texts: A comparison of textbooks and journal articles in biology and history. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.). Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies (pp.94–107). Essex: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Crespo, B
    (2011) Persuasion markers and ideology in eighteenth century philosophy texts. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 17, 199–228.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Crespo, B
    (2016) Genre categorisation in CEPhiT. In I. Moskowich , G. Camiña , I. Lareo & B. Crespo (Eds.), ‘The Conditioned and the Unconditioned’: Late Modern English Texts on Philosophy (pp.25–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Csomay, E
    (2000) Academic lectures: An interface of an oral and literate continuum. Novelty, 7(3), 30–46.
    [Google Scholar]
25. De Smet, H
    (2006) The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts (Extended Version). Department of Linguistics, University of Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Görlach, M
    (2004) Text Types and the History of English. New York, NY : Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197167
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197167 [Google Scholar]
27. Gorsuch, R.L
    (1983) Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gotti, M
    (2001) The experimental essay in Early Modern English. European Journal of English Studies, 5(2), 221–239. doi: 10.1076/ejes.5.2.221.7307
    https://doi.org/10.1076/ejes.5.2.221.7307 [Google Scholar]
29. Gotti, M
    (2003) Specialized Discourse: Linguistic Features and Changing Conventions. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Gotti, M
    (2005) Investigating Specialized Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Granger, S
    (1997) On identifying the syntactic and discourse features of participle clauses in Academic English: Native and non-native writers compared. In J. Aarts , I. de Mönnink & H. Wekker (Eds.), Studies in English Language and Teaching (pp.185–198). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gray, B
    (2011) Exploring Academic Writing Through Corpus Linguistics: When Discipline Tells Only Part of the Story (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Greenbaum, S
    (1988) Syntactic devices for compression in English. In J. Klegraf & D. Nehls (Eds.), Essays on the English Language and Applied Linguistics on the Occasion of Gerhard Nickel’s 60th Birthday (pp.3–10). Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hyland, K
    (1995) The author in the text: Hedging scientific writing. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 18, 33–42.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hyland, K
    (1998) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.54
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54 [Google Scholar]
36. Johansson, S
    (Ed.) (1982) Computer Corpora in English Language Research. Bergen: Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Johansson, S. , Leech, G. , & Goodluck, H
    (1978) Manual of Information to Accompany the Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus of British English, for Use with Digital Computers. Oslo: Department of English, University of Oslo.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lareo, I
    (2009) El Coruña Corpus. Proceso de compilación y utilidades del Corpus of English Texts on Astronomy (CETA). Resultados preliminares sobre el uso de los predicados complejos en CETA. In P. Cantos Gómez & A. Sánchez Pérez (Eds.), A Survey on Corpus-based Research (pp.267–280). Murcia: Asociación Española de Lingüística de Corpus.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Lareo, I. , & Esteve-Ramos, M.J
    (2008) 18th century scientific writing. A study of make complex predicates in the Coruña Corpus. ICAME, 32, 69–96.
    [Google Scholar]
40. McEnery, T. , & Wilson, A
    (1996) Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Monaco, L.M
    (2016) Abstractness as diachronic variation in CEPhiT: Biber’s Dimension 5 applied. In I. Moskowich , G. Camiña , I. Lareo & B. Crespo (Eds.), ‘The Conditioned and the Unconditioned’: Late Modern English Texts on Philosophy (pp.99–121). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Moskowich, I
    (2011) “The golden rule of divine philosophy” exemplified in the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 17, 167–197.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Moskowich, I
    (2012a) CETA as a tool for the study of Modern Astronomy in English. In I. Moskowich & B. Crespo (Eds.), Astronomy ‘Playne and Simple’: The Writing of Science between 1700 and 1900 (pp.35–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.173.03mos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.173.03mos [Google Scholar]
44. Moskowich, I
    (2012b) “A smooth homogeneous globe” in CETA: Compiling late Modern Astronomy texts in English. In N. Vázquez (Ed.), Creation and Use of Historical English Corpora in Spain (pp.21–37). Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Moskowich, I
    (2013) Eighteenth century female authors: Women and science in the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 33(4), 467–487. doi: 10.1080/07268602.2013.857570
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2013.857570 [Google Scholar]
46. Moskowich, I
    (2016) Philosophers and scientists from the Modern Age: Compiling the Corpus of English Philosophy Texts. In I. Moskowich , G. Camiña , I. Lareo & B. Crespo (Eds.), ‘The Conditioned and the Unconditioned’: Late Modern English Texts on Philosophy (pp.1–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Moskowich, I. , Camiña, G. , Lareo, I. , & Crespo, B
    (Eds.) (2016) ‘The Conditioned and the Unconditioned’: Late Modern English Texts on Philosophy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Moskowich, I. , & Crespo, B
    (2007) Presenting the Coruña Corpus: A collection of samples for the historical study of English scientific writing. In J. Pérez Guerra , D. González-Álvarez , J.L. Bueno-Alonso & E. Rama-Martínez (Eds.), Of Varying Language and Opposing Creed: New Insights into Late Modern English (pp.341–357). Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Moskowich, I. , & Crespo, B
    (Eds.) (2012) Astronomy ‘Playne and Simple’: The Writing of Science between 1700 and 1900. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.173
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.173 [Google Scholar]
50. Moskowich, I. , & Monaco, L.M
    (2014) Abstraction as a means of expressing reality: Women writing science in late Modern English. In M. Gotti & D.S. Giannoni (Eds.), Corpus Analysis for Descriptive and Pedagogical Purposes (pp.203–224). Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Moskowich, I. , & Parapar, J
    (2008) Writing sciences, compiling science: The Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. In M.J. Lorenzo Modia (Ed.), Proceedings from the 31st AEDEAN Conference (pp.531–544). A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Ochs, E
    (1979) Planned and unplanned discourse. In T. Givón (Ed.), Discourse and Syntax (pp.51–80). New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Oxford English Dictionary Online (3rd. ed.) (1989) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved fromdictionary.oed.com/ (last accessedDecember 2012).
    [Google Scholar]
54. Quirk, R. , Greenbaum, S. , Leech, G. , & Svartvik, J
    (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Reppen, R
    (2001) Register variation in student and adult speech. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies (pp.187–199). Essex: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Rissanen, M. , Kytö, M. , Kahlas-Tarkka, L. , Kilpiö, M. , Nevanlinna, S. , Taavitsainen, I. , Nevalainen, T. , & Raumolin-Brunberg, H
    (1991) The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Helsinki: Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Smith, N. , & Seoane, E
    (2013) Categorizing syntactic constructions in a corpus. In M. Krug & J. Schlüter (Eds.), Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, (pp.212–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511792519.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511792519.015 [Google Scholar]
58. Svartvik, J. , & Quirk, R
    (Eds.) (1980) A Corpus of English Conversation. Lund: CWK Gleerup.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Taavitsainen, I. , & Pahta, P
    (Eds.) (2004) Medical and Scientific Writing in Late Medieval English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Taavitsainen, I. , & Pahta, P
    (Eds.) (2010) Early Modern English Medical Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.160
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.160 [Google Scholar]
61. Tabachnick, B. , & Fidell, L
    (1996) Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Thompson, S
    (1982) The passive in English: A discourse perspective. Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
63. UNESCO
    (1988) Proposed International Standard Nomenclature for Fields of Science and Technology UNESCO/NS/ROU/257. Paris: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Weiner, E. & Labov, W
    (1983) Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics, 19(1), 29–58. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700007441
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700007441 [Google Scholar]
65. Xiao, R
    (2009) Multidimensional analysis and the study of World Englishes. Word Englishes, 28(4), 421–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2009.01606.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01606.x [Google Scholar]