Dative alternation in Chinese

References

1. Aoun, J., & Li, Y. H.
   (1989) Scope and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(2), 141–172.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arnold, J., Losongco, A., Wasow, T., & Ginstrom, R.
   (2000) Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language, 76(1), 28–55. 10.1353/lan.2000.0045
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2000.0045 [Google Scholar]
3. Baayen, R. H.
   (2008) Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
4. Baayen, R. H.
   (2011) Corpus linguistics and naive discriminative learning. Brazilian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 295–328. 10.1590/S1984‑63982011000200003
   https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-63982011000200003 [Google Scholar]
5. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D., & Bates, D.
   (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
6. Baayen, R. H., Endresen, A., Janda, L., Makarova, A., & Nesset, T.
   (2013) Making choices in Russian: Pros and cons of statistical methods for rival forms. Russian Linguistics, 37(3), 253–291. 10.1007/s11185‑013‑9118‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-013-9118-6 [Google Scholar]
7. Bartoń, K.
   (2020) MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.43.17. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
   (2015) Fitting linear mixed effect models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
9. Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., & Baayen, R. H.
   (2007) Predicting the dative alternation. InG. Bouma, I. Krämer & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation (pp.69–94). Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bresnan, J., & Hay, J.
    (2008) Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua, 118(2), 245–259. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.007 [Google Scholar]
11. Bresnan, J., & Ford, M.
    (2010) Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language, 86(1), 168–213. 10.1353/lan.0.0189
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0189 [Google Scholar]
12. Chang, H.
    (2014) Muyu wei yingyu he fayu de xuexizhe dui hanyu shuangbin ju jiqi yuge zhuanhuan jiegou de xide yanjiu [The acquisition of Chinese double object constructions and dative alternation constructions by English and French native speakers]. Yuyan Wenzi Yingyong [Applied Linguistics], 23(2), 96–106.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chen, P.
    (1987) Shi hanyu zhong mingci xing chengfen xiangguan de sizu gainian [Explanation on four groups of concepts related to nominal components in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 36(2), 81–92.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Chen, P.
    (2016) Hanyu dingzhi fanchou he yufahua wenti [The problem of Chinese definitional category and grammaticalization]. Dangdai Xiucixue [Contemporary Rhetoric], 35(4), 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Collins, P.
    (1995) The indirect object construction in English: An informational approach. Linguistics, 33(1), 35–49. 10.1515/ling.1995.33.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1995.33.1.35 [Google Scholar]
16. De Cuypere, L., & Verbeke, S.
    (2013) Dative alternation in Indian English: A corpus-based analysis. World Englishes, 32(2), 169–184. 10.1111/weng.12017
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12017 [Google Scholar]
17. Divjak, D., & Arppe, A.
    (2013) Extracting prototypes from exemplars: What can corpus data tell us about concept representation?Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2), 221–274. 10.1515/cog‑2013‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0008 [Google Scholar]
18. Divjak, D., Dąbrowska, E., & Arppe, A.
    (2016) Machine meets man: Evaluating the psychological reality of corpus-based probabilistic models. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(1), 1–33. 10.1515/cog‑2015‑0101
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0101 [Google Scholar]
19. Garretson, G.
    (2004) Coding Practices Used in the Project Optimal Typology of Determiner Phrases [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Boston University, Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2019) Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gries, S. Th.
    (2003) Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 1–27. 10.1075/arcl.1.02gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.1.02gri [Google Scholar]
24. Gries, S. Th.
    (2013) Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110307474
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110307474 [Google Scholar]
25. Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2004) Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations.’International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri [Google Scholar]
26. Gries, S. Th., & Bernaisch, T.
    (2016) Exploring epicentres empirically: Focus on south Asian Englishes. English World-Wide, 37(1), 1–25. 10.1075/eww.37.1.01gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.37.1.01gri [Google Scholar]
27. Gundel, J. K.
    (1988) Universals of topic-comment structure. InM. Hammond, E. Moravcsik & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in Syntactic Typology (pp.209–239). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.17.16gun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.17.16gun [Google Scholar]
28. Hawkins, J. A.
    (1994) A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hawkins, J. A.
    (2004) Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
30. He, X. W.
    (2003) Shuangbinyu jiegou he yuge jiegou de guanxi fenxi [The relation between the double object construction and the dative construction]. Waiguo Yu [Journal of Foreign Languages], 26(2), 25–31.
    [Google Scholar]
31. He, X. W.
    (2008) Shuangjiwu jiegou jushi xuanze de zhiyue yinsu yanjiu [A study on the factors influencing the selection of the ditransitive constructions]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], 30(3), 29–36.
    [Google Scholar]
32. He, X. W.
    (2009) Shuangjiwu jiegou de yuyi biaoda yanjiu [A semantic study of the ditransitive construction]. Waiyu Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Foreign Language Teaching and Research], 4(1), 18–24.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C.
    (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kendall, T., Bresnan, J., & van Herk, G.
    (2011) The dative alternation in African American English: Researching syntactic variation and change across sociolinguistic datasets. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 7(2), 229–244. 10.1515/cllt.2011.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2011.011 [Google Scholar]
35. Klavan, J.
    (2020) Pitting corpus-based classification models against each other: A case study for predicting constructional choice in written Estonian. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(2), 363–391.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lambrecht, K.
    (1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
37. Levin, B.
    (1993) English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Li, W. & Shi, P. X.
    (2015) Beijing hua yushi jieci gei gen de yufahua ji hanyu yushi xitong [On the grammaticalization of the dative prepositions gei and gen in Peking dialect and the dative category in mandarin Chinese]. Yuyan Yanjiu [Studies in Language and Linguistics], 35(1), 45–54.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Liu, D. Q.
    (2001) Hanyu jiyu lei shuangjiwu jiegou de leixingxue kaocha [A typological study of giving-type ditransitive patterns in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 50(5), 387–398.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Liu, F. H.
    (2006) Dative constructions in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 7(4), 863–904.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Liu, Y. G.
    (2005) Dongci gei yufahua guocheng de yisu chuancheng ji xiangguan wenti [The verb gei]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 54(2), 130–138.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Ma, Q. Z.
    (1992) Hanyu Dongci he Dongci Xing Jiegou [The Chinese Verb and Verbal Constructions]. Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. MacDonald, M. C.
    (2013) How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 41, 1–16. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226 [Google Scholar]
44. Man, Z. J.
    (2003) Shengcheng yufa lilun yu hanyu shuangbinyu jiegou [Generative grammar and the double object construction in Chinese]. Xiandai Waiyu [Modern Foreign Languages], 26(3), 232–240.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Milin, P., Divjak, D., Dimitrijević, S., & Baayen, R. H.
    (2016) Towards cognitively plausible data science in language research. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 507–526. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0055
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0055 [Google Scholar]
46. Newman, J.
    (1993) The semantics of giving in Mandarin. InR. Geiger & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.), Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language (pp.433–485). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110857108.433
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857108.433 [Google Scholar]
47. Newman, J.
    (1996) Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110823714
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110823714 [Google Scholar]
48. Perek, F.
    (2012) Alternation-based generalizations are stored in the mental grammar: Evidence from a sorting task experiment. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(3), 601–635. 10.1515/cog‑2012‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2012-0018 [Google Scholar]
49. Perek, F.
    (2015) Argument Structure in Usage-based Construction Grammar. John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.17 [Google Scholar]
50. Peyraube, A.
    (1986) Shuangbinyu jiegou cong handai zhi tangdai de lishi fazhan [The historical development of double object construction from Han Dynasty to Tang Dynasty]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 35(3), 204–216.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
    (1972) A Grammar of Contemporary English. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
52. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
53. Röthlisberger, M., Grafmiller, J., & Szmrecsanyi, B.
    (2017) Cognitive indigenization effects in the English dative alternation. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(4), 673–710. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0051
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0051 [Google Scholar]
54. Shen, J. X.
    (1999) Zai zi ju he gei zi ju [Zai constructions and gei constructions]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 48(2), 94–102.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Szmrecsanyi, B., Grafmiller, J., Heller, B., & Röthlisberger, M.
    (2016) Around the world in three alternations: Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide, 37(2), 109–137. 10.1075/eww.37.2.01szm
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.37.2.01szm [Google Scholar]
56. Szmrecsanyi, B., Grafmiller, J., Bresnan, J., Rosenbach, A., Tagliamonte, S., & Todd, S.
    (2017) Spoken syntax in a comparative perspective: The dative and genitive alternation in varieties of English. Glossa, 2(1), 1–27. 10.5334/gjgl.310
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.310 [Google Scholar]
57. Tang, S. W.
    (2018) Huayu juese dongci yu shuangbin ju [Discourse-role verbs and the double object construction]. Waiyu Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Foreign Language Teaching and Research], 50(2), 186–194.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Theijssen, D., ten Bosch, L., Boves, L., Cranen, B., & van Halteren, H.
    (2013) Choosing alternatives: Using Bayesian networks and memory-based learning to study the dative alternation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 9(2), 227–262. 10.1515/cllt‑2013‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0007 [Google Scholar]
59. Wasow, T.
    (1997) Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change, 91, 81–105. 10.1017/S0954394500001800
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001800 [Google Scholar]
60. Wasow, T.
    (2002) Postverbal Behaviour. CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Wasow, T., & Arnold, J.
    (2003) Post-verbal constituent ordering in English. InG. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (Eds.), Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English (pp.119–154). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110900019.119
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110900019.119 [Google Scholar]
62. Wang, J.
    (2013) Ying Han Yupian Jianjie Huizhi [Indirect Anaphora in English and Chinese]. The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Wolk, C., Bresnan, J., Rosenbach, A., & Szmrecsanyi, B.
    (2013) Dative and genitive variability in late modern English: Exploring cross-constructional variation and change. Diachronica, 301, 382–419. 10.1075/dia.30.3.04wol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.30.3.04wol [Google Scholar]
64. Wu, J., & Shi, Y. Z.
    (2009) Zhiyue yufa jiegou xuanze de yinsu: yi biaoda wuti chuandi de jiegou wei li [Motivations in the choice of constructions: A case study of object transfer sentences]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], 31(6), 17–24.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Wu, Z.
    (2017) Yingyu muyuzhe xide hanyu youding xing biaoda shouduan de yanjiu [Acquisition of mandarin definiteness devices by native speakers of English]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], 39(6), 20–30.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Xiong, X. L.
    (2007) Ying han yu shuangbin goushi tanxi [An analysis of the prototypicality of ditransitive constructions in English and Chinese]. Waiyu Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Foreign Language Teaching and Research], 39(4), 261–267.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Xun, E. D., Rao, G. Q., Xiao, X. Y., & Zang, J. J.
    (2016) Da shuju beijing xia BCC yuliaoku de yanzhi [The construction of the BCC Corpus in the age of big data]. Yuliaoku Yuyanxue [Corpus Linguistics], 3(1), 93–109.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Zhang, B. J.
    (1999) Xiandai hanyu de shuangjiwu jiegoushi [The ditransitive constructions in modern Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 48(3), 175–184.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Zhang, D.
    (2019) Ying Han Yuge Jiaoti de Duoyinsu Duibi Fenxi [A Multifactorial Contrastive Analysis of Dative Alternation Between English and Chinese] (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Zhang, D.
    (2021) Dative Alternation in Chinese. Open Science Framework. 10.17605/OSF.IO/Y8MGP
    https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Y8MGP [Google Scholar]
71. Zhang, H. P., & Liu, Q.
    (2002) ICTCLAS [Computer Software]. Chinese Academy of Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Zhang, W.
    (2015) Yingxiang hanyu jiyu lei shuangjiwu goushi jushi xuanze de zhiyue yinsu [The factors determining the alternation of ditransitive constructions]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], 37(2), 54–65.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Zhou, C. Y.
    (2000) Xiandai hanyu gei zi ju de shengcheng jufa yanjiu [The study of gei constructions in modern Chinese from the perspective of generative syntax]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics], 2(3), 155–167.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Zhu, D. X.
    (1979) Yu dongci gei xiangguan de jufa wenti [Syntactic issues related to the verb gei]. Fangyan [Dialect], 1(2), 81–87.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Zhu, D. X.
    (1982) Yufa Jiangyi [Lectures on Grammar]. The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]